logo
HS2: 16 years of high hopes, bruising reality and burgeoning costs

HS2: 16 years of high hopes, bruising reality and burgeoning costs

The Guardian5 hours ago

Under detailed plans ministers set out more than a decade ago, HS2 wwas to cost £32.7bn and trains would be running by next year. Now that money has already been spent, the planned network has been cut back to one line, no track has been laid and no train has been built.
On Wednesday, the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, announced that the London to Birmingham line would be delayed from the 2033 target, but did not set a new date. She called the project an 'appalling mess' but vowed to 'sort it out'.
As Labour attempts to draw a line under a 'litany of failure' and reset construction work on the high-speed line, here are the key moments in a story of high hopes and bruising reality.
2009
The Labour government announces plans for a high-speed railway running from London to northern England and sets up HS2 Ltd.
2010
The coalition government comes to power, backing greener transport, and reviews the scope of the line, including a possible spur to Heathrow.
January 2012
The transport secretary, Justine Greening, gives the official ministerial green light. HS2 will be a Y-shaped network from London to Birmingham, continuing to Manchester and Leeds. It will cost £32.7bn. Trains are expected to be running in 2026 and the full network operating by 2033.
June 2013
With tunnels added through the Chilterns – the result of much Conservative backbench pressure – the government resets the HS2 budget at £50bn.
January 2014
A new chief executive of HS2 Ltd is appointed, On a salary of £750,000, Simon Kirby becomes the UK's highest paid public servant by some distance.
March 2014
MPs overwhelmingly vote in favour of HS2, with only 41 votes against, and the hybrid bill starts to make its way through parliament.
November 2015
Costs are revised upwards again to £55.7bn.
June 2016
The National Audit Office says HS2 could be delayed by a year.
February 2017
After three years of detailed scrutiny, the HS2 bill becomes law, enabling preparatory work to start on the first phase between London and Birmingham. The new chief executive, Mark Thurston, who had worked on the 2012 Olympics, arrives in the spring.
July 2017
HS2 Ltd admits making £1.8m of unauthorised redundancy payments to staff, which it calls a 'serious error'.
2018
Demolition of streets, homes and businesses begins around Euston station in London.
July 2019
Boris Johnson is elected Tory leader and becomes prime minister after promising a review of HS2 on the campaign trail.
September 2019
A report by the HS2 Ltd chair, Allan Cook, warns that the railway may not be finished before 2040, and could cost £88bn.
January 2020
A National Audit Office report estimates that completing the full HS2 network will cost between £72bn and £98bn at 2019 prices.
February 2020
Johnson pledges to build HS2 despite the doubts raised in the Oakervee review he commissioned. The building of the planned north-east leg, however, will be 'reviewed', effectively putting it on ice.
May 2020
MPs on the public accounts committee (PAC) say HS2 has gone 'badly off course'.
September 2020
A ceremony marks the formal start of construction work after contracts to build the first phase of the line were signed during the Covid lockdown.
January 2021
Protesters dig a network of tunnels outside Euston as HS2 prepares to fell dozens of trees around the station.
November 2021
The government confirms that the eastern leg from Birmingham to Leeds will be scrapped.
March 2023
Construction of phase 2a – Birmingham to Crewe – will be delayed by two years, the government announces, and work at Euston is put on hold. The cost the HS2 terminal is put at £4.8bn, almost twice the initial budget. The first HS2 services will now start and stop at a new Old Oak Common, six miles from central London, until at least the 2040s.
June 2023
In the six-monthly HS2 update, ministers say services between Birmingham and Old Oak Common should begin between 2029 and 2033, with trains only reaching Manchester at some point between 2035 and 2041. Thurston resigns the following month.
October 2023
The prime minister, Rishi Sunak, axes the remaining northern half of HS2 in a speech at the Conservative party conference in Manchester, to the fury of the rail industry and northern politicians. Sunak says the Euston HS2 station can only be built with private finance and blames HS2 Ltd for cost overruns.
October 2024
The new Labour government says it will fund the line into Euston. It vows to get a grip on the project costs and commissions a review into the delivery failings.
November 2024
The HS2 chair, Jon Thompson, reveals that a 'bat shed' to protect species in woodland near the line cost £100m.
December 2024
A new chief executive, Mark Wild, takes over HS2 Ltd, promising to review and reset the remaining construction work. A leaked report suggests the cost for the truncated line has risen to £80bn at current prices.
February 2025
Another scathing PAC report says HS2 has been a 'casebook example of how not to run a major project'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says
UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

