'You See Ukraine, I See Pakistan': Jaishankar On Why India's Worldview Isn't The Same As Europe's
Last Updated:
EAM Jaishankar explained that India's security priorities—centered on Pakistan, terrorism, and China—shape a different global perspective than Europe's focus on Ukraine
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, in a recent interview with German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, candidly remarked how India's security concerns—rooted in its experiences with Pakistan, terrorism, and China—shape its distinct worldview, which is sharply different from Europe's perspectives on global conflicts.
In response to questions on the ongoing conflict with Pakistan and whether he believed in international law, Jaishankar responded, 'When you think of conflict, you think of Ukraine. But when I think of conflict, I think Pakistan, terrorism, China, and our border. That is why our views cannot be the same at all."
Was There Danger Of Nuclear War Between India And Pakistan?
Addressing concerns about the risk of nuclear war between India and Pakistan, Jaishankar dismissed such fears as misplaced.
'At no point was a nuclear level reached. There is a narrative as if everything that happens in our part of the world leads directly to a nuclear problem. That disturbs me a lot because it encourages terrible activities like terrorism," the External Affairs Minister said.
Jaishankar stated that India had conducted precise and limited actions against terrorists. He explained that the firing was initiated by the Pakistani side, to which India responded, and the firing ceased upon Pakistan's request. He emphasised that not every tension in South Asia could lead to a nuclear crisis.
He expressed that attributing every regional incident to nuclear tensions undermines global counterterrorism efforts. He emphasised that such assumptions encourage dangerous activities like terrorism and noted that more significant nuclear concerns exist in other parts of the world.
Jaishankar said that India had achieved its objectives and sent a clear message to terrorists that their actions would carry consequences. He emphasised that India responded in self-defence and noted that the situation began to stabilise once Pakistan understood the serious fallout of its provocations. According to Jaishankar, the situation has remained stable for the past two weeks.
Does Germany Understand India's Situation?
Jaishankar noted Germany's support for India's zero-tolerance policy towards terrorism, indicating that international partners recognise the need to respond to terrorism and ensure terrorists face repercussions.
The Link Between Pakistan And Terrorism
The Indian foreign minister asserted that the connection between Pakistan and terrorism is evident to anyone willing to see it. He noted that terrorist organisations operate openly from cities and towns across Pakistan, and pointed to the UN Security Council's list of designated terrorists—many of whom are Pakistani nationals—as clear proof. Jaishankar stressed that terrorism in Pakistan is not a covert activity but an 'open business", actively supported by both the government and the military.
Can The US Be Given Credit For The Ceasefire?
Jaishankar asserted that the decision to stop firing was the result of direct communication between military commanders on both sides. He explained that Pakistan agreed to the ceasefire only after India successfully targeted and disabled key Pakistani airbases and air defence systems. It was decisive action by the Indian Armed Forces, he said, that compelled Pakistan to back down.
Is Europe Adapting To The New Reality?
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar noted that Europe is undergoing significant change, with a visible shift towards greater independence and flexibility. He emphasised that India welcomes deeper engagement with a Europe that is increasingly looking beyond its immediate concerns and adapting to a more multipolar world.
Assessing America's Role
Jaishankar acknowledged that the United States remains the most powerful country globally, making it essential for other nations to carefully observe how the US engages with world affairs. He added that India has consistently navigated a complex environment, making decisions based firmly on its national interests and security priorities.
Differences Between India And Germany On Ukraine
Jaishankar explained that close relations cannot be built simply by adopting the concerns of the other side. While Europe, including Germany, prioritises the situation in Ukraine, India's primary concerns lie with Pakistan, terrorism, China, and border security. As a result, their perspectives on global conflicts naturally differ.
Is The Importance Of International Law Increasing?
Jaishankar observed that Europeans often associate international law with the situation in Ukraine, whereas India's focus is on its borders with Pakistan and China. He highlighted the difference in perspectives by saying that while Europeans may think of Ukraine when discussing rules, he thinks of India's own territorial integrity and border challenges. Reflecting this, he posed a pointed question: when discussing borders and sovereignty, what about India's borders?
How Does India's Partnership With Russia Fit In?
Jaishankar described the relationship as 'stable and friendly", noting that Russia has never harmed India's interests. He attributed the current relationship between India and Russia to this longstanding experience.
