
DOGE staffer who resigned over past social media posts reinstated with higher access: Filing
Marko Elez, 25, allegedly relinquished access to sensitive systems being reviewed by DOGE in early February as divulged by the White House.
However, he was listed as a staffer in a lawsuit that required the Trump administration to reveal the identity of the agency's hired workers.
Legal documents categorize Elez as a Department of Labor employee detailed to the United States DOGE Service and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) since March 5.
Filings say he had access to the federal directory of new hires, general ledger accounting system and contract writing system at HHS.
'Mr. Elez was granted read-only access to the above-listed systems in furtherance of the DOGE EOs [executive order] directive to identify waste, fraud, and abuse and to modernize government technology and software to increase efficiency and productivity,' according to court documents.
'Mr. Elez's access to the above referenced CMS systems has been disabled. Mr. Elez has not modified, copied and shared with any unauthorized users, or removed any records from any of the systems he has actually accessed,' it reads.
'There are currently no pending requests to grant Mr. Elez access to other sensitive systems at HHS, nor has Mr. Elez been denied access to any systems at HHS.'
The documents confirm that Musk's intent to rehire Elez as a staffer was affirmed.
'He will be brought back,' the tech giant wrote on X amid emerging reports of the 25 year old urging the public to 'Normalize Indian hate' in a deleted post.
Vice President Vance, whose wife is Indian, also supported Elez's return.
'Here's my view: I obviously disagree with some of Elez's posts, but I don't think stupid social media activity should ruin a kid's life,' the vice president said on social platform X, referring to the staffer Marko Elez. 'We shouldn't reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever. So I say bring him back.'
'If he's a bad dude or a terrible member of the team, fire him for that,' he added.
When Elez resigned from DOGE in February, the Treasury Department issued a statement saying that Elez was given 'read-only' access to the highly sensitive payment systems, despite numerous reports indicating that he had the ability to rewrite the payment system base code.
The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill's requests for comment on Elez's reinstatement at DOGE.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
28 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
The Complex Ending of Indian Thriller 'Mandala Murders'
Mandala Murders, a gripping Indian crime thriller series on Netflix, follows detective Rea Thomas as she investigates a series of ritualistic murders in the fictional remote town of Charandaspur. Over eight episodes, the show unravels a chilling mystery involving a secret cult called the Aayastis, who are attempting to create a god-like being named Yast by assembling human body parts according to an ancient ritual. The series blends crime investigation, supernatural lore, and political intrigue, revealing how deep-rooted beliefs and family legacies can drive people to horrific acts. Throughout the season, viewers are drawn into a complex web of betrayal, faith, and moral ambiguity. The story contrasts the personal journeys of Rea and Ananya Bhardwaj, two women connected by their grandmothers' opposing roles in the cult's dark history. The finale ties together these threads, offering answers but leaving enough open to hint that the saga is far from over. What is Yast and why does the cult want to create it? At the heart of Mandala Murders is the myth of Yast, a man-made god envisioned by the Aayastis cult. Yast is a being constructed by piecing together what they see as the ideal human body parts from various victims, inspired by the concept of the Vitruvian Man and ancient Indian spirituality. The cult believes that through this unnatural creation, they can usher in a new divine era—one in which Yast will reign supreme, transforming the world and cleansing it of those deemed unworthy. This god is not just a spiritual ideal but a symbol of ultimate power and control. The cult's ambition to resurrect Yast reflects a dangerous blend of fanaticism and pseudo-science, where ancient rituals meet modern technology. However, the price of this resurrection is horrifying: the ritual requires numerous human sacrifices, with each victim selected for specific body parts that will complete the divine vessel. This blend of science, mysticism, and brutality drives the narrative and raises questions about the cost of blind devotion. The ritualistic murders and the mandala pattern The murders committed by the Aayastis are not random but carefully orchestrated rituals. Each victim is chosen for a particular body part—such as a limb, face, or other distinctive attribute—that fits into the cult's grand design of Yast's body. The killings follow the geometry of a mandala, an intricate spiritual symbol representing cosmic order and balance. This pattern connects the crime scenes and serves as a symbolic map for the cult's