Britain's ‘largest on-street electric vehicle charging project' announced
Charge point operator Char.gy said it would install more than 6,000 kerbside chargers for Brighton and Hove City Council (BHCC) after securing a £130 million contract.
The rollout of public EV charging is seen as vital to persuade drivers without off-road parking to switch to electric motoring.
Installing street chargers near homes will reduce the need for people to drive to a charging station, and enable more motorists to take advantage of cheaper overnight electricity rates.
BHCC is one of the first local authorities to use the Government's Local Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (Levi) funding.
The scheme supports local authorities in England to plan and deliver charging infrastructure for residents without off-street parking.
Lilian Greenwood, the future of roads minister, said making EV charging as easy as possible was ' crucial to making the switch to electric a success '.
She went on: 'Rolling out over 6,000 chargers across Brighton and Hove will make driving an electric vehicle easier and more convenient, especially for those without a driveway.
'It will power growth, cut emissions and improve lives in Brighton and Hove and beyond, as we continue to create jobs, attract investment and secure our future.'
Quentin Willson, founder of EV lobby group FairCharge, said: 'Such a huge and very visible deployment of on-street chargers will help create consumer confidence in charging infrastructure.
'It will also show other local authorities that with ambition and Government Levi funding, it's possible to offer chargers to the neglected 30 per cent of EV drivers who can't charge at home.'
Fifteen-year contract
Char.gy has been given a 15-year contract to operate and maintain the charging network.
John Lewis, its chief executive, described the announcement as 'a huge moment for the UK and its EV ambitions' which would 'bring the UK meaningfully closer to ... sustainability goals '.
He said: 'This partnership alone will empower thousands of residents to confidently make the switch to electric vehicles, knowing they have easy access to chargers.'
Last month the Department for Transport (DfT) said the number of public EV charging devices installed in the UK had exceeded 75,000.
A report published by public spending watchdog the National Audit Office in December found the rollout of public EV chargers was 'on track' to meet the 300,000 the DfT estimated would be the minimum needed by 2030.
There are more than 680,000 domestic charge points in England alone.
The Government has pledged to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2030.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Tuition fee rise would be better than a stealth tax
Saddling a generation of young earners with a sharp tax by stealth is a cowardly political trick that harms universities too ALAMY B ritain's universities are an uneasy mix of contradictions. Many are operating near the brink of financial insolvency, despite the fact that, Luxembourg and America aside, UK universities bring in more money per student than anywhere. A number are among the world's most esteemed institutions; yet, there is a growing perception that the labour-market premium of even elite British undergraduate degrees has declined in recent years. In 2025 a record number of domestic 18-year-olds applied for places at college but despite this robust internal demand, higher education has become hooked on a supply of lucrative overseas students. In fact, so many universities are negligently allowing their degree courses to be used by foreign nationals as a back door into the UK asylum system that the government is now cracking down. Universities will be penalised if more than 5 per cent of their international students, many of whom take advantage of taxpayer-funded accommodation and loans, drop out of study having secured their student visa. That is an appropriate step but it will not fix the underlying financial precarity that makes universities desperate for foreign students in the first place. That is the fault of the ill-conceived student loan system, which seems no longer fit for purpose. It is an irony that when MPs voted in 2010 to increase tuition fees to £9,000, a key concern of the ensuing debate was that poorer students would be put off studying by the prospect of acquiring vast debts. In fact, the reverse happened. The number of young people pursuing higher education boomed. And the proportion of university-bound students from disadvantaged groups, for instance those eligible for free school meals, has risen robustly in parallel with their peer group. Still, although the present student loan system has thankfully not deterred poorer students from entering education, it has had other, less foreseeable, but clearly damaging effects. Chief among them is that the student loan system has become a graduate tax in all but name. While back in 2010, it was taken for granted that a large proportion of debt held by low-earning graduates would inevitably be forgiven by the state, changes to the repayment scheme effective from 2023 have fundamentally altered that model. Graduates in England now begin paying off their loans on any earnings over £25,000. The interest on these loans, calculated by reference to the unorthodox RPI measure of inflation, is eye-watering: it stood at 8 per cent in August 2024. The time-frame over which repayment takes place has also been extended, from 30 years to 40. The result is that the average student