
I went to a rave at a sex carnival, and here's the fever dream that followed
Dear Diary…
My Friend Misty is throwing one of its signature parties at the Museum of Sex tonight—a dark, romantic soirée layered with intrigue and sensory pleasures. Very much my scene. If past Misty parties are any indication, we're in for a tantalizing treat.
Tonight's affair takes place inside an erotic carnival. Misty tells me to dress the part. I'm wearing a pair of dark green Victorian bloomers. (I love saying 'bloomers.') White cufflinks, a black ruffled corset, and a pair of lacy black stockings, I think I pull it off. Leaning into the carnival theme, I paint my lips like a ventriloquist puppet, with cheekbone hearts and a pink button nose. It's Moulin Rouge-meets-Barnum & Bailey. Just need to find my riding crop, and I'm off for the night…
10:07pm
We have arrived. I check in with Alan T, a legend of Miami nightlife, and search for Tam Gryn, the museum's curator. I find her smiling atop the staircase, in a pleated blue skirt with metal studs. Before we hit the dancefloor, Tam walks us through the exhibitions. First is " Modern Sex: 100 Years of Design and Decency," a journey of sexual health mirrored by American media. We marvel at douches from the 1920s. There's a paper from Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. 'Whatever is happening in the world reflects in art, and reflects in sex culture,' Tam tells me. We look at post-World War II advertisements warning soldiers of syphilis. Men are noticeably absent from the ads, placing the safe-sex onus on women rather than the soldiers' own promiscuity. Classic. I giggle at the 'Anal Intruder Set,' sit with reverence on the topic of AIDS, and giggle again when I spot the original Sybian.
We move on to the next exhibition, " Hajime Sorayama: Desire Machines." I've seen images of Sorayama's 'sexy robots' before, but nothing like this. Gold and silver cyborgs, entangled and engorged, legs spread across the canvas. Provocative is an understatement. Tam points out the octopus, a classic example of Japanese 'tentacle erotica.' The gallery is rattling with heavy bass coming from the party below. Anticipation is growing. Finally, we reach the famous robots, voluptuous steel sculptures encased in glass. They look so human, and yet, not at all. Fascinating…
10:48pm
It's time to party. We hug Tam goodbye and walk through a tunnel of kaleidoscopic art—like entering a portal to another world. Suddenly, we're inside a mossy medieval castle. It smells like Big Red cinnamon gum. A few more steps and we enter the carnival.
It's hot and steamy in here, just how Misty likes it. I hope I'll catch her tonight. Misty is always elusive, never in plain sight but always present. I figure she's on the dancefloor. Her two best friends are about to play: David Sinopoli, the founder of Miami's iii Points festival; and Elad Zvi, founder of Bar Lab Hospitality, otherwise known by his DJ moniker, Maccabi.
We walk past the bounce house of inflatable boobs and shimmy our way into the crowd. Sinopoli and Maccabi start off hot. I mean red hot. I mean 'Red Right Hand' by Nick Cave hot. I LOVE THIS SONG!! I love this groovy remix. It's precisely the heady, genre-bending music I've come to expect from My Friend Misty.
A trio of sexy vixens are dancing above. They look like pin-up girls from the 1950s, dripping in sequins, wearing pointy padded bras. I recognize Elena Lee, the beautiful dancer from Club Space. There's still no sign of Misty, but I think I see Mokibaby, her partner in crime. Maybe I'll ask her—but I'm in no rush. Sinopoli and Maccabi just dropped 'Bang Bang' by Nancy Sinatra, and so, I must dance.
11:39pm
More of my friends have arrived—Caro, Juan Carlos, Eli, Jonbo. It's like a clown car, they just keep coming! We meet at the conversation pit, between the giant testicles and the skee ball game, when I see a neon 'Misty' sign out of the corner of my eye. Aha! I walk over and find Mokibaby, a.k.a. Veronica Gessa, the mastermind artist behind the My Friend Misty parties. She's hanging with Ventigoth, a local photographer whom I adore. I try not to fangirl. I fail. They're fun, hot and talented—my favorite combination.
They tell me Misty just left, and so I take advantage to chat with Mokibaby. Dressed like a sultry secretary, she tells me about the essence of Misty: her love for cinema and strong female characters, her passion for pleasure and self-pampering. At each of her events, Misty is revealed through interactive vignettes. I think about the time I wandered into Misty's bedroom at Floyd, where Audrey Hepburn movies played on analog televisions. Tonight, it's custom-made playing cards inspired by divination, a nod to carnival fortune-tellers. I play my cards right and score a bottle of Misty's essential oil, handmade by Mokibaby herself.
