TOWNHALL TENSION: State reps booed off stage during education meeting
PALESTINE, Texas (KETK) – East Texas State Rep. Cody Harris ended a Q&A session one hour early on Friday night after he warned the audience to be respectful.
East Texas Rep says school choice will pass in State House
Harris, who represents Palestine in the Texas State House, was holding a town hall at Palestine High School in order to answer questions about his education policy push in Austin.
He's pushing for bills meant to better educate Texas children and to create more opportunities for our teachers. Harris talked to parents about his initiatives, but the set two-hour long meeting only lasted half that time.
It was intense from the very beginning. There were school choice protestors outside and educators yelling throughout the evening.
Harris was joined by the author of the school choice bill, Representative Brad Buckley of Salado.
Anytime Rep. Buckley would explain a fact in House Bill 3, he was met with loud comments, yelling and questions from the audience. Harris gave one warning and became fed up.
People had already started leaving before Harris ended the meeting one hour early and walked off the stage. One Palestine ISD principal was upset she didn't hear from the man she voted for.
'Mr. Buckley, who does not represent Anderson County, answered,' Grace Mancilla, principal of A. M. Story Intermediate in Palestine said.
Texas budget proposals would fund school choice, border security, property tax relief
Harris said he wanted to bring the author of the townhall to explain HB3 in more detail. He explained that the point of the town hall was to explain the pieces of legislation to help rural East Texas public schools.
House Bill 2 will invest over $7.6 billion into public education including a significant portion for teacher pay raises.
House Bill 4 would eliminate the STAAR test and Harris said House Bill 6 would expand disciplinary measures to 'foster a respectful and conducive learning atmosphere, encouraging more professional to join and remain in the teaching profession.'
'In my entire district where I've got over 30 public school days, I have one private school that is accredited. The rest are not. None of those other private schools right now would even be eligible for the ESA's. The vast majority of what we're talking about tonight is what we're doing to benefit our local public schools,' Harris said.
One Palestine ISD parent believes the money taken away from public schools and it will hurt her daughter's education.
'Teachers do deserve to get higher pay, higher funding and I want my taxes to go towards teachers getting a better pay so my daughter can get a better education. I don't want my taxes going to the hands of the wealthy,' Palestine ISD parent, Lauren Jones said.
If parents are still worried, Harris encouraged anyone who is willing to reach out to his office.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump policy bill could bring $160 million hit to state budget
Section D subcommittee chair Rep. Bill Mercer, R-Billings, outlines the Section D portion of House Bill 2 during the second reading floor discussion on the budget for the next biennium on March 22, 2023. (Photo by Blair Miller, Daily Montanan) Changes outlined in President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill impacting Medicaid expansion, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and taxes could be a $160 million hit to Montana's state budget, according to an estimate this week from the Legislative Fiscal Division. Legislative Finance Committee members met this week and, among numerous topics, heard a report from the Legislative Fiscal Division on impacts of federal legislation. A couple of Democrats described the potential reductions as 'staggering' and 'frightening.' Trump's tax cuts would reduce revenue from the taxable income of Montana by $122 million, said Josh Poulette, with the state's fiscal division. The changes could mean 'either less general fund coming in or more general fund that needs to go out,' Poulette said during the finance committee meeting. Additionally, if the federal bill was signed into law in its current form, the state would be on the hook for more than $26 million in SNAP benefits if it was to keep the program running as it is now. Legislators heard the report Tuesday, and at the meeting, the committee discussed potential dates for a special session of the Legislature to address the reductions should one be needed. Trump's bill could be signed into law soon. While speaking with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Thursday, U.S. Senator Steve Daines said lawmakers in the Senate are trying to get it on the president's desk by July 4. Daines also said the Congressional Budget Office is wrong in its forecast of revenue projections and that the bill will 'make some of the largest cuts, true spending cuts, to this runaway spending from the federal government in American history.' The biggest direct hit to the state's budget would be the reduction in taxable income. It means the state would have more than $120 million less in its general fund because the law changes deductions. SNAP would become more expensive because the state would be required to provide a match. The federal government currently pays for the cost of all SNAP benefits. 