Relatives struggle to find last 1,000 Srebrenica victims 30 years on
Sadik Selimovic's relief at surviving the Srebrenica massacres 30 years ago did not last long.
When he found out that his father and three brothers had not been so lucky, his life took the "only possible turn" -- to find them.
Three decades on, the 62-year-old, who was driven to become an investigator at the Bosnian Institute for Missing Persons, cannot hide his anguish that the remains of around 1,000 of the victims have yet to be found.
More than 8,000 Muslim men and boys were killed within a matter of days in July 1995 after Bosnian Serb forces captured Srebrenica, which was supposed to have been a UN "protected zone" watched over by Dutch peacekeepers.
"Over the past three years, we have searched 62 locations" hoping to discover mass graves from the slaughter -- since declared a genocide under international law -- "but we have not found a single body," Selimovic told AFP.
"Those who know (where the graves are) do not want to say," he said.
Selimovic spends his time searching for witnesses among the Serbs living in and around Srebrenica, often his neighbours, school friends or those he worked with before the war at the Potocari battery factory, now a genocide memorial centre.
"How can they live with what they know?" he said. "I can't understand it. But it has to be said, there are people who have talked."
- Mass graves -
The last mass grave of Srebrenica victims, which held 10 bodies, was discovered in 2021 in the Dobro Polje area, 180 kilometres (111 miles) southwest of the town.
More than 6,800 of the dead, some 80 percent, have been identified, said Dragana Vucetic, a forensic anthropologist at the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP).
But that work has been complicated by the gruesome way the perpetrators tried to cover up their crimes.
The ICMP morgue and the Bosnian Missing Persons Commission in Tuzla hold the remains of "90 cases whose genetic fingerprint has been isolated" but who have not yet been identified.
There are also about 50 identified victims whose "families do not wish to validate the identification and bury them, most often because skeletal remains are incomplete", said the expert, who has worked investigating the genocide for more than two decades.
Initially, the victims' bodies were thrown into mass graves near the "five mass execution sites".
"A few months later, these graves were opened, and the corpses, already in the early stages of decomposition, were transported to other locations, sometimes hundreds of kilometres (miles) away," said Vucetic.
- Hiding the evidence -
The bodies were then "torn to pieces" by mechanical shovels and bulldozers and transported, often to two or three different locations, in an attempt to conceal the crime.
"Only 10 percent of bodies found during exhumations were complete," said Vucetic. DNA testing has allowed some skeletons to be reconstructed, sometimes from parts found in four different mass graves.
About 6,000 people were identified between 2012 and 2022, but since then the process has slowed, with only three this year so far.
Mevlida Omerovic, 69, has been hoping since 2013 that more of her husband Hasib's skeleton would be found so she could lay him to rest.
He was killed aged 33 with his brother Hasan.
"There's just his jaw, but I have now decided to bury him" at the Srebrenica memorial centre during the commemoration of the genocide's 30th anniversary on July 11, she said.
"We will know where his grave is and we will be able to go there and pray."
Her brother Senad, who was 17 when he was killed, has never been found.
The investigator Selimovic found the remains of his brothers and father. The last, his younger brother Sabahudin, was buried in 2023.
But he has no intention of stopping looking for the others. "That's what keeps me alive. I know what it feels like when you're told your loved one has been found," he said.
So he reads and re-reads testimonies and criss-crosses the area, revisiting the same places dozens of times. "We will find some (more) people," he insisted. "If other mass graves exist -- and I think they do -- we will find them."
But he fears the Drina River, which flows near Srebrenica forming the border between Bosnia and Serbia, "is the biggest mass grave of all", he said.
"No one will ever find those who ended up there."
