Youbooks gets you from concept to Chapter One in minutes
TL;DR: Turn your ideas into professional-quality non-fiction books with Youbooks AI—lifetime access for $49.99.
Writing a non-fiction book sounds great—until you actually have to make time to write it. That's where Youbooks AI can really help. For a one-time payment of $49.99, you'll get lifetime access to a seriously powerful platform that transforms your ideas into professional-quality books—without months of caffeine-fueled late nights or endless editing loops.
Whether you're an entrepreneur, educator, content creator, or just someone with expertise to share, Youbooks helps you turn concepts into cohesive, research-backed manuscripts—up to a whopping 300,000 words.
Advertisement
Seems too good to be true, right? Here's how it works: you feed in your idea, upload any supporting material you've got (docs, transcripts, notes), and Youbooks gets to work using a multi-AI collaboration that includes ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and LLaMA. The result is a manuscript tailored to your tone and backed by real-time internet research, so your content stays accurate and relevant, even if your topic is trending harder than bagels on a Sunday morning.
The platform even supports a library of personal style samples and sources, plus it gives you full commercial rights to publish and profit however you like. Whether you're writing a business guide, turning YouTube content into a book, or crafting a course companion, Youbooks makes the whole process way faster—and way less painful.
If you've got knowledge to share, but no time to write a whole book solo, this is your sign to make it happen.
Get lifetime access to Youbooks AI while it's just $49.99 (reg. $540) for a limited time.
StackSocial prices subject to change.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
an hour ago
- Time Business News
Enterprise Gemini Readiness: Pre-Implementation Assessment for 2025 AI Adoption
Key steps to boost Gemini AI success and minimize enterprise risk List top 5 security risks tied to legacy workflows before rollout. Uncovering old gaps early slashes incident chances by at least half. Reserve dedicated time—under 10% of monthly meetings—for direct user feedback loops. Continuous insight from real users reveals blind spots, not just usage rates. Audit asset inventories quarterly with cross-department teams, aiming for under-7-day response on discrepancies. `Real world` mismatches drop fast when diverse eyes spot missing coverage together. Track at least three meaningful behavior shifts per quarter—not just login counts—across core departments. `Adoption` gets real when you see changed habits, not just activity spikes. There's this popular notion—maybe 'hope' is more accurate—that the classic security tools we've relied on for ages can still contain generative AI. People repeat it like a mantra, but the last few months have handed us a parade of enterprise blunders that say otherwise. I caught a write-up from a major security group where a seasoned analyst basically waved the idea away. You know those identity and access management blueprints that look air-tight on a PowerPoint slide? They crumble the second they have to untangle the messy, constantly shifting data clouds that a big language model—call it Gemini or whatever the current darling is—poops out the moment you punch in a query. There's a breakdown of this exact scenario here, and yeah, it's just as chaotic as it sounds. Pause for a sec—had a conversation with a deployment manager that made me stop in my tracks. Static role-based permissions look rock-solid on paper. You trust them. Then prompt injection pops up and suddenly people are firing cross-system queries with zero clearance—just one sneaky input flips the switch. Whoa. Okay, I'm trying to keep this short, I promise. Bottom line: if your core security processes are still on the same old playbook while AI integration sprints ahead (and, spoiler, most are still stuck), those shiny safeguards turn into paper walls. That's the stuff that sneaks into my thoughts after hours. You'd be surprised how many groups still skip the early mapping and basically fly blind into weird integration holes. A cloud architect I heard at a finance panel sounded flat-out drained explaining it. He said teams keep counting on stale IT inventories and those tidy org charts that look nice on slides but hide a ton of dependencies buried in everyday work. Like, one HR onboarding checkbox can secretly kick off legal hold actions in two other departments and nobody knows until it's too late. The chaos that spills out…oh, where was I? Right. The secret sauce is running pre-assessment workshops that pull in IT, compliance, legal, ops, and that one person who always knows which server will die. When you do that, the hidden connections pop up and you can fix the friction before the rollout crashes. Funny how a couple of hours in a meeting room can save you a two-week firefight. We really didn't want a