EU court rules against green groups trying to block Spanish wind farms
Companies developing wind farms in Galicia and regional authorities welcomed the decision, which is a setback to opponents' strategy of using the courts to block plans they say encroach on the environment and the lives of local people.
The court rejected the environmentalists' argument that the public's rights to consultation had been violated.
The decision affects dozens of planned wind projects that were approved by the regional government and then halted by the highest regional court after locals and environmental groups filed hundreds of lawsuits.
Last year, the Galician court asked the European Court of Justice to rule on whether Galician and Spanish laws comply with EU access to information rules in the permitting process.
Carmen Bouso from the regional government's environment department said the court's decision "clearly and emphatically supports" the procedures used to approve wind energy projects and the government's full respect of the public's rights to participate in the process.
She urged regional judges to resume their consideration of lawsuits that they had put on hold pending the ruling of the European court.
The AEE, a Spanish wind industry group, welcomed the ruling as "a key step toward restoring legal certainty" in the region.
"Now it's time to act quickly and responsibly so that the projects that have been stalled until now can resume operations as soon as possible," AEE General Director Juan Virgilio Marquez said.
There are 92 wind farms targeted by legal actions in Galicia, 86 of which have been halted before construction started, according to data provided by regional authorities. They involve an estimated investment of 3 billion euros ($3.42 billion) and have a total planned capacity of almost 2.5 gigawatts (GW).
($1 = 0.8762 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Berkshire takes $3.8 billion Kraft Heinz write-down, operating profit falls
Aug 2 (Reuters) - Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab said on Saturday it took a $3.76 billion write-down on its stake in Kraft Heinz (KHC.O), opens new tab during the second quarter, an acknowledgment the decade-old investment hasn't worked out. Berkshire also reported a 4% decline in quarterly operating profit as insurance underwriting premiums fell. The write-down and lower gains from common stocks caused a 59% drop in overall net income. Buffett's conglomerate signaled it remains cautious about market valuations, amid uncertainty about tariffs and growth in the broader economy. It reported a near-record $344.1 billion cash stake, and sold more stocks than it bought for an 11th straight quarter. As of mid-July, Berkshire hadn't repurchased any of its own stock since May 2024. Buffett, 94, has led Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire since 1965, though he plans to step down at year-end. "Investors are getting antsy and want to seek activity, and nothing is happening," said Kyle Sanders, an analyst at Edward Jones. "Buffett definitely views the market as overvalued, and will sit back and wait for something to come to him." Uncertainty about trade policies, including tariffs, has become a headwind as delayed orders and shipments led to declining revenue at most of Berkshire's consumer businesses. Jazwares, which makes the popular Squishmallows plush toys, saw revenue fall 38.5% in the year's first half. Analysts viewed overall results as lackluster. "Berkshire and the economy are at an inflection point," said Cathy Seifert, a CFRA Research analyst. "I don't think the market will embrace the combination of mediocre results, a lack of stock buybacks, and Berkshire's recent share underperformance amid a management transition." Seifert and Sanders rate Berkshire "hold." Second-quarter operating income fell to $11.16 billion, or about $7,760 per Class A share, from $11.6 billion a year earlier. Results included $877 million of currency losses as the U.S. dollar weakened. Net income, including gains and losses on stocks such as Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab and American Express (AXP.N), opens new tab, fell to $12.37 billion from $30.35 billion. Revenue fell 1% to $92.52 billion. Buffett views unrealized investment gains and losses, including on stocks Berkshire has no plans to sell, as often meaningless to understanding his company. The $3.76 billion after-tax write-down for Berkshire's 27.4% Kraft Heinz stake, equal to $5 billion before taxes, followed the struggling food company's announcement it would consider strategic alternatives, which could include a breakup. Berkshire had carried Kraft Heinz on its books at above-market value but said economic and other uncertainties, and its longer-term plans to remain an investor, made the gap "other-than-temporary." The write-down is Berkshire's second for Kraft Heinz, following a $3 billion write-down in 2019. Buffett acknowledged at the time that Berkshire overpaid in the 2015 merger of Kraft Foods and H.J. Heinz, one of his biggest investment missteps. Kraft Heinz has suffered as more shoppers favor healthier and private-label alternatives. Its approximately 200 brands include