logo
Post Office Horizon scandal: Why hundreds were wrongly prosecuted

Post Office Horizon scandal: Why hundreds were wrongly prosecuted

Yahoo3 days ago
The Post Office Horizon scandal has been called the UK's most widespread miscarriage of justice, after hundreds of people were prosecuted on the basis of data from faulty software.
The scandal led to widespread public anger, partly as a result of a hit TV drama, and has been the subject of a lengthy inquiry.
The first part of the report from the official inquiry into what happened is due to be published on Tuesday 8 July.
More than 900 sub-postmasters were prosecuted because of incorrect information from the Horizon computer system.
Many sub-postmasters went to prison for false accounting and theft, and others were financially ruined.
The Post Office itself took many cases to court, prosecuting 700 people between 1999 and 2015. Another 283 cases were brought by other bodies, including the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
In 2017, a group of 555 sub-postmasters - led by campaigner Alan Bates, who has since been knighted - took legal action in a landmark court case against the Post Office.
In 2019, the Post Office agreed to pay the group £58m in compensation, but much of the money went on legal fees.
However, the action paved the way for dozens of sub-postmasters to have their convictions quashed in 2021.
The episode came to wider public attention last year after it was depicted in an ITV drama, Mr Bates vs The Post Office.
The outcry triggered by the drama led to legislation being rushed through Parliament to bring in a law quashing convictions from the Horizon scandal.
There are now a number of compensation schemes under way, and as of 2 June 2025, more than £1bn has been awarded to thousands of sub-postmasters across all schemes.
Many former sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses say the scandal ruined their lives.
Some used their own money to cover non-existent shortfalls because their contracts said they were responsible for unexplained losses. Many faced bankruptcy or lost their livelihoods.
Marriages broke down, and some families believe the stress led to serious health conditions, addiction and even premature death.
'I'm terrified' - Post Office victim still fears seeing old customers
'I thought mum left me, she'd been sent to prison'
There isn't a single compensation scheme for sub-postmasters to apply to, and individual eligibility depends on the particular circumstances of each case.
The four main schemes are aimed at groups of victims who had different experiences of the scandal.
As of 2 June 2025, about £1.039bn has been awarded to just over 7,300 sub-postmasters across all four redress schemes. That total breaks down as:
Horizon Shortfall Scheme - £559m
Group Litigation Order Scheme - £167m
Overturned Convictions Scheme - £68m
Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme - £245m
Prof Chris Hodges, chair of the the independent Horizon Compensation Advisory Board, told the BBC that some individual compensation claims were "well over £1m".
How do the Post Office compensation schemes work?
Horizon was developed by the Japanese company Fujitsu, for tasks such as accounting and stocktaking.
It was introduced by the Post Office in 1999.
Sub-postmasters quickly complained about bugs in the system after it falsely reported shortfalls, often for many thousands of pounds, but their concerns were dismissed.
The Horizon system is still used by the Post Office and maintained by Fujitsu. The Post Office says it has continued to make improvements to the system while it plans "to move to a new system that is being developed".
A public inquiry began in 2022 and heard evidence from Post Office and Fujitsu employees.
Last year, Sir Alan Bates appeared at the inquiry, telling it that the Post Office had spent 23 years trying to "discredit and silence" him.
Paula Vennells, who was Post Office chief executive between 2012 and 2019, gave evidence in May 2024. She was quizzed for three days and at times broke down in tears. She apologised to the sub-postmasters and their families "who have suffered as a result of all that the inquiry has been looking into for so long".
The first part of the inquiry's report is due to be published on Tuesday.
The inquiry became almost box office viewing - racking up more than 20 million views on YouTube.
People with no connection to the Post Office told the BBC how they became engrossed watching.
Who is Paula Vennells?
Alan Bates says Post Office run by 'thugs in suits'
Ms Vennells resigned from her role at the Post Office in 2019. In January 2024, she said she would hand back her CBE.
In August 2023, the then-Post Office chief executive Nick Read said he would return bonus money awarded for his work on the Horizon inquiry.
Fujitsu Europe director Paul Patterson said the firm had a "moral obligation" to help fund compensation payments.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey has been criticised for delaying meeting Sir Alan when he was postal affairs minister in 2010. He says he was "deeply misled by Post Office executives".
The BBC discovered that former Prime Minister David Cameron's government knew the Post Office had dropped a secret investigation that might have helped postmasters prove their innocence.
What are the different Post Office compensation schemes?
Post Office scandal victims claims not chased due to harassment fears
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Council scammed out of thousands for shipping container that never arrived
Council scammed out of thousands for shipping container that never arrived