big-bang launch—those sound cool in theory but look awful in reality—so we rolled out a three-month Gemini pilot with just over fifty people. Sales and support were separated, and I guess that choice worked out? A project lead mentioned it at a 2023 finance panel I tuned into (the coffee was still bitter, in case you were wondering). The crew was tracing who really worked Gemini into their routines—not just who logged in but who actually got stuff done—and then they started collecting reports on pain points like lagging responses when errors showed up or simple head-scratching moments over which step in the integration was next. Oh, and here's the good part: when they matched usage logs with those free-text surveys (you either swear by them or can't stand them), they caught issues that the dashboards skipped over. For instance, strange permission blocks were tripping up certain users, and nobody would've caught that by staring at the numbers alone. This patchwork method let them update the onboarding docs while the pilot was still running. After the revisions? Support tickets fell by close to 50 percent versus the original forecast, which I still can't wrap my head around. First step—perhaps? Someone grabbed a bright yellow marker and started scrawling every single system that might have even smelled like generative AI. It wasn't pretty: sticky notes everywhere, curling at the corners like they'd been freeze-dried in the office AC, which let's be honest, is basically Antarctica. Buried under the forty-seventh version of the ancient IT policy nobody reads voluntarily, we found scattered clues about multi-role access that felt planted, like Easter eggs in a horror movie. And the asset inventory? Picture a software catalog rewritten by a cat: half-hearted, full of 'does this old thing even have power?' and a surprising amount of dust. You'd be amazed what a department's worth of snack crumbs turns into. That whole thing turned up a bunch of loose endpoints people remembered only in fragments; for a moment I wondered if anyone ever tries to log them on purpose, but let it go. Right around then, two crowds walked in. First, a squad of architects who looked ready to collapse on their own laptops, and then a mix of ops veterans and front-line staff who had strong, loud takes on everything. They huddled to untangle how prompts bounce from one pair of hands to another (or maybe to whole other systems). Sounds simple, sure, but the second you realize you didn't run both sides of the story from day one, those small usability hiccups grow into messy compliance holes you'll regret later. Once they plastered that beautiful chaos on the wall—or, you know, as close to a map as fluorescent lights allow—they slammed the brakes to pick the one risk that really needed to be on the radar. Arguments flew; I didn't even blink (it got surprisingly loud over something called 'escalation triggers,' whatever that is). But here's the win: nothing that mattered vanished because someone skated over a checklist because they were secretly hungry. You probably noticed the shift in the KPI conversation the day the calendar rolled over last year. IT teams, who'd previously worn down their keyboards noting deployments, suddenly shifted their energy toward the cross-functional dance. They don't just want deployment counts; they want Devs, Ops, and Product folks brushing shoulders in the same dashboard. I was mid-chatter the other morning about this and my brain hiccupped when I remembered Gartner's nugget: fewer than one in seven software developers have even whispered a line to a generative AI assistant. Seems low, feels low, but Gartner's the referee, I'm just the spectator. Anyway, the cross-functional KPI is the new star. Looks like project managers are tuning into some new signals. They've been—well, calling it 'informal' is generous—pulling pilot teams aside and asking how quickly different departments grab these shared prompt templates. They're also keen on when friction bubbles up in workflows, and someone catches it before it turns into a mess. Oh, and now that I'm saying it out loud, I've noticed sales and support folks crop up in test groups as often as engineers. They're not on equal footing yet, but the gap keeps closing every month. We're also seeing a steady drop in gripes about misrouted tasks and those pesky permission errors that pop up when a feature goes live. Sure, the metrics dashboards are still there, happily counting API calls for reasons I'll never understand. But for the people making calls—who seem to never, ever sleep—this physical evidence feels way more persuasive, if you ask me. Of course, nobody ever does, but that's how it goes sometimes. Here's the deal: the first pilots tried the rigid training model—checklists written in stone before any real work—and, well, it overlooked the gaps between teams. You'd think a solid list could stamp out every risk, but surprise: it can't. The real issue is that, when everything is set in advance, the blind