logo
Lawyers for Australian student who lost eye during IDF raid in West Bank doubt Israel will investigate

Lawyers for Australian student who lost eye during IDF raid in West Bank doubt Israel will investigate

The Guardian15-04-2025
Lawyers for an Australian dentistry student who lost her eye after being struck by shrapnel in the occupied West Bank say they doubt Israel is investigating the matter despite the foreign minister, Penny Wong, demanding a comprehensive probe.
Palestinian-Australian student Ranem Abu-Izneid, 20, was sheltering with her friend on 15 November 2024 at Al-Quds University in Abu Dis, east of Jerusalem, when she says a bullet fired by Israeli forces penetrated the window. She later lost her right eye.
'The Australian government continues to seek updates from Israel into the incident and has made clear that it expects a comprehensive, thorough and transparent investigation to be conducted,' a spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in a statement.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Wong has called for a transparent review of the incident during talks with the Israeli foreign minister and the Israeli ambassador to Australia, sources said.
But Abu-Izneid's lawyer, Lara Khider – who is the acting executive director of the Australian Council for International Justice (ACIJ) – said five months after her client was severely injured, Israeli authorities had not publicly acknowledged the incident or announced an investigation.
The Australian government told the ACIJ in March that an investigation had commenced 'though no updates, timeline or findings of this investigation have been provided', Khider said before Dfat issued its latest statement.
'There must now be doubts – indeed, severe doubts – as to whether this investigation is taking place at all.
'Accountability cannot truly be achieved unless a thorough, transparent and timely investigation takes place and prosecutorial actions are pursued for unlawful conduct, extending not only to direct perpetrators but also to those responsible within the chain of command.'
Khider also said Abu-Izneid deserved 'reasonable reparations in light of [her] now permanent disability'.
Abu-Izneid said: 'We want to know what happened and why it happened.' She said the incident had been 'swept under the rug'.
An Israel border police spokesperson previously confirmed officers entered Abu Dis on the day of the incident to rescue a citizen who was reportedly under attack.
'Rioters at the place threw rocks and marble slates on the forces from the roofs of homes and, in that way, endangered their lives,' the spokesperson told the ABC. 'In response, the forces responded with live fire in order to neutralise the danger.'
But the border police had not accepted responsibility for Abu-Izneid's injuries, the ABC reported.
Abu-Izneid was at the university in Abu Dis when she heard explosions and soldiers shouting.
She watched her friend peek out a window of their dormitory building, she recalled last week from regional Victoria. Then she felt a strong push – as if a wall had 'slapped' her.
When she regained consciousness, she saw her friend looking terrified, she said. Blood was spurting from her eye onto her friend's face. There was no time to think. They crawled to the kitchen, away from the windows.
Abu-Izneid said she reached up to touch her face and felt it 'was clearly not … right'. It felt like 'strings' were coming out of her right eye as she grabbed them with her hands.
Her friend called an ambulance – and though they were stationed just across the street they couldn't help, Abu-Izneid told Guardian Australia.
'They said 'we can't make it, the border police are still in the way, and if we show up they're most likely going to shoot us too'. They had to find another way to get to us.'
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
She eventually made it to Ramallah hospital and then over the border to St John eye hospital in Jerusalem.
The Australian embassy sent a car to transport Abu-Izneid to the Jericho terminal border crossing on 19 November. She understands they were involved in talks to help her cross the Israeli border.
But Abu-Izneid claims that is where the assistance from Australia stopped. She passed into Jordan on a special shuttle service she paid for herself. She subsequently flew home to Australia with her father.
The ACIJ has claimed: 'The Australian government did not uphold a standard of care and responsiveness expected under the circumstances of Raneem's urgent and extraordinary situation.'
Overseas consular staff can't provide medical services or medications and Dfat's Smartraveller website notes they can't 'pay for medical or psychiatric services or medications'.
Abu-Izneid was treated at the Royal Melbourne hospital and is now studying at the University of Melbourne.
Shrapnel travelled through Abu-Izneid's right eye and cracked the back of her skull, doctors told her.
Shrapnel also lodged in Abu-Izneid's face and chest. Her right eye was removed in Melbourne but pieces of shrapnel remain in her face.
'You can see them from the dark spots on my face, and you can actually touch them,' she said. 'You can feel them. Unfortunately, it is going to have to stay with me.'
The student previously completed exercises like drilling into cavities with precision.
Now, without her right eye, the 20-year-old's depth perception has been hindered. 'I can't tell how far something is,' she said. 'I need help … to pour water from a jug into a cup.'
She said her backup plan was to work in childcare but she now doesn't know if that is an option. Abu-Izneid said when her young siblings first saw her after the incident, they were scared of how she looked.
'They know that there is something wrong there,' she said. 'I have dark spots in my face. I have a few scars. It is quite scary for them.'
The Israel Defense Forces and the Israeli foreign ministry were contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel announces West Bank settlement that will 'bury' idea of Palestinian state
Israel announces West Bank settlement that will 'bury' idea of Palestinian state