rus/cbo/fg/rlp
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Deadly shooting at high school in Austria
A former student who never graduated opened fire this morning in Graz, Austria. At least 10 people were killed and 11 injured. Police say the shooter used two weapons that he legally owned and took his own life in the school's bathroom. Late today, thousands of people gathered in the city square for a vigil. NBC News' Molly Hunter has the story.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump preparing to send thousands of immigrants including Europeans to Guantanamo military prison: reports
Donald Trump's administration is reportedly preparing to send thousands of illegal immigrants to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as this week, marking a rapid escalation of the president's mass deportation agenda which could target hundreds of people from European allied countries. Immigration officials are considering whether to transfer as many as 9,000 foreign nationals, including people from the United Kingdom as well as Ireland, Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Poland, Turkey and Ukraine, according to reporting from The Washington Post and Politico. Officials are not expected to inform their home countries about their imminent transfers to the notorious facility, which opened in 2002 at the height of the War on Terror. Most European allies accept deportees from the United States to their home countries, making it unclear why the Trump administration would first force them into a detention camp roundly condemned by international human rights groups. The naval base is expected to temporarily detain deportees before they're removed to their home countries in an effort to free up bed space at immigration detention facilities on American soil. A Department of Defense spokesperson did not provide any comment. The Independent has also requested comment from Homeland Security. In January, the president said as many as 30,000 immigrants could be imprisoned inside tents and camps at the naval base, though the tents were removed in recent weeks as the number of deportation flights to the facility fell and the prison didn't reach capacity. Dozens of Venezuelan detainees were initially held there before the administration abruptly emptied the facility in February following a lawsuit from civil rights groups. Roughly 300 immigrants in the country illegally were imprisoned there within the first few months of his administration. A recent lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union suggests roughly 70 immigrants are currently detained at the facility, where they face 'punitive' conditions, rodent infestations, insufficient food, a lack of clean clothes, and only one hour of relief from their 'indoor cage.' 'In effect, the government is perversely utilizing Guantanamo's well-known history as a site of abuse and mistreatment, including as the location of two former CIA 'black sites,' to frighten immigrants,' according to the lawsuit. Use of the facility exceeds $100,000 per day per detainee, according to Sen. Gary Peters, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security committee. Guantanamo's drastically expanded use would follow pressure from top Trump administration officials to boost immigration arrests after falling short of the president's campaign ambitions for the 'largest mass deportation operation in American history.' Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem have repeatedly defended use of the facility to jail suspected Tren de Aragua gang members and 'the worst of the worst and illegal criminals,' according to Noem. But the administration has also detained 'lower-threat' immigrants at the facility who were in the United States illegally but have never been charged or convicted of violent offenses or other serious crimes, according to federal guidelines. 'We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Sending anyone to Guantanamo is a profoundly cruel move and yet another effort by the Trump administration to deny due process and circumvent both U.S. and international law,' Amnesty International said in a statement. 'Gitmo should be shut down now and forever,' the group added. The potential escalation follows the president's deployment of National Guard service members and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles to crush protests against the administration's anti-immigration agenda.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Clothing brand advert banned for objectifying Katie Price after complaints made
A clothing brand advert featuring model Katie Price has been banned after a watchdog ruled it 'objectified and sexualised women'. The ad for clothing brand Diesel appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26, showing an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that it objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. It was ruled that the advert was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women. Diesel said the advert was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the advert was compliant with advertising rules, but did remove it from the Guardian website. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the advert on April 4 and blocked it from appearing again as it did not comply with their policies. Diesel argued that Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high-fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. It also believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel also said that although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. It added: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. "A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.' Katie Price was born in Sussex and has long been a part of the British entertainment industry, beginning her career as a Page 3 girl for The Sun at 18. Under the name Jordan, she quickly gained fame as a glamour model appearing in the likes of the Daily Star, Esquire and Vogue. Price's popularity in the paper gained her TV work, appearing in the third series of I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! in 2004, where she met her future husband, Peter Andre. They went on to star in their own reality TV show, Katie & Peter, which ended in 2009 when the pair divorced. She has since appeared on Celebrity Big Brother and Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins, as well as having other shows of her own, including Katie Price's Mucky Mansion and What Katie Did Next. Price has also written rom-com novels, autobiographies, a fashion guide and two series of children's books, as well as creating her own make-up line. She began a podcast called The Katie Price Show in 2023, which she hosts with her younger sister Sophie. She has five children: Harvey, Junior, Princess, Jett, and Bunny. However, despite her successful career, Price has seen some hard times with money that resulted in her declaring bankruptcy. Price reportedly previously had a net worth of around £40 million. However, the former model was declared bankrupt in November 2019 and again in March last year, over an unpaid tax bill of £761,994.05, according to International Business Times. Price faces a wait to see whether more of her income will go directly towards paying off money owed under her two bankruptcies. In October 2023, HMRC demanded payment from Price that would cover self-assessments for 2020 to 2021 and 2021 to 2022. The Telegraph reported in March 2024 that she owed £100,000 in mortgage payments for her home, named the 'Mucky Mansion'. Further evidence found Price had spent around £25,000 a year on plastic surgery and £120,000 on housekeepers, gardeners and nannies. It's also understood that the star had a lavish lifestyle that saw her spend £1,500 a week on manicures and pedicures, £800 on massages and £1,000 on hair appointments. While the bankruptcies have since been discharged, Price still owes money as a result, and had previously reached a voluntary agreement over her debts. Last August, a court judge ruled that Price's income from social media platform TikTok be suspended as part of efforts to pay off her debts. Recommended reading: Katie Price says therapy has taught her that men have been her 'downfall' What happened to Katie Price and what led to her bankruptcy in her career? Glamour modelling and reality TV shot Katie Price to fame And in February last year, a judge at a specialist bankruptcy court ordered that she must pay 40% of her monthly income from the adult entertainment website OnlyFans until February 2027. Price has previously commented on her money troubles and the media coverage, stating: "Despite consistent stories trying to humiliate me for my personal misfortunes, I am neither embarrassed nor ashamed. "I own my situation and am trying my best to work out of it and put matters right."