Meghalaya: SC formed panel seeks details on missing 4,000 MT coal, sets Sept deadline
'I have asked them to conduct an inquiry, and it has been assured that a report would be submitted within a month from now,' Justice (retired) BP Katakey told media persons on Monday evening after chairing a review meeting.
On July 25, the Meghalaya High Court sought accountability from the state government and its agencies to identify the individuals or officials responsible for the missing coal, terming it a serious breach.
Figures from the Meghalaya Basin Development Authority (MBDA) revealed that 1,839.03 MT of coal was recorded at a depot in Diengngan village, Ri-Bhoi. However, a recent inspection found just 2.5 MT, along with residue and traces of coal. In Rajaju village, West Khasi Hills, the situation was no better — only around 8 MT of coal remained against the 2,121.62 MT officially logged earlier.
The committee meeting also reviewed applications from coal traders who claim their stock was not reflected in the report prepared by M/S Garuda, despite their inclusion in an affidavit filed by the state government before the Supreme Court.
Also Read: India, Russia now explore opportunities in rare earth, critical minerals
Justice Katakey's panel further examined the discovery of 1.92 lakh MT of illegally mined coal traced jointly by M/S Garuda and MBDA, and assessed what action had been taken.
The former judge, however, was displeased with the pace of verification in East Jaiñtia Hills, the epicentre of Meghalaya's coal controversies for over a decade.
'I find the progress in East Jaiñtia Hills very slow and unsatisfying, while the quantity in other districts is very small,' he remarked, noting that while site visits had been made, the exact quantities of coal were yet to be determined.
The development comes close on the heels of Leader of Opposition Dr. Mukul Sangma accusing the state machinery of following a 'well-scripted modus operandi' to cover up coal-related corruption.
The committee will soon file its recommendations before the high court.
Meghalaya's coal industry has been under a ban on unscientific and hazardous mining since 2014 following a National Green Tribunal order.
Despite this, illegal extraction and transport have persisted, with the high court and the Justice Katakey committee frequently flagging discrepancies in official coal inventories.
The latest 'vanishing coal' episode comes just months after Meghalaya recorded the highest rainfall deficit in India at 56% — a statistic controversially floated by an excise minister as a possible reason for the missing stock.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Court extends protection to Indore cartoonist
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended the protection from arrest granted to Indore-based cartoonist Hemant Malviya for his objectionable caricatures of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the RSS. Malviya's counsel said he would publish an apology on Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms for his post. The SC had initially on July 15 in its order granted him protection from coercive action to the cartoonist. The SC, however, expressed anguish over increasing objectionable posts on social media and stressed that there was a pressing need to pass a judicial order to curb such activities. The accused had moved the top court after the MP HC had denied him anticipatory bail.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Haryana defines forest, ‘as per dictionary'
Haryana has taken the extraordinary step of defining what constitutes a 'dictionary meaning' of forest, 18 months after the Supreme Court ordered states to identify forests using that very phrase's broad, common-sense interpretation. Haryana defines forest, 'as per dictionary' In a gazette notification issued August 18, the state government said it was 'pleased to define the expression 'forest as per dictionary meaning'' with restrictive technical criteria that environmental activists say could exclude most of the state's remaining Aravalli forests from legal protection. The definition requires forest areas to have a minimum canopy density of 40% and cover at least five hectares if isolated, or two hectares if connected to government-notified forests. It explicitly excludes 'all linear, compact, agro-forestry plantations and orchards situated outside the government notified forests.' The move follows an order issued by a three-judge Supreme Court bench on February 19, 2024, which directed all states to use the broad 'dictionary meaning' established in the landmark December 12, 1996 TN Godavarman case. At the time, the court ruled ordered that states 'need to go by the dictionary definition of the word forest to determine whether any work can be approved on any land'. Dictionaries typically describe forests similar to the following Oxford Learner's Dictionary definition: 'large areas of land thickly covered with trees'. A Haryana forest official said the state would now 'constitute an expert committee to identify the forest areas in the state as per the newly defined dictionary meaning criteria.' The report will be submitted to the central government, which will place it before the Supreme Court. The redefinition, activists say, will deal a blow to the Aravalli forests, especially the 40% canopy density requirement for a region that has naturally adapted to dry conditions with scrub and open forest cover. 'Even Asola Bhatti wildlife sanctuary in Delhi Aravallis and contiguous to Gurgaon and Faridabad Aravallis would not meet this high threshold. The minimum area threshold of two and five hectares is also unreasonably high for such a dry state and should have been kept at 1 and 2 hectares respectively,' environment activist Chetan Agarwal said. Agarwal explained that while the northern Shivaliks receive 1000-1200mm of annual rainfall, the Aravallis in the south and west get just 300-600mm annually. 'This low rainfall and the rocky terrain creates tough conditions for growth of the Aravallis forests and therefore the Aravalli vegetation has adapted over millions of years into a stunted growth of thorny and dry deciduous species and scrub forest conditions.' 'At least in the Aravalli hills the open forest (10-40%) and scrub (0-10%) categories should have been treated as forest as per dictionary meaning and 10% should have been the threshold in the rest of the state,' Agarwal said. 