in England, who leaves university £53,000 in debt, faces a steep additional tax on most of their earnings over their working lives. Because of the steep interest rates, low earners are most likely to be shackled with repayments that never even make a dent in the debt's principal sum. These graduates will find it comparatively difficult to buy a house, become economically mobile, save into pensions and start families. Saddling a generation of young earners with a sharp tax by stealth is a cowardly political trick that harms universities too. Instead of trying to recover the true cost of education, there is a strong case that headline tuition fees should simply be allowed to rise. That they have been kept artificially low, at close to their 2010 level for over a decade, is one reason many universities now face financial ruin. As well as increasing internal competition and making the sector more dynamic, uncapping tuition fees would help to make students more immediately sensitive to the financial trade-offs involved in pursuing further education. At 18, students are young, their whole adult lives still ahead of them: all the more reason to inform them honestly of the costs and benefits of the first truly consequential financial choice they will make.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Korean equity surge risks stuttering without stronger reform push: Raychaudhuri
HONG KONG, August 4 (Reuters) - The Korean equity market, which went from being among the worst performers in Asia last year to the best regional performer in 2025, stumbled over the past week. The rally has fundamental support, but it could sputter if expected shareholder-friendly reforms don't materialize. The well-known 'Korea discount' afflicting the country's stocks has narrowed considerably this year. Korean equities typically trade at a sharp valuation discount to Asian stocks excluding Japan, with the exception of a brief period of AI-fuelled euphoria in 2023. But this discount fell from around 40% at the peak of political upheaval last year to under 30% in mid-July, thanks largely to expectations of shareholder-friendly reforms and greater clarity around the shape of the new government. However, Korean equities hit a hurdle in late July. The market corrected 4% in the last two trading days of the month after President Lee's government raised the peak corporate tax rate from 24% to 25% and the securities transaction tax from 0.15% to 0.20%. The announcement of a Korea-U.S. trade deal removed some uncertainties, but ambiguities about execution remain, and, overall, disappointment regarding the tax tweak overshadowed the trade truce relief. Korean equity performance in 2025 has been driven not just by political shifts but by several fundamental factors in a few large sectors. Financials, which constitute 13% of Korea's equity market, appreciated by 57% in the year through July 25, benefitting from investors' preference for high dividend yields and expectations of increased loan growth after a stream of rate cuts by the Bank of Korea. Meanwhile, industrials, representing 17% of Korea's market, have been lifted 54% over that period, thanks to the global defence and infrastructure spending boom. Technology, the country's largest sector at almost 30% of the market, has seen share prices rise by 45% in this time. The flagship technology stocks Samsung and SK Hynix are up 24% and 55%, respectively, as they continue to be propelled by AI optimism and the success of some specific new products, most notably Hynix's High Bandwidth Memory chip, an essential input to advanced AI servers and Nvidia's GPUs. Beyond these sector-specific catalysts, one of the most significant trends spurring investor enthusiasm for Korea this year has been the expectation of regulatory changes designed to protect minority shareholders. Korea's 'Value Up' program, initiated in February 2024 by the country's previous government led by former President Yoon Suk Yeol, began to tackle key issues plaguing Korean corporate governance, but many investors believe it did not go far enough. The unaddressed concerns include the prevalence of cross-holding structures that give founding families disproportionate control over companies and, relatedly, companies' reluctance to distribute excess cash to shareholders. Former President Yoon's declaration of martial law in December 2024 and his subsequent impeachment led to presidential elections in June 2025, and the formation of a seemingly stable government under President Lee Jae Myung. Soon after, on July 3, the National Assembly passed, opens new tab a corporate governance reform bill, which, among other things, requires company directors to act in the best interest of shareholders, limits large shareholders' voting rights when appointing audit committee members, mandates that hybrid virtual shareholder meetings must be held by publicly traded firms above a certain size, and raises the required proportion of independent directors on boards from one-quarter to one-third. Even before these measures were taken, corporate behaviour was already changing in anticipation of government pressure. Korean dividend payouts have been rising since 2022, and so have buybacks, according to FactSet. Indeed, buybacks in the first half of 2025 are higher than in all of 2024. These positive changes may have helped spur the rush of foreign capital flows into the country's equity market since April. Foreign institutions sold a net $28 billion of Korean equities from August 2024 to April 2025, and