Job Corps closings raise question of why
The budget ax wielded by DOGE and the Trump administration fell on Job Corps last week, when the administration announced it was closing 99 of the program's 123 centers across the country.
Job Corps, which began as part of the War on Poverty in 1964, provides free education, job training and a place to live for low-income youth ages 16 to 24. The closings shutter three rural Kentucky locations that serve over 500 students: the Carl D. Perkins Job Corps Center in Prestonsburg, the Earle C. Clements Job Corps Academy in Morganfield and the Muhlenberg Job Corps Center in Greenville.
But why is Job Corps being terminated? Doing so harms the same 'forgotten men and women of our country' that the administration says are its priority. Job Corps helps young people who are receiving public assistance or are homeless, in foster care, or qualify for free or reduced-price lunch. In 2017, 29% of the youth enrolling had a disability and 65% had left high school before earning a diploma.
Trump shutdown of Job Corps will leave 'big void' in this rural Kentucky place
So is Job Corps being shuttered to 'promote work?' Far from it. The Kentucky centers were putting students on paths to becoming welders, computer technicians, certified nursing assistants, pharmacy techs, culinary arts employees, automotive mechanics and more.
And just as importantly, Job Corps reaches those who face the biggest problems entering career-track employment. A recent report notes that Job Corps often draws from youth who have tried multiple times to earn a secondary or postsecondary credential but dropped out under the demands of low-wage jobs and financial, family or mental health challenges.
The program's approach takes these students' monumental barriers into account. It is typically a residential program, eliminating the worries of food, housing and transportation. It also offers small living stipends and health care, counseling services, life skills training, and post-program help in transitioning to employment or additional education.
Then maybe Job Corps is something our country just cannot afford? No one can say that with a straight face when Job Corps costs 0.02% of the federal budget while the administration is pushing tax cuts skewed to the wealthy that cost 400 times as much.
Neither can anyone credibly claim that the program does not work. The most rigorous study of Job Corps to date found that it helped improve employment, earnings and education outcomes. Not every hardship-facing young person comes out a roaring success, particularly in an economy that produces far too few living wage jobs. But it is easy to find testimonials of Job Corps graduates in Facebook posts:
'This place picked me up when I was broken. It gave me a reason to wake up in the morning. It gave me back the pieces of myself I thought I'd lost forever. I started to believe I could become someone,' said Jessica Williams, a current Job Corps student in Prestonsburg.
'My 21 year old son is on the autism spectrum. He is currently on Medicaid and is learning Information Technology (IT) at the Morganfield, KY Earle C. Clements Job Corps training center. He is approximately half-way through his education there … Just last week, we had discussed his plan to finish his IT program, enter into the AI/Robotics program and then obtain his advanced education … He has long wanted to work in Cyber Security, but he is now devastated,' said Dale K. Hart.
'Tearing down Job Corps, a place where you learn stability and free trades … is absolutely mind boggling. I was at Muhlenberg Job Corps Center from 2015-2016, I met amazing people from all walks of life, seen people who were on their very last strand of hope make something of themselves years later,' said Keeley Staples.
The young people in Job Corps, who have survived so many bumps in life, now face a new one. Many may lose hope and direction. Some will become homeless. And it is right to fear that cutting support for left-behind young people will further crowd our jails and juvenile detention centers and push up already obscene addiction rates.
It is important to ask why the administration is announcing these and other harmful cuts. But a more pressing question is for all of us: will we let them happen?
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs Starting to Slow Growth: Morgan Stanley's Zezas
Michael Zezas, Morgan Stanley's head of U.S. public policy research, says that over the next two to three months, we need to look carefully at inflation, labor data, as well as, product-by-product breakdowns to understand how the economy is absorbing tariff actions. He speaks to Romaine Bostick and Scarlet Fu on "The Close." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Company advised by Trump sons said it hoped to benefit from fed money, then took it back
NEW YORK (AP) — A public document filed by a company that just hired President Donald Trump's two oldest sons as advisers included a sentence early Monday that said it hoped to benefit from grants and other incentives from the federal government, which their father happens to lead. But when The Associated Press asked the Trump family business about the apparent conflict of interest, the document was revised and the line taken out. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are getting 'founder shares' worth millions of dollars in New America Acquisition 1 Corp., a company with no operating business that hopes to fill that hole by purchasing an American company that can play 'a meaningful role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing,' according to to the filing. The president has geared his trade policy toward boosting manufacturing in the U.S. The original version of the securities filing said the target company should be 'well positioned' to tap federal or state government incentives. That reference was taken out of the revised version of the filing. The Trump Organization didn't reply to a question about whether New America still planned to benefit from government programs or why the line was cut. But the outside law firm Paul Hastings that helped prepare the document sent an email to AP saying it was 'mistake' made by 'scriveners,' an old term for transcribers of legal papers. Kathleen Clark, an expert in government ethics, said any excuses are too late because the Trumps had already tipped their hand. 'They just deleted the language. They haven't committed not to do what they said earlier today they were planning to do," said the Washington University law professor and Trump critic. "It's an attempt to exploit public office for private profit.' New America is what's know as a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. It's a publicly traded company that exists solely to use its funds to acquire another company and take the target public. New America plans to raise money by selling stock on the New York Stock Exchange at $10 a share. That will hand the two Trump sons a total of $5 million in paper wealth on the first day of trading. The company hopes to sell enough shares to raise $300 million, which it then plans to use buying a yet unidentified manufacturer. A press release issued by New America saying it was focused on 'American values and priorities." It made no mention of the aim to get government incentives. The filing to New America's potential new investors to the Securities and Exchange Commission was explicit about what it was looking for in a target company. It said, among other things, it wanted a company that can ride 'public policy tailwinds" by benefiting from federal or state 'grants, tax credits, government contracts or preferential procurement programs.'
