Latest news with #genocide
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- General
- Al Jazeera
The sudden surge of genocide critique in the West
More than 600 days into its genocidal war in Gaza, some of Israel's closest allies have begun to condemn its actions. Alongside the changing global narrative, growing opposition in Israel to the Netanyahu government's war methods has seeped into the media coverage – fracturing a consensus that dates back to October 7, 2023. Contributors: Yara Hawari – Co-Director, Al-Shabaka Natasha Lennard – Contributing writer, The Intercept Orly Noy – Editor, Local Call Muhammad Shehada – Visiting fellow, European Council on Foreign Relations Over the past couple of weeks, dispatches coming out of Gaza's hospitals have grown more and more desperate. Meenakshi Ravi reports on the healthcare workers getting the story out and filling the vacuum in the news coverage. Formed a matter of months ago, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is a United States-Israeli coalition of private military contractors that includes former CIA and military personnel. We speak with Jeremy Scahill, co-founder of Drop Site News, who has investigated the GHF, together with Palestinian journalists on the ground. Featuring: Jeremy Scahill – Co-Founder, Drop Site News
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- General
- Malay Mail
‘Selective outrage must not dull moral clarity': Anwar calls for decisive action on Gaza at Singapore defence summit
SINGAPORE, May 31 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has urged the international community to act decisively and consistently in response to the genocide in Gaza. Delivering his Special Address at the 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue here, Anwar said the scale of devastation, blatant disregard for humanitarian norms, and the failure of global institutions to effectively address the conflict demand more than expressions of sympathy. 'We must not allow selective outrage or strategic fatigue to dull our moral clarity. Indeed, the genocide in Gaza is a test of our collective conscience,' he said. Anwar also described the current global landscape — with the number of armed conflicts at its highest since the end of the Second World War — as a sobering moment in history. He stressed that Malaysia is under no illusions about the security challenges ahead, noting that lasting stability must be rooted in sound fundamentals, clear policies, and a long-term vision. MORE TO COME
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- General
- Yahoo
Israel's Irish foes have just come up with their most shameless plan yet
Every country in the West has its fair share of politicians who love nothing better than to indulge in noisy grandstanding about Israel. For some reason, though, Ireland's quota seems to be particularly fervent. Last October, you may recall, local councillors in Cork responded to events in the Middle East by officially banning Benjamin Netanyahu from visiting their city. Admittedly, it is not known whether the Israeli prime minister actually had any intention of visiting it. If he'd been planning to fly in as part of a major diplomatic mission to strengthen economic ties between Israel and Cork, or simply to treat his wife to a romantic trip to Cork Butter Museum and the Old Cork Waterworks Experience, he certainly never said so on the record. But, either way, the disappointment doesn't appear to have made him rethink his strategy on Gaza. Still, Cork's councillors will have been heartened to see that the Irish government is keeping up the fight. Micheál Martin, the Taoiseach, says that Israel is guilty of genocide. To his great frustration, however, the leaders of few other European nations seem to agree with him. In order to persuade them, therefore, he's come up with an inspired plan. In the Irish parliament this week, he said: 'We're hoping that we will broaden the criteria by which genocide is judged by the Geneva Convention.' In other words: since other leaders don't agree that Israel is guilty of genocide, we'll simply change the definition of 'genocide', until they do. At present, the word is generally understood to mean a deliberate attempt to eradicate a race of people. What the new definition would be, I don't know. 'Deliberate attempt to eradicate a proscribed terrorist organisation'? 'Deliberate attempt to force the release of the 58 hostages the terrorist organisation is still holding captive, over 19 months after it abducted them'? 'Refusal to respond to the single biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust by merely lighting some candles and singing Don't Look Back in Anger'? At any rate, I just hope this doesn't give our own Government any ideas. Otherwise some members of it might think: 'Hang on. If we broaden the word 'genocide' to mean 'posting offensive opinions on social media', we can keep Lucy Connolly banged up for life.' A prisoner has attacked a prison officer using boiling water. That's the second time this has happened in a month. And so, once again, the public is left asking itself the following question. Who on earth decided that prisoners should be allowed to have kettles? Someone must have. Indeed, there must have been a high-level meeting, at which some very important people discussed the matter, and concluded that no possible risk could arise from permitting dangerous criminals to access a device that can be used to cause third-degree burns. Whoever these people are, they presumably haven't read Decline and Fall. Evelyn Waugh's sublimely horrible debut novel, published in 1928, contains a chapter about an ultra-progressive prison governor. After one inmate, a carpenter by trade, verbally abuses the chief warder, the governor concludes that the inmate is suffering from a 'frustrated creative urge'. So he orders that the inmate be provided with a set of carpentry tools. Upon receipt of these thoughtful gifts, the inmate immediately uses them to saw off the prison chaplain's head. This week's news, therefore, only serves to enhance Evelyn Waugh's stature as a satirist. Not only did he satirise the 1920s. He managed to satirise the 2020s, too. 