'This would be tied to the payment error rate of the state. So essentially, the feds do a backward looking error rate calculation for SNAP, and they've got historical data on that,' Poulette said during the meeting. 'Montana's error rate has hovered in that 78% range over the years. That would equate to Montana having a 15% match requirement that would come out to a cost of about $26 million additional state funds per year.' Medicaid expansion, meanwhile, could see 27,000 people dropped. Medicaid covers about 13% of all workers in the state. The Montana Legislature this session approved an extension removing the Medicaid expansion sunset date. One of the big changes the federal bill makes is increased work requirements to be eligible for benefits. Montana already has this law on the books, but it's never been enforced, and the Biden Administration did not approve the state's request to add the stipulation. Most people on Medicaid expansion already work, and in Montana, the number of people who are enrolled in the program and work is 72%. Another 7% are caretaking, 2% are retired and 10% are acutely ill or disabled and have serious barriers to employment. Poulette also said there is 'essentially a ban' on new taxes on medical providers. Those taxes are often pumped into the Medicaid program, he added. Rep. Connie Keogh, a Missoula Democrat and a member of the committee, called the impact to the budget 'frightening' during Tuesday's meeting, while Rep. Paul Tuss, D-Havre, said during the meeting the numbers were 'staggering.' Gov. Greg Gianforte's office did not respond to a request for comment. However in a recent 'Leave Us Alone' podcast episode, the Republican governor did speak on the topic. 'If you believe in limited government, the best way to produce that is to limit the amount of money government collects,' Gianforte said. 'Let's leave it in the people's pockets.'
Newsweek
18 hours ago
- Newsweek
Judge in 2024 Election Results Lawsuit Sets Timeline
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A lawsuit questioning the accuracy of the 2024 election will go to trial early next year, a judge has said. SMART Legislation, the action arm of the nonpartisan watchdog group SMART Elections, brought the lawsuit over voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York. Why It Matters The lawsuit has brought the results of the 2024 election under scrutiny. However, as Congress has certified the results declaring President Donald Trump the winner, it won't change the outcome. Election integrity has become a concern for many Americans following Trump's unsupported claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. A voter using a ballot drop box at the Bucks County Administration Building in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, on October 31, 2024. A voter using a ballot drop box at the Bucks County Administration Building in Doylestown, Pennsylvania, on October 31, 2024. Ed Jones/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Last month, Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled that the allegations in the lawsuit were serious enough for discovery to proceed. In an order filed on Wednesday, Tanguay said all discovery—where the involved parties exchange information and evidence relevant to the case—must be completed within 210 days, about seven months. The order also said the plaintiffs "shall file Note of Issue and Trial Readiness Order" no later than eight months from now "unless otherwise directed by the court." According to the complaint, more voters have sworn in legal affidavits that they voted for independent U.S. Senate candidate Diane Sare than the Rockland County Board of Elections counted and certified, contradicting those results. The complaint said at least nine votes must have been cast for Sare in District 39, with seven voters signing sworn statements saying they voted for her on Election Day, but the Rockland County Board of Elections recorded five votes. The complaint also cited numerous statistical anomalies in the presidential election results. They include multiple districts where hundreds of voters chose the Democratic candidate Kirsten Gillibrand for Senate, but none voted for then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for president. The complaint said that in Rockland County, 9 percent of voters who voted for Gillibrand did not vote Harris, giving Harris a -9 percent drop-off rate. "The difference in the drop-off rate between the Republican Presidential candidate and the Democratic Presidential candidate is in excess of 30 percent," the complaint said. "A study conducted by researchers at Yale, Harvard, MIT and Columbia Universities found that split-ticket voting averaged between 1-2 percent in the 2020 