Britain and France try again to tackle English Channel migrant crossings
At a U.K.-France summit on Thursday that caps Macron's three-day stay, senior officials from the two countries will try to seal deals on economic growth, defense cooperation and – perhaps trickiest of all – unauthorized migration.
Macron and Starmer also will visit a military base and dial in to a planning meeting of the ' coalition of the willing, ' a U.K.- and France-backed plan for an international force to guarantee a future ceasefire in Ukraine.
During a meeting inside 10 Downing St. on Wednesday, the two leaders agreed that tackling small boat crossings 'is a shared priority that requires shared solutions, including a new deterrent to break the business model' of people-smuggling gangs, Starmer's office said.
It said they would aim for 'concrete progress' on Thursday.
Channel crossings are a longstanding challenge
Britain receives fewer asylum-seekers than Mediterranean European countries, but sees thousands of very visible arrivals each year as migrants cross the 20-mile (32 kilometer) channel from northern France in small, overcrowded boats.
About 37,000 people were detected crossing the channel in 2024, and more than 20,000 made the crossing in the first six months of 2025, up by about 50% from the same period last year. Dozens of people have died trying to reach the English coast.
Britain and France agree the dangerous and unregulated crossings are a problem, but have long differed on how to address it.
The U.K. wants France to do more to stop boats leaving the beaches, and has paid the Paris government hundreds of millions of pounds (dollars, euros) to increase patrols and share intelligence in an attempt to disrupt the smuggling gangs.
'We share information to a much greater extent than was the case before,' Starmer told lawmakers in the House of Commons on Wednesday. 'We've got a new specialist intelligence unit in Dunkirk and we're the first government to persuade the French to review their laws and tactics on the north coast to take more effective action.'
Macron says Britain must address 'pull factors' like the perception it is easy for unauthorized migrants to find work in the U.K. Many migrants also want to reach Britain because they have friends or family there, or because they speak English.
Solutions have proved elusive
As far back as 2001, the two countries were discussing ways to stop migrants stowing away on trains and trucks using the tunnel under the channel.
Over the following years, French authorities cleared out camps near Calais where thousands of migrants gathered before trying to reach Britain. Beefed up security sharply reduced the number of vehicle stowaways, but from about 2018 people-smugglers offered migrants a new route by sea.
'You see that pattern again and again, where smuggling gangs and migrants try to find new ways to cross from France to the U.K.,' said Mihnea Cuibus, a researcher at the University of Oxford's Migration Observatory. 'The authorities crack down on that, and then gradually you see migrants and gangs try to adapt to that. And it becomes a bit of a game of cat and mouse.'
Cooperation on stopping the boats stalled after Britain's acrimonious split from the European Union in 2020, but in the past few years the countries have struck several agreements that saw the U.K. pay France to increase police and drone patrols of the coast.
Britain's previous Conservative government came up with a contentious plan in 2022 to deport asylum-seekers arriving by boat to Rwanda. Critics called it unworkable and unethical, and it was scrapped by Starmer soon after he took office in July 2024.
Britain hopes for a returns deal with France
Starmer is staking success on closer cooperation with France and with countries further up the migrants' routes from Africa and the Middle East.
British officials have been pushing for French police to intervene more forcefully to stop boats once they have left the shore, and welcomed the sight of officers slashing rubber dinghies with knives in recent days.
France is also considering a U.K. proposal for a 'one-in, one-out' deal that would see France take back some migrants who reached Britain, in return for the U.K. accepting migrants seeking to join relatives in Britain.
Macron said the leaders would aim for 'tangible results' on an issue that's 'a burden for our two countries.'
Cuibus said irregular cross-channel migration would likely always be a challenge, but that the measures being discussed by Britain and France could make an impact, 'if they're implemented in the right way.
