FAMU President, DeSantis' Choice
Florida A&M University has weathered its share of storms, the most recent being a deeply embarrassing debacle when a Texas donor conned former FAMU President Larry Robinson and a close circle of school officials into believing that the hallowed institution was the recipient of a $237.75 million gift.
After discovering the gift was a hoax, Robinson resigned, which led to the uproar over the past several weeks surrounding the choice of Robinson's successor. During a presidential search process shrouded in secrecy, the Ron DeSantis-dominated FAMU Board of Trustees voted 8-4 for Marva Johnson, a last-minute addition to the presidential finalist list.
'The late entry of Marva Johnson into the pool of candidates to become FAMU's president has sparked concern about her allegiances, the selection process and her apparent lack of qualifications, MSNBC said. 'Johnson, who has been appointed to boards by Gov. Ron DeSantis and former Gov. Rick Scott, has no college administrative experience and has remained an ally of DeSantis as his GOP administration has undermined Black history lessons in the state.'
The likelihood that Johnson might be chosen provoked in a multipronged campaign of resistance, including a Change.org petition against her candidacy that gathered more than 10,000 signatures.
Florida's state NAACP president threatened legal action over the selection process. Popular film director Will Packer, a FAMU graduate who has produced films like 'Takers,' 'Straight Outta Compton,' and 'Think Like a Man,' warned that 'a group of activist Republicans are trying to put in the highest position of power someone who is solidly and objectively unqualified for it.
A range of Black media personalities online also sounded the alarm on Johnson.
There have been calls for boycotts and other punitive measures to express displeasure over how all this has played out. The primary objections involve Jonhson's connections to DeSantis, who throughout his time as governor has exhibited barefaced hostility towards Black Floridians while implementing a raft of racist ideological MAGA policies aimed at institutions of higher learning.
A WFSU story in the days following last Friday's selection captures the temperature.
'Florida A&M University is ablaze following the appointment of Marva Johnson to the school's presidency. Alumni, students and other FAMU stakeholders are weighing how best to move forward,' the story said.
'Johnson is a controversial candidate for her ties to Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, as he works to remake higher education in the state. Now, the school's interim president is urging calm amid backlash and boycott threats in response to Johnson's appointment by the FAMU Board of Trustees,' the story continues.
'I urge you to stay engaged and remain connected,' Interim President Tim Beard wrote in a statement. 'Your advocacy, your feedback and your financial support are crucial to ensuring that our institution continues to thrive.'
To describe DeSantis' assault on higher education as a remaking is a grave understatement.
Since 2023, he has taken a wrecking ball to Florida's higher educational system in his misguided effort to stamp out liberalism and 'woke' ideology and install university presidents, educators, board members, and others who embrace the governor's conservative agenda.
A 2024 report by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), details the 'the various manifestations of political and legislative interference in Florida's higher education system under the DeSantis administration and that of his predecessor, Rick Scott.'
'These include attacks on faculty academic freedom and tenure; the assault on the curriculum; the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs; the development of a patronage system marked by politically connected administrative appointments; the stacking of the statewide board of governors with Republican former political officeholders and professional political operatives beholden to the governor and the legislature; the passage of legislation making confidential identifying information of applicants for presidential positions at state universities or Florida College System institutions; political and legislative attacks on the higher education accreditation system; legal challenges to public employee unions; and the broader assault on the rights and social gains of LGBTQ+ communities.'
In short order, DeSantis – term-limited from running again for governor – has enacted hostile takeovers of the New College, the University of Florida, Florida International University, and the University of West Florida. As the Florida Phoenix has reported, DeSantis is installing his political allies at state universities so that they can purge these institutions of 'ideological concepts.' To date, five of 12 schools have new presidents and another four are looking.
People like Packer and Adora Obi Nweze, president of the Florida State Conference NAACP, issued calls to scrap the entire process and start again.
Nweze urged the FAMU Board of Trustees to 'recommit to a fair and untainted process' that reflects the university's legacy of academic excellence.
She and others were ignored and Johnson now will become FAMU's 13th president.
During a volatile meeting that ran about two hours, as Johnson introduced herself to the community, tempers ran hot. Packer warned trustees that choosing Johnson would be detrimental to FAMU's future, but she sought to assuage those fears.
'I know that the comments you're bringing – while they're coming to me in a way that may evidence angst – are coming from your love for this university, your love for this university's legacy, and your interest in making sure that you protect it. If I am selected, I would fight and win for FAMU,' Johnson told the crowd.