election. Therefore, split-ticket voting seems a very unlikely explanation of the Rockland BOE data." What People Are Saying Lulu Friesdat, the founder and executive director of SMART Legislation, said in a statement: "There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely. "If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election. The best way to determine if the results are correct is to examine the paper ballots in a full public, transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots in Rockland County. We believe it's vitally important, especially in the current environment, to be absolutely confident about the results of the election." Max Bonamente, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the author of Statistics and Analysis of Scientific Data, said in a paper on the voting data from Rockland County: "These data would require extreme sociological or political causes for their explanation, and would benefit from further assurances as to their fidelity." Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, previously told Newsweek: "Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated, but the sources of such inconsistencies, which can include error or miscalculation, are not always nefarious. Still, scrutinizing election results can strengthen confidence in elections. Mistakes can happen. "In this case, the drop-off inconsistencies could reflect the idiosyncratic nature of the 2024 presidential election cycle. Alone, statistical comparisons to previous cycles cannot provide definitive proof of wrongdoing. "In any case, it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state. That does not mean they should not be scrutinized, and any errors, if verified, should be corrected for the historical record. But there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions." What Happens Next The lawsuit is seeking a full hand recount of ballots cast in the presidential and U.S. Senate races in Rockland County. A hearing has been scheduled for September 22.
Politico
20 hours ago
- Politico
Inside Kamala Harris' LA unrest
Presented by Californians for Energy Independence KAMALA'S CALCULUS — Like many Angelenos, Kamala Harris has spent recent days glued to local TV news and doom-scrolling on the Apple News app. Unlike most in the city, she's also been making calls to her mayor, Karen Bass, and Gov. Gavin Newsom, a person close to her told Playbook. Such is the odd duality of the former vice president's state of affairs — a civilian who not long ago was the putative leader of the Democratic Party and who could soon be seeking that role again, either in another White House bid or by running for California governor. This will-she-or-won't-she phase, described by five people with knowledge of her activities, has now collided with the world's biggest news story unfolding in her backyard. Harris has been choosy about when to weigh in publicly on politics since leaving Washington. So her statement on social media this week denouncing President Donald Trump's activation of the National Guard as a 'dangerous escalation' instantly lent itself to frenzied tea leaves reading. (Not to mention shenanigans: A post with similar formatting that stated Harris was passing on the governor's race cropped up online soon after, temporarily confusing political insiders and even other gubernatorial candidates. The suspicious provenance, not to mention the typos, should've been the tip-off it was fake.) For Harris, it was a natural issue to speak up on for several reasons, according to one of the people familiar with her thinking and granted anonymity to speak freely. First, she's coming at this as a lifelong Californian who came up in law enforcement and has made the rule of law a driving theme of her career. She also empathizes with the protesters, after growing up steeped in the civil rights protests of her childhood and campus anti-apartheid movement of the 1980s. From her time as vice president, she's aware of how the decisions made in the White House can shape these volatile situations — hence her denunciation of Trump for making what she called a 'cruel, calculated decision to spread panic and division.' As tumultuous as these days have been, those close to her say her decision-making process has not been fundamentally disrupted. Her late-summer deadline remains the same, which means the waiting game will likely continue for weeks. Harris allies, who are ever cautious of getting out ahead of her decision, argue that if she does enter the governor's race, the president picking a fight with the state will be a boon to her, since she'd be the only one in the field of Democrats who has been in direct confrontation with him before. And, in their view, Trump taking aim at Los Angeles now undermines a point that's being whispered quietly among some rival contenders — that his personal dislike of Harris could imperil the state. 'If she was worried that her becoming governor might put a bigger target on California, the last week took that question off the table,' one Harris supporter said. 