IND Vs ENG 5th Test: England 339/6 At Stumps On Day 4, Trail India By 35 Runs
Bad light and rain stopped play on day four of the fifth Test at the Oval. England were 339/6, needing 35 runs to win; India needed three wickets to square the series.
Bad light and rain forced stumps on the fourth day in the fifth Test between India and England at the Oval on Sunday. That means the five-match series for the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy will end on Monday (August 4) – the 25th day.
England were 339/6 at stumps, needing 35 runs to win the final Test and the five-match series. India, on the other hand, required just three wickets to win the Test and square the series 2-2, as Chris Woakes had already been ruled out of the match due to injury. However, Woakes was seen dressed up with his hand in a sling.
What Happened On Day 4 At The Oval?
Jamie Smith and Jamie Overton were batting at 2 and 0 respectively when the umpires checked the light meter and decided to halt proceedings.
England reached 317-4 at tea on the fourth day as Harry Brook, who had some moments of luck, was dismissed for 111 shortly before the interval. His fourth-wicket partnership of 195 runs in 35 overs with Yorkshire teammate Joe Root shifted the momentum after England had been reduced to 106-3 following the loss of stand-in captain Ollie Pope.
Root, the world's top-ranked Test batsman, was unbeaten on 98 at tea. No team has ever chased more than England's 263 runs in the fourth innings of a Test at the Oval, a record set in their one-wicket victory over Australia in 1902. However, aggressive batting has been a hallmark of England's approach to Test cricket since captain Ben Stokes, who missed this match due to a shoulder injury, and coach Brendon McCullum took charge in 2022.
England are now poised to end this series as they began it, having successfully chased 371 runs for a five-wicket win in the first Test at Headingley in June — the 10th highest successful fourth-innings run chase in Test history.
Brook made an immediate impact upon his arrival at the crease on Sunday, hitting 27 runs in the space of eight balls at one point. The talented 26-year-old charged down the pitch to hit Akash Deep for an extraordinary six over cover despite heavy cloud cover in London favouring India's quicks.
He narrowly avoided being dismissed when he almost holed out to fine leg off Prasidh Krishna, but Mohammed Siraj inadvertently stepped onto the boundary rope, resulting in a six for Brook. India captain Shubman Gill delayed introducing spin until the 43rd over, with England at 190-2, when he brought on Washington Sundar. However, neither Sundar nor left-arm spinner Ravindra Jadeja had much impact against the well-set batsmen, who reached their century partnership in just 108 balls.
India's fielding grew increasingly ragged, with Brook reaching 98 when Deep misfielded a drive off Sundar at the boundary, conceding a four. Brook completed his century with a two to third man off the next ball, reaching 100 in 91 balls, including 12 fours and two sixes — his second century of the series.
Brook's innings ended spectacularly when, attempting another big hit off Deep, his bat flew out of his hands as the ball looped to mid-off where Siraj caught it. Root, however, continued to score steadily, hitting a straight-driven four off Siraj to move closer to his 39th Test hundred.
England had resumed on Sunday at 50-1 after Siraj bowled Zak Crawley with the last ball of Saturday's play. Ben Duckett, who was 34 not out overnight, fell for 54 after edging an intended drive off Krishna to KL Rahul at second slip, while Pope was dismissed lbw for 27 by Siraj.
Brief Scores:
India: 224 and 396 vs England: 247 and 339/6 in 76.2 overs (Ben Duckett 54, Joe Root 105, Harry Brook 111; Mohammed Siraj 2/95, Prasidh Krishna 3/109).
(With inputs from Agencies)
About the Author
Ritayan Basu
Ritayan Basu, Senior Sub-Editor, Sports at News18.com. Has been covering domestic and and international football for nearly a decade. Has played and covered badminton. Ocassionally writes on cricket content, ha...Read More
Get latest Cricket news, live score and match results on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Discipline? Defence? All went out of window': English media rant after India's 'miracle'; Aussies drop Ashes truth bomb
The English media showed no mercy after England lost the fifth and final Test against India at The Oval on Monday, as the tourists drew the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2. Meanwhile, the Australian media delivered a brutal reality check to the Ben Stokes-led side ahead of their upcoming Ashes assignment. England's Gus Atkinson bowled out by India's Mohammed Siraj on day five of the fifth cricket test match between England and India at The Kia Oval (AP) England, at one point, were cruising towards the 374-run target, riding on centuries from Harry Brook and Joe Root. Their 195-run stand for the fourth wicket took them to 301 for three. But their hopes took a major hit on the fourth afternoon when India struck thrice around the Tea break, removing three batters for just 26 runs. On the final morning, England began positively, hitting back-to-back boundaries with just 35 runs needed. But Mohammed Siraj turned the tide, striking twice in his first two overs before cleaning up the final wicket to complete his five-wicket haul. England fell just six runs short—suffering their narrowest defeat on home soil in 123 years. The Telegraph article titled 'Chris Woakes' remarkable act of bravery will be remembered forever' questioned England's approach against the Indian seamers, strongly criticising Jacob Bethell and Jamie Smith. It argued that tail-ender Gus Atkinson was the only batter with a clear plan, while the rest 'did exactly what India's seamers wanted them to do—either by throwing the bat at anything and everything, or poking their bats at anything and everything.' The piece read: 'Discipline? Defence? It all went out of the window in the nerves of the occasion. The disease had actually started on the fourth evening when Joe Root played a shot—or dab—which he regretted the moment he had tried it. He had