Speaking of the carnival—where on earth is Misty? Has she run away with the circus?! 'Misty is a vaudeville dancer tonight,' Mokibaby says. 'She's probably on stage with Elena performing a burlesque act.' Finally, a lead, I think to myself. Ventigoth snaps a photo. I'm off to search for my friend Misty—but not before some naughty adventure.
2:41am
THIS IS SO MUCH FUN. My riding crop is a huge hit (and a great way to shepherd the crowds.) I'm loving all the carnival games, especially 'Glory Stall'. Diary, I dare not tell you how to play, just know you need to tug three times…
The music is swirling like the girls riding the mechanical bull. I hear 'Smalltown Boy' and Faithless, a low-vocal edit of Madonna's 'Jump', gothic rock and heavy techno all rolled into one. There's a lady in an alligator mask. Alan T is feeding people slices of cake. Elena and the dancers are binding each other Shibari-style, in full-body leotards that somehow look sexier than anything else they've worn tonight.
There's a rumor of an after-party at Jolene in downtown. I'm intrigued, but my feeble friends are weary. (To be fair, we've been here for five hours.) Actually, come to think of it, I'm hungry. Maybe we bounce.
3:32am
Dear Diary…
I'm writing in pajamas. Pizza rolls are in the oven. Night at the Roxbury is on TV. I feel like a teenage cliché, but truthfully, I'm content. I never did find Misty. Maybe she ran away with the circus after all. At least I got a glimpse into Misty's magical world, even if just for a night. Until next time…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Graziadaily
an hour ago
- Graziadaily
Love Island: Toni's Mum Shares Concern After Harrison Recoupling And Admits She 'Wouldn't Mind' If Toni Came Home
For audiences at home, it's hard to tell what hypnotic aftershave Harrison Solomon has been wearing in the Love Island villa, but the girls, especially the shows first American contestant Toni Laites, are intoxicated. Ever since Toni and Harrison laid eyes on each other, Toni has been under his spell. For the first week or so it was sweet to witness; they have a natural chemistry and make each other laugh. However, Harrison quickly exposed himself as a serial playboy, and his favoured technique is to keep Toni interested while getting to know as many other women as possible. When Helena Ford showed interest in him, he quickly brushed Toni and their connection aside. That was until Helena went back to Harry Cooksley and Harrison came crawling back to Toni. Then came Casa Amor. Toni and Harrison were on fairly good terms when the boys left the villa, but it took Harrison approximately 10 minutes to kiss someone else, and then recouple with a different person. Last week, he returned to the main villa with Lauren Wood, which was a surprise to exactly no one. Knowing what he's like, Toni also re-coupled with Cacherel Mercer, much to Harrison's dismay. What followed in the week since Casa Amor has been difficult to watch with thousands of viewers taking to social media to say so. After being flirtatiously questioned by Harrison, Toni admitted that she still has feelings for him and that she preferred being in a couple with him to Cach. At this point, Harrison decided to stay with Lauren and Lauren later revealed they had slept together on two different occasions. The next day, he returned to Toni and asked her to take him back. Then in a shock re-coupling Toni decided to forgive and pick Harrison, still unaware that he has slept with Lauren. Another victim of the situation, Cach told Toni, 'That was one of the most embarrassing things I've been through in my entire life. You knew what decision you wanted to make, you were just waiting for the go ahead from someone else.' Watching all of this unfold from home, Toni's mum Leslie has taken to social media to share her thoughts on the situation. Breaking down in tears, Leslie said she was 'devastated' by Toni's decision to take Harrison back. 'I feel like I just watched my daughter walk out onto the train tracks and there is a bullet train coming for her, and I can't scream to her, I can't grab her from the tracks,' she said. 'I am really disappointed, and I'm sure there are many of you that are as well. I felt like at one point she really woke up and was like "I'm done". I feel like him doing this sneaky "come to the terrace" thing before the re-coupling is another really calculated move to keep him in the villa.' Leslie added that her daughter is 'smarter than this' and has 'more pride than this', but she 'doesn't know what is happening in that villa'. 'I am devastated by this decision that she has made,' Toni's mum continued. 'I've devastated that Cach was so hurt in this and that she blew her chance with a really good guy, who would have treated her with respect.' She also admitted that she's 'all for a comeback' but does not believe Harrison is genuine. 'Someone give me a best case scenario after this episode,' she concluded, 'because I've got nothing. If Toni came home now, I'd be ok with it at this point.' Viewers at home agree. 'Harrison is genuinely one of the most sickening men ever to be on Love Island ,' reads on X post. 