Bulgaria receives first US F-16
Bulgaria on Sunday welcomed its first US-made F-16 fighter jet ordered as part of the eastern-flank Nato member's landmark efforts to modernise its air force. To replace its Soviet-era MiG-29 jets, Bulgaria has ordered 16 American F-16s for a cost of around 2.4 billion euros ($2.7 billion), in the largest contract to overhaul its armed forces since the fall of communism in 1989. At a ceremony marking the jet's delivery at the Graf Ignatievo military base in central Bulgaria, Prime Minister Rossen Jeliazkov said those in attendance were celebrating "the inexorable and irreversible modernisation of the Bulgarian army.
US defence official David Baker hailed the jet's delivery as a "significant milestone".
"Your investments today will improve Bulgaria's security for decades to come and enable you to further contribute to making Nato the greatest military alliance in history," Baker added.
After the first delivery on Sunday, seven more F-16s are due to be delivered by the end of 2025, with the remaining eight to arrive by 2027.
Bulgaria, which last year celebrated the 20th anniversary of its entry into Nato, has for a long time delayed the modernisation of its air force for political and financial reasons.
But as with other eastern members of the US-led defence alliance Russia's attack of Ukraine has forced a rethink of its defence posture.
The poorest member of the European Union now spends more than the Nato-baseline two per cent of national output on defence -- though still well below the five per cent now demanded by US President Donald Trump.
As a result of its ageing fleet, the country's fighter pilots lack training, according to a 2024 government report, which also pointed to a dearth of qualified personnel.
In June 2021, a Bulgarian pilot died after his MiG-29 crashed during a military drill in the Black Sea.
In September 2024, two more soldiers were killed during a training flight for an air show.
rb/sbk/gv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
7 hours ago
- Observer
The EU can play it cool with Trump's trade threats
Other governments have so far taken three main approaches to dealing with Donald Trump's trade threats. China hit back hard at the US president's tariffs and got him to back down partly. Canada also retaliated and avoided some of the pain Trump inflicted on other countries. Meanwhile, Britain cut a quick deal that favoured the United States. None of these is a model for the European Union. The 27-member group is not China. Though its bilateral goods trade with the United States last year was worth 70% more than between the US and the People's Republic, the EU is not an autocracy that can outpunch Trump. If it antagonises the US president, he might up the stakes by pulling the rug from under Ukraine and undermining the EU's defences. American hard power gives it what geopolitical strategists call 'escalation dominance'. The EU is not Canada either. Ottawa was able to hang tough because its people were infuriated that Trump was trying to blackmail Canada into becoming part of the United States. While anti-Trump sentiment is high in the EU, politicians who are sympathetic to him, such as Poland's new president, can still get elected. On the other hand, the EU is not the United Kingdom. Both are at risk from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But the EU trades seven times more goods with the United States than Britain does - so Washington has more to lose if economic relations break down. There is another way for the EU to handle Trump's threats: play it cool. That is more or less what the bloc is doing. It involves neither escalating the conflict nor accepting a bad deal. It means being open to a good agreement if the US lowers its demands, but willing to play the long game if it does not. One reason to buy time is to help Kyiv. The longer the EU has to prepare its own support package for Ukraine, which should include getting it a lot of cash, the less the damage if Trump ultimately cuts off all US aid to the country. The president's own vulnerabilities may also increase over time. Just look at the spectacular end of his alliance with Tesla boss Elon Musk. The fragile US trade truce with China may break down causing more financial turmoil, making Trump less keen to pick a fight with the EU. If the Supreme Court stops him using emergency powers to impose tariffs, his negotiating position will be weaker. And tariffs could hurt the US more than its supposed victims, by pushing up inflation and crimping growth. A QUICK DEAL? Trump has zig-zagged in his trade threats and actions against the EU. The current state of play is that there are 50% tariffs on US imports of steel and aluminium from the bloc, a 25% tariff on cars and 10% so-called reciprocal tariffs on most other goods. And so they're trying to be the first and the best to get there, which is why everybody's throwing so much money at it without any clear sense of, you know, The US president has threatened to jack up these reciprocal tariffs to 50% if there is no deal by July 9. He is also looking at more 'sectoral tariffs', including on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. While the EU has complained to the World Trade Organization (WTO), it has delayed its own retaliation. Its negotiators accept that they are unlikely to overturn the reciprocal tariffs, the Financial Times has reported. The bloc still aims to avoid the sectoral ones. Those on cars and any on pharmaceuticals would hurt it the most. It has dangled the possibility of buying more US equipment and natural gas to get a deal. An agreement on those lines could be good for the EU. It needs to beef up its defences and eliminate its purchases of Russian gas. While it would be best to have its own arms and energy supplies, buying more from the US makes sense as an interim measure. An important nuance, though, is that the EU should reserve the right to take action against the reciprocal tariffs after