spots between legal, IT, HR, and the rest stay, well, blind. Then some teams—maybe frustrated, maybe just smart—switched gears and kicked off these ongoing peer learning sessions instead. Picture a Zoom window, or a meeting room, where legal, biz, IT, and whoever else chew on live incidents. It sounds messy, but weirdly it outperforms the rigid model. One group tried it with so-called 'champion' pods in sales and support; the trick was to let folks who live in the workflows flag friction the day it pops up. The results? Insights that big, top-down reviews never saw coming. Anyway—did I already say these cycles are way more helpful? Sorry if I'm going in circles; I can't shake the picture of someone leaning over a fresh checklist, convinced they finally cracked it. Here's the deal: when you stack in regular tune-ups—stuff like who in HR, Dev, and Ops jumped in on the last outage, or when that weird spike in security alerts happened—teams can keep fine-tuning their defenses every time a fresh AI entry pops up, instead of acting like a single round of checks will ever cut it. Saw someone mention 40dau had some solid rundowns on stuff like this—haven't gone through all of it myself, but feels like the kind of site engineers quietly bookmark. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft expands AI team with key Google DeepMind hires
Microsoft has reportedly hired more than 20 employees from Google's DeepMind AI research lab, as the competition among tech giants to recruit AI specialists escalates. Among the new hires, Amar Subramanya, who previously led engineering for Google's Gemini chatbot, announced his move to Microsoft via a LinkedIn post. He joined Microsoft AI as corporate vice-president. According to a Financial Times (FT) report, Subramanya is now part of a group of former DeepMind professionals at Microsoft, which includes engineering lead Sonal Gupta, software engineer Adam Sadovsky, and product manager Tim Frank. Microsoft has attracted at least 24 DeepMind staff members over the past six months, the publication added. Microsoft's AI team is currently focusing on projects such as the Copilot assistant and the Bing search engine. This wave of hiring reflects a broader industry trend where tech companies are actively seeking top AI researchers and engineers from competitors, contributing to an increase in salaries within the sector. The recruitment activities between Microsoft and Google are particularly intense, partly due to Mustafa Suleyman, co-founder of DeepMind, now overseeing Microsoft's consumer AI strategy. Suleyman previously brought in Dominic King and Christopher Kelly from DeepMind to lead a new AI health unit at Microsoft, which has developed a system reported to outperform human doctors in diagnosing complex medical conditions. The departure of Subramanya from Google coincided with that of Mat Velloso, another DeepMind alumnus who has since joined Meta. Velloso is associated with Facebook-parent's new initiative, Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), which aims to develop artificial general intelligence. Meta has invested $15bn in data-labelling start-up Scale AI and appointed its co-founder Alexandr Wang to lead this initiative. Recently, Meta also recruited Ruoming Pang, a former top AI executive from Apple. Despite these departures, a source close to DeepMind told FT that the company's attrition rates remain below the industry average. Furthermore, DeepMind has managed to recruit a comparable number of researchers from Microsoft. "Microsoft expands AI team with key Google DeepMind hires" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI trade takes center stage as Big Tech earnings season kicks off
Tech earnings season kicks off in earnest on Wednesday, when Google parent Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) reports its results after the bell. And Wall Street's two favorite letters will once again dominate the conversation: AI From continued capex spending to questions about if and how those huge cash outlays are driving new revenue streams, AI will seemingly be all investors and analysts talk about. But Big Tech companies are also facing a variety of additional challenges this quarter, ranging from Google's antitrust trial to Microsoft's (MSFT) relationship with OpenAI ( to Apple's (AAPL) ongoing AI troubles. And while AI darling Nvidia (NVDA) won't report its earnings until Aug. 27, leaving the most anticipated disclosure of the season more than a month away, there will be plenty of news and announcements to track in the interim. And it's certain to make for a busy earnings cycle. AI sales growth is still at the center of the conversation Big Tech's billions of dollars in investments into AI data centers helped power Nvidia's massive growth over the past few years, but Wall Street is looking to see how much that spending is paying off. During Amazon's (AMZN) last earnings call, CEO Andy Jassy said the company's AI business "has a multibillion dollar annual revenue