'The decision to keep such a high threshold of forest cover of 40% will further exclude much of the potential deemed forest of the Aravallis from the protective embrace of the Forest Conservation Act and may facilitate opening them up to the ravages of the licences of Town and Country Planning and Mining departments and their clients.' The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling gave the Union government two weeks to issue a circular directing states to comply with the 1996 ruling, gave states until March 31 to submit reports on identified forest lands, and ordered the Centre to digitise and publish these records on the environment ministry website by April 15. Since then, the top has escalated pressure on states to comply with the broad forest definition. The original challenge arose because the Forest Conservation Amendment Act 2023 would have legalised all forest diversions between 1980 and 1996, while stripping protection from unrecorded forests. Retired forest officials and other petitioners successfully challenged these provisions, leading the court to reaffirm that all forests meeting the dictionary definition must receive protection regardless of ownership status. A subsequent order on March 4, 2025, directed that identified forest lands must be geo-referenced according to the court's 2011 Lafarge order guidelines, which mandated creation of a comprehensive GIS-based decision support database containing district-wise details of forest boundaries, protected area buffers, wildlife corridors, and previously diverted forest lands. The Union ministry of environment, forest and climate change was given six months until September 2025 to submit comprehensive reports obtained from states. The court specifically cautioned that forest identification should follow the 1996 Godavarman order 'in letter and spirit.' A retired forest official and forestry expert was more blunt in his assessment: 'The step by Haryana in drastically restricting the definition of forests is against the Godavarman order of 1996 which is illegal, mischievous and malicious. It is with the sole purpose of eliminating most forests from protection violating the directions of SC orders of 12.12.96 in WP 202/96, 19/02/2024 and 04/03/2025 in WP 1164/23.' The expert argued that Haryana's approach was 'unscientific and makes a laughing stock of the forest department of Haryana which very well knows that forests are identified by their ecological value and not tree stands like any layman would do.' 'By such a definition, all grasslands, wetlands, 'wastelands' - shallow soils with little tree growth but ecologically rich with its wildlife will get excluded and decimated. This is only being done to help contractors, miners and other destructive forces of forests and this should not be allowed.' The official emphasised the urgency of proper forest protection: 'This is especially important in these times of extreme climate events sweeping across the country and while we are experiencing climate change in its most active form. Haryana too had been impacted by floods and heavy rainfall and the only protection against this is to conserve our forests and ecologically vital areas.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
MCD workers and dog-catching van attacked, group booked
New Delhi: Dealing with street dogs isn't easy for the as an incident on Monday proved. A group has been booked for allegedly assaulting MCD workers and vandalising a dog-catching van in Rohini, where some dog-bite incidents involving students of a govt school set off a chain of events that spiralled into alleged violence against a municipal team. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A purported video of the incident, widely shared on social media, shows a group releasing a dog from an MCD van while others smash the vehicle's windows with hammers and sticks and puncture its tyres. According to a police complaint by MCD's veterinary department (Rohini zone), a six-member team responded on Monday morning to a complaint from teachers at Sarvodaya Vidyalaya in Sector 16, Rohini, about a stray dog on the premises. While the school authorities have refrained from commenting, staff members told TOI that some students had recently been bitten by dogs on the school premises, which may have prompted the teachers to contact MCD. The municipal team caught a dog in Sector 16 and proceeded to Sector 3 after receiving another complaint, where they caught a second animal. "At that point, a group of dog lovers arrived and physically assaulted the team," the MCD complaint letter says. "They forced the team to release the dog caught in Sector 3 and return the one from Sector 16 to its original location." Under pressure from the group, MCD officials said they were forced to return to Sarvodaya Vidyalaya and release the dog there. "As the van exited the school, the same group surrounded the vehicle, assaulted the staff, smashed the van's glass and forcibly took away tools, ignition key and logbook before fleeing," the letter added. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Rajeev Ranjan, DCP (Rohini), said, "An FIR was registered immediately on receiving the complaint. The investigation has begun and we are analysing the footage." The FIR has been lodged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's sections 212 (obstructing public servant in the discharge of public functions), 132 (assault or use of criminal force against a public servant to deter them from their duty), 324(4) (causing mischief, punishments for causing loss or damage to property) and 305(c) (theft) at KN Katju Marg police station in Rohini. Vijay Goel, former Union minister and convenor of the "No Dogs on Streets" campaign, reached the office of the Rohini DCP on Tuesday and demanded strong action against the so-called dog lovers who, he accused, "in blatant violation of the Supreme Court's clear orders, not only obstructed official work but also attacked MCD officers and damaged their vehicles". Goel said that on Aug 11, the Supreme Court had categorically ordered that all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR be removed from the streets and sent to shelter homes, where proper arrangements for their care and food would be ensured. "The court also made it clear that no one should remain under the illusion that the order was stayed — it is fully in force and all authorities must implement it strictly," he said. The former minister said that the action of the dog lovers who manhandled municipal officials and damaged their vehicles on Monday was not only contempt of court but also a serious threat to the safety of citizens. Goel has also sent a copy of his complaint to MCD, urging that the culprits be identified and booked. Except for the police complaint by the veterinary officer, the corporation offered no other comment on the matter. Police later caught a suspects in Rohini. They found out that he used to feed four strays outside his shop. He is also a member of a WhatsApp group dedicated to dogs. When the MCD team arrived at his shop to pick up a dog, he alerted group members, who forcibly freed the dog. Police said the identities of two women have been established. Meanwhile, MCD picked up 35 dogs on Tuesday.