progress toward creating Yast. This methodical approach to murder highlights the cult's cold precision and the extent of their fanaticism. The mandala pattern is a dark twist on spiritual symbolism. While mandalas are typically associated with harmony and enlightenment, here they become the blueprint for ritual slaughter. The series uses this contrast to underscore the warped ideology behind the Ayastis' mission, showing how religious symbolism can be twisted to justify horror. Ananya and the legacy of Rukmini Devi Ananya Bhardwaj, a prominent political figure in Charandaspur, is revealed as a key antagonist who is determined to continue the cult's work. She is the granddaughter of Rukmini Devi, the original founder of the Ayasthis' project in the 1950s. Rukmini's vision combined radical science and ancient spiritual beliefs to begin the dangerous experiment of bringing Yast to life. Ananya, driven by loyalty to her grandmother's legacy and her own political ambitions, reboots this project with ruthless determination. Ananya's actions show a chilling disregard for human life. She orchestrates murders, manipulates people around her, and shows no remorse for the carnage left in her wake. Her personal flaws and toxic relationships further complicate her character—she is politically powerful but deeply flawed, willing to betray family and friends to complete the Yast project. Rea Thomas and the legacy of Nandini Opposing Ananya is Rea Thomas, a dedicated and morally grounded detective from the Crime Investigation Bureau. Unbeknownst to her at first, Rea is linked to the cult's past through her grandmother Nandini, who was once part of the original Aayastis but ultimately rejected their cause. Nandini's turning point came when she realized the catastrophic consequences of bringing Yast into the world and sabotaged the original plan by destroying a critical part of the ritual. Rea's journey is one of discovery and redemption. As she uncovers her grandmother's story and the cult's history, she becomes determined to stop Ananya and the Aayastis from completing their apocalyptic mission. Her struggle represents the theme of legacy as a choice—while Ananya embraces the cult's darkness, Rea fights to bring justice and protect her community, even at great personal cost. Vikram's role as the final sacrifice Vikram Singh, a local police officer and Rea's close ally, becomes the cult's ultimate target. His body is believed to be the last piece necessary to complete Yast's perfect human form. The cult's plan culminates in harvesting Vikram's blood and body parts, tying him directly to the mythological ritual and making his survival crucial to stopping the catastrophe. Vikram's involvement raises the stakes emotionally and narratively, especially when it's revealed that he also has a mysterious connection to the cult, through his mother Vasudha's role in past events. The threat to Vikram personalizes the fight between Rea and Ananya, turning it into a race to save not only a life but the future of Charandaspur and possibly the world. The failed resurrection and the fall of Ananya The final episode builds to a tense confrontation deep within the underground chambers where the cult prepares to complete Yast's resurrection. Ananya and her followers are ready to perform the final ritual, with Yast's grotesque, incomplete form suspended in a tank. As the blood sacrifice of Vikram is about to be carried out, Rea arrives to stop the ceremony. Rea's intervention is violent and decisive. She stabs Ananya just as the latter attempts to kill Vikram. This moment disrupts the ritual, preventing Yast's full resurrection. The scene is both a climax and a turning point, symbolizing the struggle between the destructive legacy of the past and the hope for justice. However, despite the victory, the lingering presence of the cult members suggests that the threat is far from over. What the ending implies for the future Though the immediate danger is halted, the series ends on a note of uncertainty. The final scenes hint that some cult members remain free, and the ideology behind Yast has not been fully eradicated. The shadow of the Ayastis still looms over Charandaspur, leaving the door open for future conflicts. This ambiguous ending invites viewers to reflect on the cyclical nature of fanaticism and the challenges of uprooting deeply entrenched beliefs. The unresolved threads suggest that the story could continue in a second season, exploring how the battle between darkness and justice evolves in a world where faith and power collide.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrats demand answers on rural health fund
