Some domestic violence calls to police going unanswered
Family violence support agency SHINE says many domestic violence calls to police are going un-answered.
Photo:
RNZ
A family violence support agency says police are undoing decades of hard work by not attending some domestic violence callouts that are considered mental health related.
Last year, police announced they would
pull back on mental health related callouts
in a phased approach, while still attending high risk incidents, in a bid to save their time and resources.
But a family violence support agency said that meant many domestic violence calls were going un-answered, leaving victims without the help they needed.
Rachel Williams is a senior adviser for SHINE - an Auckland service provider aimed at addressing family violence.
The agency had seen the results of the police's policy change first-hand.
"We had a incident at our refuge in Auckland where the police were called, but they couldn't intervene because it was deemed mental health."
They had also heard the same thing from victims in the community.
As well as pulling back on mental health related callouts - police have been trialling a new Risk Harm Attendance Framework, aimed at reducing responses to social harm callouts where other agencies could step in.
Williams felt the changes were undoing years of work from the family violence sector in encouraging victims to seek out help.
"The police are the only ones who can go into the home and stop someone who's experiencing harm. So by pulling back on that message we feel like decades of work has been undone."
Between 2009 and 2018, there were 125 deaths from intimate partner violence in New Zealand.
Police said they would still attend incidents where there was an immediate risk to life, but Williams said in a family violence situation it was not always so black and white.
"One form of family violence is that somebody's standing there with a gun to your head and I think the police will probably still respond then.
"But there are lots of other ways that people can harm you... and I don't think the police are responding to all of those."
Women's Refuge chief executive Ang Jury agreed.
She said in a family violence incident police may not get the full picture from the victim over the phone.
"Somebody who's ringing them, may not be giving them that sort of information that they need to even make that judgement."
"Most people don't ring police because they want a cup of tea and to have someone to talk to. They actually are fearful. To me, if a victim or a family member has got to that point you're talking about risk."
Women's Refuge had seen police slowly pulling back from family violence callouts over the last five or so years - and the recent changes made things worse in certain parts of the country, Jury said.
The police mental health pull-back has been happening in different stages across different police districts.
Jury acknowledged police were tight on resources, and it was not realistic for them to attend all family violence incidents.
"In lieu of that, what I would like to see is some really full-on and far more stringent training of their call-takers... to make sure they are identifying the level of risk they claim to be identifying."
In a statement, a police spokesperson said their new Risk Harm Attendance Framework enabled staff to identify clearly, confidently and consistently what required urgent or timely police attendance.
The new framework included a special prioritisation for family violence offences, they said.
Police wanted to reassure the community they would continue to assess risk to ensure people get appropriate help when they needed it.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Twelve-month prescription renewals: What you need to know
The government's plan will allow some patients to go longer between prescription renewals. Photo: 123RF In the annual flood of Budget coverage a few weeks back, one of the big announcements for the health sector was a move to allow 12-month prescription renewals from 2026. But how is it going to work and how will it affect your health services? RNZ is here to explain it all. The current maximum prescription length for most medicines is three months, but the government's new plan would extend that to 12 months for many medicines. This means that some patients will no longer need to visit their GP every three months to get their standing medication renewed. While some repeat prescriptions can be filled without a doctor's visit now by contacting their office, guidelines by the Medical Council of New Zealand on good prescribing practice say "patients receiving repeat prescriptions should be assessed in person on a regular basis" and repeats are given only with a doctor's discretion. In announcing the plan , Health Minister Simeon Brown said the current system "creates unnecessary barriers for patients on stable, long-term medications like asthma inhalers, insulin for diabetes, and blood pressure tablets. It means added costs for patients and more paperwork for health professionals, taking time away from patients with more urgent or complex needs". Medicines will still have to be dispensed every three months from pharmacies. "It's a win-win for patients and the health system - fewer avoidable hospitalisations, better health outcomes and reduced long term costs," Brown has said. Not until the first quarter of 2026. Luke Bradford of the Royal New Zealand College of GPs. Photo: supplied This is expected to mostly affect people on long-term medicines, the Ministry of Health said. The increased prescribing limit will also apply to oral contraceptives, which currently have a six-month prescribing limit. Royal New Zealand College of GPs medical director Dr Luke Bradford said that during consultation on the plan, the college had supported a six-month prescription renewal instead of 12. "We submitted on this and said 12 months is probably too long, six months would be reasonable." Dr Bradford said there would not be a centralised list of drugs that are part of the scheme and physicians will need to determine who benefits from 12-month renewals. "It's very much going to be a patient by patient situation and we can't put blanket rules across this. It depends on a whole raft of things but predominantly depends on conditions being managed." If you have multiple prescriptions for multiple conditions, you are far less likely to get 12-month renewals as a physician needs to monitor your ongoing health and possible interactions. "Prescribers will be responsible for determining the clinically appropriate prescription length and can prescribe for up to 12 months, or for shorter periods if they consider that most appropriate," a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health said. Controlled substances - which include opiates such as morphine and fentanyl - are not included. Controlled substances will not be included. Photo: 123RF/Steve Heap 2016 The Budget allocated $91 million over four years "to support this change". "It is expected this change will increase patients' access to medicines and therefore create a higher demand for medicines. Funding is required for the Combined Pharmaceutical Budget to meet the increased demand for medicines," the Ministry of Health spokesperson said. "The Budget includes $10m initial funding in the 2025/26 financial year, with outyear funding held in contingency, pending information gathered from the initial uptake." Some patients won't have to go to the GP quite as