Oscar Mayer, Kool-Aid, Velveeta and Jell-O. Berkshire also carries another big investment, its 28.1% stake in Occidental Petroleum (OXY.N), opens new tab at $5.3 billion above fair value, but reported no need for a write-down. Shares of Berkshire have fallen more than 12%, and lagged the Standard & Poor's 500 (.SPX), opens new tab by about 22 percentage points, since Buffett announced on May 3 he would step down as chief executive at year end. Vice Chairman Greg Abel, 63, will succeed him, though Buffett will remain chairman. Analysts said the premium embedded in Berkshire's stock price because of the presence of Buffett, arguably the world's most well-known investor, has eroded, while growth may slow in the insurance sector, a major Berkshire profit center. The lack of new investments has also been a drag. Analysts believe Berkshire's BNSF unit could buy CSX (CSX.O), opens new tab to create another transcontinental railroad, after Union Pacific (UNP.N), opens new tab agreed on July 29 to buy Norfolk Southern (NSC.N), opens new tab. Buffett transformed Berkshire over six decades from a troubled and since-closed textile company into a $1.02 trillion conglomerate. Berkshire owns several insurers and reinsurers, electric utility and renewable energy businesses, several chemical and industrial companies, and familiar consumer brands such as Dairy Queen, Fruit of the Loom and See's Candies. Berkshire said the 12% quarterly decline in insurance underwriting profit stemmed primarily from reinsurance businesses and some smaller insurance businesses. Geico, its best-known insurance business, saw pre-tax underwriting profit rise 2%, as a 5% increase in premiums offset a smaller rise in accident losses. The car insurer has been ceding market share to State Farm and Progressive (PGR.N), opens new tab, while focusing on improving underwriting quality and technology and cutting jobs. Analysts said higher tariffs could be a headwind for Geico if the cost of auto parts rose, potentially increasing losses from accident claims. BNSF is also cutting expenses. Lower fuel costs helped boost quarterly profit 19% gain, though revenue and cargo volumes barely changed. The energy business, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, posted a 7% profit increase. Berkshire said it is evaluating the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed last month by U.S. President Donald Trump, on the "economics and viability" of its renewable energy, storage and technology-neutral projects.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Who's most to blame for Newcastle's issues? The recruiter who didn't recruit
There is one morsel of good news for Newcastle United's incoming sporting director. Whoever it may be, he can't be as bad as the last bloke. Ross Wilson is the favourite for the role, ahead of Jason Ayto, formerly of Arsenal. Wilson has been the chief football officer at Nottingham Forest, so at least we know he's not scared of hard work. And he will need that restlessness. Newcastle's summer has been marked largely by frustration and tumbleweed. Not since cartoon skunk Pepé Le Pew has anyone in black and white had such trouble finding a match. If Newcastle identify a target, he goes elsewhere. Meanwhile, star turn Alexander Isak has fled to northern Spain to avoid the pre-season tour and agitate for a move to Liverpool, whose first bid of £110 million was rejected. Liverpool are briefing that they won't come back, but that hardly matters. Newcastle's preparations are already in ruins. Isak doesn't want to be there and the fans know this and are increasingly against him. It's a mess. What did former sporting director Paul Mitchell do in his year at the club? What did he bestow? What plans, what blueprints? Mitchell cannot be blamed for some recent disappointments, but he was a recruiter who didn't recruit and, by the looks of it, didn't leave much behind that was concrete as his legacy. Plenty of deals are set up in advance. We all knew that Trent Alexander-Arnold was on his way to Real Madrid many months out. Chelsea had Christian Pulisic agreed six months before he came, too. And José Mourinho would never take credit for the arrival of Petr Cech or Arjen Robben, saying those deals were in place before he was. Yet, having supposedly kept their powder dry for the great leap forward, what did Newcastle have arranged that hasn't fallen apart? Not Marc Guéhi — last summer's missed target — not João Pedro. They couldn't even keep goalkeeper James Trafford from joining Manchester City, the club that jettisoned him two years ago. Hopes of beating last season's 15th-placed team, Manchester United, to Benjamin Sesko sit in the balance. And before Liverpool came in for Isak they had already secured Hugo Ekitike, who Newcastle had fondly imagined would be his partner, or his replacement if the unthinkable happened. To see both in red would be little short of disastrous. And if all Mitchell had done was nothing — well, it wouldn't be impressive, but it wouldn't be actively harmful. Yet one of the few calls he did make is believed to have alienated Isak and may be the root of his present dissatisfaction. Having been promised an improved