
The trick to using retinol in midlife (without damaging your skin)
In this regular series, Ageless Beauty, The Telegraph's beauty experts Annabel Jones and Lisa Armstrong tackle the conundrums they've been searching for answers to, and share their favourite tips and tricks. This week, they discuss how often you should wash your hair.
Amidst the thousands of emails we receive on the fashion and beauty desk every week, it was one about retinol from Dr Michael Prager that caught my eye. 'Retinol has been touted as a holy grail of skincare, but I've never been a fan,' wrote Prager. 'True, using retinol can result in a modest increase in skin collagen by a factor of 1.3. However, the side effects far outweigh the benefits: red, sore, flaky skin and extreme light sensitivity.' After using it and going on a Caribbean holiday, Prager returned with dark blotches on his forehead. 'That was the end of my relationship with retinol,' he says. 'While it disperses pigment clusters, it also strips the protective dead cell layer, making your skin vulnerable to damage. This waxen, overly sensitive look is far from what I consider desirable or practical.'
That really got me thinking, because someone else I hugely respect in the beauty industry has been saying something similar for years. Alexandra Soveral, the facialist-cum-bio-chemist-cum-mother-of-organic-skincare, sits some way along the beauty continuum from Prager, who rose to prominence as a dispenser of injectables to the A-list. Soveral takes a more holistic approach, believing in the power of massage (hand not mechanical) to give skin a lift, tone and glow. In her 50s, she – and her regular clients – are proof this approach works. If both she and Prager, with more than half a century in skincare between them, are raising questions about retinol, it's time to listen.
As a reminder, retinol – and retinal, a stronger formulation – are forms of vitamin A. In moderation, they're a great tool. 'Vitamin A is a powerhouse for skin health, playing a crucial role in cell division, tissue repair, and maintaining the skin's protective barrier,' says Soveral. 'Used in the right amounts, it helps keep skin smooth, firm and resilient by encouraging healthy cell turnover and guarding against environmental damage. 'But,' she continues, 'the skincare industry, alongside dermatologists, have disregarded the safety guidelines and encouraged consumers to overuse retinol.' (That's just changed in the EU, where new legislation has been passed that restricts the use of all forms of vitamin A in skincare products.)
The results of overzealous retinol application are all around us, particularly in mid-life and older women: skin looks like parchment. 'Too much retinol accelerates skill cell division in an unhealthy way,' says Soveral, 'leading to issues such as inflammation, acne, rosacea, hypersensitivity and hyperpigmentation. It actually speeds up ageing.'
For optimal results, Soveral recommends vitamin A in its most bio-available form, ie (ideally organic) broccoli, sweet potatoes, carrots, leafy greens, fish... and using cold-pressed oils containing vitamin A. Rosehips are a rich source – and there are some reasonably priced options. The Rolls Royce is Soveral's Alpha Water Serum and Delta Lipids Oil. If I could only have two skin care products in my bathroom, it would be these.
Designed to be used in tandem, they're highly active but gentle and long-lasting with trace amounts of natural vitamin A. 'Instead of forcing cell division, it will just give them a gentle boost to not become sluggish,' says Soveral. 'In the end, nature knows best.'
My first encounter with retinol was in no uncertain terms a car crash. I was in my early 30s and keen to reap the glow-inducing benefits I'd heard (and seen) so much about, but I aborted the mission before the month was up due to an intolerable case of the 'retinol uglies'.
The uglies is TikTok lexicon for the settling-in phase of flaky, inflamed skin. Mine was so angry looking, a friend gasped before asking, half jokingly, if I'd contracted an infectious skin disease.
I'm told by retinol evangelists that if you stick it out, your complexion repays you with an otherworldly glow. Sadly, I'll never know; I pulled rank for the sake of vanity and steered clear of retinol for the next decade – at least.
To be fair this was 20 years ago when retinol formulations were far less sophisticated than they are now. These days retinoids are often delivered in skin-friendly liposomal capsules to minimise irritation and transport the molecule directly where it needs to go. Plus, there are varying retinoids to choose from like the ever-popular retin-A (retinaldehyde) which is deemed a gentler alternative to pure retinol.
There isn't a dermatologist I know who doesn't believe in tretinoin, the prescription retinoid that's scientifically proven to have a role in acne and wrinkle reduction. Furthermore, long-term studies have shown that retinoids improve collagen production over time – more collagen, and firmer skin. All in all, the evidence is hard to dispute.
That said, I'm often asked to abate the concerns many people have about whether or not to use retinol. So I recently asked the dermatologist Dr Ellie Rashid about whether retinoids do indeed thin the skin. Her response was balanced. It does compromise the top surface of the skin temporarily, hence why SPF and minimal sun exposure is recommended.
