
Irish whiskey facing 15% tariff until different deal agreed
A framework trade deal between Brussels and Washington on Sunday agreed a 15% tariff for most EU imports into the United States, although some sectors were expected to be exempted.
The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms.
"The Commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits," Commission spokesperson for trade Olof Gill told a news conference.
"It is not our expectation that wine and spirits will be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow. And therefore that sector will be captured by the 15% ceiling," he said.
Wine-makers said the tariff, even if temporary, would hurt the sector, especially when combined with the stronger euro.
"The 15% duty on EU wines, even if applied for some months until the negotiations are closed, would cause significant economic losses not only for EU wine producers but also for US businesses involved throughout the supply chain," said Ignacio Sanchez Recarte, secretary general of European wine producers group CEEV.
"When combined with the currency shift in the USD/EUR exchange rate, the overall financial burden on the sector could reach 30%. Investments will be halted and export volumes will decline while waiting for the final agreement," he said.
The US is to publish an executive order on Friday, implementing the framework trade deal that was agreed on Sunday between US president Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Separately, the EU and the US are set to publish a joint statement in the coming days spelling out the details of the framework deal.
A senior diplomat close to the negotiations told Reuters that talks on wine and spirits tariffs would continue after the EU and US finalise their joint statement.
"(This will take place) probably in the autumn," the diplomat said.
Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan.
That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021.
US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases.
The EU has already envisaged a quota system for steel exports with US most-favoured-nation rates, which are very low or at zero.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Agriland
2 hours ago
- Agriland
Looking Ahead to the Tullamore Show Fbd National Livestock Show
As the Tullamore Show approaches, the team at FBD Insurance is looking forward to this highlight in the agri-shows calendar. Proud main sponsor of the FBD National Livestock Show since 2018, FBD Insurance's involvement underscores its dedication to promoting excellence in farming and livestock breeding. This prestigious show attracts top breeders and farmers from across the country, showcasing the very best of Irish livestock. Attendees of this year's Tullamore Show are encouraged to visit the FBD Insurance at stand L99, where the FBD team will be on-site to offer expert advice on a range of insurance products tailored specifically for farmers and those in rural communities. Packed full of exciting activities for all ages, the FBD stand is one you will not want to miss. Watch the video below to see some of the action from last year's stand. At the 2025 Tullamore Show, visitors to the FBD stand will have the opportunity to enter a competition for a ride-on lawnmower, while younger guests will love creating a masterpiece on the kids' colouring wall. Anyone passing by can also take a break from their busy day to enjoy the complementary tea and coffee station at stand L99. FBD Insurance is proud to support the FBD Speakers' Corner in the Sustainable Livestock Village. The expanded 'FBD Speakers' Corner' is running from 11:00a.m to 2:00p.m with short, farmer-led talks on sustainability, succession planning and protecting natural resources. A wide range of hands-on supports will be on display in the Sustainable Livestock Village to help farmers reduce emissions, enhance biodiversity, and boost farm profitability. The livestock display features beef and new sheep exhibits, highlighting genetics, animal health and the benefits of earlier finishing. In a first for the event, this year's village is being powered by zero-emission green hydrogen, delivered in partnership with Offaly County Council and the ESB to reinforce the village's commitment to practical, low-carbon innovation. The Macra FBD National Farm Skills Finals take place at the Tullamore Show annually. Finalists who have qualified at regional rounds come to Tullamore, where they are put through their pacesonce again. The teams compete against other clubs as they carry out a variety of farm tasks, including fencing and safe tractor driving. Visit the Macra stand throughout the day to see the finalists in action. Farm safety is a key concern for FBD Insurance, and they are partnering with FRS, the HSA and the Tullamore Show committee again this year in bringing the Farm Safety Live demo arena back to the show. Farming is a demanding and sometimes hazardous profession, and FBD Insurance is committed to helping farmers stay safe. The demo arena will feature live demonstrations and practical advice on farm safety, aiming to educate and inform attendees on how to reduce risks and protect themselves and their families. The FBD National Livestock Show features all-Ireland cattle (pedigree and commercial), sheep (pedigree and commercial) and horse competitions. Visit the Livestock Village throughout the day to see the competitions in action. The day culminates in the Parade of Champions where winners from across the day are awarded with their prizes. See how the National Livestock Show went in at the 2024 Tullamore Show. At the launch of the Tullamore Show, Pat Gilligan, FBD Head of Sales in the Midlands & West region, commented that FBD was proud to be the title sponsor of the show. He added: 'The Tullamore Show is a true highlight in our calendar, celebrating the very best of Ireland's world-class livestock. "We are delighted to continue our close collaboration with the Tullamore Show committee in the lead-up to this year's event. "On behalf of everyone at FBD Insurance, I'd like to extend our best wishes to the organisers, competitors, exhibitors, and attendees. "Our team is looking forward to show day - we will see you in Tullamore!' FBD Insurance Group Ltd trading as FBD Insurance is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. FBD Insurance Group Ltd, trading as FBD Insurance, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.


RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Can Trump's threatened tariffs make Russia end its war?
First it was 50 days. But that deadline hardly made the Kremlin blink. Then, earlier this week, US President Donald Trump gave Russia a new 10-day deadline to end its three-and-half-year war in Ukraine. It was a simple ultimatum from the US: sign up to a ceasefire agreement by next Friday or face 100% tariffs. A couple of weeks ago, the White House indicated that tariffs on Russia and its trading partners could be as high as 100%. Russian exports of oil and gas account for about 60% of the country's overall exports, according to various estimates. Given that the profits of Russian oil companies are taxed heavily by the Russian state, implementing such high tariffs would deny Russia much-needed revenue for its war in Ukraine. According to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Helsinki-based thinktank, Russia has made more than €920bn on exports of fossil fuels since the start of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Oil exports accounted for more than €630bn during that time. The Kremlin ignored Mr Trump's first 50-day ultimatum and has done the same with the new one, simply saying that the US president's comments were "noted". True to form, Russian President Vladimir Putin has not responded directly to Mr Trump's latest ultimatum to end the war. Russia's missile strikes on Ukrainian cities during this week have also indicated that Mr Trump's new deadline has not influenced Russia's war tactics. On Thursday, Russian strikes killed 31 people in Kyiv, including five children, and on Tuesday, Russian airstrikes on a prison and hospital in the Zaporizhzhia region killed 19 people. Russian forces are continuing their slow advance along the front, claiming to have captured Chasiv Yar on Thursday. Chasiv Yar is a strategically important but destroyed town in eastern Ukraine that has been fought over for 16 months. Ukraine denied that the town had been lost. If there are any moves inside the Kremlin towards agreeing a ceasefire deal by next Friday, then its leadership is hiding it very well indeed. During the week, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Russia had "developed an immunity" to Western sanctions after years of being sanctioned, while other senior officials aired similar views. Many analysts agree that Russia's economy has largely weathered more than three years of Western penalties - actions that included sanctions on Russian banks, freezing their assets and excluding them from using the global system for international payments. The West also set a price cap in late 2022 of $60 per barrel on Russian maritime exports of oil. However, Russia has continued to export its oil to buyers from non-sanctioning countries through its so-called 'shadow fleet'. These are mostly aging tankers with opaque maritime histories, registered in third-party countries to circumvent sanctions. The EU's latest batch of sanctions last month - the 18th so far - aims to make it harder for Russia to transport its oil around the world by lowering the price cap to $47 per barrel and blacklisting more than 100 of the shadow fleet's vessels from docking at ports across the EU. So Mr Trump's threat to impose 100% tariffs on Russia and its trading partners is a novel move to reduce the Kremlin's ability to collect oil revenues and thereby dent its war chest. "If the US comes with secondary sanctions on Russian oil, I can't see a bolder play," Ben McWilliams, an energy expert at the Bruegel thinktank in Brussels, told RTÉ News. "It's playing all their cards and that's trying to exert maximum pressure on Russia through energy," Mr McWilliams added. China buys almost half of all Russian crude oil exports, followed closely by India. Turkey and the EU both account for about 6% each of total Russian oil exports - most Russian crude oil flowing into the EU is bought by Hungary and Slovakia via pipeline. Russia also sells smaller volumes of oil to other markets including Myanmar, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Pakistan and Venezuela. The loss of revenue from those smaller markets is surmountable for Russia. However, a reduction in Chinese or Indian imports of the commodity would deny the Kremlin vital revenue for its war. Last year, China's level of Russian crude oil imports reached