
Trump, Raking In Cash, Expands His Power in the G.O.P. Money World
President Trump is harnessing the Republican Party's all-encompassing deference to him to exert even greater control over the G.O.P. big-money world, which had long been one of the party's final remaining redoubts of Trump skepticism.
For years, the super PACs allied with House and Senate Republicans have been some of the most powerful and independent fiefs in American politics, raising and spending hundreds of millions of dollars in each election.
But even though Mr. Trump is in his second term and cannot run again, he is quickly bringing them inside his sphere of influence — a sign that his dominance over the party could endure well into the future.
Both super PACs, the Congressional Leadership Fund and the Senate Leadership Fund, have new leaders this year, and they are working closer than ever with the White House, overhauling their boards of directors and installing veteran Trump strategists in senior positions.
At the same time, Mr. Trump's super PAC, MAGA Inc., and its allied nonprofit group have already amassed roughly $400 million since the 2024 election, according to two people briefed on the fund-raising who insisted on anonymity to discuss the organization's finances. That sum is without precedent so early in an election cycle, especially for a termed-out president. The Trump super PAC is expected to play a major role in the midterm elections, scrambling the usual flow of cash and encroaching on the traditional dominion of the congressional super PACs.
The changes — both in personnel and financial firepower — amount to a fundamental reordering of Republican finance, and an extraordinary expansion of Mr. Trump's already overwhelming sway. Interviews with senior Republicans allied with leaders on Capitol Hill reveal private fears about a power imbalance if the G.O.P.'s top super PACs are weakened and overly submissive to Mr. Trump.
The concerns are especially acute in the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson owes his post largely to Mr. Trump. His allies fear not only for their independence but also for how this will play out when the president's personal resentments and agenda are at odds with the political priorities of the Republican leaders of the chambers, dividing the G.O.P. and potentially delivering an edge to Democrats.
Some Republicans say that a hand-in-glove relationship between Capitol Hill and the White House is simply good politics, and that bringing Mr. Trump's allies inside the tent is far more strategic than having the president wreak havoc from afar. Republican strategists involved in the midterm elections agree that the party must motivate Trump supporters to turn out even when he is not on the ballot.
'Political alignment in a midterm is an absolute necessity,' said Josh Holmes, who played a key role advising the Senate Leadership Fund when Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was the majority leader. 'I worry a lot less about whose bank account looks bigger than I do about the alignment.'
An Influx of Trump Allies
Big changes are happening at the Congressional Leadership Fund, the main outside group working to elect Republicans to the House.
The new president of the super PAC and its allied nonprofit group, Chris Winkelman, is actively soliciting Mr. Trump's team for collaboration. One of the president's top advisers in 2024, Chris LaCivita, is now a senior adviser to the group in addition to helping steer MAGA Inc.
The House super PAC is also adding at least three new people to its board of directors, including Andy Surabian, a top political adviser to Vice President JD Vance and Donald Trump Jr., and Richard Walters, a top strategist at the Republican National Committee during the elder Mr. Trump's first term and his 2024 campaign. The additions, which also include Matt Brooks, the chief executive of the pro-Trump Republican Jewish Coalition, have not been previously reported.
'We are actively seeking these people out because they are good at what they do,' Mr. Winkelman said in an interview. 'This is what a unified government among political professionals is supposed to look like.'
Trump allies are arriving on the Senate side, too.
The new executive director of the Senate Leadership Fund and its allied nonprofit group, Alex Latcham, was an official on the Trump 2024 campaign. He said his group would 'work closely with President Trump to ensure the Democrats' radical vision for America never becomes reality.'
The Senate super PAC is replacing its entire board of directors. It is not clear what the board's makeup will be, though its new chair is former Senator Cory Gardner of Colorado, who is close to some major donors. Other members are expected to be allies of Senator John Thune, the new majority leader. One Thune confidant, Johnny DeStefano, who served in the first Trump administration, has joined the S.L.F. board and already serves on the C.L.F. board.
While the super PACs are guided largely — though not directly — by the party's leader in each chamber, the changes to the groups' boards are significant for their symbolism.
Visions of Trouble Ahead
The fact that Mr. Trump's super PAC could dwarf those of congressional leaders looms large.
The president, of course, has always played a big role in down-ballot races, freely endorsing 2022 midterm candidates in ways that frustrated some senior Republicans. But he was not a big factor financially. The Congressional Leadership Fund spent about $260 million that cycle, and the Senate Leadership Fund spent $290 million, while Mr. Trump's group laid out just $19 million.
