logo
Unilever rolls out major sustainability drive in UAE in bid to boost sales, shift consumer behaviour

Unilever rolls out major sustainability drive in UAE in bid to boost sales, shift consumer behaviour

Global consumer products giant Unilever, in collaboration with regional biggies LuLu and Emirates Nature-WWF, has unleashed a unique sustainability campaign in the UAE – and the wider region – driving consumers to reimagine being environment-friendly as a cool, accessible and everyday choice rather than a luxury through a combo offer of product discounts and tangible environmental benefits on purchases.
The major tactical strategy shift is already paying off handsomely, with the smartly conceived initiative boosting sales by double-digit figures month-on-month for the Anglo-Dutch consumer products major.
The company has also roped in Dubai-based popular social media influencers and content creators such as Amar & Rim – amarandrim – and Shihab Al Hashemi – Shihabkoo – to amplify its campaign messaging on social media.
Besides, it has also rolled out an aggressive omnichannel media strategy to deepen its consumer engagement and campaign reach, spanning radio, in-mall experiences and digital content that is estimated to have garnered over 7 million video views already and counting.
'In the UAE, we've launched a pioneering mangrove restoration campaign in partnership with LuLu Group, Mastercard, and Emirates Nature-WWF. We've seen a 12 per cent year-on-year uplift in sales across sustainable products during our recent UAE campaign, with a 13 per cent increase compared to previous months,' Manan Gupta, General Manager – Beauty & Wellbeing for Middle East, Pakistan, Turkey & Bangladesh, Unilever, told Arabian Business.
A post shared by Unilever Arabia (@unilever.arabia)
Gupta, who assumed charge in his new role early this month, however, said while consumer awareness around sustainability has grown, the challenge remains in converting that awareness into significant action at the shelf.
'This initiative also highlights public-private partnerships and community engagement as key for bridging the gap between awareness and tangible action – ultimately advancing the UAE's ambitious environmental targets,' he said.
The Unilever senior executive said such initiatives are scalable and act as blueprints for expansion across other markets in the region, 'reinforcing our regional leadership in sustainable business transformation'.
Changing consumer perception remains major challenge
Industry watchers, however, said that though the consumer campaign by Unilever directly addresses the challenge of changing deeply ingrained consumer behaviours by emphasising the power of education in shifting perceptions and driving action, the relatively high prices for environmental-friendly – or organic – products still remain a major barrier to sustainable purchases.
While consumers increasingly prioritise sustainability, many still perceive eco-friendly products as more expensive, often beyond what they are willing to pay, they said.
The 2024 Global Sustainability Study by Simon-Kucher, a leading global pricing consultancy, also showed that affordability is the primary factor preventing mass adoption of sustainable goods, though consumer willingness to pay a premium has risen to 54 per cent compared to the earlier levels.
Similarly, recent research by Bain & Company found that while the US consumers are open to paying an 11 per cent premium for sustainable products, these items are often priced 28 per cent higher, creating a gap between intent and affordability.
'Unilever has long recognised this challenge, which is why our recent campaign deliberately addressed the price barrier,' Gupts said.
He said by combining product-level incentives such as discounts with initiatives that link purchases to tangible environmental benefits, the company's new campaign in the UAE made sustainability feel less like a luxury and more like an accessible, everyday choice.
'Our just concluded first sustainability campaign was aimed to help, educate, encourage, and incentivise consumers to make sustainable product purchases and become an integral part of the solution and support nature restoration,' he said.
Gupta, however, said the industry must continue working to close the pricing gap because 'when sustainability becomes the easy choice, it becomes the default choice'.
Unilever Arabia's green campaign
Gupta said Unilever Arabia is actively tackling the value-action gap through education, in-store nudges, and impactful storytelling.
'Our campaign – 'A Great Deal for Everyone' – combined product promotions with environmental action, such as restoring 6,000 mangrove trees, which will offset an estimated 120,000 kg of CO₂e over five years.
'In-store interventions, educational activations and consumer pledge at LuLu Barsha, a dedicated microsite, and strategic product placement all aimed to make sustainable shopping more intuitive and rewarding,' he said.
Gupta also cited the findings by independent Kantar research, studying the impact of the company's campaign, that 67 per cent of UAE consumers felt empowered to make greener choices in the future, while campaign awareness rose 7.9 points—far above industry norms.
'Our findings reveal that by making sustainability more accessible—through education, visibility, and rewards—consumers are increasingly willing to engage.
'However, we also believe that driving lasting behavioural change takes time and consistent brand commitment.'
The Dubai-based Unilever regional top honcho also revealed that the company's sustainability initiatives are not limited to the UAE, but are embedded across multiple brands and markets.
While this began locally, it aligns with our broader global commitments, like achieving net-zero emissions across our value chain by 2039 and implementing regenerative agriculture practices on 1 million hectares by 2030, he said.
'For over 15 years, sustainability has been core to Unilever's mission, starting with the Unilever Sustainable Living Plan (USLP). Today, our focused strategy spans climate, nature, plastics, and livelihoods,' Gupta said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eid Al Adha in UAE: Hundreds of workers celebrate; win car, flight tickets
Eid Al Adha in UAE: Hundreds of workers celebrate; win car, flight tickets