a record high of 108 million tonnes, according to data from China's national customs authority. Those imports account for about 20% of all Chinese oil consumption and are estimated to be worth about $62bn in 2024, based on analysis by the Centre of Eastern Studies in Warsaw and MERICS, a Berlin-based thinktank that focuses on China. In April, after the Trump administration imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese imports, Beijing hit back with high 110% tariffs of its own on US goods. A truce has been in place between Washington and Beijing since May, with the US reducing its tariffs to 30% and China to 10%. Statements from senior Chinese officials earlier this week suggest Beijing is unlikely to yield to pressure from Washington to stop buying Russian oil. "China will take energy supply measures that are right for China based on our national interests," Guo Jiakun, spokesperson for China's foreign affairs ministry, told reporters. Tariff wars have no winners. Coercion and pressuring cannot solve problems," he added. India might be more likely to reconsider reducing the amount of Russian oil it buys, if faced with 100% tariffs. On Friday, the US hit India with 25% tariffs on its imported goods - just one of many countries whose goods are to be levied by the US as part of Mr Trump's plan to, as he sees it, address US trade imbalances with other countries. The $60 price cap in late 2022 drove down the price of Russian oil exports, leading India to buy up much larger quantities of the stuff than it did before the war - it now buys more than two million barrels of oil a day from Russia, equivalent to about 2% of the world's total supply. Russian crude oil now accounts for about 35% of India's oil imports. Those purchases were valued at an estimated $50bn last year, according to India's government data, sourced by Reuters. New Delhi's reaction to the 25% levies has been to engage in trade talks. Mr Trump has also threatened to impose additional economic penalties on India for trading with Russia. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that India's purchase of Russian oil was "a point of irritation" so it looks like the US sees India's heavy reliance on Russian oil as a deal breaker in their overall trade talks. A number of Indian state oil refineries stopped buying Russian oil in the past week, buying more oil from Gulf States instead, an indication that American pressure is working. Reduced oil exports to India would force Russia to find substitute markets to make up for the shortfall. "Russia could still manage to get many barrels to market. You could still imagine small markets, each taking 50,000 barrels or something," Mr McWilliams said. "The question would be, at what price," he added, pointing to the cheaper price that buyers from India and China paid for Russian oil after European demand all but disappeared in 2022. If India and another big economy such as Turkey stop buying Russian oil, then buyers in other markets might have more leverage to offer lower prices for Russian crude, he argued. Turkey is the world's largest importer of Russian oil products such as diesel, heating oil and jet fuel. However, Turkey has also played a key role recently in US efforts to broker a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine. Turkish diplomats have mediated three brief face-to-face meetings between Russian and Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul since May. Unleashing 100% tariffs on Turkey for buying Russian oil would jeopardise Turkey's eagerness to work alongside the US as a mediator. Turkey, a NATO member, is also one of the few countries that Russia views as an acceptable mediator. Mr Trump's threat of 100% tariffs is unlikely to sway Russia to stop its war immediately, nor in the weeks ahead. The Kremlin has been quite clear that it plans to weather new sanctions. Imposing high tariffs on China for trading with Russia could also set off a new, all-out trade war between Beijing and Washington. But tariffs could force India and a number of other smaller economies that buy Russian oil imports to buy elsewhere and that lost revenue would dent the Russian state's war economy in the months ahead. The big unknown factors are whether Mr Trump will follow through on his tariff threats and whether Mr Putin might yet come up with a diplomatic ploy to delay them.


RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
New AI rules come into force in EU
New rules came into force yesterday requiring makers of artificial intelligence (AI) models to ensure their systems are safe and transparent. The latest phase of the EU's AI Act also means the Government must put structures in place to police the companies providing AI tools. Europe's regulation of AI comes as the US vows to cut red tape for the sector. At the offices of digital agency All human in Dublin, developers are working on a new project for a client - an AI-driven energy price comparison tool. Advances in technology mean the AI chatbot being used in the project has an Irish accent and sounds human. The new AI rules mean it must be made clear to consumers if a realistic voice they are engaging with is in fact an AI chatbot. "With the sophistication of AI, things like artificial voices can be so nuanced that they can convince you it's human," said John Mitchell, CEO of All human. "As a consequence of the AI Act, organisations, brands and providers of services, particularly in a digital context, have to declare what is real and what is not," Mr Mitchell said. The EU AI Act came into force last year and is being implemented on a phased basis with its latest provisions taking effect yesterday. The Act bans artificial intelligence systems considered a clear threat to the safety, livelihoods and rights of people. 'Businesses need to start making their preparations now' There are also rules for AI systems in terms of transparency and safety. Maureen Daly is a Partner specialising in Intellectual Property and AI at law firm Pinsent Masons Ireland. "Businesses need to start making their preparations now," Ms Daly said. "Obviously it relates to the big players like Google and Meta, but also to start-ups and SMEs that have AI systems, they are going to have to comply as well." And there are big fines for companies found to be in breach of the AI rules. "The European Commission has said because they don't have the relevant powers they won't start fining people until 2 August 2026 but that doesn't mean you can just sit on your laurels until then because all of this is going to take time and resources," Ms Daly said. "The fines are quite large, 3% of annual turnover or €15 million if you don't comply," she added. The AI rules that came into force yesterday require EU Member States to prepare for the policing of the act. It means the Irish Government must designate competent authorities and legislate for penalties for infringements. Government has not done enough to prepare for rules - senior fellow Dr Kris Shrishak is a senior fellow with the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL). He believes the Government has not done enough to prepare for the AI new rules. "They should have started this process much, much earlier," Dr Shrishak said. "There needs to be an urgency from the Government not only to set up the required governance mechanism for the regulators, but also to provide the resources so that regulators can do their jobs." "Part of that job will be the setting up of sandboxes to help and guide Irish companies, so it's not just about stopping bad AI, it's also about promoting the good uses of AI." "I think the State needs to accelerate what it is doing," he added. The Department of Enterprise said Ireland has met all of its obligations under the act to date and will continue to do so. "A significant body of work is ongoing to support the designated authorities in preparing for implementation of the Act, including workshops, working groups, and facilitated dialogue with the Commission and counterparts in other Member States," a Department spokesperson said. "Resourcing is managed through the estimates process," they added. Trump vows to 'win the AI race' But while Ireland presses ahead with EU regulation, a very different stance is being taken in the US where President Donald Trump has vowed to cut red tape to ensure America "wins the AI race". But is there a danger that regulation will see Ireland, and the EU, fall behind when it comes to innovation? Caroline Dunlea is the Chairperson of Digital Business Ireland (DBI) and believes it is now on member states and the EU to allow the European AI space to grow and evolve. "Bridging the competitiveness gap between ourselves and the likes of the US and China in AI is essential, if we are to stay ahead of the curve in the digital sector and its emerging technologies," Ms Dunlea said. "DBI believes that a balanced attitude to enforcing the Act must be taken to avoid overregulation of the AI space," she added. All human CEO, John Mitchell agrees that a balanced approach is key. "I think there needs to be guardrails," Mr Mitchell said. "I think the EU has got the balance right with a combination of being progressive but also being protective." "In the long term, that is the way to go with AI because it is very unregulated today," he added.