lost the strike as Jacob Bethell struggled to come to terms with a red ball, and after the euphoria of his 39th Test hundred, Root tried something that was unworthy of his reputation. Bethell was given scant chance by England's selectors.' The Guardian, on the other hand, in its piece 'Are you not wowed? Bazball, India and a one-armed man deliver drama and beauty', couldn't stop gushing about India's heroism on the final morning and Siraj's fire. It wrote: 'England needed 35 to win and India three and a half wickets to level the series. The players came out to a huge rolling wave of applause, India's fielders breaking from their huddle to sprint in unison, impossibly heroic already—a group who have given us everything over the past two months. And this was a day for Mohammed 'the Demon' Siraj, who really is the most lovable maniac in sport, and who bowled like a god here to win this game.' England ready for Ashes? Since the summer of 2022, when the Bazball era began in England, the Stokes-led side has played 13 Test series and won eight of them. While that tally suggests success for the McCullum-Stokes partnership, the Bazball philosophy has faltered in crucial moments—a drawn Ashes at home in 2023, a 1-4 defeat in India in 2024, and now a 2-2 draw at home against an Indian side that recently saw the retirements of Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, and R Ashwin. The most recent result has prompted many—especially the Australian media—to deliver a scathing Ashes verdict. "Toppling India would have given England a timely boost of confidence ahead of the upcoming Ashes tour, but the lingering Bazball sceptics would grow in volume if Brendon McCullum's troops failed to win another marquee series," a Fox Sports article titled 'Test miracle for the ages as Poms stunned at the death despite one-arm sacrifice' read. "Regardless, failure to defeat an undermanned Indian team — who are without retired superstars Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma and Ravichandran Ashwin — is a hammer blow for England's Bazballers." The Sydney Morning Herald noted that England were expected to turn a corner in this series, shifting from crowd-pleasers to serious contenders. But their recurring struggles—especially the inability to manage key fast bowlers—highlighted deeper problems that Bazball alone couldn't fix. The article titled 'The hard truths that show England will struggle to win the Ashes' read: "It is worth remembering that this was the series in which England were meant to have evolved from entertainers to winners. They had become more pragmatic in tactics, more inclined to sledge opponents on the field, and more susceptible to the petulance that followed India's series-saving rearguard in Manchester. Putting on a show was no longer enough. All those changes were, however, largely cosmetic next to a couple of hard cricket truths. First, winning big series generally requires keeping your best fast bowlers fit, something England have consistently failed to do over many years, not just during the Bazball era that began in 2022."
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Injury substitution in cricket: Big no from Stokes, Ashwin calls out karma
The 2025 Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy between India and England came to a close on Monday with one of the most dramatic finishes of all time, where India pulled off a perfect Stone Cold 'Stunner' on England on the final day of the match and series, orchestrated by Md Siraj, to win the match by just six runs to end the series on level terms of 2-2. The series had been home to some extraordinary moments of cricketing action and also of determination. From Rishabh Pant coming out to bat with a fractured toe in Manchester to add a crucial 17 more runs to his total in India's first and ready to do it all over again in the second innings if required, to Chris Woakes' entry at the Oval with his arm tucked inside his sweater to keep England's hopes of winning the series alive—this was a series where emotions and grit were put on the highest pedestal. But these instances also call for a big question to be asked, i.e., should ICC allow player substitution for all types of injury instead of restricting it only to head injuries? While many believe ICC should, the English skipper Ben Stokes believes otherwise. Stokes, who ended up on both the giving and receiving end of the injury replacement question in the post-match press conference at the Oval, quoted a British idiom called Sod's law, which means if something can go wrong, it will go wrong—and usually at the worst possible time—and outwardly refused to support the idea of injury replacement in cricket. I don't see it being a thing: Ben Stokes Stokes, who almost mocked the idea of injury replacement in cricket after the Manchester Test where India were left struggling after their best red-ball batter of the last five years, Rishabh Pant, suffered a fractured toe, found himself surrounded by the same question after the Oval Test—after his team lost a game they might have won if the rule of player substitution for any kind of injury existed. Stokes, after the match, said that teams would continue to find loopholes around the rule if made, which will be unfair. Stokes, who himself was ruled out of the final Test due to a shoulder injury, further added that if the rule existed, he could have made himself available for the match, taken a chance, and would have simply replaced himself with someone else if it didn't work out. Stokes did acknowledge how his team suffered due to Woakes' injury in a similar fashion to how India struggled due to Pant's injury, but he simply dismissed the idea of substitution by saying we all need to just deal with the injury and rules as they are and move forward. While Stokes quoted Sod's law, his current situation can more perfectly be described by Murphy's law post his comments on Pant's injury, as the law states: whatever can go wrong will go wrong. Stokes was given karma treatment: Ashwin Former Indian off-spinner R Ashwin, while talking on his YouTube show 'Ash Ki Baat' after the Oval Test, called out Ben Stokes while mentioning