The Guardian

time13 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

Britain's benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs. Kendall published her welfare reform bill on Wednesday, confirming it would lead to benefit cuts for 950,000 people by 2030. She said the country's £326bn social security net might cease to exist if costs continued to escalate. The bill includes several concessions designed to win over fractious Labour MPs as ministers look to ward off the biggest rebellion of Keir Starmer's premiership. But the efforts were met with hostility by many in the party, who said they still intended to vote against the bill next month. Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth.' The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers' support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition. The cuts are at the heart of an overall package of nearly £5bn in welfare savings which ministers argue are necessary to protect the financial sustainability of the benefits system. Kendall has tried to dispel widespread anger in the Labour party over the plans by introducing new concessions. Under the terms of the bill, people losing their disability benefits will get additional financial support for 13 weeks, while those with severe conditions such as heart disease or spinal injuries will not have to face reassessments. The work and pensions secretary has set out a separate £1bn plan to help unemployed people get back to work, but this is not related to Pips, which are unconnected to employment status. Whips are also issuing threats, and the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, refused on Wednesday to rule out the possibility of suspending any Labour rebels when the bill is put to a vote next month. The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published. Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, said: 'Having read the bill, it is clear that disabled people will lose significant support. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'The explanatory notes set out that 800,000 will not receive the daily living component of Pip by 2029/2030 and 150,000 will also lose their carers allowance. Poverty will be the legacy of this bill.' Andy McDonald, the MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said the bill was 'a huge attack on the incomes of disabled people'. 'MPs are being expected to vote these through whilst the green paper consultation continues, before the Pip assessment review is conducted, and without any evidence the separate employment support package – which is not in this bill – will work. 'This bill will be a yes or no on impoverishing disabled people. It's a no from me.' Those feelings were echoed by disability campaign groups and charities. James Taylor, the director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope said: 'This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people. Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from Pip. 'It will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.'

Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'
Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Future of Notting Hill Carnival 'in jeopardy'

The future of the Notting Hill Carnival could be in doubt without "urgent funding" from the government, its organisers said in a letter leaked to the chair Ian Comfort has written to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy to request the funding, which he said was "essential to safeguarding the future and public safety of this iconic event".It follows a review of the festival, which attracts about two million people over the August Bank Holiday weekend, that identified "critical public safety concerns" that needed additional funding to address, the letter Met Police's Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist previously raised concerns of a "mass casualty event" due to crowd density. Funding 'essential' The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has been contacted for a independent safety review was commissioned by the carnival's organisers and paid for at a cost of £100,000 by the Greater London Authority (GLA), Kensington and Chelsea Council and Westminster the leaked letter, Mr Comfort said: "The April 2025 London Assembly report highlights the increasing strain placed on the Metropolitan Police during large-scale public events. "Limited resourcing has restricted the police service's ability to respond to growing operational pressures."The carnival chair said that increased investment in stewarding and crowd management was "now essential to allow the police to focus on their primary role of crime prevention and public protection".Mr Comfort added that a failure to secure "immediate" additional funding "risks compromising public safety and jeopardising the future of the carnival".He did not put a number on the level of funding safety review's full findings and recommendations have not been made public. Mr Comfort said that while the GLA and the two councils had provided "substantial support" for stewarding during past festivals, they could no longer "meet the growing operational requirements identified in the review".The government has supported Carnival through bodies such as Arts Council it is understood that if the organisers' request is granted, it would mark the first time direct government funding has been provided. Mr Comfort added: "A co-ordinated, well-resourced safety approach is essential to protect attendees and meet the operational demands of this major national event." As part of its policing operation for the 2024 carnival, the Met had about 7,000 officers on duty, drawn from local policing teams as well as specialist units, with a total of around 14,000 officer shifts across the whole evidence to the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee in September, Mr Twist said: "While we acknowledge that crime often gets the headlines, the thing that worries me most is the crowd density and the potential for a mass casualty event."The committee's report - separate to the safety review commissioned by Carnival organisers - found that while the force was being put under increasing strain by Carnival, "this has not been matched with an increase in funding from the government".Speaking in April at the report's publication, committee chair Susan Hall said: "It is absolutely essential that the Met is on hand to carry out its duties, and not fill in for a lack of stewarding from the organisers."