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Council scammed out of thousands for shipping container that never arrived

Bridgend County Borough Council lost more than £3,000 to fraud in the 2024-25 financial year after a shipping container they ordered never arrived. Council bosses heard about the purchase at a governance and audit committee meeting where they discussed the submission of an audit inquiries letter to Audit Wales. The letter is intended to help Audit Wales' understanding of the governance arrangements for the council to support their work in providing an audit opinion on the yearly financial statement. However a part of the report given to councillors noted a case of "actual, suspected, or alleged fraud" where a shipping container had been ordered with 50% of the cost being paid up-front but which never arrived. READ MORE: M4 shut overnight after in police incident READ MORE: Porthcawl's beloved Coney Beach amusement park to close within months Get daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice The letter which was submitted to Audit Wales said: "The council ordered a shipping container which did not arrive and paid 50% up-front (£3,658). "This has been identified as a fraud and a request for the final 50% payment was rejected. "Financial regulations require that payments in advance should not be made without s151 officer approval." Addressing the chamber councillor Martin Hughes of Maesteg East asked how the purchase was made and if it would be possible for the council to recoup any of the losses. Officers responded by saying there had been attempts to make contact with the company to recover the money though they were "not sure" if it was possible. They also added that while this seemed to be a one-off incident they would look into it further to see if there had been a breach in procedure to make sure it didn't happen again. Councillor Steven Easterbrook of Bridgend Central described the situation as embarrassing for the authority and said they needed to be "a lot more careful" in the way they were doing things. While it was unclear exactly why the shipping container had been purchased some members pointed out that a number of other containers had recently been set up in Porthcawl for start-up businesses to use. Following the report the committee approved the letter of response to Audit Wales though asked that further investigations take place on the incident with the missing shipping container. For the latest Bridgend news sign up to our newsletter here.

Owner of 'dangerously out of control' dog jailed as judge orders pet to be destroyed
Owner of 'dangerously out of control' dog jailed as judge orders pet to be destroyed

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Owner of 'dangerously out of control' dog jailed as judge orders pet to be destroyed

Members of a family were left heartbroken after their beloved dog was attacked by a labrador - before they had to make the horrific decision to put their pet down. Jean and David Scott went to pick up their two dogs from a groomers in Openshaw in July last year when they saw a bigger animal running towards them. The dog, Chico, had escaped from a nearby garden. It grabbed one of the Scotts' dogs - Yorkshire Terrier Bosley - and shook it until it went limp. READ MORE: BMW driver smashes into front of takeaway on first day of opening as police swarm area READ MORE: 'Major incident' declared in Greater Manchester town amid 'illegal waste' fire Chico's owner, Callum Bridge-Banks, 32, was heard shouting: "Let go." The Scotts desperately tried to help their pet. Sign up to the MEN Court newsletter here Vet bills of around £10,000 - and the possibility Bosley would not survive in any event - meant Jean and David had to make the terrible decision to put their pet down. Bridge-Banks was jailed for a year and four months at Manchester Crown Court having earlier pleaded guilty to being an owner in charge of a dog dangerously out of control, causing injury. Prosecuting, Chloe Fordham earlier told the court the drama unfolded on June 19, 2024. "Both Mrs Scott and her husband tried to stop the attack, as did the dog groomer, by kicking and punching the dog," she added. Jean was left with a wound to her arm, bruising and thumb injuries. She said in a statement she had been left 'heartbroken and devastated', adding: "I don't think I'll ever be the same again. No sentence I can make can explain how much of a wonderful dog he was." Husband David added: "When we take our dogs out we are constantly looking for other dogs. We get flashbacks of the incident." The court heard that in February 2023, Bridge-Banks was handed a caution after Chico attacked another dog and bit its owner. The dog was not muzzled, and when officers went to the defendant's house, they found there was no secure area for the pet, meaning it was able to escape the property. When officers returned to arrest Bridge-Banks, they found the front gate was tied off with a piece of rope. The court heard he has 27 previous convictions for 65 offences. Join our Court and Crime WhatsApp group HERE Georgia Faulke, defending, said her client struggled with anxiety and depression and had suffered with substance abuse. She said he would 'not be happy' if Chico was put down and said the animal was only aggressive with other dogs because it had been attacked as a puppy. Recorder Sarah Griffin said: "These offences demonstrate that you are an irresponsible dog owner." Bridge-Banks, of Wycombe Avenue, was jailed for a year and four months months. He must pay £500 compensation. Chico was ordered to be destroyed and Bridge-Banks was banned from owning dogs for five years.