'All he has done is make Toni and Lauren feel crazy, and he fully enjoys watching them mentally struggle.' Another viewer asked, 'Is Harrison the biggest villain we've seen?' While a third wrote, 'All jokes aside. I feel so bad for Lauren. I don't think men understand the emotional toll it has on women – when you give your body to someone and they move like Harrison.' Leslie is not the only one to voice her concerns about the show. Jessye Werner, communications manager at Women's Aid, has said: 'In recent years, Love Island and other forms of reality TV have been repeatedly called out by viewers for allowing in contestants that had a history of abusive, coercive and manipulative behaviour in previous relationships. As a result, production companies have been more careful when it comes to selecting contestants and calling out toxic behaviours when we see them.' 'Despite these positive steps,' she continued, 'we still see unhealthy patterns of behaviour on these shoes, showing just how steeped in misogyny and sexism our society still is. Women are often lied to, slut-shamed and manipulated, as well as laughed at behind their backs. Misogyny and sexism lay the foundation for the tolerance of abuse and violence – it reinforces a culture that excuses and trivialises violence against women and girls. More must be done to educate contestants on sexism and misogyny, and it is a great credit to viewers who take to social media, continuing to call out these behaviours as soon as they see them.' History has a habit of repeating itself and Love Island is once again becoming toxic and uncomfortable to watch. As Leslie's emotional video attests, it's not only the islanders who stand to get hurt from the toxic mind games and manipulation, but their loved ones and viewers relating from home too. Even after all these years, the producers seem to underestimate the level of support the contestants need while overestimating our appetite for schadenfreude. At what point do we switch off for good? Nikki Peach is a writer at Grazia UK, working across entertainment, TV and news. She has also written for the i, i-D and the New Statesman Media Group and covers all things pop culture for Grazia (treating high and lowbrow with equal respect).


Graziadaily
an hour ago
- Graziadaily
Love Island: This Is What A 'Handy Carroll' Is
'Do Bits', NVQs, handballs – if there's one thing Love Islanders know how to do, it's create an utterly bizarre code word to describe a sexual act. With the villa hotting up, it's no surprise then that islanders are coming up with creative ways to disguise their bedroom antics. Last night, a new code word entered the chat – with Helena Ford saying, 'Handy Carroll was in the building yesterday.' The phrase is in someways a nod to ex-England international Andy Carroll. As the name suggests, the word 'handy' is in reference to sex acts involving hands. To quote singer/songwriter CMAT, it's 'hand stuff.' How 36-year-old Andy feels about this crude tribute, we can only guess. For anyone who has reached this point and still isn't quite sure on what on earth these islanders are talking about, we've got you. To spell it out in the simplest terms: a Handy Carroll is a handjob. Andy Carroll (Not to be confused with 'Handy Carroll') ©Jacques Feeney/Offside/Offside via Getty Images The phrase quickly caught on, with Lauren Wood teasing Helena that she'd heard 'Handy Carroll' was in the villa. American star Toni Laites telling Shakira Khan and Yasmin Pettet, 'If you give Handy Carrolls to keep your man close then by all means go for it.' The comment was in reference to Lauren's relationship with Harrison Solomon – who has both women in a love triangle. While Toni thought 'Handy Carrolls' were all that happened in the bedroom, she's yet to learn what really went down. One scene saw Harrison admit to his fellow boys that he had had sex with Lauren, cryptically saying, 'The full time whistle blew. Game done. It was great, honestly, a nice little 2-0 win.' That night in bed, Harrison was seen leaning over to Helena and Harry to ask for a condom. Lauren and Harrison have been growing close ©ITV Meanwhile, Helena voiced her frustration that a 'Handy Carroll' was as far as she'd gone with footballer Harry Cooksley. 'He's done f*ck all to me,' she said. The islanders may be having fun with their lingo, but it seems viewers aren't enjoying it quite so much. After their 'Handy Carroll' talk, one viewer commented, 'Gross, it makes me feel sick to watch!' 'Handy Carroll is the worst euphemism I've ever heard,' added another. Others were left confused by the lingo. 'Watching Love Island, and what the hell is a Handy Carroll? Surely not a nod to a footballer,' asked one. Why is it 8 AM on a Wednesday and I'm wondering who the f*ck is Handy Carroll' another tweet read. Whether it's a term you want to add to your own vocab, or something you'd rather scrub from your brain, the choice is all yours... Charlotte Roberts is a news and entertainment writer at Grazia UK. She spends her days covering everything celebrity, culture, and entertainment.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, are we on the road to Idiocracy?
