Guernsey States urged to act on concerns over housing plans
Karl Guille, from St Sampson's Parish Douzaine, said they had "been on the back foot" since the IDA was introduced in 2011, putting "the majority of new housing in our parish"."We are concerned that our infrastructure simply can't cope with the level of development that is being proposed," he said.He said it was "somewhat ironic" that the Development and Planning Authority chose to recognise road safety, traffic management and other concerns raised around the planned development of 89 new homes in Vazon "when it continues to promote over 1,000 new houses in the north of the island".Guille said several road junctions were already operating over capacity and traffic volumes there were more than twice the levels seen in the west and south of the island.In a statement issued in response to the plans, the Douzaine said it was disappointed there had not been a review to the spatial strategy to allow the "burden of development to be shared more widely".The 1,000 new homes represented 64% of the island's allocation, they added.
'Concerns largely ignored'
The parish's junior constable Joe Abbotts said it was a shame concerns continually highlighted by the parish and traffic consultants in 2010 and in 2012 "have largely been ignored". "Central to those concerns is the cumulative impact such developments will have on existing roads infrastructure resulting in numerous junctions operating above capacity with significant queuing," he added.Concerns have also been expressed about the increased flood risk if large numbers of housing were to be built on low lying land such as in the Braye du Valle and about the impact on existing public utility infrastructure. St Sampson's Douzaine said while it appreciated that demand for housing, and especially affordable housing, was becoming increasingly urgent, the new housing would cause a "significant increase" in demand on "already constrained roads and public utility infrastructure".Parishioners of St Sampson were also "rightly concerned about the potential depreciation in the value of their homes and the deterioration in the quality of life that could arise living in such highly developed areas", the spokesperson added.The spatial strategy prioritises housing development in and around the edges of the urban centres of St Peter Port and St Sampson and Vale.
'Extremely disappointed'
A spokesperson for St Sampson's Douzaine said they were "extremely disappointed the States had not taken the opportunity to review the strategy to allow the burden of development to be shared more widely".They said some of the latest proposed amendments to the draft plan were sensible in seeking to concentrate future developments on brownfield or redundant glasshouse sites and creating some limited additional housing sites in the west and south of the island.But these amendments "do not go anywhere near far enough in the opinion of St Sampson's Douzaine to allay existing concerns over the anticipated impact that such high levels of continued development will have on the north of the Island", they added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Dear Britain, it's now clear: 20mph zones save lives and don't slow traffic. Implement them
Every 17 minutes. That's how often someone is killed or seriously injured in a collision on the UK's roads. Each and every one of these accidents brings an unbearable loss: for family and friends left mourning the loved ones who have been cruelly stolen from them, and survivors whose injuries can change their lives for ever. When we talk about how we make our roads safer, it's easy to get distracted by bluff and bluster. But, every time we do, we lose sight of the most important fact: traffic accidents took over 1,600 lives last year, and we have the power to reduce and prevent them. Take speed limits. Rigorous new research published by Transport for London shows the number of people killed or seriously injured on London borough roads reduced by 34% following the implementation of 20mph speed limits, with the number of children killed falling by 75% (from four to one). That means fewer grieving families and fewer people's lives made a misery. At the same time, the predicted downsides for drivers simply haven't materialised. Despite what their detractors might claim, 20mph speed limits haven't actually made journeys slower because journey times are largely dictated by junction delays, not vehicle speed. Roads where 20mph speed limits apply aren't just safer; they are quieter, too, encouraging more people to walk or cycle. Those who do drive have fewer collisions and pay less for their insurance as a result. It's no surprise that residents overwhelmingly back slower speed limits in their own communities; more than three out of four of them think that 20mph is the right speed for the area they live in. Our experience isn't isolated. The first year of a 20mph speed limit scheme in Wales led to 100 fewer people being killed or seriously injured. As mayor of the capital, my approach to road safety has never been about ideology, belief, or bias; it's about following the evidence and doing what is best. If we want to save lives, the evidence shows that there's no time to waste. That's why we're rolling out 20mph speed limits on appropriate roads. Because of our policies, today half of London's streets have 20mph speed limits. We've created more than 800 'school streets' across our city, cutting toxic air pollution and giving thousands of children a safer, healthier way to get to school. At the same time, we've increased the number of protected cycle routes fivefold, giving more Londoners the confidence to swap four wheels for two. Step by step, street by street, we have made the capital a better place to walk, cycle and drive. Faced with tough problems, we had the courage to come up with our own answers when the world offered none. When I launched the ultra-low emission zone (Ulez), it was the first of its kind anywhere. Others have followed with similar schemes, but London's is the largest in the world. In 2024, the year after we expanded it, levels of roadside nitrogen dioxide – the toxic gas that exacerbates asthma and raises the risk of lung cancer – declined by 27%. Since 2019, the