'We've got a helluva target on us no matter who the governor is.' Right now, it's Newsom, her longtime friend and rival, who's bearing the brunt of Trump's ire, and his profile has surged substantially because of it. Harris, who wasn't able to connect with her longtime political friend and rival but left him a voicemail to express support, may be eyeing Newsom's rising stock as she contemplates her next moves, said Democratic strategist Steve Maviglio. 'There's enhanced competition if she does decide to run for president. That's a worry, because she's clearly thinking, 'Do I want to do that again?'' he said. 'On the other hand, it helps her if she runs for governor, because aside from him in the state, she's viewed as the most anti-Trump candidate.' GOOD MORNING. It's Thursday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at 916-562-0685 — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? In Los Angeles, coordinating the state's response. THE SCOOP FIRST IN POLITICO: PLOUFFE'S NEW BASE — Veteran Democratic strategist David Plouffe is joining the global advisory council of Coinbase, our Christine Mui and Christopher Cadelago scooped this a.m. Plouffe has in recent years worked extensively in tech, helped guide Kamala Harris' presidential campaign and was a top aide to Barack Obama. He's the latest political heavy-hitter to join the advisory body, where he said he aims to bring his skills as a storyteller to an industry fighting for credibility and stability. Plouffe will be charged with outreach to tech-savvy voters who have shifted to the right in recent years. His addition is meant to reinforce the bipartisan credentials of the largest U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange as it pushes for broader buy-in after Trump and other Republicans opened their arms to the industry and many of its policy goals. 'A lot of the debate is 'are you pro-crypto or anti-crypto, pro-ride sharing or not, pro-home-sharing or not,'' Plouffe said in an interview, referencing the emerging industries that have grown around companies like Uber and Airbnb. 'And I think this next stage is really deepening the benefits, whether that's the unbanked, whether that's security, whether that's opening up new forms of commerce.' POLLING PLACE TIME LAPSE — California voter support for providing health care coverage for undocumented immigrants has fallen below a majority, according to Public Policy Institute of California polling released last night. Just 38 percent of likely voters supported the benefit, down from 50 percent in 2023 and 58 percent in 2021. The survey was conducted from May 22 to May 29, after Newsom floated freezing Medi-Cal enrollment for undocumented Californians and requiring undocumented adults to pay $1,200 annual insurance premiums to offset the rising costs of the offering. The poll was taken before state legislative leaders publicly countered Newsom by proposing smaller premiums for patients ages 19-59 and other changes meant to soften the cuts. FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: SUING SOCIETY — A PAC pushing to target what it calls 'predatory personal injury lawyers' is promoting a new internal poll that suggests most Californians are concerned about the costs of excessive litigation. The poll, exclusively shared with Playbook, suggests that 72 percent of registered voters agree that 'lawsuit abuse' drives up the price of goods and services for consumers. It was commissioned by Protecting American Consumers Together, an advocacy group whose major donors include Uber and Waffle House Inc. The survey was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, which bills itself the largest GOP polling firm in the country, and included 1,000 voters contacted last month. PACT shared the poll days after the Consumer Attorneys of California, which represents injury lawyers, announced an ad blitz targeting the group and accusing it of attempting to 'roll back consumer protections' to enrich greedy corporations. It's the latest volley in a growing feud between large corporations and so-called billboard attorneys, as they battle over tort reform proposals in Sacramento. Earlier this year, PACT persuaded Georgia lawmakers to pass sweeping legislation that limits civil lawsuits. CAMPAIGN YEAR(S) FIRST IN PLAYBOOK: FOURTH LIEUTENANT — Former Sausalito Mayor Janelle Kellman doesn't bring a household name to the lieutenant governor's race. But neither do her opponents, which — her campaign argues — makes the race wide open even though Treasurer Fiona Ma is lapping the field in fundraising so far. Her campaign is circulating internal polling to key donors showing Kellman and Ma tied as the top Democrats in the field with 16 percent support among likely primary voters. The survey, conducted over phone calls and text-to-web, relied on Kellman receiving the ballot designation 'small business owner and climate nonprofit leader,' while using Ma's 2018 designation, which labeled her a CPA despite her being a Board of Equalization member at the time. Former Stockton Mayor Michael Tubbs received 6 percent support while Newsom's Chief Service Officer Josh Fryday had 3 percent. But the survey was taken before former state Sen. Steven Bradford dropped out of the race to run for insurance commissioner; it also included Republican David Serpa, who is now running for governor and received 25 percent support. 