'No, I'm not a Trojan horse. I was not sent here to dismantle FAMU. … 'I would love the opportunity to work with you and to grow FAMU.'
Johnson also said: 'I understand the gravity of this moment. I'm grounded in the importance of FAMU's legacy, and I'm energized by the opportunities that we have in front of us.'
The new president served as vice president for governmental affairs (meaning she was a lobbyist) for Charter Communications, a telecom company, and is a former member of the State Board of Education.
I reached out to Desirée Nero, a corporate and government consultant and 'a very proud alum,' said she understands the concerns but now that Johnson has been selected, FAMUANs must figure out how to work with her.
'Universities are moving more in the direction of being managed like businesses. The president's job is to raise money, build relationships, and increase the universities' global impact and reputation. Marva Johnson can do that,' Nero said.
Nero gives Johnson props for succeeding as a Black woman in business – 'I'm sure she has had to fight some battles in her rise to leadership,' she said.
'She's well educated; a Georgetown undergrad, an MBA from Emory and a J.D. from Georgia State,' said Nero, who has 20 years of experience working in leadership development within Florida State government. 'Republicans and MAGA are not one and the same. There's nothing recently that indicates she will walk the MAGA path.'
FAMU, the state's only public historically Black institution, was established in 1887 during the height of Jim Crow and segregation because African Americans weren't allowed to attend white institutions. Racism and purposeful underinvestment has always dogged the university.
In 2023, the Biden administration sent letters to 16 governors – including DeSantis – urging these states to review $12 billion in funding disparities among land-grant universities. The U.S. Department of Education alleged that the states disproportionately underfunded Florida A&M University by nearly $2 billion compared to University of Florida – the second largest funding disparity among all land-grant universities.
This disparity has resulted in 'inadequate resources and delay critical investments in everything from campus infrastructure to research and development to student support services,' then-U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona wrote.
The Trump administration recently rescinded a $16.3 million grant that had been awarded to FAMU's College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Meanwhile, FAMU is struggling to properly prepare its students to pass board examinations in its nursing, law, pharmacy, and physical therapy programs. Alan Levine, vice chair of the Florida Board of Governors, last year threatened to get rid of the programs if there's no improvement.
Those who support Johnson hope she has the political connections, fundraising acumen, and leadership skills to reverse these challenges. And they hope she will convince DeSantis not to mess with FAMU the way he did New College.
'Change is inevitable and history has shown us that those who fight change are subject to be left behind,' Nero said. 'Change isn't coming to FAMU, it's here. FAMU may be in the fight of its life and we need a warrior to champion this fight. This is too important to be confrontational.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats Unveil Map Targeting California GOP House Members
(Bloomberg Government) -- Top Democrats released a draft congressional map Friday that may lead to Republicans losing five US House seats as Democratic leaders in the state push to offset possible GOP gains from redistricting in Texas. The California map released Friday by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee would imperil the 2026 re-election bids of California Republicans including Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao, Ken Calvert, and Darrell Issa. It would also bolster some swing-district Democrats who won close 2024 elections. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain 'We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters,' Julie Merz, executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said he will ask California voters to approve new congressional districts in a special election on Nov. 4 if Republican lawmakers in Texas go ahead with redrawing congressional maps in that state at President Donald Trump's urging. The governor was joined by other federal and state Democratic officials Thursday at an event to build support for the plan. Kiley, a leading Newsom critic who represents some Sacramento suburbs and Lake Tahoe, would receive Democratic voters in Sacramento now represented by Rep. Doris Matsui (D) and Rep. Ami Bera (D). Kiley said he expects voters will reject the Democratic proposal and will keep his district intact. 'We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters,' he said in a post on X. The proposed map would shake up several races ahead of a June 2, 2026, primary election, likely spurring additional candidates to jump into newly competitive races while emboldening Democrats who have already launched campaigns targeting vulnerable Republicans such as Valadao, who represents a Central Valley swing district. The California map would also boost Reps. Adam Gray and Josh Harder, the only California Democrats from districts that favored Trump in 2024. Gray would receive voters in the Stockton area now represented by Harder, whose San Joaquin County-centered district would move westward to take in more Democrats from Contra Costa County. The top two finishers in each primary race, regardless of party, would face off in next November's general election. Democrats hold 43 of California's 52 congressional districts, which were drawn by an independent commission under a process approved by voters in 2010 that was meant to take power over redistricting away from politicians. Newsom is proposing to get around that process by asking voters to approve the new map directly. California lawmakers, who return from summer recess Aug. 18, will have until Aug. 22 to pass legislation with support from supermajorities in the Senate and Assembly to formally call for the election, according to the secretary of state's office. Assembly and Senate committees plan to hold Aug. 19 hearings on the redistricting plan. The map would only take effect if approved by California voters, and if Texas goes ahead with its redistricting plans, Newsom said. The redistricting commission would redraw the districts after the next census in 2030. Greg Giroux in Washington also contributed to this story. To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Oxford in Sacramento at To contact the editors responsible for this story: Bill Swindell at ; Loren Duggan at ; Cheryl Saenz at (Updates with comments from Merz and Kiley, and adds analysis of the changes in some key districts.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