'Hell is other people,' wrote the French philosopher, playwright and all-round ray of sunshine Jean-Paul Sartre. It seems, however, that his fellow countrymen now wish to make a slight amendment to his best-known line. Hell isn't other people. Hell is other people's children. Hence the rapid rise, all over France, of child-free restaurants and hotels. More and more French people have had it up to here with the screeching of today's delinquent brats. So they wish to escape it. And plenty of businesses are happy to oblige. All of a sudden, though, these blissful idylls are under threat – not from a child, but from a government minister. Sarah El Haïry, France's 'high commissioner for childhood', is furious about this adults-only trend – because, she thunders, it's nothing less than 'violence against children'. Her critics will say this is nonsense. Indeed, they may even say she's got it the wrong way round. Keeping restaurants and hotels free of screaming urchins actually prevents violence against children. None the less, I can't help feeling that she has a point. It does seem unfair to single out children. Mainly because nowadays, the people who create the most infuriating noise in public are invariably adults. Especially on public transport, where so many of them insist on merrily inflicting their favourite music on everyone in earshot. It's never good music, either. The people with the worst manners always have the worst taste, as well. Anyway, no matter what Madame El Haïry says, the long-suffering people of France needn't worry. Their birth rate is now so low, there soon won't be any children left to annoy them. 'Way of the World' is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines while aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 6am every Tuesday and Saturday Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Lifestyle
- Telegraph
Israel's Irish foes have just come up with their most shameless plan yet
Every country in the West has its fair share of politicians who love nothing better than to indulge in noisy grandstanding about Israel. For some reason, though, Ireland's quota seems to be particularly fervent. Last October, you may recall, local councillors in Cork responded to events in the Middle East by officially banning Benjamin Netanyahu from visiting their city. Admittedly, it is not known whether the Israeli prime minister actually had any intention of visiting it. If he'd been planning to fly in as part of a major diplomatic mission to strengthen economic ties between Israel and Cork, or simply to treat his wife to a romantic trip to Cork Butter Museum and the Old Cork Waterworks Experience, he certainly never said so on the record. But, either way, the disappointment doesn't appear to have made him rethink his strategy on Gaza. Still, Cork's councillors will have been heartened to see that the Irish government is keeping up the fight. Micheál Martin, the Taoiseach, says that Israel is guilty of genocide. To his great frustration, however, the leaders of few other European nations seem to agree with him. In order to persuade them, therefore, he's come up with an inspired plan. In the Irish parliament this week, he said: 'We're hoping that we will broaden the criteria by which genocide is judged by the Geneva Convention.' In other words: since other leaders don't agree that Israel is guilty of genocide, we'll simply change the definition of 'genocide', until they do. At present, the word is generally understood to mean a deliberate attempt to eradicate a race of people. What the new definition would be, I don't know. 'Deliberate attempt to eradicate a proscribed terrorist organisation'? 'Deliberate attempt to force the release of the 58 hostages the terrorist organisation is still holding captive, over 19 months after it abducted them'? 'Refusal to respond to the single biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust by merely lighting some candles and singing Don't Look Back in Anger '? At any rate, I just hope this doesn't give our own Government any ideas. Otherwise some members of it might think: 'Hang on. If we broaden the word 'genocide' to mean 'posting offensive opinions on social media', we can keep Lucy Connolly banged up for life.' Waugh on woke A prisoner has attacked a prison officer using boiling water. That's the second time this has happened in a month. And so, once again, the public is left asking itself the following question. Who on earth decided that prisoners should be allowed to have kettles? Someone must have. Indeed, there must have been a high-level meeting, at which some very important people discussed the matter, and concluded that no possible risk could arise from permitting dangerous criminals to access a device that can be used to cause third-degree burns. Whoever these people are, they presumably haven't read Decline and Fall. Evelyn Waugh's sublimely horrible debut novel, published in 1928, contains a chapter about an