UK manufacturing downturn eases in June despite continued weak demand
The S&P Global UK manufacturing PMI survey, watched closely by economists, showed a reading of 47.7 in June, up from 46.4 in May.
Any reading above 50 indicates that activity is growing while any score below means it is contracting.
This was in line with predictions by economists.
The survey pointed to a steadying situation for businesses, who said they were also increasingly optimistic.
Rob Dobson, director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said: 'Although the downturn in UK manufacturing continued in June, the latest PMI survey provides signs of conditions stabilising.
'Production, new orders and employment all fell at slower rates, while business optimism picked up to a four-month high.
'That said, any hoped-for stabilisation remains fragile and subject to potential headwinds that could severely impact demand, supply chain reliability and future growth prospects.'
The data showed that UK manufacturing production contracted for the eighth consecutive month as the companies referenced weak market conditions.
New orders were also lower for the month, although this drop was the smallest over the past nine months.
Firms reported that new export business dropped for the 41st month in a row in the face of 'reduced demand from the US, Europe and China'.
Mike Thornton, head of industrials at RSM UK, said: 'The manufacturing PMI increased for the second consecutive month in June, showing signs of improvement across the board.
'The new orders index saw the most notable monthly uptick, rising to the highest level since October 2024, which is contributing to growing industry optimism, a trend that's likely to continue following this week's trade deal between the US and UK coming into force.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Sir Keir Starmer has lost control of the Labour Party
Once you pay the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane. As Kipling observed in 1911, it's tempting to 'a rich and lazy nation' to try to spend its way out of trouble rather than deal with the fundamental problem. In surrendering to his rebellious backbenchers on his flagship benefit reforms, Sir Keir Starmer has followed exactly that path. There are, however, two problems with this approach. The first is that Britain, after decades of wasteful spending, and with a sky-high tax burden, is rapidly running out of fiscal road with which to buy out future opposition. The second is that Labour rebels will now smell blood in the water and they will undoubtedly turn their attention to thwarting the Government's attempts to make savings elsewhere. The bill for health and disability benefits is expected to reach £70 billion a year by the end of the decade. These measures were expected to cut them by just £5 billion. A previous climbdown this week had reduced that to £2.5 billion. Now what's left of the Bill has been gutted, with the Government withdrawing elements in a panic. That Sir Keir, who won a majority of 174 just a year ago, has found that he cannot make even a small change to a welfare system that is spiralling out of control without meeting mutiny from his Labour colleagues, speaks poorly of Britain's ability to change course before it is forced to by circumstances beyond its control. In the short run, the Government has a £5 billion hole to fix in its fiscal plans, and a blow to its credibility in the eyes of the bond markets. In the long run, its concession has made it significantly more tempting for Commons rebels to engage in games of chicken in the belief that Sir Keir will back down. The Prime Minister's track record is already littered with U-turns and backtracks but this latest reverse has shown that he may simply be unable to manage his party, let alone govern this country. Indeed, even after this chaotic concession, 49 of his own MPs still voted against the Bill. What prospect is there of Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves now getting to grips with the sort of large scale welfare reform that Britain really needs? The pressure, if anything, seems to be from an ascendant Left which demands more spending, more taxation, more state intervention in the economy: the scrapping of the two child benefit cap is already in the sights for some rebels. It is a bleak thought that Sir Keir's response to this may be to tack Left. Once you pay the Danegeld ...
Leader Live
44 minutes ago
- Leader Live
PM braced for revolt over welfare after defending his record of a year in power
Some 39 Labour MPs have indicated they will vote to halt an overhaul of the benefits system on Tuesday evening, though that number is far lower than the 83 needed to overturn the Prime Minister's working majority. However, more are expected to join them in what could be the largest revolt of Sir Keir's time in office. Ahead of the parliamentary showdown, the Prime Minister insisted at a meeting with his senior ministers that the Government could look back with a 'real sense of pride and achievement' as the July 5 anniversary of his first year in office nears. Ministers have given working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', Sir Keir also told the Cabinet meeting, according to a No 10 spokesman. Downing Street pointed to trade deals, economic growth, the extra long-term investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on. The spokesman added: '(The Prime Minister) said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' Cabinet ministers, and even Sir Keir himself, were said to be involved in efforts to persuade Labour MPs not to join the rebels ahead of the crunch Commons debate. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels. As the second reading of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill began in the Commons, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said reforms to the welfare system are needed to ensure its longevity. 