Activists and MPs vow to fight decriminalisation of abortion after landmark change passed with just 45 minutes of debate
Activists and MPs vow to fight decriminalisation of abortion after landmark change passed with just 45 minutes of debate

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Activists and MPs vow to fight decriminalisation of abortion after landmark change passed with just 45 minutes of debate

MPs and campaigners have vowed to fight abortion decriminalisation in the House of Lords after a policing bill was 'hijacked' to push through landmark reforms with limited scrutiny. On Tuesday MPs voted for the biggest change to abortion law for half a century, meaning women will no longer be prosecuted for aborting their baby for any reason and at any stage up to birth. This was introduced as an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill - which is concerned with police powers and anti-social behaviour - meaning MPs had less than two hours to debate the most consequential change since the 1967 Abortion Act. Tuesday night was the first time this amendment was debated in the Commons and campaigners claim that pro-choice MPs 'hijacked' the Crime Bill to force through the change and limit scrutiny. Had it been introduced as a standalone Government Bill this would have guaranteed hours of debate and scrutiny, with MPs given the opportunity to amend the legislation to add safeguards. Tory MP Jerome Mayhew raised a point of order following the debate, telling the Commons: 'We have made a major change to the abortion law, and that was on the basis of no evidence session, no committee stage scrutiny, [and] just 46 minutes of backbench debate.' And Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said in a letter to constituents ahead of Tuesday's vote that she was 'troubled' by the amendment being introduced to the Crime and Policing Bill 'meaning there will be less time for debate'. The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords. Last night Catherine Robinson, of pro-life group Right to Life UK, said that campaigners 'will be fighting this amendment at every stage in the Lords'. 'Pro-abortion MPs hijacked a Government Bill to force through a radical and far-reaching change to our abortion laws,' she added. 'There has been no public consultation, no evidence sessions, no detailed scrutiny at Committee Stage - instead, the largest change to abortion law since the Abortion Act was introduced in 1967 had just over forty-five minutes of backbench debate, then a ministerial closing speech in which the minister refused to take any interventions.' Tory MP Andrew Rosindell described the way in which abortion decriminalisation was brought before the House as 'truly shocking'. He said: 'These are hugely consequential changes to our abortion laws that will put many vulnerable women and viable babies at grave risk. The fact that these extreme changes were subject to such a rushed debate is lamentable. 'Recent polling makes clear that the vast majority of the public oppose these inhumane changes to our abortion law, and it's hardly surprising there has been such a strong backlash.' Alithea Williams, from anti-abortion campaign group the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), said: 'Shoehorning abortion decriminalisation into the Crime and Policing Bill, which has been described as 'Christmas treeing', has denied considered and mature reflection of this change, fixing a problem that simply doesn't exist.' Immediately after the vote, Ms Williams said: 'We call on the Lords to throw this undemocratic, barbaric proposal out when it reaches them. We will never accept a law that puts women in danger and removes all rights from unborn babies.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store