often, in theory. GP visits are charged differently from place to place and can run anywhere from $20 to $90 depending on the complicated calculation of fees at individual doctors' offices. The Ministry of Health has said that the average patient who renews prescriptions four times a year could save up to $105 a year on GP fees. It also has said the change could mean less time off work or school for appointments and it could make life easier for people in rural and remote areas who travel to get to their doctor. No. The $5 co-payment for most prescriptions - which was brought back under the current National-led government - will remain unchanged. And you'll still need to go back to the pharmacy every three months to have your prescriptions dispensed even if you're on a 12-month renewal from your doctor, Dr Bradford said. "There's some safety mechanisms built into this in that they're not going to dispense 12 months of medicines. People aren't going to suddenly have huge boxes of medicine at home." In a statement to RNZ, the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand said it cautiously supported the move, but had concerns. "PSNZ support the increased period in principle, but with some provisos - as always, it's the detail that will matter and we are waiting to receive that. "For example, there is currently no indication that funds to support the extra monitoring and counselling that may be required, when patients are picking up their medication every three months without any interacting with their general practice." If people visit their GPs less often, it will affect the income their practices receive. In its submission on the proposal , the Royal College said prescriptions account for between seven to 10 percent of practice revenue. "The financial impact on practices that rely on revenue from current prescription renewals could be substantial, e.g., one specialist GP calculated a $320,000 loss in a patient population of 14,500," that submission also reported. "There will definitely be an impact on that," Dr Bradford said. At the same time, it won't necessarily reduce the admin work needed. Doctors will still need to do the legwork with their patients to keep on top of ongoing records, tests and screening, he said. Health Minister Simeon Brown. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro On its website, the Ministry of Health said the Medicines Regulations will need to be amended to increase the maximum length of prescriptions, and IT systems will need to be updated to allow this change. The Medicines Regulations 1984 will need to be amended. Pharmac will make changes to the Pharmaceutical Schedule, while Health NZ will work to support GPs, other prescribers and pharmacies with updating systems and the transition. The Pharmaceutical Society said it also would work to ensure the prescription plan changes go smoothly. "PSNZ will use this time to engage with officials to support a smooth transition and highlight any unintended consequences, particularly any changes in workload and financial pressures that this change could place on pharmacists and their teams," it said in its statement. General Practice Owners Association chair Dr Angus Chambers recently told RNZ that many patients with chronic conditions needed regular reviews by a doctor or nurse. "Just to leave someone for 12 months to have their diabetes deteriorate may well lead to more emergency department visits and hospital admissions." Everyone manages their conditions differently, Dr Bradford said, and no two cases are quite the same. "If you're on five different meds for diabetes you're going to need three-month checkups." In announcing the plan, Simeon Brown said it would give GPs a breather. "Instead of spending time on routine repeat prescriptions, they can focus more on supporting those with complex or deteriorating health needs." Dr Bradford said the current three-month renewals do give a "safety net" for physicians to keep on top of issues. "By taking that away we either say we've still got to do that or the pressure goes on GPs to do it anyway and have to sit their own reminders for those periods of time and follow it up in their hour of clinic time." "The majority of patients will be fine," but a visit to a GP involves a lot more than just checking off a prescription renewal box, Dr Bradford said. "The moment you come in we're watching how you're walking, we're looking at your body language and listening for cues and we're reminding you of the screening you haven't done. "Those things that happen because you come in and say, 'Oh, I'm just here for my asthma medicine, doc,' are at risk of being lost." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Man charged for passenger's death after unreported crash
The crash on Maniatutu Road was not reported to police at the time. Photo: RNZ / Richard Tindiller A driver has been charged after an unreported car crash in western Bay of Plenty led to the death of his passenger. The one-car crash on Maniatutu Road, at Pongakawa, happened at 8:45pm on Tuesday, 3 June. Police said the crash was not reported at the time, and after the crash the driver and his passengers made their own way to their addresses. However, at 4:30am, one passenger was found dead in his home by his flatmate and the driver. On Friday, a 40-year-old man was charged with dangerous driving causing death. He is due in Tauranga District Court on 12 June. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Residents told to stop using bore water after diesel leak at Christchurch prison
A diesel leak at Christchurch Men's Prison late last month has seeped into bore water 200 metres away. Photo: NZME / George Heard Some residents in the small town of Templeton on the outskirts of Christchurch are now being told not to use their private bore water after a diesel leak at the nearby prison nearly two weeks ago. Corrections said a "significant amount" of diesel leaked from a fuel tank at Christchurch Men's Prison and seeped into the ground below one of its buildings on 25 May. Experts immediately began testing nearby bores and results had been negative for "dissolved hydrocarbons", but on Friday there was a positive result from a bore about 200 metres away from the prison grounds, according to Leigh Marsh, Corrections' custodial services commissioner. "As a result, we have visited approximately 40 properties - by door-knocking and leaving a letter with further information - and have advised a small number of occupied properties that they should stop using water from their private bores, and use water from other sources," Marsh said. "Corrections will be working with these residents directly to provide an alternate source if they do not already have one." The affected properties had bores down gradient from where the diesel entered the ground, Marsh said. "If a property has not been visited by Corrections, or had a letter left in their absence, they are able to continue using their bore water. "This does not impact residents in the area on town water supply and it does not impact anyone in the wider Christchurch area." People living in affected properties should avoid drinking and cooking with the water, Marsh said. The department was conducting further testing to confirm the positive result, and would keep affected neighbours updated. At the time of the diesel leak, it notified key agencies including Environment Canterbury, Taumata Arowai and Fire and Emergency New Zealand. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