'I do not believe that this is sustainable if we want a welfare state that protects people who most need our help for generations to come,' the senior minister said. She added: 'There is no responsibility in leaving our system of social security to continue as it is, and risk support for it becoming so frayed that it is no longer there to provide a safety net for those who can never work, and who most need our help and support.' To see off the threat of far greater rebellion by some 126 Labour MPs led by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher universal credit rate for those already claiming the health-related element. As a result of the U-turn, the reforms are expected to save less than half the £5 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. In the Commons, Ms Kendall faced warnings the Timms review could be published after the reforms themselves are implemented. She insisted any changes to be made following the review will be done so 'as soon as is practically possible via primary or secondary legislation', though Downing Street would earlier not guarantee Sir Stephen's review would be completed by the time reforms are implemented. No 10 was also insistent that Government modelling, which predicts the welfare proposals will push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, was 'subject to uncertainty'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the Government's plans were 'driven not by principle but by panic'. Indicating that the Tories will not support the Government, Mrs Badenoch told the Commons: 'By 2030, on this Government's spending plans, we will hit £100 billion on health and disability benefits alone, that is more than what we spend on defence, and this should make everyone in this House stop and think, because this Bill does nothing to fix that problem, and that is why we cannot support it.' She described the Bill as a 'fudge', adding: 'A fundamental and serious programme to reform our welfare system is required, and this Bill is not it.' Rachael Maskell, the leading force of the rebellion which seeks to halt the Bill in its tracks on Tuesday night, urged MPs to join her in the voting lobbies. The York Central MP told the Commons: 'These Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party. 'They are far from what this Labour Party is for, a party to protect the poor, as is my purpose, for I am my brother's keeper.' Ahead of the Commons debate, Ms Maskell indicated she believed 'many more' Labour MPs than the 39 who had signed her 'reasoned amendment' would join her in rebelling. The Liberal Democrats are also expected to back the rebel amendment, the party's work and pensions spokesman Steve Darling told the Commons. Ministers have been coy about whether rebel Labour MPs will face disciplinary action, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds telling broadcasters he was 'not aware' they would lose the party whip, but said 'those issues are for the chief whip'. Whatever people's views about the concessions, surely everyone can see the process here is ALL wrong? Third Reading in eight days? A timetable like that diminishes the role of MPs in getting this legislation right, shuts out disabled people and puts too many at risk. — Andy Burnham (@AndyBurnhamGM) July 1, 2025 Elsewhere, critic of the Bill Andy Burnham, the Labour Mayor of Greater Manchester, hit out at the parliamentary process it will undergo, claiming it was all wrong. On social media site X, he wrote: 'Third Reading in eight days? A timetable like that diminishes the role of MPs in getting this legislation right, shuts out disabled people and puts too many at risk.'
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Starmer abandons key welfare reforms in face of Labour revolt
The Government has shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and any changes will now only come after a review of the benefit. The climbdown came just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. It will cause a major headache for Chancellor Rachel Reeves as the welfare squeeze was originally meant to save £4.8 billion a year, which was subsequently reduced to £2.3 billion when the Bill was first watered down last week. Postponing any changes to the eligibility criteria for Pip means it is now uncertain how much the reforms will save from the soaring welfare bill. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused ministers of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'. She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' A Labour rebel attempt to halt the Bill in its tracks was defeated by 328 votes to 149, majority 179. Rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell, who was behind the failed attempt, said: 'The whole Bill is now unravelling and is a complete farce.' A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial U-turn on the legislation last week, which restricted the Pip changes to new claimants from November 2026. That date has now been abandoned in the latest climbdown, with any changes now only coming after disability minister Sir Stephen Timms' review of the Pip assessment process. Sir Stephen announced the climbdown in the middle of the debate on the legislation. He acknowledged 'concerns that the changes to Pip are coming ahead of the conclusions of the review of the assessment that I will be leading'. He said the Government would now 'only make changes to Pip eligibility activities and descriptors following that review', which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026. The concession came after frantic behind-the-scenes negotiations in Westminster involving the Prime Minister, his cabinet and wavering Labour MPs. It appeared to have won round some Labour doubters. Josh Fenton-Glynn, who was one of the 126 Labour MPs who signed the original rebel amendment to the welfare reform Bill last week, described the move as 'really good news'. He said he wanted to support the Government at 'every opportunity' and was glad changes to personal independence payment eligibility would be delayed until after the Timms review. But other Labour MPs appeared exasperated, with one telling the PA news agency that no-one 'knew what they were voting on anymore'. Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs at the MS Society, said: 'We thought last week's so-called concessions were last minute. But these panicked 11th hour changes still don't fix a rushed, poorly thought-out Bill.' But Jon Sparkes, chief executive of learning disability charity Mencap, said: 'The last-minute change relating to the review Sir Stephen Timms is leading sounds positive and we are pleased that the Government has listened.' He added: 'Disabled people should not have to pay to fix black holes in the public finances.' The Government's concessions have effectively removed a major plank of its welfare reform, leaving only parts of the current Bill still on the table. Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50% for most new claimants from April 2026 remain in place, along with an above-inflation increase in the benefit's standard allowance. In an earlier climbdown, Ms Kendall said existing recipients of the health element of universal credit, and new claimants with the most severe conditions, would have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'.
