logo
Matthew Farwell seeks to add death penalty expert to defense team

Matthew Farwell seeks to add death penalty expert to defense team

Boston Globe24-06-2025
Stevens is a senior capital resource counsel at the Federal Capital Trial Project, which provides assistance to defendants in death penalty cases.
Related
:
She was a part of the team that represented
Members of Dylan Roof's defense team, including Kimberly C. Stevens, far left. Lawyers for Matthew Farwell have sought to have Stevens, who has expertise in death penalty cases, on their team.
AP Photo/Chuck Burton
Advertisement
Federal prosecutors have charged Farwell, 39, with killing a witness in relation to the death of Birchmore, whose body was found in her Canton apartment on Feb. 4, 2021.
The crime is eligible for the death penalty, though the Department of Justice hasn't indicated whether it will pursue that punishment.
Related
:
Spokespeople for the DOJ and United States attorney's office in Massachusetts didn't immediately respond Tuesday to requests for comment.
Farwell has pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial in a detention center in Rhode Island. On Monday, he asked a judge to reschedule a hearing in his case set for next week. The proceeding is now scheduled for early August.
Advertisement
Stevens and Farwell's other lawyers didn't immediately respond Tuesday to requests for comment. Farwell is already
represented by federal public defenders Jane Peachy and Sandra Gant.
Related
:
On Monday, attorney Joanne M. Daley, an assistant federal public defender in Rhode Island, joined the defense team, court records show.
Farwell is accused of
strangling Birchmore, 23, and then staging the scene to look like a suicide. Birchmore was about three months pregnant when she died. The
Sandra Birchmore
Family photo
These
allegations are
bolstered by texts between the two that are part of the court record. Their sexual contact continued into her adult years, and she discussed wanting to have a child with Farwell, a married father, officials have said, citing the texts.
Also Tuesday, the state's law enforcement regulator hosted its first public proceeding concerning
Advertisement
The Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission is seeking to suspend or revoke Heal's law enforcement certification.
Birchmore frequently shared deeply personal information with Heal, telling him about her sexual encounters with Farwell and others, court records show.
At a pre-hearing conference, Heal's lawyer, Peter S. Farrell said his client 'is likely going to resolve the case,' by agreeing not to seek renewal of his certification after it expires next Tuesday.
Heal, who resigned from Abington police in 2023, no longer works in law enforcement, but he doesn't intend to agree to decertification as did Farwell and his twin brother, William, another former Stoughton police officer, Farrell said.
Heal has put through the 'ringer' and has had difficulty staying employed because of his connection to Birchmore's case, Farrell said.
'I'll say this bluntly, directly, and to the point. Enough is enough,' he said.
Officers must be certified by the commission if they want to work in law enforcement in Massachusetts.
Shaun Martinez, an enforcement lawyer for POST, said he expects both sides will submit a proposed resolution for commissioners to consider at their meeting next month.
Heal, 45, met Birchmore in 2019 while he worked for Stoughton as an animal control officer. The same year, he had a consensual sexual encounter with Birchmore, 22, that occurred after business hours at Stoughton's animal control office, court records show.
Birchmore's estate named Heal in a wrongful death lawsuit, but he was dismissed from the case last year.
Advertisement
POST's disciplinary hearing against
Laura Crimaldi can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Oversight Democrat: DOJ plan to release Epstein files in ‘batches' a ‘cover-up'
Top Oversight Democrat: DOJ plan to release Epstein files in ‘batches' a ‘cover-up'

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Top Oversight Democrat: DOJ plan to release Epstein files in ‘batches' a ‘cover-up'

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) said the plan for the Department of Justice to respond in 'batches' to the committee's subpoena for files relating to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein amounts to a 'cover-up.' 'Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up,' Garcia said in a statement on Tuesday. 'The American People will not accept anything short of the full, unredacted Epstein files.' Garcia's statement came as the clock struck noon on Tuesday, the deadline for the Department of Justice to turn over documents and communications relating to the 'Epstein files' pursuant to an Oversight panel subpoena issued earlier this month. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chair of the panel, said Monday that the DOJ was going through the material, but it would take time to ensure 'identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted.' He said the DOJ would begin to give the committee records pursuant to the subpoena on Friday. 'In a bipartisan vote, the Committee demanded complete compliance with our subpoena,' Garcia said in the statement. 'Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading, especially after Attorney General Bondi bragged about having the entirety of the Epstein files on her desk mere months ago.' Comer had issued the subpoena to the DOJ pursuant to a Democratic-led motion in a subcommittee in July to seek the 'full, unredacted Epstein files,' which passed with support from three Republicans on the panel. In that same subcommittee meeting, Republicans offered a successful motion to subpoena a swath of former federal officials in the Epstein probe, including former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and several former attorneys general and FBI directors. The first of those depositions occurred Monday when former Attorney General Bill Barr, who held the job in President Trump's first term, spoke to the panel. Comer told reporters on Monday that Barr testified that he did not know of any information that would implicate Trump. Garcia, though, said that Barr during his deposition 'could not clear President Trump of wrongdoing,' calling on Comer to release the full unedited transcript of Barr's deposition to the public. 'We will keep pressing until the American people get the truth — every document, every fact, in full,' Garcia said. 'The administration must comply with our subpoena, by law.'