contract by the previous executive regime of Amanda Staveley and Mehrdad Ghodoussi, Isak was then informed that would not be happening. The logic was straightforward: Isak was a high earner with four years left on his deal and Newcastle are mindful of Profitability and Sustainability Rules. Yet the ramifications can now be seen. Isak clearly knows another club can make him happy. One whose recruitment agents are efficiency's gold standard. That's the problem with football's new executive model. Recruiters, sporting directors, call them what you will, appear to be no more reliable than the people they have replaced: the managers. Manchester United were said to have fallen behind because they were entirely reliant on the wit of Sir Alex Ferguson. Last season, Sir Jim Ratcliffe bemoaned the fact the club were still behind on data analytics and could only rely on the eyes of Jason Wilcox, the sporting director. Yet if Newcastle had a coach as ferociously proactive as Ferguson, would they have struggled to get deals done? No criticism of Eddie Howe is intended. He works in a modern club, which Ferguson's United were not. Yet it's not just about chains of command, philosophies and strategies. The best people, that is what Liverpool have. All clubs employ executives to direct football, or sport, or recruitment, whichever title is the fashion. Chelsea's probably have their own wing at the training ground. Yet some clubs buy consistently well, others do not. Newcastle recruited a man to recruit the men, but he failed. The ramifications are significant. Neither Wilson nor Ayto can be active in this transfer window. Another one is passing Newcastle by. Has Howe got too much power, it is asked? After all, Mitchell's time there may not have recovered from an early schism with Howe and with a void at the top sporting direction increasingly lands at the manager's door. Yet what option is there, in Newcastle's state? They had a man to do that job. Not only didn't he do it but some of the decisions appear to have benefited a rival. That's what you call a good recruitment strategy. Liverpool have even got the opposition working for them. And not so much as a thank you. We used to be such a polite nation too. Manners maketh man and all that. Yet no so much as a tip of the hat in the direction of the Netherlands for Sarina Wiegman. We've heard a lot about patriotism and 'proper' England since the European Championship was retained, but very little acknowledgement of the method behind it all. For that would mean conceding it really isn't all our work. It can't be, with a foreign coach. England's women were superb in this tournament. Resilient, brave, determined. The moment Spain did not get the game won in extra time, it was England all the way. Yet much of the credit for that strength of attitude goes to Wiegman and her largely Dutch backroom team, and the credit for them goes to the Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbalbond (KNVB), the Royal Dutch Football Association. So this was an Anglo-Dutch victory, an Anglo-Dutch operation, like Unilever, Shell or The Legendary Pink Dots. Close, but England's women had never got over the line at a major international tournament until Wiegman arrived. And she didn't fluke it this time, as was churlishly implied until the moment of ultimate victory. Yes, England can play better. Yet there are very solid reasons why England defeated Spain, many of them down to the work of the central midfield, which was no accident. Wiegman has reached five straight tournament finals, winning three. That's no fluke, either. The system that produced this remarkable head coach deserves its due. Now there is concern because the proportion of English players in the WSL has halved to just 30 per cent. Baroness Campbell, instrumental in Wiegman's appointment, is worried. Ironic that champions of a national team with a foreign coach suddenly think nationality is important. We want it all ways. In victory, we wish to celebrate and promote this as the best of us, which is what successful international sport is supposed to represent. Yet the FA, and its chief executive Mark Bullingham, are too frightened of failure to take a chance on just our best. It wishes for England to comprise that, plus the best of yours too, if we're short. And it will blow the competition out of the water with its financial might to facilitate this. Just don't expect the tiniest acknowledgment if it pays off. That's why it was so amusing when Bullingham said Wiegman was 'not for sale at any price' in the build-up to the final. For a start, she is. That's why she left her position as Netherlands head coach to manage England: because she is very much the gun for hire. But that's her call. The real reason she's not for sale is because there is not another nation in Europe — and only one, the United States, across the rest of the world — that would pay what she receives for coaching England. When Wiegman won the European Championship with the Netherlands in 2017 she was made a Knight of the Order of Orange-Nassau and was awarded a statue in the garden of the KNVB; which is all well and good, but the FA gave her £400,000 a year and that rather ended discussions. Not to be outdone on the titles, there is now talk of making Wiegman a dame here too. It's another form of ownership. Look, she's ours, really. She's one of us. So we're Manchester City. And the majority don't care because all that matters is winning. Yet how a nation wins is important, too, particularly if that victory is going to be seized upon with great nationalistic fervour. Chloe Kelly's declaration that, 'I'm so proud to be English' was particularly well received. 