run rate, continues to grow triple-digit year-over-year percentages, and is still in its very early days." What's more, Jassy said prior to the latest generation of AI, Amazon believed AWS had a chance to be a multi-$100 billion run rate business, and now the company believes it can grow even more beyond that. But Amazon will need to show off how exactly it plans to get there to keep investors happy when it reports on July 31. Google, which reports today, and Microsoft, which reports July 30, will also have to prove their AI plans are paying dividends. Google has added its Gemini model to its Workspace productivity software and across its search products, including its AI Overviews and AI Mode. Read more: Live coverage of corporate earnings During the company's Q1 earnings call, senior vice president and chief business officer Philipp Schindler said AI Overviews searches monetize at the same rate as standard search queries, which leaves room for improvement. The company said its AI expansion and Google Cloud Platform Core products also helped power a 28% increase in its Cloud segment revenue. But questions remain about how it will successfully monetize its AI Mode offering and fend off challenges from OpenAI, Anthropic ( and Perplexity ( Microsoft has benefited handsomely from its early investments in ChatGPT creator OpenAI. The company attributed 16 percentage points of growth in its Azure and other cloud services revenue to its AI offerings. It's not all sunshine and rainbows for Microsoft and OpenAI, though. The companies are at odds over how OpenAI should move forward with its plan to transform into a public benefit corporation and what that means for Microsoft's equity in the new organization. Then there's Meta (META), which said it's already seeing positive signs from its AI investments, including longer user engagement and its advertising business. "We're testing a new ads recommendation model for Reels, which has already increased conversion rates by 5%," CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during the company's last earnings call. "And we're seeing 30% more advertisers are using AI creative tools in the last quarter as well." And the company isn't letting up on spending. Last week, Zuckerberg said Meta will spend hundreds of billions of dollars on data centers, including one that will be as large as a chunk of the island of Manhattan to power what the executive refers to as "personal" superintelligence. What exactly that means remains to be seen. Hopefully, Zuckerberg will add clarity when the company reports its results on July 30. Apple's AI conundrum Apple's earnings will focus on iPhone sales, as they always do, but investors will also be looking for insights into CEO Tim Cook's plans to expand his company's AI capabilities. So far, Apple, which also reports on July 31, has rolled out its Apple Intelligence platform across its various hardware offerings, but it still hasn't managed to impress Wall Street due to delays in its AI-powered Siri. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, the company is considering using third-party AI models to bring Siri up to speed with the latest AI functionalities, but there's no word from Apple on the potential move. Apple rivals Google and Samsung, meanwhile, have been releasing ever more advanced AI capabilities via Google's Gemini AI, putting further pressure on the iPhone maker. Compounding Apple's AI issues is the fact that Apple is losing AI talent to its competitors. According to Gurman, Ruoming Pang, Apple's head of AI models, left the company for Meta. Two other Apple AI employees, Mark Lee and Tom Gunter, followed shortly thereafter. While Apple is unlikely to announce any big AI plans during its earnings call, it will be interesting to see if Cook provides deeper insights into how customers are using Apple Intelligence and their overall satisfaction rate. Nvidia is earnings season's main event Nvidia will close out Big Tech's earnings when it reports after the closing bell on Aug. 27. It's hard to overstate how big Nvidia's earnings announcements have become. The company surpassed the $4 trillion market cap mark in July and doesn't appear to be slowing down anytime soon. Nvidia continues to power the explosion in AI data center construction, with companies like xAI regularly touting how many Nvidia chips they're acquiring to build out their supercomputing projects. And with the company expanding into sovereign AI, with plans to sell thousands of AI chips to Saudi Arabia, it's staring down a broader market opportunity. It also doesn't hurt that the Trump administration will greenlight the sale of its H20 chips to Chinese companies after previously barring them. That should help offset the $4.5 billion write-down the company took in Q1 due to the White House's initial sales ban and the $8 billion hit it projected for Q2. It all should make for an interesting end to earnings season, and it starts today. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
