
All eyes on the Trump-Putin summit – but the US-Russia rift runs deep
Recently, with American 'mediation' – if not outright pressure – Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a preliminary peace agreement that went largely unnoticed in Greece. In reality, it marks Armenia's official capitulation after its defeats in recent wars with Azerbaijan. The consensus is that the big winner is Türkiye, which has been openly backing Azerbaijan – and still is.
The peace deal, signed in Washington on August 8 with the help of US President Donald Trump, is widely seen as a geopolitical win for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Ankara, which supported Baku in its 'blitzkrieg' in Karabakh, stands to gain the most – first and foremost by securing a direct land link to Azerbaijan via Nakhichevan. That said, the geopolitical and geoeconomic benefits for American interests are hardly smaller.
Following the US-Turkish-engineered deal in the Caucasus, observers expect Washington to push similar plans elsewhere in the post-Soviet space. Georgia and Moldova top the list of likely next targets.
Both countries have their own 'thorny' territories – self-declared autonomous regions, Kosovo-style, lacking international recognition and hosting Russian military bases. Kosovo itself, of course, is recognized by most of the West, though it technically still lacks full independent-state status. Notably, Greece, Romania, Cyprus, and Spain refuse to recognize it, while Serbia still considers it part of its territory.
The hottest flashpoint inside Europe – especially with elections in Moldova this September – is Chisinau's ambition to 'reintegrate' Transnistria.
In recent years, disputed elections have brought pro-Western governments and a pro-Western president to power in Moldova. Now, at least on paper, Chisinau could call on Kiev for help and attempt a military solution to the Transnistria question. No one can rule out such a move – especially with Russian forces largely tied down in the Ukraine conflict.
Parliamentary elections are adding to the tension. The country is split almost evenly for and against pro-Western President Maia Sandu and her PAS party. A new military adventure could serve as the perfect pretext to shift the domestic political climate – and to escalate the broader standoff between Europe and Russia.
If another European war were to break out – this time over Moldova – NATO member Romania would almost certainly side with Chisinau.
As Romania's ally, Greece would face a hard choice: back Bucharest (and by extension, Moldova) or keep its distance from another European conflict? In the case of Ukraine, Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis's government took no such distance – instead, openly declaring that Greece was 'at war with Russia.'
Whatever Athens decides will depend in part on Türkiye's stance toward this – for now – hypothetical scenario. Ankara would likely get involved indirectly, if only to boost its geopolitical influence in the region and its standing within NATO. It has done so repeatedly in recent years – in Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond.
Türkiye's and Azerbaijan's success in Karabakh – at the expense of Armenia and Russia – has emboldened Ankara in other arenas of foreign policy. Erdogan has repeatedly stated that Türkiye will not give up 'a single inch of land once Turkish soldiers have set foot on it.' History suggests those are not idle words.
The United States is clearly playing a bigger game across the post-Soviet geopolitical chessboard. By closing the chapter on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict in the Caucasus – a confrontation dating back to the collapse of the USSR – Washington has engineered a settlement tailored to its own strategic script. Next up are other 'frozen conflicts' in the former Soviet Union.
Georgia wants to peacefully 'reintegrate' Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two breakaway territories in the Caucasus that split from Tbilisi after bloody conflicts – the first in the early 1990s, the second in 2008. They are, in effect, the 'Kosovos' of the Caucasus.
In Moldova, the president and government have made deepening ties with the US and NATO a top priority. Like Kiev in years past, Chisinau sees this as its ticket to security guarantees against Moscow – and, more importantly, as its 'golden opportunity' to retake Transnistria.
A Karabakh-style 'blitzkrieg' would be hard to pull off against territories hosting Russian military bases. But Washington doesn't seem in a rush – even if events are moving at a dangerously fast pace.
It hasn't gone unnoticed that NATO military exercises have included scenarios simulating a crisis in these 'Kosovos' of Georgia and Moldova.
One telling example: Agile Spirit 2025, the 12th such exercise hosted jointly with Georgia, ran from July 25 to August 6 with participants from 13 countries – including the US, Türkiye, Poland, Germany, Italy, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania, and Ukraine – not counting observer nations.
Adding fuel to the speculation, online rumors claim that during joint 'Fiery Shield-2025' drills with the US and Romania, which began August 4, Moldovan troops fired at targets depicting Russian soldiers.
Military ties between Greece and Romania – and between Greece and Moldova – have been strengthening. On June 26, 2025, Greece's chief of the Hellenic National Defense General Staff, Dimitris Choupis, awarded Moldova's deputy chief of the General Staff, Brigadier General Sergiu Cirimpei, the Medal of Merit and Honor.
Diplomatic contacts are also on the rise. Deputy Foreign Minister Charis Theocharis recently visited Moldova, adding to a string of earlier meetings.
