logo
‘Shocks the conscience:' Oak Park man given 5 years for stalking, harassing victim he met on a dating app

‘Shocks the conscience:' Oak Park man given 5 years for stalking, harassing victim he met on a dating app

Yahoo01-05-2025

OAK PARK, Ill. (WGN) — A suburban Chicago man will spend five years in prison and pay more than $15,000 in restitution for stalking and harassing a victim he met on a dating app.
34-year-old Kevin Cruz, an Oak Park resident who pleaded guilty to a federal cyberstalking charge in 2024, has been sentenced to five years in federal prison and ordered to pay $17,313.18 in restitution for the cyberstalking campaign, which lasted nearly two years, the U.S. Attorney's Office of the Northern District of Illinois announced Thursday.
Prosecutors said Cruz first met the victim in 2021 on the dating app Grindr. The two discussed a potential intimate relationship and at one point, Cruz even sent the victim nude photographs of himself.
Read more: Latest Chicago news and headlines
The two had met on several occasions, but prosecutors said the relationship soured when Cruz expressed interest in pursuing a romantic relationship with the victim, who did not express the same feelings.
Things then took a dark turn starting in December of 2021 when prosecutors say Cruz began harassing and intimidating the victim.
The Cyberstalking campaign lasted through mid-2023 and prosecutors said during that period, Cruz created several fake profiles on dating apps in which he impersonated the victim.
While impersonating the victim, prosecutors said Cruz arranged for men to travel to the victim's home for sexual encounters and, in some instances, even instructed them to enter the victim's home and attempt to have sex with him even if he resisted, telling the men that it was part of a role-playing scenario.
As a result, prosecutors said numerous men arrived at the victim's home seeking sex as a result of their communications with Cruz.
LATEST CASES: Missing people in Chicagoland
In addition to the phony meetups, Cruz also sent nude photographs of the victim to the victim's family members, including his mother, brother and cousins.
In one instance, prosecutors said Cruz used a spoofed phone number to text the victim's mother and falsely suggest the victim had committed suicide.
'Defendant's conduct shocks the conscience,' Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Shih said during sentencing 'He created significant risks that the victim would be hurt, injured, and raped.'
Cruz's sentence was handed down on Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Steven Seeger.
The U.S. Attorney's Office of the Northern District of Illinois did not provide a booking photo for Cruz.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

VSP issue Codi Alert for endangered boy in Chesapeake
VSP issue Codi Alert for endangered boy in Chesapeake

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

VSP issue Codi Alert for endangered boy in Chesapeake

CHESAPEAKE, Va. (WAVY)– Virginia State Police have issued a Codi Alert for an endangered boy in Chesapeake. According to state police, 17-year-old Jose Miguel Pomales was last seen at his residence on June 10 at 3:40 p.m. The description of his clothing is unknown. He may be operating a 2017 Chevrolet Sonic with Virginia license plate: TEK4237. Pomales is described as a white male with brown hair and hazel eyes. He is 5'10 and 186 pounds. He has an appendix scar. Police say he is considered endangered and may be a danger to himself. He is believed to have his phone with him, but he is not known to require any medications or suffer from any known physical or mental illnesses Anyone with information regarding Jose's whereabouts is asked to contact the Chesapeake Police Department immediately at 757-382-6161 or call 911. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Mobile city councilman in District 2 seeks re-election
Mobile city councilman in District 2 seeks re-election

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Mobile city councilman in District 2 seeks re-election