'Will this take long?', man asks after going through 'nothing to declare' lane at Manchester Airport
'Will this take long?', man asks after going through 'nothing to declare' lane at Manchester Airport

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'Will this take long?', man asks after going through 'nothing to declare' lane at Manchester Airport

A drug mule claimed he had 'only brought clothes' as he tried to pass through the 'nothing to declare' lane at Manchester Airport. Wembadive Onokoko aroused the suspicions of Border Force officers after arriving at Ringway on a flight from Thailand. After further investigation, the 21-year-old's suitcase was found to contain 15 kilos of cannabis, Manchester Crown Court heard. 'I don't know what it is, I only brought clothes,' he said after officers made the discovery. Prosecuting, Katherine Wright said Onokoko was spotted just after 7am on May 27 last year, after arriving at Manchester Airport on a flight from Thailand, via Doha. READ MORE: BMW driver smashes into front of takeaway on first day of opening as police swarm area READ MORE: 'Major incident' declared in Greater Manchester town amid 'illegal waste' fire He was stopped by Border Force while he passed through the nothing to declare lane. Onokoko had a large black suitcase and a smaller holdall. Sign up to the MEN Court newsletter here When questioned by officers, he confirmed that the baggage belonged to him and that he had packed it. After being asked for the PIN code for the suitcase, he began looking on his phone but did not provide it. Forcing it open, the officers discovered 25 vacuum sealed packages containing 15 kilos of cannabis. 'I don't know what it is, I only brought clothes,' he said. After being told he was under arrest, Onokoko replied: 'Will this take long? I've only got six hours.' He was taken to Ashton police station to be interviewed, where he denied any knowledge of the cannabis. Ms Wright said that in a pre-sentence report compiled by the probation service, Onokoko said he was 'trying to make quick money'. Defending, Keith Jones said Onokoko found himself in a 'difficult situation he was unable to overcome'. 'He accepts now that his actions were unlawful, and of course he accepts he will have to be punished for those actions,' Mr Jones said. 'This isn't a situation he wants to find himself in again.' He said that Onokoko was a new dad at the time and was experiencing financial troubles. He had been offered £1,500 for the smuggling bid, the court was told. Join our Court and Crime WhatsApp group HERE Mr Jones appealed for the judge to impose a suspended sentence, noting Onokoko had already spent about three months behind bars on remand. Sentencing, Judge Neil Usher told the defendant: 'You felt under pressure to provide financially for your family. The irony is of course that you have let your family down enormously in choosing easy money and committing crime.' The judge said he was able to pass a suspended prison sentence, noting that Onokoko's age, that he had expressed genuine remorse and that he was 'hard working' with a 'good work record'. 'In my judgement, it is possible to say, just, that this is an appropriate case to suspend the inevitable prison sentence,' the judge added. Onokoko, of Wrythe Lane, Carshalton, Sutton, was sentenced to 20 months in prison, suspended for 18 months, after pleading guilty to one count of being concerned in the fraudulent evasion of a prohibition on the importation of a class B drug. He was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work and five rehabilitation activity requirement days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store