the WTO issues its verdict, says Ignacio Garcia Bercero, a former senior EU trade official. Such a pact would involve quite a climbdown by Trump. True, arms and gas purchases would narrow the US goods deficit with the EU, which was $236 billion last year. But his administration has a host of other complaints including the bloc's value-added tax and food safety standards as well the digital taxes that some of its members impose on tech giants. It is hard to see the bloc agreeing anything in those areas, says Simon Evenett, professor of geopolitics and strategy at IMD. BACK TO WAR? Although the US side described last week's trade talks with the EU as 'very constructive', discussions could easily break down. The question then is how the bloc would react if Trump imposed higher reciprocal tariffs. The EU has so far imposed no countermeasures. Though it has agreed to tax 21 billion euros of US imports in response to the steel and aluminium tariffs, it has delayed these until July 14 to try to get a deal. The European Commission, its executive arm, is also consulting on taxing a further 95 billion euros of US imports in response to the car tariffs and the reciprocal ones. But added together, these tit-for-tat measures would be equivalent to only a third of the 379 billion euros of EU imports subject to Trump's tariffs. Some analysts think the bloc needs to be tougher. One idea is to crack down on American services, where the US had a 109 billion euro surplus with the EU in 2023. Another is to activate its 'anti-coercion instrument ', which would allow retaliation against US companies operating in the bloc. Yet another is to threaten to ban exports of critical goods, such as the lithographic equipment necessary to make semiconductors. Extreme events may require extreme responses. But for now, the EU should keep its cool. It should not kid itself that it is stronger or more united than it is. It should remember that Trump may get weaker with time. And it should never forget Ukraine. — Reuters Hugo Dixon The writer is Commentator-at-Large for Reuters. He was the founding chair and editor-in-chief of Breakingviews.
Observer
10 hours ago
- Observer
$5 billion boost for Shariah housing in Oman and GCC
MUSCAT: A major regional investment firm aims to accelerate the development of affordable, Shariah-compliant housing in Oman and the wider GCC, following a new strategic partnership between international finance institutions. BCIB Holding Co, Ltd, a Thailand-based financial service and investment banking firm, has acquired a 20 per cent stake in Amwalus Finance LLC, a US-incorporated financial institution with strategic operations in Oman, aligning both companies to jointly scale ethical housing finance solutions across the region. The investment is supported by a $5 billion Medium Term Note (MTN) issued by Bastion Commonwealth Investment Bank, the banking arm of BCIB Holding. According to BCIB Holding Co, the proceeds from the MTN will be used to finance housing projects that adhere to Islamic finance principles, addressing the growing demand for inclusive and affordable residential solutions in Oman and neighbouring Gulf countries. The agreement was formalised in a signing ceremony between Low Chun Keong, Managing Director of BCIB Holding, and Wassem Mesto, Managing Director of Amwalus Finance LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of US-based Amwalus Trust. The ceremony was also attended by Dr Chutamas Vongvorakit, Co-founder and Chief Financial Officer of BCIB Holding. 'This strategic investment, backed by institutional financing through Bastion Commonwealth Investment Bank, underscores our commitment to fostering inclusive and sustainable development in Oman and across the region,' said Low. Amwalus Finance focuses on Shariah-compliant financing for affordable housing. With the new capital injection and support from its strategic partner, the company plans to expand its housing solutions across the GCC, targeting underserved communities. Wassem Mesto welcomed the partnership as a milestone for the company's mission. 'We are proud to welcome BCIB Holding as a key strategic partner in our mission to provide dignified, affordable housing guided by Islamic finance principles,' he said. 'With this collaboration, and the support of Bastion Commonwealth Investment Bank, we are well-positioned to scale our impact across the GCC and meet the growing demand for ethical, inclusive housing solutions.' The alliance reflects BCIB Holding's broader goal to promote long-term socioeconomic development through innovative Islamic financial instruments, with a particular focus on infrastructure and housing. Oman, which is advancing national priorities under Vision 2040, is expected to be a central focus of these investments.
Observer
10 hours ago
- Observer
Canada to hit defence Nato spending target
TORONTO: Canada will hit Nato defence spending threshold of two per cent this year, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday, warning that in a "darker" world, Canada must reduce its security dependence on the United States. "I am announcing today that Canada will achieve Nato's 2 per cent target this year — half a decade ahead of schedule," Carney said during a speech at the University of Toronto. "The threats that Canada faces are multiplying," he added. Carney's pledge followed similar announcements by members of the alliance and comes after consistent pressure by US President Donald Trump for Nato members to spend more on defence. "In a darker, more competitive world, Canadian leadership will be defined not just by the strength of our values, but also by the value of our strength," Carney said. "The United States is beginning to monetise its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its (relative) contributions to our collective security," Carney said, condemning Trump's trade war. "We should no longer send three quarters of our defence capital spending to America," the prime minister said. — AFP