'But that's a big if,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
35 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Russia warns US, South Korea and Japan against forming security alliance targeting North Korea
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — Russia's foreign minister on Saturday warned the U.S., South Korea and Japan against forming a security partnership targeting North Korea as he visited his country's ally for talks on further solidifying their booming military and other cooperation. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov flew to North Korea's eastern Wonsan city on Friday for a meeting with his North Korean counterpart Choe Son Hui. Relations between Russia and North Korea have been flourishing in recent years, with North Korea supplying troops and ammunitions to support Russia's war against Ukraine in return for military and economic assistance. That has raised concerns among South Korea, the U.S. and others that Russia might also transfer to North Korea sensitive technologies that can increase the danger of its nuclear and missile programs. After a meeting with Choe on Saturday, Lavrov accused the U.S., South Korea and Japan of what he called their military buildups around North Korea. 'We warn against exploiting these ties to build alliances directed against anyone, including North Korea and, of course, Russia,' he told reporters, according to Russia's state Tass news agency. The U.S., South Korea and Japan have been expanding or restoring their trilateral military exercises in response to North Korea's advancing nuclear program. On Friday, the three countries held a joint air drill involving U.S. nuclear-capable bombers near the Korean Peninsula, as their top military officers met in Seoul and urged North Korea to cease all unlawful activities that threaten regional security. North Korea views major U.S.-led military drills as invasion rehearsals. It has long argued that it's forced to develop nuclear weapons to defend itself from U.S. military threats. Lavrov said Russia understands North Korea's decision to seek nuclear weapons. 'The technologies used by North Korea are the result of the work of its own scientists. We respect North Korea's aspirations and understand the reasons why it is pursuing a nuclear development,' Lavrov said. During their meeting, Choe reiterated that North Korea 'unconditionally' supports Russia's fight against Ukraine. She described ties between North Korea and Russia as 'the invincible alliance.' Lavrov said he repeated Russia's gratitude for the contribution that North Korean troops made in efforts to repel a Ukrainian incursion into Russia's Kursk border region. Wonsan city, the meeting venue, is where North Korea recently opened a mammoth beach resort that it says can accommodate nearly 20,000 people. In his comments at the start of his meeting with Choe, Lavrov said that 'I am sure that Russian tourists will be increasingly eager to come here. We will do everything we can to facilitate this, creating conditions for this, including air travel,' according to the Russian Foreign Ministry. The Wonsan-Kalma tourist zone is at the center of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's push to boost tourism as a way to improve his country's troubled economy. But prospects for the biggest tourist complex in North Korea aren't clear, as the country appears unlikely to fully reopen its borders and embrace Western tourists anytime soon. ___ Associated Press writer Elise Morton in Athens, Greece contributed to this report.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Finally at a loss for an opinion
Opinion I have often joked that if I wrote my autobiography it would be titled Never at a Loss for an Opinion, Which Everyone Is Entitled to, Whether They Want It or Not. The joke arises from my 50-plus years of providing commentary on politics and government on the national, provincial and local levels, including writing biweekly columns in this space for the past decade. For better or worse, I have been a pundit, someone who opines regularly on topics about which they are presumed to have some expertise. My days of punditry are over. In grocery terms, I have passed my 'best-before date' and thankfully have not reached my 'expiry date.' This will be my last column and my availability to reporters will be limited to topics of deep interest to me. For several reasons, most academics decline to play the pundit role. Preparing for and talking to the media takes time they believe is better spent on research and engaging with students. Tenure, promotion and salary increases are based mainly on the quantity and quality of a professor's research and publications, not on the sharing of knowledge with the media and the general public. Some academics will talk to the media only about their own research, believing that their opinions on other subjects are worth no more than those of any informed citizen. Others decline media interviews because they believe it will involve dumbing down their specialized knowledge for a general public. Others fear they will be misquoted or statements will be taken out of context. Others are 'media hesitant' because they lack confidence in their capacity to offer insights in the brief and engaging fashion the media most values. From 1969 to 2010 I was paid from the public purse to teach Canadian politics, public policy and public administration. This specialty meant there were always more media requests than for colleagues in other fields like political theory or international relations. No doubt there was some vanity involved with my regular appearances on television and seeing my name in print. However, it was also my belief that I was partly paid to conduct educational outreach and community service. A colleague once jokingly labelled me 'rent-a-quote Thomas,' which is not entirely true since the only media 'gigs' that paid a modest fee were election-night coverage for the CBC and this biweekly column. Because I was a public servant and then a parliamentary intern in the House of Commons before becoming an academic, I developed a strong interest in merging theory and practice and a belief that teaching and learning should go beyond the classroom. Engaging in media work led to connections with others with shared interests, including providers and users of government