bought back a net $6 billion over the next three months. The currency has also been supportive of inflows. The Korean won has appreciated 7% against the U.S. dollar in 2025, second only to the Taiwanese dollar in the Asian leaderboard. Valuations remain attractive in Korea's market despite the sharp rally. Korean equities trade at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 12.3x, far lower than its Asian peers that have similar earnings growth profiles. Of course, Korea's PE ratio is based on an 18% earnings growth forecast in 2026, the FactSet consensus expectation, and some investors may be sceptical about this figure. But such scepticism seems unjustified, as Korea's consensus EPS forecasts have been rising since March, a period marked by significant geopolitical and economic uncertainties that are, in many cases, now being resolved. Can the Korean rally regain its momentum? While the market's response to the U.S.-Korea trade deal may not have been overly positive, the outcome – a 15% tariff for many Korean goods versus the 25% rate feared – removes a massive risk, given that 15% of Korean companies' aggregate revenue comes directly from the U.S., according to FactSet. Investors, however, would be well-advised to keep an eye on the country's reform calendar, as several governance-enhancing reforms are still not finalized, most notably a tax amendment to incentivize higher dividend payouts. Moving forward, the fate of the Korean equity rally could depend, to a large extent, on what happens in government. (The views expressed here are those of Manishi Raychaudhuri, the founder and CEO of Emmer Capital Partners Ltd. and the former Head of Asia-Pacific Equity Research at BNP Paribas Securities). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Auto Blog
5 hours ago
- Auto Blog
MIT's Light-Only AI Chip Could Supercharge Electric Vehicles
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Chevy's Toyota Tacoma contender is getting pricier, but 2025 models offer the same powertrain and more value. View post: 2026 Chevrolet Colorado Updates Are Coming—But Should You Buy the 2025 Instead? View post: Amazon Is Selling a 'Secure' $14 Car Phone Holder for 43% Off, and Shoppers Say It's 'By Far One of the Best' The only correct way to modify something as heinous as the XM is to lean into its absurdity. Imagine an EV that doesn't need a bulky cooling system for its brain. Imagine your car processing LiDAR data, high-res camera feeds, and driver monitoring in real time—without sipping a ton of juice from the battery. MIT's new light-only AI chip, which swaps electrons for photons, might just pull this off. This isn't a minor tweak in chip design. It's a potential industry earthquake. The chip runs on photons, meaning it processes data with light instead of electricity. Sounds like sci-fi, right? But the benefits are huge: 90 percent less power consumption, almost no heat generation, and computations that happen at, well, the speed of light. For EVs, which fight tooth and nail for every mile of range, this could be the difference between 300 miles and 350 miles on a single charge. Why This Matters for EVs Every modern EV has a digital nervous system that sucks energy. The AI stack — everything from lane-keeping assist to voice commands — relies on energy-hungry chips like NVIDIA's Drive platform. Even when the car's parked, these processors run diagnostics and software updates, quietly draining the battery. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. Swap those power-hogging silicon chips with something that barely sips energy? You free up power for the motor, heating, and air conditioning. Suddenly, EVs can be smarter and go further without strapping on a bigger, heavier battery pack. And it's not just about range. The photonic chip's speed could slash latency in autonomous driving. Maybe this is exactly what Tesla's Autopilot needs to work without killing people. Imagine your car spotting a cyclist darting across the road and responding faster than your reflexes. That's not marketing hype — that's rather some life-saving tech. The Autonomous Game-Changer Self-driving cars rely on billions of calculations per second. Traditional GPUs do the job, but they're power-hungry beasts that require liquid cooling and complex thermal management. A photonic AI chip can handle these calculations with barely any heat output, which means lighter systems, lower costs, and fewer points of failure. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Tesla, Waymo, and every other company chasing autonomy would kill for this kind of efficiency. Even if photonic chips start as co-processors — handling vision or sensor fusion — they'll free up traditional CPUs and GPUs to handle the rest with more breathing room. The Catch There's always a catch. These chips are still in the lab, and automotive-grade hardware certification isn't exactly speedy. Cars need chips that can survive scorching heat, freezing temperatures, and years of vibration. Expect a timeline closer to 2027 before you see a production EV using this tech. Still, the writing's on the wall. The next wave of EV innovation won't just be about battery chemistry or charging speed. It'll be about making the brains of the car just as efficient as its brawn. This MIT breakthrough is a reminder that the EV arms race is far from over. Today, it's all about range anxiety. Tomorrow, it will be about how fast your car's AI can think without stealing electrons from the wheels. About the Author Brian Iselin View Profile