'Uncomplicated patriotism,' one headline called it. But it is complicated, isn't it, if the manager is Dutch and the English didn't land a trophy until she arrived? The team have every right to wrap themselves in the flag because what they have achieved is exceptional; but the FA should at least have the decency to offer some small thank you to their counterparts in Zeist. Without them, we're nothing. When Richard Gould, the ECB chief executive, spoke to the media before the start of the fifth Test with India, he attempted to explain the thinking behind Test series being crushed into ever-shorter periods of time. He said the idea of keeping August free for the Hundred was here to stay and that part of the reasoning for making June and July the Test season was to avoid a clash with big football tournaments. When the Ashes are contested here in 2027, the schedule will replicate that for India this summer. The one that has culminated in a ruinous round of injuries. Yet that plan is already out of date. Now that tournaments involving England's women command almost as much attention as the men, there will not be a summer that cricket does not have to share with international football. Take the next four years: 2026, men's World Cup, 2027 women's World Cup, 2028 men's European Championships, 2029 women's European Championships. And that is before factoring in the 2029 Club World Cup, which may feature an expanded roster of Premier League clubs, including some of the bigger draws such as Liverpool or Arsenal. Test cricket has always competed with football in some way, and endures. Ben Stokes's famous match-winning innings at Headingley in 2019 took place across August 24 and 25, the same weekend as a full Premier League programme including Liverpool versus Arsenal and, on the day of the heroics, Tottenham Hotspur versus Newcastle United. Anyone much remember those matches? Nobody is forgetting Stokes's 135 not out and his partnership with Jack Leach, though. The Open, Wimbledon, the British Grand Prix, cricket is always challenged by our sporting summer. On Sunday, July 19, 2009, England were trying to win a Lord's Test against Australia for the first time since 1934. It was the day before Freddie Flintoff's iconic, kneeling, open-armed celebration. Yet on day four, many in the media centre were gathered around a television in a back suite because at Turnberry, the 59-year-old Tom Watson was within a hair's breadth of winning the Open. England's dramatic victory in the 2019 Cricket World Cup took place at the same time as arguably the greatest Wimbledon's men's singles final in history, Novak Djokovic defeating Roger Federer 7-6, 1-6, 7-6, 4-6, 13-12. So a little faith is needed, surely. For cricket to rearrange its calendar shows an absence of confidence in a sport that, at its best, still offers rewards like no other. How can we not believe in that? It was 46 degrees when Manchester United reached Chicago last week, with extreme weather warnings across the Midwest. Still, there was money to be made: £7.5million in United's case, the most of any Premier League team engaged in the Summer Series in the United States. So, a little bit more than Pachuca from Mexico got out of the Club World Cup, not quite as much as Los Angeles FC. No glory in the Summer Series, either. Chelsea can bask in the glow of being world champions for four years, with all the added commercial value this affords. Who won the Summer Series? Who cares? There are even suggestions that, far from being a money-spinner, it is failing commercially. The inaugural version two years ago lost £5.4 million — and that was before Fifa came in and delivered a genuine football competition for the locals, not a succession of glorified friendlies. We are yet to see the toll, if any, of the Club World Cup on Chelsea and Manchester City as the domestic season unfolds, but there is a risk-reward from taking part in a tournament with such obvious benefits. The Summer Series, by contrast, seems one big drain. Sunderland have already spent more than £100million on transfers. Coming into the Premier League via the play-offs it is no doubt necessary, while offering no guarantees. Ipswich Town were similarly ambitious last season and look where it got them. One prospective signing is interesting, though. Marc Guiu has started only seven games for Chelsea. On the face of it, his loan move to Sunderland would not make waves. The reason Chelsea are not prepared to make the deal permanent, however, is that inside the club Guiu is believed to have Cole Palmer potential. He's 19, four years Palmer's junior and with only slightly more first-team experience than Palmer had at the same stage of his career with Manchester City. So watch this space. Sunderland may be getting a special one, even if only for the season. The reason fans felt such love for Joey Jones was a shared devotion. Late in his career, at Huddersfield Town, snow had wiped out a weekend's fixture list. Mick Buxton, the manager, had an idea. He got the club to secure tickets at matches for all those players who had shown ambition to go into management. Watch the game, he said, and then write up a scout's report. It'll be good practice for you to get pointers from a manager's perspective. He assigned each player a match based on where he lived. Joey, a resident of north Wales but a Liverpool fanatic, was told there would be a ticket for him at Everton. 