Germany-India Security Partnership
Jaishankar noted that Germany has traditionally maintained certain restrictions in its security and defence relations. However, in recent years, it has recognised the need to strengthen its own security and defence capabilities. While India is keen to expand technological and defence cooperation, progress depends on the implementation of appropriate policies on both sides.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
ceasefire European Union germany India Germany Operation Sindoor S Jaishankar Ukraine
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 27, 2025, 11:45 IST
News india 'You See Ukraine, I See Pakistan': Jaishankar On Why India's Worldview Isn't The Same As Europe's
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Cancelling contracts, making big disclosures: Who loses what in Musk-Trump breakup?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk have called time on their friendship in the most shocking of ways — social media posts were fired off, threats were made, and big bombshells were dropped. In the aftermath of it, Tesla stocks tanked, and the world's richest man's personal net worth declined. Yes, this breakup could be costly for both. Here's how read more The aftermath of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's breakup raises the question: Who has the most to lose? File image/Reuters No one believed that the Donald Trump-Elon Musk friendship would be one that would last forever. But the fact that it ended in the most spectacular of ways and that too so quickly was not anticipated. On Thursday (June 5), America's two most powerful men — one is the US president and the other is the world's richest man — spent time on social media trying to destroy each other's reputations with threats and secrets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Their spectacular breakup also means the end to perhaps the most powerful of alliances in the US with many pondering who emerges as the bigger loser in this spat. Does Trump have more to lose or will Musk be the one to suffer? A bromance turns nasty It was last July when Elon Musk endorsed Trump for president and became an integral part of his campaign machinery — who can forget Musk manically jumping around at Trump rallies, funding a massive super-PAC on his behalf. Later, when Trump became US president, he returned the favour by appointing Musk to take charge at Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). When Elon Musk attached himself to Trump many began speculating when these two massive egos would, eventually, clash and that their strategic partnership would flame out spectacularly. And crash and burn the relationship did. Since late May, Musk has been vocally critical of Trump's so-called big, beautiful spending bill. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk told the TV programme CBS Sunday Morning. But Trump kept his cool and bid adieu to Musk as he called time on his service to the White House. Once out of government, though, the Tesla chief took his criticism against the bill even further. He called the bill a 'd isgusting abomination ,' threatened to politically retaliate against its supporters, and argued it would increase the debt. Social media posts by US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk are displayed on smartphones. Trump has threatened to revoke government contracts from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as a public feud escalates over Musk's criticism of the Trump administration's policies. AFP The US president then shot back on Thursday, while he had a sit down in the Oval Office with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ' I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said. 'He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He further stated, ' I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Trump then took the fight online, writing in one social media post, 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' And this led Musk to hit back. Musk argued, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election' and accused Trump of 'such ingratitude.' And that wasn't the end, the feud kept going with Musk levelling a serious allegation, '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Consequences of the big, nasty breakup But who shall suffer from this breakup? After all, it was a mutual relationship benefiting both individuals. Many analysts and Trump watchers believe Musk shall be the big loser from this breakup. In fact, as the two bickered on social media, Tesla shares slumped — dropping 14 per cent, wiping out roughly $150 billion in market value in one of the worst days in months. Analysts and pundits believed that the losses were an indication of what might be at stake for Musk. Musk's personal net worth also took a tumble on Thursday — it fell by nearly $34 billion, making him the biggest daily loser on Bloomberg's list of the world's 500 richest people. Trump could even take the fight further with cancelling government contracts with Musk's various companies, including SpaceX and Tesla. In fact, the US president even suggested this while feuding with Musk online. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California. If the Trump administration pauses government contracts, SpaceX will lose billions of dollars. Reuters According to data available, last year, Musk's companies were promised $3 billion in nearly 100 contracts with 17 government agencies. Additionally, Reuters reported that if Trump did go ahead with this move, about $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts would be at risk. In addition to hitting his businesses, this feud could also threaten Musk's stay in the US. Musk is not a natural-born American — he was born in Pretoria, South Africa and thanks to his mother, Maye Musk, obtained Canadian citizenship in 1989 when he was 17 years old. This helped him move to North America for his studies and eventually to the United States. It was only in 2002 that he became a naturalised US citizen. Moreover, Musk has already lost his fan base on the liberal side and now with the fight with Trump, he will also lose his Conservative supporters. This will be bad for Musk — personally and from a business standpoint. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On June 5, Elon Musk and Donald Trump ended their friendship in the most spectacular way. File image/Reuters But many also note that the Trump-Musk feud also has the potential to hurt the US president. How? When Trump was campaigning, Musk emerged as one of his major donors. The SpaceX chief spent more than $250 million to get Trump elected. Now imagine if he used that same financial clout against the US president. Musk could fund campaigns against Republicans, hurting Trump in the long run. Moreover, he could also align with fiscally conservative lawmakers to block Trump's signature tax bill in the Senate. Besides this, Musk could also use the time he has spent with Trump against him. After spending a lot of time closely with the US president, he could use information that the two shared to hurt Trump. He could make big revelations, which have the ability to hurt the US president. For instance, on Thursday, amid the online battle Musk claimed that the US president was part of the Epstein Files STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk could also use X against Trump — the X owner has more than 220 million followers compared to the US president's 105.6 million followers. As some note, Musk could use the platform to keep airing his grievances against Trump. In fact, on Thursday, he called for the impeachment of the US president and even asked his followers 'is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle?' It's left to be seen if Trump or Musk will win this battle, but for now, we can buckle up and wait for their next steps. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
No official version of Bharat Mata portrait, so cannot be allowed in govt events: Kerala government
The Left government in Kerala on Friday made it clear that it was not in agreement with the use of the Bharat Mata portrait at the Environment Day event at the Raj Bhavan here as the picture was not authorised as the official version by the Constitution or the Indian government. Kerala Agriculture Minister P Prasad , who boycotted the event at the Raj Bhavan a day ago over the use of the portrait, said that those in constitutional offices cannot convert government programmes into political events . A similar view was also expressed by state General Education Minister V Sivankutty who said that the Raj Bhavan and the Governor were above politics and said that Arlekar should withdraw from the stand taken by him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like El patrimonio de Palito Ortega conmociona al mundo. Boite A Scoop Undo The government's stand came a day after Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar asserted that there would be no compromise on Bharat Mata. Prasad, while talking to a TV channel, said that no Bharat Mata portrait has ever been acknowledged as the official or authorised version by the Constitution or any of the governments in power since independence. Live Events He further said that the portrait about to be used at the event was not carrying the Indian flag, but that of a political organisation, and therefore, it could not be honoured during a government event. The minister said that the particular political organisation and the Governor were free to pay homage to the portrait at private events, but it cannot be done in state government programmes. "We all have a political view, but those in constitutional positions have restrictions on how they express it," he added. He said that the government view was that such a stand ought not to have been taken by a constitutional establishment and expressed hope that it will be corrected by the concerned persons. "It actually should not be repeated in our country. We cannot accept it in Kerala," he added. The minister also questioned why the Governor was "rigid" on the issue, when none of the earlier Governors in the state and not even the Presidents of the country have carried out such a practice in the past. For the World Environment Day event, the Raj Bhavan came out with a minute-to-minute programme, but it initially did not have anything about paying floral tributes to the portrait of Bharat Mata, he said. On eve of the programme, a new schedule was sent to us and it included the paying of floral tribute to Bharat Mata portrait. "So, I enquired with the Raj Bhavan about the floral tributes and asked them to send me a picture of the portrait. The portrait was the one used by the RSS and was not recognised or authorised as an official version, I informed the Raj Bhavan that we cannot offer floral tributes to it," he said. The minister said that the Raj Bhavan in response said they cannot remove the portrait. On being told that the opposition was criticising the lack of response on the issue by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Prasad said that the Congress-led UDF was trying to gain political mileage out of it especially in view of the upcoming bypoll in Nilambur assembly constituency. After knowing Raj Bhavan's stand, the state government relocated the event to the Secretariat's Durbar Hall and the Raj Bhavan went ahead with its programme. Later, in a statement issued by the Raj Bhavan, the Governor said, "Whatever be the pressure, from whichever quarters, there will be no compromise whatsoever on Bharat Mata." In his speech at the Raj Bhavan programme, the Governor said two ministers--state Education Minister and Agriculture Minister--had agreed to attend the function but they did not turn up for the event. While Sangh outfit Bharatiya Vichara Kendram strongly backed the Governor, the ruling CPI(M) and the Congress criticised the Raj Bhavan on the matter.
The Print
29 minutes ago
- The Print
26/11 Mumbai terror attack: Delhi court extends Tahawwur Rana's judicial custody till July 9
The judge, meanwhile, sought a status report from Tihar by June 9 on the health condition of Rana, after his lawyer raised concerns about his wellbeing. Special Judge Chander Jit Singh passed the order after Rana was produced before it through video conference after expiry of his judicial custody granted earlier. New Delhi, Jun 6 (PTI) A Delhi court on Friday extended the judicial custody of 26/11 Mumbai attack accused Tahawwur Hussain Rana till July 9. Rana, a close associate of 26/11 main conspirator David Coleman Headley alias Daood Gilani, a US citizen, was brought to India after the US Supreme Court on April 4 dismissed his review plea against his extradition to India. The court sent him to judicial custody last month. On November 26, 2008, a group of 10 Pakistani terrorists went on a rampage, carrying out a coordinated attack on a railway station, two luxury hotels and a Jewish centre, after they sneaked into India's financial capital using the sea route. As many as 166 people were killed in the nearly 60-hour assault. PTI UK DV DV This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