ultra-progressive prison governor. After one inmate, a carpenter by trade, verbally abuses the chief warder, the governor concludes that the inmate is suffering from a 'frustrated creative urge'. So he orders that the inmate be provided with a set of carpentry tools. Upon receipt of these thoughtful gifts, the inmate immediately uses them to saw off the prison chaplain's head. This week's news, therefore, only serves to enhance Evelyn Waugh's stature as a satirist. Not only did he satirise the 1920s. He managed to satirise the 2020s, too. Silence is violence 'Hell is other people,' wrote the French philosopher, playwright and all-round ray of sunshine Jean-Paul Sartre. It seems, however, that his fellow countrymen now wish to make a slight amendment to his best-known line. Hell isn't other people. Hell is other people's children. Hence the rapid rise, all over France, of child-free restaurants and hotels. More and more French people have had it up to here with the screeching of today's delinquent brats. So they wish to escape it. And plenty of businesses are happy to oblige. All of a sudden, though, these blissful idylls are under threat – not from a child, but from a government minister. Sarah El Haïry, France's 'high commissioner for childhood', is furious about this adults-only trend – because, she thunders, it's nothing less than 'violence against children'. Her critics will say this is nonsense. Indeed, they may even say she's got it the wrong way round. Keeping restaurants and hotels free of screaming urchins actually prevents violence against children. None the less, I can't help feeling that she has a point. It does seem unfair to single out children. Mainly because nowadays, the people who create the most infuriating noise in public are invariably adults. Especially on public transport, where so many of them insist on merrily inflicting their favourite music on everyone in earshot. It's never good music, either. The people with the worst manners always have the worst taste, as well. Anyway, no matter what Madame El Haïry says, the long-suffering people of France needn't worry. Their birth rate is now so low, there soon won't be any children left to annoy them.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Trump to press South African president about how his country treats its White minority
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump plans to discuss his concerns about South Africa's White minority with the country's president during an Oval Office meeting, a White House official said. Delving into the long dispute over South Africa's racial inequities could make for a tense meeting between Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Trump has long raised such concerns. Trump cut off U.S. aid to South Africa for what he called 'egregious' accusations of genocide against Israel and for 'fueling disproportionate violence against racially disfavored landowners' – a claim widely disputed by human rights activists and South Africa's government. He also began accepting White people from South Africa − many of them descendants of Dutch colonists known as Afrikaners – as refugees fleeing alleged racial discrimination. In discussing the Afrikaners, Trump will encourage Ramaphosa's government to condemn what the White House official described as incendiary rhetoric against them by politicians. Trump has said the White South Africans are the victims of 'genocide' – an accusation the South African government and human rights experts say is not supported by evidence. Ramaphosa called accusations of racial persecution against Afrikaners a 'completely false narrative.' Although apartheid − a period during which South Africa was controlled by the country's White minority and Black South Africans were deprived of basic civil rights – ended in 1994, White people still own a large majority of the land and control a hugely outsized share of the country's wealth. Trump also plans to discuss U.S. trade with South Africa and the country's laws touching on race, the White House official said. Ramaphosa told reporters on May 17, ahead of his trip, that he wasn't worried about a hostile welcome at the White House. 'There is no genocide in South Africa,' Ramaphosa said. 'We are going to have good discussions on trade.' Ramaphosa, 72, led the negotiating team for the African National Congress – the party that now rules the country – in talks during the 1990s that led to the end of apartheid. He has been president since 2018. John Steenhuisen, the South African minister for agriculture, said on social media May 20 that he had a constructive meeting with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. 'Trade is essential between our two countries and we are determined to ensure that access for agricultural products remains open in a mutually beneficial way,' Steenhuisen said. 