year the scheme was first introduced, air quality has improved at 99% of monitoring sites across the capital. In a city where air pollution is linked to up to 4,000 early deaths every year, the Ulez is saving lives. It's not just Ulez. We knew that lorries were five times more likely to be involved in a collision causing a fatality relative to their share of traffic. So, in 2021, we became the first place in the world to enforce a direct vision standard for lorries, forcing tens of thousands of dangerous vehicles to implement safety measures and improve how much drivers can see from their cab. Today, that standard is working; in 2023, the number of vulnerable road users killed by an HGV had declined by 62% from the 2017-19 baseline. The EU has since introduced a similar scheme, which it expects to save thousands of lives across the continent. When it comes to improving road safety, the record in our capital is second to none. But the truth is that, despite impressive progress, there are still too many places where higher speed limits are putting pedestrians at risk. We can and must do more, because not a single one of the tragedies that take place on the capital's roads is inevitable. This fundamental principle – that one casualty on our roads is one too many – underpins my Vision Zero for London. By implementing it, we aim to eliminate all deaths and serious injuries on our transport network by 2041. But we will not succeed unless borough councils do their bit. Most of the capital's boroughs have leapt at the chance to make our roads safer; 21 of them now have a default 20mph speed limit. Unfortunately, though, there are a few councils who have so far refused to play their part. In these blocker boroughs, leaders are fighting against lower speed limits on their streets. To those councils, my message is clear: it's time to step up. Because there is nothing to be gained by playing politics with speed limits – only people to be injured and lives to be lost. Every day, I meet people who tell me they want to make even more progress to clean up our air and cut speeds on the capital's streets. Some of them are campaigners who have dedicated their lives to making the way we travel safer and more sustainable. But the vast majority are ordinary citizens: children walking home from school; parents cycling to work; carers driving to see their relatives. What they want is simple: the freedom to go about their lives in the knowledge that they are safe from harm. For their sake, the fight for safer roads must continue. Sadiq Khan is the mayor of London
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
States of Guernsey Housing committee seeking two members
The States of Guernsey said it was searching for two people to join the committee for Housing as non-voting members. The roles would provide the committee with expertise on housing related matters as well as scrutiny when implementing policies. Housing President, Deputy Williams said the committee wanted a "diverse range of views" and welcomed applications of all ages and backgrounds. The deadline to apply is 25 August and requires attending half-day meetings every fortnight. The term of office would commence in October and continue until May 2029 ahead of the next general election, the States said. Committees of the States can elect non-voting members to sit alongside States role of a non-voting member includes offering expertise, challenging ideas and offering independent advice and broader perspectives on issues. 'Real value' Deputy Williams said: "We believe non-voting members can add real value to the work of the committee."We would be delighted to find up to two people with suitable experience to support the committee's work".A spokesperson for the committee said the role would include general housing policy, affordable housing policy and government policy and initiatives related to the private market.
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
People disposing of waste incorrectly in St Peter Port
Constables in St Peter Port have said people disposing of their household waste incorrectly in the town was "prolific".Constable Diane Mitchell said the Douzaine office received between five and 10 complaints about rubbish left in the streets every said she had received complaints from traders in the area who said residents were putting their food waste and rubbish bags into public Douzaine of St Peter Port employs staff to empty public bins in the parish every day and Guernsey Waste is responsible for collecting household waste once a week. Households in the island use "pay-as-you-throw" stickers on black bags of non-recyclable waste to cover disposal costs. A £2.50 sticker is needed for a 90l bag, and a £1.40 sticker for a 50l said she thought one of the reasons the bins were full was because people may be trying to avoid the charges."It is prolific. We get five to ten phone calls a week with regards to inappropriate disposal of waste," she said. "Whether it's to do with people trying to avoid the charges or seagulls attacking the bags, we don't know."Mitchell said she did not think the parish should change its waste disposal system, but she wanted to encourage more personal responsibility among residents."When you go somewhere that's messy, you don't get a good feeling," she said."We want to foster a sense of pride here so people want to come into town." Photographer Ben Fiore owns a shop in the Arcade and said he picked up rubbish from the street caused by seagulls which would peck open household black bags left beside public bins."I don't think it gives Guernsey the best look," he said."We have cruise ships sometimes arriving in the morning before the shops have opened and the streets are covered in litter."He said he "has no choice" but to lift it himself."It's communal spirit, I'll do it for Guernsey to look good."Mill Street traders asked the Douzaine to place a sign in their street to remind residents not to leave their food waste in public bins. Mitchell said constables were "considering possible solutions" to the suggested larger bins could be installed in town where residents could put 50p in a slot to put their rubbish is a criminal offence in Guernsey which could lead to prosecution and substantial fines.
