Forum: Raise standards for private driving instructors
M any learner drivers in Singapore turn to private driving instructors (PDIs) for flexibility and lower costs. While many PDIs are patient and committed, a minority tarnish the profession by belittling learners, dragging out lessons, or giving vague instructions that slow progress. For national servicemen and students on tight budgets, this isn't just frustrating – it can feel exploitative. Some booking platforms impose basic standards and collect reviews, but participation is voluntary.
Many instructors operate independently, without consistent expectations or accountability. Unlike driving school instructors, PDIs are not held to a central code of conduct. Misconduct can be reported to the Land Transport Authority (LTA), but only through a generic feedback form that is not widely publicised or tailored for such complaints. There is no centralised complaints process, no official registry of licensed PDIs, and no public review system. Many learners are unsure where to turn to when problems arise.
From May 2024 to April 2025, first-time pass rates were lower for private learners (28 per cent for Class 3, 37 per cent for Class 3A) compared with school learners (39 per cent and 52 per cent respectively). While the difference isn't dramatic, it may reflect uneven instructional quality. Driving is a serious responsibility. If we expect high standards from drivers, we should hold instructors to the same. More can be done to ensure transparency, protect learners and uphold the professionalism of PDIs who do the job well.
Ethan Tan
More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
16 hours ago
- Straits Times
USGA has no plans to publish results of driver tests
Jun 12, 2024; Pinehurst, North Carolina, USA; Chief executive officer Mike Whan with the USGA addresses the media during a press conference for the U.S. Open golf tournament at Pinehurst No. 2. Mandatory Credit: John David Mercer-USA TODAY Sports REUTERS OAKMONT, Pennsylvania - The United States Golf Association (USGA) said on Wednesday it has no plans to publish results or change protocols for driver testing after clubs belonging to two of the game's biggest names failed conformance tests last month. USGA CEO Mike Whan, speaking ahead of this week's U.S. Open, said drivers deemed non-conforming through random tests are the result of overuse and "creep over the line" of what's allowed but never raise eyebrows by those overseeing the tests. Driver testing made headlines at the PGA Championship last month after a report said the club belonging to Masters champion Rory McIlroy was ruled non-conforming. McIlroy, who later confirmed the report and expressed his disappointment that test results were leaked, played with a backup driver all week. World number one Scottie Scheffler, speaking after he won the PGA Championship, revealed he also used a backup driver that week after his original one failed a test. Whan said the USGA conducts driver testing as a service to players, manufacturers and the tours and has no desire to see results made public. "If I'm being honest with you, I think in terms of what happened at the PGA Championship, it made us more committed to not wanting to have this be the topic of the town," said Whan. "Because I think when you talked about a rules violation or somebody who's playing with a hot driver, that gets so much more sensational than the reality." Faces on the drivers used by current players relax over time and ultimately lead to them failing a so-called "characteristic time" test that measures the spring-like effect of the club. Whan likened the test to someone jumping on a trampoline, saying the longer they are on the trampoline the higher they bounce off. "So we set a limit with manufacturers in terms of how long that ball can stay on -- it's tested in terms of microseconds," Whan said. "There's a test, there's a tolerance, but at the end of the day, if it's on there for more than 258 microseconds, we consider that club out of tolerance." Although Whan said the USGA conducted random tests this week at Oakmont Country Club, where the year's third major begins on Thursday, he was not aware of any failures. "I know that if we saw a trend that was alarming in terms of either how many or how far they were moving beyond, we would change the way we approach it," Whan said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Issues reported in 5,400 out of 300k cars with ERP on-board unit installed
Around 5,400 cars have had problems with their Electronic Road Pricing on-board units (OBUs) since installation started in November 2023, including issues with wiring that have necessitated return visits to workshops. This represents 1.8 per cent of around 300,000 cars that have had the unit installed so far, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) told The Straits Times on June 10. LTA said that as at June, more than 500,000 vehicles - including other vehicle types such as commercial vehicles - have been fitted with OBUs. This means the installation exercise has crossed the halfway mark towards equipping the entire vehicle population of around 1 million units with OBUs by 2026. The OBUs are used for road toll and carpark payments, among other things, as part of Singapore's move to the new ERP system, known as ERP 2.0. LTA said: "As with any large-scale technology roll-out, some vehicles may experience issues that require follow-up