'Trade means jobs and a growing economy.' The United States had an $8 billion trade deficit with South Africa in 2024. Upon taking office, Trump immediately suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and ordered most potential refugees to remain in other countries. But an exception Trump ordered Feb. 7 was for 'Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination,' whom he offered admission and resettlement in the United States as refugees. The Trump administration warmly greeted 59 White people from South Africa upon their arrival on May 12, after granting them refugee status. But experts on South Africa say Trump's claims of anti-White discrimination − much less genocide − are baseless. "Genocide has a very clear definition and what is happening in South Africa with White South Africans does not fit the definition at all," said Mandeep Tiwana, chief officer of evidence and engagement at CIVICUS, a human rights advocacy organization headquartered in South Africa. "In fact, White South Africans are a privileged minority." "There is no White genocide. It is a story that has been sold," said Thapelo Mohapi, secretary general of Abahlali baseMjondolo, a South African poor people's movement. "It is very unfortunate, as a poor South African that lives in a shack, seeing somebody going abroad on a flight with gifts and clothing and receiving a warm welcome from the presidency in the U.S., with a lie that they are being persecuted," Mohapi said of the Afrikaners granted refugee status. "We, in fact, are the ones who are living in poverty," Mohapi said. Some White Afrikaners have praised Trump for highlighting what they say is the discrimination they face. Theo de Jager, an Afrikaner who chairs the Southern African Agriculture Initiative, wrote in a letter to Trump that "the opportunity you have extended" to enter the United States as a refugee could be the "only viable path forward" for some Afrikaners. But, he added, some Black families suffer "just as much – if not more." "It is critical for you to understand that the tensions in our country are not simply a black-and-white issue." Trump's admission of the Afrikaners also angered refugee assistance programs. The Episcopal Church announced it would shutter its refugee resettlement program on May 12 after Trump asked it to help resettle the group of Afrikaners, even as the flow of refugees from all other countries had stopped. "This is a corruption of the U.S. refugee program," Kenn Speicher, co-founder of Northern Virginia Friends of Refugees, said at Dulles Airport, where he was protesting the Afrikaners' arrival. Genocide is defined in the Genocide Convention, an international treaty that criminalizes genocide, as the killing of members of a group because of their race, religion or national origin, as in the Holocaust. "White farmers are being brutally killed," Trump told reporters May 12 in the White House Roosevelt Room. Ramaphosa has branded the claim a "false narrative." In South Africa, White people are much less likely to be murder victims than Black people. The group Genocide Watch has said that while South Africa's population is 7% White, White people make up just 2% of its murder victims. The South African government said on May 9 that "The South African Police Service statistics on farm-related crimes do not support allegations of violent crime targeted at farmers generally or any particular race." Allegations of a White "genocide" in the country have been bolstered by Elon Musk, Trump's close advisor, who was born in South Africa. Last week, users of X, the social media site owned by Musk, widely reported that its AI chatbot repeatedly spat out statements that the South African White genocide is real in unrelated conversations. Musk has also frequently used the platform to broadcast his accusations that White South Africans are victims of targeted racial violence. "When a farmer dies, then the whole world must know, because that farmer is White and the farmer is privileged," Mohapi said. "Black people can die anytime, like flies." The conflict over South African refugees erupted at a Senate hearing on May 20 between Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Kaine disputed that Afrikaners are refugees because their political party is part of the government. 'I assert that this claim that there is persecution of Afrikaner famers is specious,' Kaine said. Rubio said the Afrikaners who arrived as refugees felt persecuted because 'their farms were burned down and they were killed because of the color of their skin.' Rubio denied that the Trump administration favored Afrikaners as refugees because they are White. He said accepting refugees from additional countries would lead to millions more people arriving. 'It was acting as a magnet,' Rubio said of the refugee program. 'They can't all come here.' Trump's allegations of a White "genocide" in South Africa center on recent land reform legislation signed by Ramaphosa in January called the Expropriation Act. The bill, aimed at rectifying inequality in land ownership left over from South Africa's racial apartheid system, opens pathways for the government to seize private land for public use – sometimes without compensation. The White House's executive order slammed the bill as "in shocking disregard of its citizens' rights," and Musk branded it "racist." But South Africa's racial wealth gap leans starkly in the opposite direction. Whites make up just over 7% of the population, but own around 72% of the country's farms and agricultural land, according to a 2017 government report. The country's inequality levels – consistently rated by the World Bank as among the worst globally – impact its Black population at a vastly disproportionate rate. Last year, the unemployment rate hit 37.6% for Black South Africans, while 7.9% of Whites were without a job. Around 10% of Blacks had medical care in 2018, as compared to 72% of their White counterparts. "We are finding ourselves in a very tight and difficult situation," said Mohapi. "People celebrate when they get a meal a day." "We are defending White privilege rather than to actually talk about the real issues, the bread and butter issues," he said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump to confront South African president amid trade, refugee talks