Finally, the former US ambassador to Athens and later Biden-era deputy secretary of state for energy, Geoffrey Pyatt, has repeatedly emphasized the 'Vertical Gas Corridor' – a network that would allow bidirectional flows from south to north, specifically from Greece through Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Moldova, and Ukraine, via both existing and new European natural gas and LNG infrastructure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Why both sides want the Putin-Trump Alaska summit to succeed
On Friday, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in Alaska. This will be the first full-scale Russia-US summit since June 2021 in Geneva, and the first official visit by a Russian president to American soil since Dmitry Medvedev's trip in 2010 at the height of the 'reset.' It will also be the first time the leaders of Russia and the US have met in Alaska, the closest US state to Russia, separated only by the narrow Bering Strait, and once part of the Russian Empire. The symbolism is obvious: as far as possible from Ukraine and Western Europe, but as close as possible to Russia. And neither Zelensky nor the EU's top brass will be in the room. The message could not be clearer – Moscow and Washington will make the key decisions on Ukraine, then inform others later. As Trump has said, 'they hold all the cards.' The Alaska summit marks a sharp departure from the Biden years, when even the idea of such a meeting was unthinkable and Washington's priority was isolating Russia. Now, not only will Putin travel to Alaska, but Trump is already planning a return visit to Russia. Moderate optimism surrounds the meeting. Summits of this type are rarely held 'just to talk'; they usually cap a long process of behind-the-scenes negotiations. The idea for this one emerged after three hours of talks in Moscow on August 6 between Putin and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff. Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov described Washington's offer as 'very acceptable.' That suggests Putin and Trump will arrive in Alaska with a preliminary deal – or at least a framework for a truce – already in place. Trump has good reason to want the summit to succeed. His effort to squeeze Moscow by pushing China and India to stop buying Russian oil has backfired badly. Far from isolating Russia, it triggered the worst US-India crisis in 25 years and drove New Delhi even closer to Moscow. It also encouraged a thaw between India and China, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi now set to attend the SCO summit in Tianjin. BRICS, which Trump has openly vowed to weaken, has only grown more cohesive. The Alaska summit is Trump's chance to escape the trap he built for himself – trying to pressure Moscow through Beijing and New Delhi – and to show results on Ukraine that he can sell as a diplomatic victory. For Moscow, a successful summit would be a powerful demonstration that talk of 'isolation' is obsolete – even in the West. It would cement Russia's standing with the 'global majority' and highlight Western Europe's diminished influence. The transatlantic split would widen, weakening Brussels' claim to be Russia's toughest opponent. Most importantly, Washington today has little real leverage over Russia, especially on Ukraine. If the summit yields a joint Russian–American vision for a truce or settlement, it will inevitably reflect Moscow's position more than Kiev's or Brussels'. And if the Western Europeans try to derail it, the US could pull the plug on all aid to Ukraine – including intelligence support – accelerating Kiev's defeat. Not everyone in Russia is cheering. Many prominent 'Z'-aligned war correspondents see the war as unfinished and oppose any truce. But they have been asked to stick to the official line. If the Alaska meeting produces a deal, they will be expected to back it – or at least use 'cooling' language for their audiences. The Kremlin is betting it can manage this dissent. Western Europe, for its part, will be watching from the sidelines. Its leaders are 'scrambling' for scraps of information via secondary channels. The optics will underline a humiliating reality: for the first time in almost a century, decisions about Europe's security will be made without the likes of Italy, France and Germany in the room. The location hints at other agenda items. Arctic economic cooperation, largely frozen since 2014, could be revived. Both sides stand to gain from joint development in the far north, and a deal here would be politically symbolic – proof that the two countries can work together despite the baggage of the last decade. Arms control will also be on the table. Moscow's recent decision to end its unilateral moratorium on deploying intermediate-range missiles was almost certainly timed to influence the talks. Strategic stability after the New START Treaty expires in February 2026 will be a central concern. If Alaska delivers, it could reshape the conflict in Ukraine and the broader Russia-US relationship. A joint settlement plan would marginalize Kiev and Brussels, shift the diplomatic center of gravity back to Moscow and Washington, and reopen channels for cooperation on global issues – from the Arctic to arms control. If it fails – if Trump bends to last-minute EU pressure – Moscow will continue fighting, confident that US involvement will fade. Either way, Russia's position is stronger than it was two years ago. What's different now is that the two powers with 'all the cards' are finally back at the same table – and Western Europe is on the outside looking in.


Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump floats ‘quick' Putin-Zelensky meeting
US President Donald Trump has suggested holding a 'quick' second round of talks following the Alaska summit that would bring together Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky. Trump said he would join the proposed meeting if he is wanted. Ahead of his meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, Trump told journalists while speaking at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC on Wednesday that during the upcoming talks he's 'going to find out where we are and what we're doing.' 'If the meeting goes okay, we'll have a quick second one – I would like to do it almost immediately,' he added. Trump suggested that the follow-up would bring together Putin, Zelensky, and himself, 'if they'd like to have me there.' Moscow has repeatedly stated it is open to a peaceful resolution of the hostilities but has stressed that any deal would have to address the roots of the conflict and respect the realities on the ground. This includes the status of the former Ukrainian territories that joined Russia after public referendums. Zelensky, who earlier called the Alaska summit a 'personal victory' for Putin, arrived in Berlin on Wednesday to join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a video call between European leaders and Trump. Moscow has long accused Zelensky of being in denial and unnecessarily prolonging a conflict he cannot win. Putin has said he has 'nothing in principle' against meeting with Zelensky but maintains that 'certain conditions must be created' for it to take place. He has also questioned Zelensky's legal capacity to sign binding agreements, as the Ukrainian leader's presidential term expired last year and he has refused to hold a new election, citing martial law – prompting Moscow to declare him 'illegitimate.' Russian officials have said the upcoming Trump-Putin meeting is a chance to mend strained relations between Russia and the US and tackle long-running disagreements between the two countries.


Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump wants ceasefire deal at Putin summit
US President Donald Trump has reportedly told Western European leaders that he wants to reach a ceasefire deal in the Ukraine conflict at his upcoming meeting with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, according to France's Emmanuel Macron. A video conference was held between Trump and the leaders of Germany, Finland, France, the UK, Italy, Poland, EU officials and Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky on Wednesday. The virtual meeting was devoted to discussions of Trump's summit with Putin in Alaska scheduled for TO FOLLOW