STV News

time3 hours ago

  • STV News

Israel announces West Bank settlement that will 'bury' idea of Palestinian state

Israel is developing plans to build thousands of new housing units in the occupied West Bank, in a move that would 'permanently bury the idea of a Palestinian state', Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has said. The E1 settlement project, which seeks to connect Jerusalem to the settlement of Maale Adumim and essentially split the West Bank in two, would effectively make it impossible to create a future Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem. The announcement comes as an increasing number of countries, including the UK, France and Canada, are announcing they would recognise a Palestinian state from September. Smotrich presented the advances in the project as Israel's response to those announcements. The project has been in the works for two decades, but progress has been frozen due to strong international opposition. Smitroch announced on Thursday that approval for 3,401 new houses was currently pending, with final approval expected next week. An area in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says housing units will be built. / Credit: AP He was speaking at press conference held at a planned construction site. 'They will talk about a Palestinian dream, and we will continue to build a Jewish reality,' Smotrich said. 'This reality is what will permanently bury the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise.' He has repeatedly lobbied Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to annex the occupied West Bank and apply Israeli sovereignty to the entire territory. Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning. Palestinian officials were quick to criticise the plans. In a statement, the presidency of the Palestinian National Council described them as a 'systemic plan to steal land, Judaize it, and impose biblical and Talmudic facts on the conflict'. Palestinian Speaker Rawhi Fattouh said the 'colonial plan falls within the policy of creeping annexation' of the West Bank, which is accompanied by settler violence against Palestinians. Israeli settlement watchdog Peace Now described the E1 plan as 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution'. All petitions to stop the construction were rejected by the planning committee on August 6. Palestinians in the West Bank Israel's plans for construction in the West Bank are contributing to increasingly difficult circumstances for Palestinians living in the West Bank as much of the focus is instead on Gaza, around 40 kilometres away from the occupied territory. Attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank have increased since October 7, 2023, while evictions from towns and an increased number of checkpoints have made life harder for those living there. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. Would this be legal? Israeli settlements in the West Bank are considered illegal under international law. But during the first Trump administration, the State Department reversed longstanding US policy and ruled settlements were 'not inconsistent' with international law. The Biden administration left this new policy in place. Could other countries take in displaced Palestinians? Prime Minister Netanyahu has said there are talks underway with a number of countries about taking in Palestinians displaced by the war in Gaza. South Sudan, Somaliland, Ethiopia, Libya and Indonesia are all involved in those talks, according to a senior Israeli official who spoke to ITV News' American partner CNN. In exchange for taking in some of Gaza's population of more than two million people, the official said the countries are looking for 'significant financial and international compensation'. But the countries have not individually confirmed what part they could play. On Wednesday, South Sudan rejected a report that it was in discussions about the resettlement of Palestinians, saying in a statement the reports were 'baseless and do not reflect the official position' of the country. Somaliland also said there were no such talks earlier in the year. Last week Indonesia said it was ready to take in 2,000 Palestinians from Gaza for treatment but that they would return to Gaza once they recovered. Netanyahu has never given a detailed vision of what will happen to Gaza after the war but has repeatedly advocated for resettling displaced Palestinians in other countries, particularly after President Donald Trump floated the idea in January. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Australia news live: business council plan to cut ‘$110bn red tape' including building codes and environmental assessments
Australia news live: business council plan to cut ‘$110bn red tape' including building codes and environmental assessments