services, who taught me a great deal based on the distinctive knowledge which comes from first-hand experience. I never assumed that my opinions had a wide impact, but the media offered a much larger audience than the handful of academics and students who read my books and journal articles. That is also why I undertook a number of outside assignments leading or participating in public bodies/inquiries which led to reports and related media coverage, which had educational value even when the recommendations went into a black hole. In providing commentaries, my goal was always to be accurate, fair and balanced, which hopefully happened more often than not. Positive and negative reactions were in principle equally welcome, but naturally the former led to more satisfaction. I was once threatened with a lawsuit when on television I labelled a candidate in a hopeless cause as a 'sacrificial lamb,' an unnecessary attempt on my part to be colourful. Mistrust of 'experts' has always existed, but it is now more widespread than when I first became a commentator. The proliferation of social media has resulted in more mis- and disinformation in circulation. This should mean a greater obligation on academics, whose employment and research has been funded with public money, to share their knowledge on a wide range of topics. Media outlets should not always return to the 'usual suspects.' Rather, they should seek out and encourage younger academics to share their expertise and fresh perspectives. This is made easier today because many academics make use of social media and Substacks to publicize their research and their opinions. I know from experience that with encouragement and support academics can improve their communications skills to reach both specialist and general audiences. At CBC, numerous producers and hosts on television and radio patiently tried to make a 'decent' commentator out of a woolly headed academic. After rehearsals for election night television coverage, for example, there was a review of the tape and I was coached on how to tell the 'big picture' stories behind the constituency-level election results. Meanwhile, over at the editorial desk of this newspaper, Shannon Sampert recruited me as a regular contributor to this page and along with other editors, like Brad Oswald and Russell Wangersky, curbed my wordiness and taught me not to 'bury the lede.' Punditry has been stimulating and fun for me. My commentaries were often on 'wonky' topics so I am grateful if some people found them of value. Paul G. Thomas is professor emeritus of political studies at the University of Manitoba.
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Cambodian sites of Khmer Rouge brutality added to UNESCO heritage list
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia (AP) — Three locations used by Cambodia's brutal Khmer Rouge regime as torture and execution sites 50 years ago have been added by UNESCO to its World Heritage List. The three locations were inscribed to the list by the United Nations cultural agency Friday during the 47th Session of the World Heritage Committee in Paris. The inscription coincided with the 50th anniversary of the rise to power by the communist Khmer Rouge government, which caused the deaths of an estimated 1.7 million Cambodians through starvation, torture and mass executions during a four-year reign from 1975 to 1979. UNESCO's World Heritage List lists sites considered important to humanity and includes the Great Wall of China, the Pyramids of Giza in Egypt, the Taj Mahal in India and Cambodia's Angkor archaeological complex. The three sites listed Friday include two notorious prisons and an execution site immortalized in a Hollywood film. Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum, located in the capital Phnom Penh, is the site of a former high school used by the Khmer Rouge as a notorious prison. Better known as S-21, about 15,000 people were imprisoned and tortured there. The M-13 prison, located in rural Kampong Chhnang province in central Cambodia, also was regarded as one of the main prisons of the early Khmer Rouge. Choeung Ek, located about 15 kilometers (10 miles) south of the capital, was used as an execution site and mass grave. The story of the atrocities committed there are the focus of the 1984 film 'The Killing Fields,' based on the experiences of New York Times photojournalist Dith Pran and correspondent Sydney Schanberg. The Khmer Rouge captured Phnom Penh on April 17, 1975, and immediately herded almost all the city's residents into the countryside, where they were forced to toil in harsh conditions until 1979, when the regime was driven from power by an invasion from neighboring Vietnam. In September 2022, the U.N.-backed Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, better known as the Khmer Rouge tribunal, concluded its work compiling cases against Khmer Rouge leaders. The tribunal cost $337 million over 16 years but convicted just three men. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet issued a message Friday directing people to beat drums simultaneously across the country Sunday morning to mark the UNESCO listing. 'May this inscription serve as a lasting reminder that peace must always be defended,' Hun Manet said in a video message posted online. 'From the darkest chapters of history, we can draw strength to build a better future for humanity.' Youk Chhang, executive director of the Documentation Center of Cambodia in Phnom Penh, said the country is 'still grappling with the painful legacies of genocide, torture, and mass atrocity.' But naming the three sites to the UNESCO list will play a role in educating younger generations of Cambodians and others worldwide. 'Though they were the landscape of violence, they too will and can contribute to heal the wounds inflicted during that era that have yet to heal,' he said. The UNESCO inscription was Cambodia's first nomination for a modern and non-classical archaeological site and is among the first in the world to be submitted as a site associated with recent conflict, Cambodia's Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts said in a statement Friday. Four Cambodian archaeological sites were previously inscribed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites including Angkor, Preah Vihear, Sambo Prei Kuk and Koh Ker, the ministry said.