As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, a long-forgotten flick from the naughties is gaining cult status by posing a simple question: are we on the road to Idiocracy? In the tradition of Bill and Ted, Idiocracy, a 2006 American sci-fi comedy, depicts an average guy transported 500 years into the future to find he is the smartest man on earth. A wrestler is president, people worship 'the profit' and the world's biggest corporation is a sports drink company whose market strategy has taken humanity to the brink of collapse. Idiocracy is not a flawless film; it's jarring class eugenics and casual sexism seem more dated than its 20 years would suggest. But what it does brilliantly is challenge the assumption that the human race is on an uncontested journey to higher consciousness. This is a timely counterpoint to the zeitgeist about the self-evident benefits of machine learning built by large tech companies under the conceit of 'artificial intelligence'. Already we are seeing academic studies suggesting that Large Language Models are linked to cognitive decline, with a recent MIT study finding lower brain engagement among students using GPTs in writing essays. We've also seen AI chatbots accused of inducing vulnerable people to suicide and cheery predictions about the hollowing out of entry level knowledge economy jobs which loom as our next inter-generational betrayal. The question is whether these dumb outcomes are features or bugs of our emerging information ecosystem. Evidence is mounting it is the former. Exhibit A is OpenAI's Economic Blueprint for Australia, an embarrassing document seeking rapid government adaptation, investment and minimalist regulation for 'the most significant economic and strategic opportunity of our time' You could drive a truck through the holes in OpenAI's analysis: $115bn in predicted productivity improvements based on crude calculations of hours saved at work, with no trade-off for the costs of the jobs already being destroyed. To realise this promised dividend OpenAI says the government would need to lean into resource-sucking datacentres, socialising the costs of energy and water, steamrolling communities and putting new pressures on the grid and fast-tracking development at the cost of the energy transition. As our creativity is being stolen and repurposed, trading off our collective empathy for automated culture, OpenAI wants us to 'streamline and update copyright law', with industry groups already pushing hard for a general right to mine our data. But these self-serving policy asks are not the worst of the OpenAI blueprint; it is the very fact that this massive corporation purports to set our future agenda at all, defining rather than responding to our collective needs. This design principle could represent the inflection point between a smart future and an impending Idiocracy. It is true this technology carries amazing power to synthesise information and challenge higher order thinking in new and profound ways. OpenAI is right to describe the technology as 'like electricity' something that can illuminate the night sky. But would you get a power company to set the rules for electrical safety? The truth is OpenAI is nether open or intelligent: it's a play to dominate a new technology on commercial terms for its material benefit, using their copious venture capital as a shield against competitors and a sword against government to create a policy environment to suit them. We are witnessing the next phase of their corporate history. ChatGPT is a compelling shop front, but what if it is intellectual heroin? It tricks us to feel smarter, more seen and even loved, while actually providing the opposite by convincing us to commoditise our collective intelligence. Short of returning to a genuine not-for-profit mission, OpenAI can never be a good faith partner. Theirs is an operating model to be resisted but that relies on us having the time, the understanding and, yes, the leadership to do this intelligently. In the latest episode of my podcast Burning Platforms one of the godfathers of artificial intelligence, Prof Toby Walsh, differentiates between the richness of distributed intelligence and the homogeneity of the concentrated intelligence that chatbots serve up. High quality data is earned not stolen property; it is used mindfully to address problems humans identify, not commoditised to fill some market niche. While the tech broligarchs battle for world domination, maybe the smart money should be on the design and value of small data models, designed for purpose not for producing mainstream slop and brain rot, that chew up less energy and eradicate fewer jobs. Because of the power of the tech sector, all of whom have well-paid and well-positioned Canberra lobbyists, we also need to resist. Since shouting out the Luddites in my last column I've been delighted to discover there are people already doing this. Ben Zhao, a University of Chicago computer scientist has developed programs like Glaze which protects private photos being harvested to train facial recognition technology and Nightshade, a filter for artists that tricks AI into seeing a cat as a dog, like putting ink in a bag of stolen bank cheques. And Cloudfare, one of the dominant cybersecurity companies, has announced it will ban AI web crawlers from scraping content from their sites without paying compensation to the owner of those sites. As Cloudfare CEO, Matthew Prince, says: 'I go to war every single day with the Chinese government, the Russian government, the Iranians, the North Koreans, probably Americans, the Israelis, all of them who are trying to hack into our customer sites. And you're telling me, I can't stop some nerd with a C-corporation in Palo Alto?' In the battle for our future intelligence, we need to deploy all the grey matter at our disposal: workers' intelligence, cultural intelligence, collective intelligence and the power of technologists in the face of the artifice. Spoiler: in the movie the sports drink company, 'Brawndo' extends its market dominance in electrolytes by expanding into agriculture, poisoning the land in pursuit of 'The Profit'. Open AI's Blueprint for Australia would be a similar triumph of Idiocracy. Peter Lewis is the executive director of Essential, a progressive strategic communications and research company that undertook research for Labor in the 2025 election and conducts qualitative research for Guardian Australia. He is also the host of Per Capita's Burning Platforms podcast