Senate Democrats are demanding answers over how the Trump administration plans to manage the $50 billion rural health slush fund included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) in light of reports that the fund was made to buy Republican votes. In a letter to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz, a group of 16 Senate Democrats led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) blasted the rural health fund as 'wholly insufficient to plug the massive hole created by the Big, Ugly Betrayal,' but said it was 'critical' that CMS provide clarity and guidance. 'We are alarmed by reports suggesting these taxpayer funds are already promised to Republican members of Congress in exchange for their votes in support of the Big, Ugly Betrayal. In addition, the vague legislative language creating this fund will seemingly function as your personal fund to be distributed according to your political whims,' they wrote. The Democrats cited additional reporting that some of the rural health fund has been promised to regions in states like Pennsylvania that are not rural. The fund will not make direct payments to rural hospitals, but will first go to states that must file 'rural health transformation plans' and receive approval from Oz. The federal government can take back any unobligated money before the program ends in 2030. 'The Big, Ugly Betrayal makes no meaningful investments in rural hospitals, rural health centers, and other rural health care providers, which have some of the most fragile operating margins in the nation, and often are the largest employers and economic engines of their communities,' their letter read. The Trump administration defended the rural health fund this week, writing in a memo that the law 'contains unprecedented levels of federal assistance to rural and other vulnerable hospitals.' The Senate Democrats asked to know when CMS would provide states with guidance on what to include in their applications, how much of the money will go to rural health care providers as well as what the administrative process will look like. They additionally asked to know 'what other states or districts have Trump Administration officials already promised funding from the rural health slush fund to?' Democratic senators who signed the letter include Sens. Ron Wyden (Ore.), Ben Ray Lujan (N.M.), Angela Alsobrooks (Md.), Edward Markey (Mass.), Martin Heinrich (N.M.), Dick Durbin (Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) Alex Padilla (Calif.), Tina Smith (Minn.) Andy Kim (N.J.), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) The Hill has reached out to HHS for comment.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Controversial Interior Department Aide From DOGE to Leave Agency
Tyler Hassen, a former Texas oil executive from Elon Musk's government efficiency team who was given sweeping powers to overhaul the Department of the Interior, is leaving the agency, he confirmed on Friday. 'It has been the honor of a lifetime to serve our great country under President Trump's historic administration,' Mr. Hassen said in a statement to The New York Times. He said his six-month commitment to the agency had 'come to a close.' A former member of Mr. Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, Mr. Hassen initially came to the Interior Department as an assistant secretary for policy, management and budget. The Associated Press reported that was changed in April to 'principal deputy assistant secretary,' a position that, unlike assistant secretary, does not require Senate confirmation. The Musk-led office, DOGE, was controversial in part because it wasn't an official government agency, yet it had taken on broad authority to cut government staff and spending. Mr. Musk stepped away from DOGE in recent months as his relationship with President Trump soured and as sales of his Tesla electric vehicles faltered. Several people on Friday said that Mr. Hassen had informed them during a staff meeting that his last day would be August 1. Aubrie Spady, a spokeswoman for the Interior Department, confirmed Mr. Hassen's departure and in a statement called him a 'true American patriot' dedicated to making the agency more efficient. Doug Burgum, the secretary of the Interior, granted Mr. Hassen in April broad powers to oversee and reorganize the agency, which is responsible for more than 500 million acres of public lands and employs about 70,000 people across the country in numerous agencies including the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service. According to a secretarial order that Mr. Burgum wrote, Mr. Hassen was given authority to take 'all necessary actions' to carry out 'consolidation, unification and optimization' at the department and its bureaus. That move drew criticism from many Democrats and environmental activists, who said Mr. Burgum had turned over too much authority to Mr. Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. The decision demonstrated a 'willingness to freely hand over the keys to the Department to a DOGE representative,' Senator Martin Heinrich, Democrat of New Mexico, wrote in a letter to Mr. Burgum. 'Delegating sweeping authorities and responsibilities to a non-Senate-confirmed person in violation of the Vacancies Reform Act is baffling and extremely troubling,' he wrote. Before joining DOGE, Mr. Hassen spent nearly two decades as an executive at Basin Holdings, which describes itself as 'a green energy metals exploration and development company.' He was previously chief finance officer for Basin Holdings, 'a global diversified oil field/industrial supply and services company,' according to his LinkedIn page.