But, she argued, cell turnover slows considerably with age, thus speeding it up isn't necessarily a bad thing. One could argue it's merely restoring the status quo. If you use the right dose and formulation (she's a fan of CeraVe) for you, the benefits of retinol generally outweigh the cons. Especially if you suffer from hyperpigmentation, fine lines or dullness.
I have been using a retinoid cream on my hands and décolletage for the past six months or so, as they have seen more UV rays than I care to admit. Does that make me a fan? As irritating (pardon the pun) as it sounds, I'm still on the fence.
I believe retinol has its place. I trust the experts who advocate for it and there's no doubt it works at fading hyperpigmentation and evening out skin tone, so long as you don't overuse it and apply SPF50.
But I also think, like with all anti-ageing protocols, that in the end it is a personal choice. If your wrinkles and pigmentation bother you enough to deal with some minor irritation then it's a useful tool alongside a good barrier cream and religious UV protection – especially in winter when the sun is hiding out.
I dip in and out, and when I do I use gentle formulations that are slower to work. When it comes to my hands I'm unapologetic. They get a liberal coating every other day – and it's made a visible difference to pigmentation and fine lines.
If, however, I could give my teenage self a talking to, the girl who slathered on a coconut-scented SPF8 sun oil with abandon, my advice would be simple: stay out of the sun, apply a good full spectrum SPF daily, mitigate stress, eat well and you won't be debating the pros and cons of anti-ageing protocols decades later.
Ask Annabel and Lisa

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
TikTok blocks use of popular hashtag after concerns it promotes eating disorders
On June 1, TikTok blocked search results for 'Skinnytok' following a rising trend of dangerous content promoting eating disorders on the platform and concerns raised by European regulators TikTok has implemented a worldwide ban on a popular hashtag for its link to the promotion of extreme diets and exercise regimes. The company said the block is part of a regular review to 'address evolving risks' on its platform but comes after concerns were raised by European regulators. As of June 1, TikTok has blocked search results for 'SkinnyTok' and removed the hashtag globally. Content associated with the hashtag typically included videos targeting young women promoting extreme thinness and unhealthy ways to lose weight. "[We] have blocked search results for #skinnytok since it has become linked to unhealthy weight loss content," TikTok spokesperson Paolo Ganino said in a statement issued on Monday, June 2. Ganino said the move is part of a "regular review" of TikTok's safety measures "to address evolving risks". Users who now search for the hashtag will be directed to mental health support. The ban follows a boom in the trend in recent months, which saw the platform flooded with videos for and by young women glamourizing eating disorders like anorexia. The rise in the dangerous content reached the attention of both the European Commission and the French digital regulator Arcom. The European Commission investigated the 'Skinnytok' trend after France's Digital Minister Clara Chappaz lobbied for an investigation and created a public petition entitled to 'Stop Skinnytok'. After news of the ban was made public, Chappaz shared her excitement on X. 'Skinnytok is OVER!' the minister posted. 'This is a first collective victory. I salute it. However, the fight to protect our children online doesn't stop there. And I won't give up. Banning social media before 15 is my priority.' The protection of kids online is growing priority as countries consider proposals for new EU rules to curb children's social media use. TikTok's duty to guard against the harmful effects of the SkinnyTok hashtag were a feature of a call between the EU's Consumer Protection Commissioner Michael McGrath and TikTok CEO Shou Chew, as reported by Politico . Currently any search for 'skinnytok' or even 'skinniertok' yields the following message: 'You're not alone. If you or someone you know has questions about body image, food or exercise – it is important to know that help is out there and you are not alone. If you feel comfortable, you can confide in someone you trust or check out the resources below. Please remember to take care of yourselves and each other.' Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! The message is followed by a help phone number and a link to the platform's Eating Disorder Safety Centre page. While it's a step forward, the ban will not necessarily mean the 'Skinnytok' trend is over. The TikTok community has a strong track record of pivoting with agility to navigate new regulations and user guidelines with new hashtags and code words. Still, social media platforms are being forced to take more accountability for the wellbeing of young users. A legal responsibility for online services to make their sites safe for children will finally come into force in this summer. Under the Online Safety Act, social media firms will be ordered to ensure they tame toxic algorithms, take faster action on removing harmful content and introduce proper age checks on their platforms. Tech companies will now be expected to begin assessing the risk of harm to children on their platforms after Ofcom's final children's safety codes were published today. From July these protections will be fully enforceable and services that don't comply could face serious enforcement action from Ofcom.