So far, early in the 2026 election cycle, Republicans say, there are few signs of outright conflict between Mr. Trump's operation and those of Capitol Hill Republicans. But in private conversations among themselves, some Republicans say they can see foresee trouble.
The top concern is if MAGA Inc. starts spending its war chest against someone like Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of the most vulnerable Republican incumbents in 2026.
This week, Mr. Tillis announced that he would not support Ed Martin, Mr. Trump's nominee for United States attorney for Washington, because of his work defending the rioters who stormed the Capitol in 2021. The move forced the White House to pull the nomination.
The incentives for Mr. Trump, who prizes loyalty and is not up for re-election, could easily diverge from the aims of the Senate super PAC, which generally tries to support more moderate nominees and pursues a principal goal of re-electing incumbents, Republicans say.
In private conversations, Mr. Winkelman has expressed concern about his super PAC being outmuscled by Mr. Trump's groups, according to three people who have discussed the matter with him.
Mr. Winkelman denied expressing that sentiment. 'This isn't true,' he said in a statement, adding that the Trump team was invested in holding the House majority. 'We'd be stupid not to welcome more money and more wins,' he said.
Unprecedented Fund-Raising
Never before has a term-limited president amassed so much fund-raising power.
The only other second-term president in the super PAC era to have such a group was President Barack Obama after 2012. But his super PAC, Priorities USA, effectively went dormant for the 2014 midterms.
Mr. Trump made a different decision. He has headlined at least six fund-raisers for MAGA Inc. since he was elected in November, with the price tag for a seat reaching as high as $1.5 million for an event with cryptocurrency executives that he attended on Monday in the Washington area.
Plenty of the money that Mr. Trump is raising comes from corporate interests eager for better access to him.
Mr. Trump's allies say, essentially, that he is raising the money because he can. But it is hard to ignore that the gusher of cash coincides with his repeated comments about a constitutionally prohibited third term. MAGA Inc. officials did not respond to requests for comment.
Even some of the people helping him raise money are privately confused why doing so is such a priority, though Mr. Trump is said to be far more aware of the importance of keeping control of Congress than he was in his first term.
Mr. Trump also now has the support of the world's richest man, Elon Musk, who has signaled that he wants to donate at least $100 million more to the president's political operation.
'Cannibalization' Concerns
So far, the Trump political groups have mostly laid low as they vacuum up money. But on Friday, the nonprofit arm, Securing American Greatness, began buying television ads to promote the president's tax plan.
Some Republicans worry about 'cannibalization,' or the House and Senate super PACs struggling because donors and corporations are sending their limited resources to Mr. Trump's groups.
Mr. Thune is keeping up an aggressive fund-raising schedule. This month, the Senate Leadership Fund hosted a donor event on the sidelines of a Formula 1 race in Miami.
Still, some candidates, uneasy about the new funding landscape, are considering starting their own outside groups.
Some people close to Mr. Tillis, for instance, are uncertain about how much financial backup he will receive from Mr. Thune, especially if Mr. Trump goes after the North Carolina senator. Mr. Tillis is in the process of setting up his own outside groups for the race, according to two people briefed on the matter. The move is intended to simply give him more ways to raise money, but it would also inevitably offer him more financial autonomy.
Jordan Shaw, a strategist for Mr. Tillis, said that the campaign had 'all the confidence in the world in S.L.F., MAGA Inc. and the entire Republican ecosystem.'
MAGA Inc. itself has brought in one notable new adviser: Chris Buskirk, who leads an influential group of donors called the Rockbridge Network and is close to Mr. Vance. His role at the super PAC, which is previously unreported, could help the vice president down the line.
Mr. LaCivita, meanwhile, is not only involved in MAGA Inc. and the House G.O.P. super PAC. He was quietly added recently to the board of Data Trust, a Republican firm — adding to his overlapping roles that place him in the middle of the billionaire world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.


Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at


Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
4 ChatGPT Prompts Emerging Leaders Should Be Using In 2025
Using ChatGPT to help develop as an effective leader Whether you're a teen entrepreneur building your first business team or an educator stepping into department leadership, the desire to lead effectively is often stronger than the knowledge of how to do it well. The challenge? Most leadership development happens through expensive coaching, lengthy programs, or trial-and-error experiences that can be costly and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence offers a practical solution. When used strategically, ChatGPT becomes more than a chatbot—it transforms into a personal development coach that helps clarify thinking and strengthen decision-making skills. These four ChatGPT prompts help emerging leaders build self-awareness, navigate real-world challenges, and lead with greater confidence. Self-awareness distinguishes effective leaders from those who are not, yet most people lack training in productive self-reflection. This prompt positions ChatGPT as an executive coach, generating questions that dig beneath surface-level concerns. Rather than vague journaling, this approach creates structured reflection. The AI identifies patterns, such as perfectionism, fear of visibility, or unclear priorities, that may be limiting progress. How to maximize results: After answering the five questions, follow up with: "Can you summarize the mindset I seem to be operating from? What belief is driving my hesitation?" This moves the conversation from symptoms to root causes. A teen entrepreneur might discover they're avoiding reaching out to potential customers not because they lack time, but because they fear adults won't take them seriously. A teacher might realize they're hesitating to implement new classroom management strategies not because of workload, but because they're worried about appearing inexperienced to their colleagues. This awareness alone can shift behavior and open new opportunities. New leaders typically either over-function by attempting to control every detail or under-function by failing to establish clear expectations. This prompt provides a preview of common challenges and practical prevention strategies. Anticipating leadership challenges enables proactive decision-making rather than reactive crisis management. Understanding potential pitfalls helps new leaders develop strategies before problems emerge. Make it specific: Add context for better results. For example: "I'm a teen founder leading my first team of three classmates on our social media marketing business. What traps should I watch out for when my team members are also my friends?" Or: "I'm a first-year teacher managing parent volunteers for our school fundraiser. How do I maintain authority while staying collaborative?" Advanced application: Request scenarios: "Give me an example of what micromanaging versus clear leadership looks like in a group chat with teen team members." This transforms abstract concepts into concrete behaviors you can recognize and adjust. Many first-time teen leaders discover that setting clear expectations with friends-turned-teammates strengthens their business relationships. Teachers often find that being direct about volunteer responsibilities yields better outcomes than relying on people to figure things out on their own. Effective leaders adjust their approach to suit the situation. This prompt helps explore different leadership styles and consider how each might affect team dynamics and project outcomes. When a teen entrepreneur faces team members who aren't meeting deadlines for their custom sticker business, or when a teacher deals with students who seem disengaged during group projects, ChatGPT might suggest: Directive approach: Implement stricter deadlines with clear consequences. A teen might create formal check-in schedules with team members, while a teacher might establish daily progress reports for project groups. Coaching approach: Meet individually with team members to identify obstacles and realign on goals. This builds relationships and addresses root issues, but requires a more significant time investment. Visionary approach: Reconnect the team to the larger purpose behind their work. A teen entrepreneur might remind their team about the impact their business will have on their college applications, while a teacher might help students see how their project connects to real-world applications. Follow-up question: "Which of these approaches aligns most with my leadership style, and how can I combine elements of all three without confusing the team?" This framework helps young leaders move beyond their default style to consider what the specific situation requires. Teen entrepreneurs often discover they've been trying to be everyone's friend instead of a clear leader, while new teachers realize they've been defaulting to the coaching approach when some situations require more direct guidance. This prompt shifts perspective from uncertainty to clarity by using your existing leadership knowledge. Instead of asking, "What should I do?" it asks, "What would the best version of me already know to do?" Advanced variation: "Act like my future self three years from now—someone who has grown as a leader. What advice would they give me about this situation?" This temporal shift helps make decisions based on long-term principles rather than short-term fears. For deeper insight: Ask ChatGPT to explain why that version of you would act that way. This reveals the values and principles you're developing as a leader. A teen entrepreneur might use this prompt when deciding whether to fire a team member who is consistently late to virtual meetings, while a teacher might apply it when considering how to address a parent who is undermining classroom policies. The "future self" approach often reveals that effective leadership requires having difficult conversations rather than avoiding them. These ChatGPT prompts are most effective when used consistently rather than sporadically. Schedule weekly 15-minute sessions to work through one prompt, focusing on current leadership challenges. Save responses that provide valuable insights and track patterns over time. The goal isn't to replace experience or mentorship but to accelerate learning through structured reflection. Leadership develops through practice, feedback, and iteration—ChatGPT creates more opportunities for productive self-examination. While AI can provide valuable frameworks and perspectives, real leadership development happens through application. Use these prompts to clarify thinking, then test insights through actual leadership situations. Document what works and what doesn't. Share learnings with mentors or peer groups. The combination of AI-powered reflection and real-world practice creates a powerful development cycle that enables emerging leaders to build capabilities more quickly than traditional methods alone. Leadership isn't about having all the answers—it's about asking better questions and acting on the insights. These ChatGPT prompts help accelerate that process, transforming everyday challenges into leadership development opportunities.