'I'm not going there,' he said. Buxton was bemused. 'I've never set foot inside Goodison Park unless I was playing,' Jones insisted. 'I'm not going to start now.' Despite Buxton's protests, he wouldn't budge. 'No way, not Everton. Anywhere but Everton.' Joey died last month. There is to be a statue of him at the home of his other great love, Wrexham. And if anyone goes near it with a blue scarf, he'll come back and haunt them. Numbers at the Women's European Championship told a story. Most goals, most assists and most chances created went to players from Spain, as did the first five berths for successful passes. Leading on most dribbles and most touches in the opposition box was Klara Buhl, of Germany. So how did England win? Most tackles, Keira Walsh. Most interceptions, Alex Greenwood. Most recoveries, Leah Williamson. Proof that even at the highest level, the dirty work brings reward. Standing besides the Uefa president, Aleksander Ceferin, on the podium in Basel was the general secretary Theodore Theodoridis, a native of Athens and formerly a board member of the Hellenic Football Federation. Uncanny, isn't it, the way that Olympiacos and Nottingham Forest, the clubs owned by Evangelos Marinakis, manage to nervelessly tiptoe their way through Uefa's minefield of multiclub ownership when Crystal Palace cannot.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Viktor Gyokeres' surprise move, ten days before Swedish star completed £70m Arsenal transfer
Viktor Gyokeres reportedly set up a company in London almost two weeks before his move to Arsenal was finalised. The Gunners' interest in the prolific Swede had been obvious from the start of the summer window, but negotiations over a deal went on for weeks. Amid interest from rivals Manchester United, the delays must have left Arsenal supporters wondering whether they'd ever finalise a deal, let alone complete a transfer in time for next season. But it seems for the man himself the move was never in-doubt, as Gyokeres registered a new London-based promotions company 10 days before he signed on the dotted line on July 26, according to The Times. The company was registered on July 16 and is expected to handle the striker's image rights income. Its title, VG9 Productions Ltd, takes inspiration from Gyokeres' initials and the number he wore during his two seasons at Sporting Lisbon. It was thought that the Swede would have preferred the No 9 at Arsenal - currently occupied by Gabriel Jesus - but later expressed his desire to follow in the footsteps of Thierry Henry with No 14. After completing his £64m move last weekend, Gyokeres jetted off to Asia to meet his new team-mates on their pre-season tour of Asia. His debut came on Thursday against rivals Tottenham Hotspur, with the frontman afforded 20 or so minutes off the bench as he builds his fitness ahead of the new season. Arsenal begin their campaign with a difficult away fixture at Old Trafford on August 16. He signs with a heap of expectation on his shoulders after slotting home an incredible 97 goals in 102 appearances in Lisbon. The Gunners' longing for a proven frontman has been well- documented amid the struggles of Gabriel Jesus since his move from Manchester City. Mikel Arteta expressed his delight that he and club officials finally got their man last week, saying: ''We're absolutely delighted to welcome Viktor Gyokeres to the club. The consistency he has shown in his performances and availability have been outstanding, and his goal contributions speak for themselves. 'Viktor has so many qualities. He is a quick and powerful presence up front, with incredible goalscoring numbers at club and international levels. 'He brings a clinical edge with a high conversion rate of chances into goals, with his intelligent movement in the box making him a constant threat. 'We're excited about what Viktor brings to our squad and are looking forward to start working with him. We welcome Viktor and his family to Arsenal.' Sporting Director Andrea Berta added: 'We are so pleased with the excellent deal we have completed to bring Viktor Gyokeres to the club. 'Viktor is an exceptional talent and has consistently demonstrated he has the qualities and winning mentality required of a top-level centre-forward. 'His physicality, intelligence and work ethic make him a perfect fit for our vision. We are confident Viktor will have a major impact on the pitch and become an important figure in our dressing room. Welcome, Viktor!'