checks." Some motorists told ST they could not enter carparks or pay road charges with their OBUs, which became unresponsive. A spokesman for Lim Tan Motor in Sin Ming said owners of around 5 per cent of the 200 or so cars on which the workshop has installed OBUs had gone back for help, mostly because carpark gantries could not detect the units. He said this is more common at private and commercial building carparks than at those operated by the Housing Board. Another complaint is that the touchscreen display of the OBU freezes. OBU installation is free for all vehicles registered before May 1, 2024, if the unit is installed by the deadline stated in an LTA invitation letter to owners. All vehicles registered from May 1, 2024, are fitted with the unit. Depending on the vehicle, an OBU installation takes between two and four hours, and it can take just as long to troubleshoot and replace the unit. For vehicles other than motorcycles, the OBU consists of three parts: an antenna, a processing unit that holds the stored-value card, and an optional touchscreen display. Service and workshop manager Lester Yeong, 48, said the OBU touchscreen display on the van leased by his company, an industrial equipment supplier, showed a blank screen in April - five months after the unit was installed. The leasing company that provided the van managed to fix the issue once at its workshop, but the problem resurfaced two days later. This time, the faulty OBU was replaced. The OBU touchscreen display on Mr Christian Gani's BMW sport utility vehicle acted up two months after it was installed, with the display stuck in booting-up mode. In May, the information technology professional at a bank had to call for help via the buzzer at his office carpark gantry, because the system could not detect the OBU in his car, which had been registered for season parking. The OBU remained in the booting-up mode throughout his journey home. There was no beep from the system when he passed an operational ERP gantry, but he did not receive any fine for that. The screen continued to be stuck in this mode the next day, prompting Mr Gani to drive the car to the BMW agent, which eventually replaced the OBU. "The OBU just failed suddenly without warning and caused me so much inconvenience. Hopefully, it doesn't fail on me again," said Mr Gani. The OBU on Mr Nigel Yong's Mini Cooper failed within days of being installed. As he opted not to have a touchscreen display, the 35-year-old public relations manager did not notice anything amiss until he could not leave the carpark near his Housing Board flat in February. He had to ask the carpark staff for help and verify his vehicle registration number before the gantry was lifted. The OBU resumed working after a few days and functioned normally until it suddenly became unresponsive in May. Mr Yong could not wait for an appointment with the workshop that installed his OBU, so he visited another workshop that told him he would have to pay for a replacement unit unless he returned to the previous workshop. He paid $380 for the replacement instead of bearing with the inconvenience of having to return to the first workshop. The OBUs have a five-year warranty against manufacturing defects, under which parts are replaced at no charge. LTA advised motorists who experience issues with their OBUs to return to the workshops that installed the units. This is because those workshops would have the necessary records "for more effective troubleshooting". "In a small number of cases where more specialised attention is needed, the workshop may refer motorists to another workshop with the relevant expertise," the authority added. Motorists who need clarification can contact the ERP 2.0 Call Assist Service on 6377-2255.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Raise standards for private driving instructors
M any learner drivers in Singapore turn to private driving instructors (PDIs) for flexibility and lower costs. While many PDIs are patient and committed, a minority tarnish the profession by belittling learners, dragging out lessons, or giving vague instructions that slow progress. For national servicemen and students on tight budgets, this isn't just frustrating – it can feel exploitative. Some booking platforms impose basic standards and collect reviews, but participation is voluntary. Many instructors operate independently, without consistent expectations or accountability. Unlike driving school instructors, PDIs are not held to a central code of conduct. Misconduct can be reported to the Land Transport Authority (LTA), but only through a generic feedback form that is not widely publicised or tailored for such complaints. There is no centralised complaints process, no official registry of licensed PDIs, and no public review system. Many learners are unsure where to turn to when problems arise. From May 2024 to April 2025, first-time pass rates were lower for private learners (28 per cent for Class 3, 37 per cent for Class 3A) compared with school learners (39 per cent and 52 per cent respectively). While the difference isn't dramatic, it may reflect uneven instructional quality. Driving is a serious responsibility. If we expect high standards from drivers, we should hold instructors to the same. More can be done to ensure transparency, protect learners and uphold the professionalism of PDIs who do the job well. Ethan Tan More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