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Australia news live: business council plan to cut ‘$110bn red tape' including building codes and environmental assessments

Update: Date: 2025-08-14T20:30:12.000Z Title: Welcome Content: Good morning and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Martin Farrer with the top overnight stories to get you started. Before next week's economic summit, the Business Council of Australia has outlined a vision to relieve business owners from what it calls the country's '$110bn red tape burden' as the federal government hunts for a solution to the nation's withered productivity. More coming up. The war in the Pacific ended 80 years ago and a ceremony at the Australian War Memorial later today will remember the service personnel who gave their lives fighting the Japanese. We have more coming up.

Palestine Action ban reveals Labour's dangerously authoritarian instincts
Palestine Action ban reveals Labour's dangerously authoritarian instincts

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Palestine Action ban reveals Labour's dangerously authoritarian instincts

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... 'Why can you not just be Labour?' It is a question I have been asked since I was a teenager, often by Labour friends in an exasperated tone. It is not an entirely unreasonable question. In many areas of policy on health, education, transport etc, Labour and Liberal Democrats seek broadly similar outcomes and, the argument goes, our electoral system punishes the centre left for splitting. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The question, however, ignores the fact that sometimes what matters in politics is the first principles from which you start. For all the similarities between Liberal Democrats and Labour, the differences matter too. Labour has centralising instincts that will always be anathema to liberals who champion community empowerment. Then there is the freedom thing. READ MORE: Why Palestinians in Gaza are protesting with photos of Israeli children killed by Hamas Police and protesters confront each other during a demonstration in support of Palestine Action outside the High Court in London (Picture: Dan Kitwood) | Getty Images Labour's socialist roots remain Scratch any Labour government and you will find a deep authoritarian streak. It is increasingly apparent that this is every bit as true of Yvette Cooper's Home Office as it was of those headed by David Blunkett, John Reid and Jack Straw. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We hear talk of introducing digital ID cards (with no consideration of how to protect the data held). Now live facial-recognition technology is to be rolled out on our streets with no thought given to how it is to be used and against whom. Labour may no longer style themselves as socialists but their roots in a politics that expects government to control the people are there for all to see. For liberals, protecting freedoms of speech, assembly and protest is a given. It runs to the heart of how we see the relationship between the citizen and the state. For Labour, these freedoms are rarely more than 'nice to have' when circumstances allow. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So it was that last weekend we saw the Metropolitan Police's finest in hand-to-hand combat with the serried ranks of retired teachers, social workers and academics armed with placards proclaiming their opposition to genocide – something that would be uncontroversial in most normal times – and their support for Palestine Action (which seems to be the sticking point). Palestine Action's unacceptable tactics Let me make a few things clear at this point. I am not a supporter of Palestine Action. The tactics that they employ in protesting against government policy on Palestine are wrong-headed and counter-productive. Targeting military installations for acts of vandalism is not an acceptable tactic to promote the Palestinian cause. It does not, however, make you a terrorist organisation and the decision to proscribe Palestinian Action was disproportionate and a mistake. That proscription would lead to the sort of scenes that we witnessed at the weekend was inevitable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Using anti-terror legislation to arrest peaceful protestors is not just illiberal and oppressive. We give government extra power to tackle terrorism and trust them to use it for that. Anti-terrorism laws should be used to deal with terrorists, not our own citizens who wish to demonstrate their disagreements with their government. Ultimately the biggest threat to our safety could turn out to be Labour's authoritarian instincts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store