Khaleej Times

time8 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Eid Al Adha in UAE: Hundreds of workers celebrate; win car, flight tickets

Hundreds of workers celebrated Eid Al Adha with various activities, competitions, and raffle draws winning valuable prize, including a car and flight tickets. Held under the slogan ' Eid with Our Workers: Joy and Happiness', the activities were organised by the Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation (MoHRE) at 10 locations across the UAE. 'Celebrating and honouring workers during holidays and national occasions is an integral part of MoHRE's sustainable strategy", said the ministry, adding: '(Our) objective is to bring joy to workers and enhance their wellbeing, quality of life, and psychological and social stability, while fostering a sense of belonging to the community and motivating them to give their best.' Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. Eid Al Adha events were held at workers' compounds in Jebel Ali, Al Quoz, and Muhaisnah in Dubai; Mussafah and Hameem Worker City in Abu Dhabi; Al Sajaa in Sharjah; the Industrial Areas in Ajman and Umm Al Quwain; RAKEZ in Ras Al Khaimah; and Al Hail Industrial Area in Fujairah. Partners from the government and private sectors took part in the celebrations, including the Ministry of Interior; Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs, and Ports Security; the General Commands of Abu Dhabi, Dubai, and Sharjah Police; and municipalities across the country. Partners also include Abu Dhabi Ports Group; the General Directorate of Residency and Foreigners Affairs in Dubai; Abu Dhabi Civil Defence Authority; Dubai Civil Defence; the Permanent Committee for Labour Affairs in the Emirate of Dubai; Dubai's Roads and Transport Authority (RTA); the Islamic Affairs and Charitable Activities Department in Dubai; Sharjah's Labour Standards Development Authority; the National Ambulance; Dubai Corporation for Ambulance Services; and Ras Al Khaimah Economic Zone (RAKEZ). MoHRE underscored the Eid celebrations 'highlight the significant role that workers in the UAE play in driving the country's development, supporting its ambitious and pioneering economic vision, and cementing its status as a premier global destination for living, investing, and working.'

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation
PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

Arabian Post

time9 hours ago

  • Arabian Post

PumpFun's Revenue Redistribution Plan Sparks Debate Amid $4bn Valuation

PumpFun, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, has announced plans to distribute protocol revenue to $PUMP token holders through a buyback mechanism. This move marks a significant shift from the typical speculative nature of memecoins, aiming to provide tangible value to its community. However, the platform's ambitious $4 billion valuation and a targeted $1 billion raise have raised questions about the feasibility and sustainability of its revenue model. Since its inception in January 2024, PumpFun has facilitated the creation of over 6 million memecoins, positioning itself as a central player in the Solana ecosystem's resurgence following the FTX collapse. The platform's user-friendly interface allows individuals to launch tokens with minimal effort, contributing to a surge in activity that saw Solana's Total Value Locked surpass $5 billion by mid-2025. The proposed buyback strategy involves using a portion of the platform's revenue to repurchase $PUMP tokens from the open market, thereby reducing supply and potentially increasing token value. This approach is intended to reward long-term holders and align the interests of the community with the platform's growth. However, the lack of clarity regarding the specific revenue streams and the proportion allocated for buybacks has led to skepticism among investors and analysts. ADVERTISEMENT PumpFun's revenue primarily stems from a 1% swap fee on all token trades and a 1.5 SOL fee when a token 'graduates' by reaching a market cap of $90,000. While these mechanisms have generated substantial income—estimated at over $380 million—the sustainability of such revenue in the volatile memecoin market remains uncertain. The platform's reliance on continuous user engagement and token creation raises concerns about the long-term viability of its financial model. The announcement of the $1 billion raise at a $4 billion valuation has further intensified scrutiny. Critics argue that the valuation may be inflated, given the speculative nature of the memecoin market and the platform's nascent stage. Comparisons have been drawn to other DeFi projects that have faced challenges in maintaining high valuations without robust and diversified revenue streams. Community members have expressed mixed reactions to the buyback plan. Some view it as a positive step towards creating a more sustainable and value-driven ecosystem, while others question the timing and transparency of the initiative. The absence of detailed information about the buyback schedule, funding sources, and governance mechanisms has fueled debates about the platform's commitment to accountability and investor protection. PumpFun's leadership, including founders Noah Tweedale, Alon Cohen, and Dylan Kerler, has yet to provide comprehensive details addressing these concerns. The platform's history of rapid growth and controversial features, such as the now-suspended livestreaming service that allowed for unmoderated content, adds to the apprehension surrounding its governance and operational practices. The broader context of the DeFi and memecoin markets also plays a role in shaping perceptions of PumpFun's strategy. The memecoin sector has experienced explosive growth, with market capitalizations reaching unprecedented levels. However, this growth has often been accompanied by high volatility, regulatory scrutiny, and instances of market manipulation, leading to caution among institutional investors and regulators.

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?
How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Gulf Today

time9 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

How badly could Donald Trump hurt Elon Musk?

Io Dodds, The Independent Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. SpaceX and the $68bn black hole. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the US political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the US government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalisation". Tesla in regulators' crosshairs?Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by US states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. Potential deportation — or worseSo far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the US while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a US citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store