'Voters' decisions are heavily influenced by party label and ballot designation when candidates are not widely known by the broader voting base,' reads a polling memo distributed by the campaign. 'Provided sufficient funding to increase outreach, this survey data proves Kellman's ability to consolidate most Democratic voters and secure an advancement to the general election.' Kellman made an initial campaign push at the California Democratic Party Convention in Anaheim two weeks ago, speaking to delegates alongside Ma, Tubbs and Fryday. She grew up in Pennsylvania and went to Yale for her undergraduate degree and Oxford for a master's in environmental management before moving to California to go to law school at Stanford. Now, Kellman leads the climate organization Center for Sea Rise Solutions and has an e-commerce platform for selling team sports shirts and uniforms. In an interview, she stressed her ability to address voters' climate anxiety as a key to her viability. 'I've also been on the front lines nationally and globally, taking action on climate resilience and climate risk, and I know what measures we need to be taking to help protect people like everyday Californians up and down our coastlines, which are already flooding and prone to wildfire,' Kellman said. HOMELESSNESS CRISIS MIFFED MAYORS — The leaders of the Bay Area's three largest cities released a joint statement Wednesday assailing lawmakers in Sacramento for releasing a budget deal that doesn't fully restore funding for a grant program to combat homelessness. Mayors Matt Mahan of San Jose, Barbara Lee of Oakland and Daniel Lurie of San Francisco accuse the state of walking away from the crisis by failing to maintain $1 billion in annual funding for the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention program. Lawmakers have proposed to set aside $500 million for the program in fiscal 2026-27, while Newsom wants no new funding for it. 'Homelessness is our residents' biggest concern,' the Democratic mayors said. 'We already spend a fraction of our state budget to address it. Now is not the time to do even less.' CLIMATE AND ENERGY POWER PLAY — California energy officials green-lighted the largest solar and battery project in the country Wednesday — their first time using a new streamlined permit process meant to shorten timelines and circumvent local opposition. Read last night's California Climate for more on the project and what its lessons are for other renewable energy projects. Top Talkers TENSIONS HEIGHTEN— Federal agents crashed into a vehicle in Boyle Heights on Wednesday, then appeared to fire some sort of chemical round before taking the man who was driving into custody, the Los Angeles Times reports. 'This was no hit and run. This was a targeted arrest of a violent rioter who punched a CBP officer,' said the Department of Homeland Security in a post on X. DESERTED MONUMENTS — The Trump administration plans to eliminate designations for California's two newest national monuments, the San Francisco Chronicle reports. Sáttítla Highlands National Monument and Chuckwalla National Monument were both issued designations by President Joe Biden earlier this year. AROUND THE STATE — San Diego has the highest inflation rate in the nation, with a rate of 3.8 percent. (The San Diego Union Tribune) — The State Bar has suspended former San Bernardino County District Attorney Mike Ramos from practicing law for six months after he destroyed evidence in a civil lawsuit. (The Orange County Register) — Nearly one in three jobs in the Fresno County Public Defender's Office are empty. (ABC) Compiled by Nicole Norman PLAYBOOKERS PEOPLE MOVES — Sean Elsbernd is the new president and CEO of SPUR (the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association), one of the region's most prominent public policy think tanks. He was previously a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Elsbernd was also chief of staff to former Mayor London Breed and worked for the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein. — Kevin McKinley, who most recently handled California public policy for Meta, has joined the government affairs team at a16z (also known as the VC giant Andreessen Horowitz) as its new state lead. He also had stints at the now-defunct Internet Association, heading up California advocacy, and the state Chamber of Commerce, focusing on privacy and tech policy. BIRTHDAYS — former Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) … Jack Yao of SC Strategies … Coco Pannell BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Wednesday): Disney's Lucas Acosta … Juliette Medina WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.