MOBILE COUNTY, Ala. (WKRG) — Mobile District 2 City Councilman William Carroll has announced his re-election campaign to the city council, according to a news release. Trial begins for Mobile County father accused of killing his 14-year-old daughter who went missing in 2012 Carroll hopes to continue representing District 2 like he has for the past four years. Since rejoining the council in 2021, he's focused on infrastructure projects, advocated for affordable housing and pushed for stronger community investments. 'My work has always been about putting the needs of our residents first listening, responding, and delivering real solutions,' Carroll said. 'We've made important progress, but there's more to do, and I'm ready to keep moving District 2 forward.' While serving District 2, Carroll has led many initiatives to build Mobile's community. Infrastructure has steadily upgraded, with recent road and sidewalk resurfacing on North Scott Street, Maryland Street, and Jefferson Street. Public parks have had changes as well. James Seals Park, Texas Street Park, and Crawford Murphy Park have received new sidewalks, pickleball and tennis courts, sitting areas, and new playground equipment, the release said. If re-elected, Carroll plans to focus on affordable housing, public safety, modern infrastructure, and attracting businesses. Fort Walton Beach High senior makes history, winning his second national Incubate Debate Championship 'This campaign is about continuing the work we've started—building safer neighborhoods, stronger families, and a more resilient District 2,' Carroll said. 'Together, we can keep creating a community that works for everyone.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

How a traffic stop exploded into human smuggling charges for Kilmar Abrego Garcia
How a traffic stop exploded into human smuggling charges for Kilmar Abrego Garcia

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

How a traffic stop exploded into human smuggling charges for Kilmar Abrego Garcia