South Wales Guardian
21 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Children in most deprived areas more likely to visit A&E and be obese
The organisation has called on the Government to lift its two-child benefit cap after its findings showed that where children grow up until the age of five has 'a significant impact' on their early outcomes and future potential. In the report published on Monday, every local authority in England was analysed against its level of deprivation and a range of early childhood health and educational outcomes. It found that, when considering early years development, the most deprived authorities were more than twice as far away from achieving the Government's 'good level' target of 75% than the most affluent areas. Only four of the 151 upper tier local authorities in England are currently meeting that target. Nearly twice as many children suffer from late-stage, untreated tooth decay in the most deprived areas (29%) compared to the least deprived (15%), while five-year-old children living in the poorest communities are three times more likely to have had teeth removed due to decay, the report found. Almost a quarter of reception-age children in the most deprived areas (24%) are overweight or obese, while general obesity levels in those areas are more than double those of children in the most affluent areas (12.9%, compared to 6%). There is also an average of 1,020 A&E visits per 1,000 babies and young children in the most deprived areas, an increase of 55% on rates in the most affluent areas, the report found. The five local authorities with the highest levels of deprivation – Blackpool, Knowsley, Liverpool, Kingston upon Hull, and Middlesbrough – were each in the lowest 20% for five of the six child wellbeing measures used in the analysis. Some 1.2 million babies and children under the age of five – 35% of the age group's total population – now live in poverty across England, the report said. It added that child poverty has increased more in the UK then in any of the 38 OECD and EU countries. Among the report's recommendations are long-term, sustainable funding and expanding provision for Family Hubs, recruiting an additional 1,000 health visitors a year and making access to Government-funded childcare hours equal for all children aged two or older, regardless of their location or parental employment. Unicef UK, joined by BBC presenter Dr Chris Van Tulleken, will present a petition calling for investments in early childhood, which has more than 105,000 signatures, to the Prime Minister at 10 Downing Street on Tuesday. Chief executive Dr Philip Goodwin warned the consequences of growing up in poverty can be lifelong and said the report's findings were 'not acceptable'. He said: 'There must be immediate, decisive, and ambitious action by the government. Any further delays will entrench inequality and condemn hundreds of thousands of children to poverty and its effects, as child poverty rates continue to rise. 'The Government must act urgently to lift the two-child limit and the benefit cap and commit to investing in the vital health and education services that support children during their crucial early years.' Introduced in 2015 by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne, the cap restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families. Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty when he was pressed on the two-child benefit cap in Parliament last week, ahead of the publication of the Government's strategy on the issue.

Leader Live
21 hours ago
- Leader Live
Children in most deprived areas more likely to visit A&E and be obese
The organisation has called on the Government to lift its two-child benefit cap after its findings showed that where children grow up until the age of five has 'a significant impact' on their early outcomes and future potential. In the report published on Monday, every local authority in England was analysed against its level of deprivation and a range of early childhood health and educational outcomes. It found that, when considering early years development, the most deprived authorities were more than twice as far away from achieving the Government's 'good level' target of 75% than the most affluent areas. Only four of the 151 upper tier local authorities in England are currently meeting that target. Nearly twice as many children suffer from late-stage, untreated tooth decay in the most deprived areas (29%) compared to the least deprived (15%), while five-year-old children living in the poorest communities are three times more likely to have had teeth removed due to decay, the report found. Almost a quarter of reception-age children in the most deprived areas (24%) are overweight or obese, while general obesity levels in those areas are more than double those of children in the most affluent areas (12.9%, compared to 6%). There is also an average of 1,020 A&E visits per 1,000 babies and young children in the most deprived areas, an increase of 55% on rates in the most affluent areas, the report found. The five local authorities with the highest levels of deprivation – Blackpool, Knowsley, Liverpool, Kingston upon Hull, and Middlesbrough – were each in the lowest 20% for five of the six child wellbeing measures used in the analysis. Some 1.2 million babies and children under the age of five – 35% of the age group's total population – now live in poverty across England, the report said. It added that child poverty has increased more in the UK then in any of the 38 OECD and EU countries. Among the report's recommendations are long-term, sustainable funding and expanding provision for Family Hubs, recruiting an additional 1,000 health visitors a year and making access to Government-funded childcare hours equal for all children aged two or older, regardless of their location or parental employment. Unicef UK, joined by BBC presenter Dr Chris Van Tulleken, will present a petition calling for investments in early childhood, which has more than 105,000 signatures, to the Prime Minister at 10 Downing Street on Tuesday. Chief executive Dr Philip Goodwin warned the consequences of growing up in poverty can be lifelong and said the report's findings were 'not acceptable'. He said: 'There must be immediate, decisive, and ambitious action by the government. Any further delays will entrench inequality and condemn hundreds of thousands of children to poverty and its effects, as child poverty rates continue to rise. 'The Government must act urgently to lift the two-child limit and the benefit cap and commit to investing in the vital health and education services that support children during their crucial early years.' Introduced in 2015 by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne, the cap restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families. Sir Keir Starmer said he was 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty when he was pressed on the two-child benefit cap in Parliament last week, ahead of the publication of the Government's strategy on the issue.