CA redistricting 101: how we got here and what's next for a possible Nov. 4 vote
In June, with an eye on the 2026 midterms, President Donald Trump's administration began pressing Republicans in Texas to redraw congressional lines to shore up the GOP's razor thin majority and elect five more Republicans to the House. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican but no staunch ally of the president, initially demurred at redrawing district lines at the request of a sitting president for political gain. Then the Department of Justice, led by former San Francisco attorney Harmeet Dhillon, weighed in, charging four Houston and Fort Worth districts currently held by Black and Latino Democrats with being unfairly drawn along racial lines. The Supreme Court is also set to hear a Louisiana redistricting case in October that could weaken parts of the Voting Rights Act, a major accomplishment of the Civil Rights era. Abbott's push to redraw boundaries to boost the GOP's prospects has now sparked a proxy war with Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who until recently was still viewed with suspicion even within his own party. Democrats, joined by organized labor, threw their weight behind his campaign, which launched Thursday. 'We need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done,' Newsom said, likening Trump's takeover of law enforcement in Washington, D.C. to an authoritarian takeover. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be.' The governor is pushing for the Legislature, poised to return from summer break next Monday, to approve a Nov. 4 special election to present voters with a map that would redistribute liberal voters into five districts currently held by Republican Reps. David Valadao, Darrell Issa, Ken Calvert, Doug LaMalfa, and Kevin Kiley. Democrats in California's 52-member congressional delegation have already tentatively approved the map, which would be in effect for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections. The Citizen Redistricting Commission, an independent entity first formed in 2008, would retain power over state legislative redistricting, and that body would regain power of congressional redistricting after the 2030 Census, Newsom said. After Trump ignored his request to block Texas from redistricting, Newsom launched his own campaign with a polished ad and backing from top House Democrats. A chart obtained by The Sacramento Bee later that day showed how Democrats intend to flip Calvert, Issa, Kiley and LaMalfa's districts to lean 'safely Democrat.' What would the process look like? The California Legislature is currently poised to jump into action when they return from summer recess Monday, August 18. According to the governor's office, legislators will consider a package that includes a bill calling for a special election, a bill that approves proposed maps, and one that approves reimbursement for county election costs. (On Thursday, a coalition of counties called on the state's leadership to provide funding in advance of the election to limit the strain on local budgets). Any legislation they want to pass must be in print for 72 hours, so if lawmakers want to vote on the bills during their floor session on Thursday (which they will have to do to meet a deadline of Friday August 22 set by the Secretary of State's office), the package will likely be put into print Monday. The Senate elections committee has set a hearing for Tuesday morning. Elections officials across the state are already preparing for a possible Nov. 4 vote. Neither the governor nor legislative leaders have spoken much about who is involved in the map-making process, other than that the end result would be put before voters. A spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, Nick Miller, said their office is 'aiming' to release the maps on Friday, Aug. 15. If voters choose to approve the measure, the real work begins for elections officials, who will need to update voter databases to meet the deadlines of a June primary election. How would it affect me and my district? We'll know more when the maps are released, but the districts that Democrats are committed to redrawing are those currently held by Republican Reps. David Valadao, Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, Darrell Issa and Ken Calvert, and the districts abutting those. All of those districts could be changed to include a broader Democratic voter base to make them more likely to elect a Democrat in the next election. That could mean taking a big city from a reliably blue district. How much will it cost? The Secretary of State's office estimates a special election would cost a little bit more than the last statewide election with nothing else on the ballot — about $200 million, with most of the costs coming from printing and mailing ballots. Newsom has said the cost would be reduced because of a number of pre-existing municipal elections, but aside from a county-wide election in Santa Clara county, most are small and wouldn't make a difference, according to elections officials. The state's Republican party is pegging the cost to be higher, at $235.5 million. In a news release, the Assembly Republican Caucus said the estimate was prepared by their Office of Policy and Budget, and