Woakes' situation for them as karma and said, 'As you sow, so shall you reap.' Ashwin called out Stokes by saying that the English skipper was joking about the idea of player substitution after Pant's injury but karma hit him, and his team found themselves in a similar situation with Woakes. Although the off-spinner did not shy away from commending Woakes' effort and said that he is in awe of the English all-rounder who put his life and career on the line to almost help England walk away with the match, he simultaneously urged some serious discussion around these types of situations and asked teams to have some empathy towards the opposition. I am all for it: Gautam Gambhir India's head coach Gautam Gambhir voiced strong support for the introduction of injury replacements in cricket, especially in high-stakes Test series after the Manchester Test. According to Gambhir, if the umpires and match referee determine that an injury is serious and clearly visible, teams should be allowed to bring in a substitute. He believes this would be a fair move, particularly in tightly contested series like the one currently underway. Gambhir emphasised that no team should be forced to continue with just ten players due to an unfortunate injury, calling such a scenario highly unfair in a competitive setting. Legends side with Gambhir's views The English skipper Ben Stokes found no support for his comments about injury replacement, as cricketing legends from India and England such as Sunil Gavaskar and Michael Vaughan also voiced their support for Gambhir's comments. Gavaskar said, 'Here, it is a clear injury; there has to be a substitute. I want some committee to take a call on this kind of injury so that teams are not left handicapped.' Vaughan's comments came after England's unfortunate situation with Woakes, but his remarks eventually supported Gambhir's ideas. During the morning session of the fifth day, while Woakes was running around with just one good arm, Vaughan said, 'If there's a genuine injury in the first innings, it affects the game and the entertainment, which fans pay money to watch. The first innings is a good cutoff to make it fair.' How does player substitution actually work in cricket For most of its history, cricket had no injury-related replacement, as if a player was unable to continue, he simply had to walk away and his team had to play with one less player. However, on August 1, 2019, the ICC made a change and introduced player replacement for head-related injuries. According to the latest player substitution rule, cricket's substitution rules are set out by the MCC in Law 24 ('Fielder's Absence; Substitutes'). Here's how substitutions work: If a player on the field gets injured or falls sick, the team can bring in a substitute fielder. This substitute can only field—they are not allowed to bat, bowl, or act as captain in the match. A substitute can keep wicket only if the umpires agree, but only as a stand-in, not permanently. A big change was made in 2019 with the introduction of the concussion substitute rule. If a player suffers a head injury (concussion) during a game, a 'like-for-like' substitute is allowed. This means the replacement can do everything the injured player could—bat, bowl, field, or keep wicket. This substitution needs approval from the match referee to make sure the swap is fair. Runners (who used to run between the wickets for injured batsmen) are no longer allowed in international cricket. Tactical substitutions—replacing a player for strategy reasons—are not allowed according to MCC Laws, except in franchise leagues like the IPL, which have their own 'Impact Player' rule. In standard cricket (Tests, ODIs, most T20s), only substitutes for injury, illness, or concussion are permitted.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'If Bumrah Plays In Asia Cup..': BCCI Source Gives Huge 'Workload' Update
Last Updated: Jasprit Bumrah's inability to handle the workload of five Tests has raised concerns within BCCI. Following a knee injury, Bumrah will undergo rehabilitation at CoE in Bengaluru. Jasprit Bumrah's inability to handle the workload of five Tests of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy against England hasn't been well-received by the BCCI authorities, as per a report. It has also raised questions about the competence of the sports science team at the Centre of Excellence in Bengaluru. Following a month-long rest, Bumrah is expected to be available for the Asia Cup T20 in the UAE from September 9 to 28. 'Look if Bumrah plays in the Asia Cup and if India go the distance till September 28, he won't obviously play the West Indies Test series starting October 2. However, if there are no injuries, he will certainly play the two Tests against World champions South Africa in November," a senior BCCI official privy to current happenings told PTI on conditions of anonymity. With Nitin Patel's exit and a new head of the sports science team expected at the CoE, it is anticipated that fast bowlers will be able to play more matches rather than being excessively protected. What Is The Controversy Around Bumrah? However, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) issued a media brief on August 31 that stated Bumrah had been released from the squad during the fifth Test, which raised some eyebrows. If he was merely being rested, why not keep him in the squad to benefit from his experience in the dugout? A report, in the Times of India, has provided more insight into the situation. The Times of India reported that Bumrah has suffered a knee injury. The report from TOI further mentioned that the 31-year-old pacer will now commence his rehabilitation at the BCCI's Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Bengaluru. If Bumrah has indeed suffered a knee injury, it would be a significant setback for India. Although they won't play any Tests for a while, preparations for the 2026 T20 World Cup start next month with the Asia Cup. Moreover, the BCCI would be concerned about the longevity of their star pacer's career, especially if this is his second serious injury in eight months. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