How a traffic stop exploded into human smuggling charges for Kilmar Abrego Garcia Show Caption Hide Caption Kilmar Abrego Garcia is back in the US to face federal charges The Maryland man who was mistakenly deported is accused of making more than 100 trips to move illegal immigrants across the country. NASHVILLE − The Chevrolet Suburban was heading east along Interstate 40 when it caught the attention of a Tennessee State Trooper, who pulled the driver over for speeding near Cookeville, Tennessee. Behind the wheel was Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who had arrived in the United States illegally a decade earlier from El Salvador. Inside the vehicle were nine other passengers, all Hispanic men, according to court documents. Abrego Garcia told the officer he was taking the men back to Maryland from St. Louis, where he said they had been working on a construction site. But police were suspicious. None of the passengers had any identification or luggage, there was no sign of tools or construction equipment, and several of the men gave the same Maryland address when asked where they were heading. After a few minutes, police allowed the SUV to continue its journey, issuing only a warning citation to Abrego Garcia for driving on an expired license. More than two years later, that routine traffic stop on Nov. 30, 2022 in Cookeville, a city 80 miles east of Nashville, is at the center of a federal criminal case involving allegations of an international immigrant smuggling ring and criticism of President Donald Trump's hardline policy of deporting migrants who are in the United States illegally. A federal grand jury in Nashville indicted Abrego Garcia on May 21 on charges that he was part of a conspiracy to transport undocumented migrants for financial gain. He will appear June 13 in U.S. District Court in Nashville to respond to the charges. If convicted, he could face up to 10 years in prison for each person transported. Prosecutors say he made more than 100 trips. Related: Who is Kilmar Abrego Garcia? The answer is found on the streets where he lived and worked The charges are the latest chapter in the saga against the sheet metal worker and father of three, whom the Trump administration deported to El Salvador in March in violation of a prior court ruling that barred the government from sending him back to his native country. Government attorneys, who acknowledged in court records that Abrego Garcia had been mistakenly deported, had argued for weeks the U.S. had no authority to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States from the Salvadoran prison where he was being held. They abruptly reversed course and flew him back to the United States on June 6, the same day the indictment against him was unsealed and the charges were made public. Lawyers for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Nashville, who are prosecuting the case, contend Abrego Garcia should remain jailed while the case is argued. Abrego Garcia's criminal lawyers, from the Federal Public Defender's office in Nashville, argue the government has not given enough evidence to warrant his detention. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia asks the Court for what he has been denied the past several months — due process,' his attorneys wrote in a June 11 filing. U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes will consider that question during the hearing on June 13. Meanwhile, other questions continue to swirl around the case, along with concerns that politics may have influenced the decision to file the criminal charges. Why did the government wait for more than two years to charge Abrego Garcia if it had evidence that he was involved in an international smuggling ring? Why did the Trump administration file the charges only after it faced a flood of criticism for deporting Abrego Garcia in violation of the prior court order? And why is the case being prosecuted in Tennessee instead of Maryland, where Abrego Garcia was living when he was pulled over by immigration agents in March and then deported to El Salvador? The Trump administration, which has accused Abrego Garcia of being a member of the violent gang MS-13, has pointed to the case to justify its decision to expel him from the United States. The administration also has blamed former President Joe Biden for delays in pursuing the criminal charges, arguing Biden had no interest in taking action against migrants who were in the United States illegally. Maryland case: Judge scolds Trump administration in Abrego Garcia case: 'Exercise in utter frustration' Attorney General Pam Bondi, asked at a recent news conference in Washington, D.C., about what changed since the traffic stop in 2022, responded: 'What has changed is Donald Trump is now president of the United States, and our borders are again secure.' Abrego Garcia's immigration attorney has raised questions about the government's motivation for filing the criminal charges. 'The government disappeared Kilmar to a foreign prison in violation of a court order,' said his immigration attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, who has represented Abrego Garcia in his civil case challenging his deportation. 'Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they're bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him.' 'This is an abuse of power, not justice,' he said. The criminal case also reportedly led to a high-profile resignation in the U.S. Attorney's Office in Tennessee. The day Abrego Garcia was indicted, Ben Schrader, chief of the criminal division for the Middle District of Tennessee, resigned. A 15-year veteran of the U.S. Attorney's Office, Schrader had grown increasingly uncomfortable with the administration's actions, and the indictment was "the final straw," a person familiar with the situation told Reuters. Schrader has declined requests for comment. Why were the criminal charges filed in Tennessee? In criminal cases like the one against Abrego Garcia, prosecutors need to point to one 'overt act' that shows the defendant participated in the conspiracy. 'They charge an overarching conspiracy, and then they pick one overt act of the conspiracy to give the court jurisdiction,' said longtime Nashville defense attorney David Raybin, who is not representing anyone in the case and is not affiliated with it in any way. In this case, Abrego Garcia's stop with the Tennessee Highway Patrol in 2022 is that 'overt act.' The indictment against Abrego Garcia alleges that, from 2016 through 2025, he and other unnamed people conspired to bring undocumented migrants into the United States from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador and elsewhere, passing through Mexico before crossing into Texas. At times, members of MS-13 accompanied him on the trips, the indictment states. Prosecutors say Abrego Garcia's role in the conspiracy was typically transporting people once they were within the U.S., typically picking them up in the Houston area. When he was pulled over in Tennessee, Abrego Garcia told police his passengers had been working at a construction site in St. Louis. But the indictment states data from license plate readers showed the vehicle had not been in St. Louis in the past year but had been in Houston the previous week. Raybin predicted Abrego Garcia's attorneys will ask that the case be dismissed because of the amount of time that has elapsed since the alleged crimes took place. 'What you anticipate is the defense saying, 'We think the case should be dismissed on due process grounds. You severely prejudiced my right to defend my client, because a lot of evidence is about four or five years old, the witnesses are gone,' that kind of thing,' Raybin said. 'In other words, the question would be, where have you been for six years?' he said. Right now, it's not clear how much evidence the government has against Abrego Garcia. 'You cannot discern the quality or the amount of proof that the government has from an indictment, because, by definition, it is only required to state the charge and one factual predicate act,' Raybin said. Prosecutors say they know who some of the co-conspirators in the case are, although they are unnamed in the indictment. Raybin said in general, prosecutors want to have more evidence than just the testimony of co-conspirators. 'As a practical matter, you're going to want to have something just beyond a bunch of jailhouse snitches, who themselves are at risk of deportation,' Raybin said. 'That, to me, is an enormous issue of the case.' And while the case has been politicized in the media and by government officials, Raybin didn't think that would be a prudent strategy in the courtroom. 'I think the defense will probably start raising the specter that this is a political case or political witch hunt,' he said. 'As a lawyer, I would never do that unless I was holding four aces.' He compared it to another recent high-profile case in the Middle District of Tennessee. 'You know, cries of political witch hunts only go so far,' he said, citing a political corruption case against Glen Casada, Tennessee's former House speaker who was recently convicted of federal crimes. 'In the Casada case, it went nowhere.' Michael Collins is a national correspondent for USA TODAY. Follow him on X @mcollinsNEWS. Evan Mealins is the justice reporter for The Tennessean. Contact him with questions, tips or story ideas at emealins@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store