accounts for inflation, increased postage costs and a larger number of registered voters since the last statewide special election. What precedent is there for a move like this? A deliberate Congressional gerrymander in response to another state's action is unprecedented in California. The last large mid-decade redistricting of congressional districts in California was in 1965, according to California State Librarian spokesperson Alex Vassar, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled legislative districts should have roughly equal population sizes. Before that, mid-decade redistricting would happen if there were significant population changes, most often in the early days of the state's establishment. In general, Vassar said, redistricting follows the reapportionment of Congressional seats that happens in accordance with Census data. That's why legislatures around the country do redistricting after the 10-year census, a process that's been administered in California by the Citizens Redistricting Commission since 2010. In the background looms a pending Louisiana redistricting court case, which the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments for on Oct. 15, that could rewrite parts of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting. The plaintiffs, a group of 'self-described non-African-Americans,' are challenging their districts, saying they're biased in favor of Black candidates. What's the argument against this idea? Republicans, a handful of Democrats and some nonpartisan good government groups have opposed the idea. Assemblymember Alex Lee, D-San Jose, chair of the Legislative Progressive Caucus, described the whole thing as a 'race to the bottom of gerrymandering.' 'We understand the threat authoritarianism poses, but the way to fight it is not by breaking our own democratic safeguards,' said League of Women Voters Deputy Director Dora Rose in a statement. 'You don't save democracy by imitating those who seek to destroy it — you save it by inspiring voters with bold ideas and principled leadership.' National good governance group Common Cause initially opposed redistricting, but this week walked some of that back. In a statement, they said sticking to calls to respect independent redistricting would 'amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.' In a media briefing with reporters on Wednesday, Common Cause board chair Martha Tierney blamed both parties for failing to fully embrace independent redistricting: 'We are here in this moment because the courts, Congress, political leaders have failed to act, and our country is sliding toward authoritarianism.' Critics argue that tit-for-tat political gerrymandering will further erode trust in government and hurt democracy. The mere thought of suspending maps drawn by California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, often hailed as 'the gold standard,' stoked fears about voter disenfranchisement. 'Independent redistricting commissions work because they put people first, not special interests or political parties,' said Patricia Sinay, a Democratic redistricting commissioner. 'Handing the power to incumbent legislators, lobbyists and special interests will bring back the political gamesmanship that brought us to independent redistricting in the first place.' Opponents argue that Newsom's push flies in the face of the principle the redistricting commission was founded on: voters should choose their elected officials, not the other way around. Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-Roseville, who could lose his House seat if it's redrawn to become more competitive, introduced federal legislation last week that would ban all mid-decade redistricting and called Newsom's plan 'a dangerous attack on democracy.' 'California voters have already settled this matter, voting that politicians should not draw district lines because it is an inherent conflict of interest,' Kiley said. 'While Newsom's scheme is especially undemocratic, redrawing district lines in the middle of the decade is unhealthy for representative government in general.' Would we go back? Newsom has said the responsibility of drawing the maps would go back to the Independent Redistricting Commission after the 2030 Census, and any ballot language would reflect that plan. Grant Reeher, a political science professor at Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, said that outcome doesn't seem likely. He described the situation as a 'redistricting arms race' that will continue as long as there are states willing to out-gerrymander each other. If Democratic states redistrict to pick up more Democratic representatives, 'it's going to lead to Texas coming back and saying, 'Well, we're going to redraw next time too,'' he said. 'Where does it end?'
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
California Dems release map drawn to oust 5 House Republicans
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. | Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP By Blake Jones and Melanie Mason 08/15/2025 07:29 PM EDT SACRAMENTO, California — California Democrats on Friday finalized their plan to snatch five GOP House seats next year by redrawing the state's congressional lines, according to a copy of the new House map submitted to the Legislature on behalf of the DCCC. The new lines, which voters would need to approve in a Nov. 4 special election, adds registered Democratic voters to districts held by Republicans and frontline Democrats, while making some safe blue districts slightly more competitive. State legislators are expected next week to place the new district lines on the statewide ballot, sparking a furious campaign to override the work of the state's independent redistricting commission for the next several election cycles. California's bold and risky play, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom and senior members of the state's congressional delegation, is designed to cancel out Republicans' bid to flip five Democratic-held House seats in Texas — a tactic urged by President Donald Trump to retain the House majority.