Chinese national gets 8 years in prison for smuggling weapons, tech to North Korea
Chinese national gets 8 years in prison for smuggling weapons, tech to North Korea

CNBC

time19 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Chinese national gets 8 years in prison for smuggling weapons, tech to North Korea

A Chinese national was sentenced to eight years in prison for conspiring to illegally smuggle guns, ammunition, and sensitive U.S. tech to North Korea, the Department of Justice said Tuesday. Shenghua Wen, 42, pleaded guilty in June to one count each of conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government. Wen had admitted to concealing the contraband inside shipping containers that he falsely claimed were filled with consumer goods bound for China. Wen said North Korean officials wired him about $2 million to buy guns and other products, according to a criminal complaint in Los Angeles federal court. U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson sentenced Wen in that court on Monday. Attorneys from the Federal Public Defenders Office, who represented Wen, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Wen, a Chinese citizen who entered the U.S. in 2012, has been living in the country illegally since his student visa expired in December 2013, the DOJ said. He met with North Korean officials before entering the U.S., and they directed him to procure goods for them, the DOJ said. Wen successfully exported at least two shipments of guns and ammo from Long Beach, California, to North Korea, according to the complaint. He identified the contents of one of those shipping containers as a "refrigerator." When federal agents searched his Ontario, California, home in August 2024, they seized a "chemical threat identification device" and another item intended to detect eavesdropping devices, the court document said. Wen admitted at that time that he had acquired those devices to send to North Korea's military, according to the complaint. Less than a month later, the feds seized 50,000 rounds of 9mm ammunition from Wen's van, which he said was also intended to be sent to North Korea, the document said. He has been held in federal custody since his arrest in early December. His conspiracy charge carried a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

20 states and D.C. sue Trump admin. for tying crime victim grants to immigration
20 states and D.C. sue Trump admin. for tying crime victim grants to immigration

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

20 states and D.C. sue Trump admin. for tying crime victim grants to immigration

Twenty states and the District of Columbia sued the Justice Department on Monday for adding a new immigration enforcement rule to federal grants that assist victims of crime — arguing it's part of the Trump administration's crackdown against "sanctuary states." The lawsuit focuses on the Office for Victims of Crime, a 42-year-old division of the Justice Department that hands out more than $1 billion per year to all 50 states to compensate crime victims and fund programs like local crisis counseling centers, emergency shelters, domestic abuse hotlines and victim advocacy services. The Trump-era Justice Department added a new condition to those grants that denies funding to any program that "violates (or promotes or facilitates the violation of) federal immigration law." That includes failing to "give access to [Department of Homeland Security] agents, or honor DHS requests." But the states that joined Monday's lawsuit argue that the rule is illegal, since the Reagan-era law that set up the federal government's crime victim grant programs doesn't say anything about immigration enforcement. "The challenged conditions would force these States into an untenable position: either forfeit access to critical resources for vulnerable crime victims and their families, or accept unlawful conditions, allowing the federal government to conscript state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law," the states and D.C. argue in the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Rhode Island. Mostly Democratic states joined the suit, including California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota and Colorado. Collectively, they've received more than $500 million a year in crime victim grants since 2021, according to the lawsuit. The states asked a federal judge to block the new rules and declare them illegal. They said they need "urgent relief" since applications for most of the grants are due Wednesday. The Justice Department declined to comment on the lawsuit. As President Trump seeks to dramatically ramp up arrests of suspected undocumented immigrants, his administration has taken aim at so-called sanctuary cities and states, which generally limit local police from cooperating with federal immigration agents. Within hours of his swearing-in on Jan. 20, the president signed an executive order directing officials to ensure that sanctuary jurisdictions "do not receive access to Federal funds." Weeks later, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered the Justice Department to identify and pause grants to groups that "support or provide services to removable or illegal aliens." The administration argues that sanctuary cities and states make it harder to enforce immigration laws, especially against criminals who end up in state or local custody. Supporters of sanctuary laws, however, argue that forcing local law enforcement officers to work with immigration agents makes migrants less likely to cooperate with the police. Monday's lawsuit said the conditions on crime victim grants risk "destroying trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities that is critical to preventing and responding to crime." "The federal government is attempting to use crime victim funds as a bargaining chip to force states into doing its bidding on immigration enforcement," New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. Earlier this year, the Justice Department cut off hundreds of federal grant programs, including money for nonprofits that help victims of hate crimes, sex trafficking and violence against children, according to a list obtained by CBS News. The heads of some nonprofits warned they would need to lay off staff or shutter crime victim hotlines. At the time, a Justice Department spokesperson told CBS News: "We are confident that these cuts are consistent with the administration's priorities while at the same time protecting services that tangibly impact victims." A group of anti-domestic-violence nonprofits also sued the Justice Department earlier this year for banning grant funding under the Violence Against Women Act to groups that promote "gender ideology" or diversity, equity and inclusion programs. A judge paused that rule. Justice Department set to begin sharing Epstein files with Congress How Texas House Democrats are shifting focus on redistricting battle against Republicans D.C. mayor questions Trump's crime crackdown as more troops head to capital

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store