Trump administration's lawsuit against all of Maryland's federal judges meets skepticism in court
U.S. District Judge Thomas Cullen didn't issue a ruling following a hearing in federal court in Baltimore, but he expressed skepticism about the administration's extraordinary legal maneuver, which attorneys for the Maryland judges called completely unprecedented.
Cullen serves in the Western District of Virginia, but he was tapped to oversee the Baltimore case because all of Maryland's 15 federal judges are named as defendants, a highly unusual circumstance that reflects the Republican administration's aggressive response to courts that slow or stop its policies.
At issue in the lawsuit is an order signed by Chief Maryland District Judge George L. Russell III that prevents the administration from immediately deporting any immigrants seeking review of their detention in a Maryland federal court. The order blocks their removal until 4 p.m. on the second business day after their habeas corpus petition is filed.
The Justice Department, which filed the lawsuit in June, says the automatic pause impedes President Trump's authority to enforce immigration laws.
But attorneys for the Maryland judges argue that the suit was intended to limit the power of the judiciary to review certain immigration proceedings while the administration pursues a mass deportation agenda.
'The executive branch seeks to bring suit in the name of the United States against a co-equal branch of government,' said Paul Clement, a prominent conservative lawyer who served as Republican President George W. Bush's solicitor general. 'There really is no precursor for this suit.'
Clement listed several other avenues the administration could have taken to challenge the order, such as filing an appeal in an individual habeas case.
Cullen also asked the government's lawyers whether they had considered that alternative, which he said could have been more expeditious than suing all the judges. He also questioned what would happen if the administration accelerated its current approach and sued a federal appellate bench, or even the Supreme Court.
'I think you probably picked up on the fact that I have some skepticism,' Cullen told Justice Department attorney Elizabeth Themins Hedges when she stood to present the Trump administration's case.
Hedges denied that the case would 'open the floodgates' to similar lawsuits. She said the government is simply seeking relief from a legal roadblock preventing effective immigration enforcement.
'The United States is a plaintiff here because the United States is being harmed,' she said.
Cullen, who was nominated to the federal bench by Trump in 2019, said he would issue a ruling by Labor Day on whether to dismiss the lawsuit. If allowed to proceed, he could also grant the government's request for a preliminary injunction that would block the Maryland federal bench from following the conditions of the chief judge's order.
The automatic pause in deportation proceedings sought to maintain existing conditions and the potential jurisdiction of the court, ensure immigrant petitioners are able to participate in court proceedings and access attorneys and give the government 'fulsome opportunity to brief and present arguments in its defense,' according to the order.
Russell also said the court had received an influx of habeas petitions after hours that 'resulted in hurried and frustrating hearings in that obtaining clear and concrete information about the location and status of the petitioners is elusive.' Habeas petitions allow people to challenge their detention by the government.
The administration accused Maryland judges of prioritizing a regular schedule, saying in court documents that 'a sense of frustration and a desire for greater convenience do not give Defendants license to flout the law.'
Among the judges named in the lawsuit is Paula Xinis, who found the administration illegally deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in March — a case that quickly became a flashpoint in Trump's immigration crackdown. Abrego Garcia was held in a notorious Salvadoran megaprison, where he claims to have been beaten and tortured.
The administration later brought Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. and charged him with human smuggling in Tennessee. His attorneys characterized the charge as an attempt to justify his erroneous deportation. Xinis recently prohibited the administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail pending trial.
Skene writes for the Associated Press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
Force Design 2028 will expand Coast Guard's national security capabilities
Early on May 23, U.S. Coast Guard watchstanders at the Joint Harbor Operations Center in San Diego tracked a vessel crossing into U.S. waters off Southern California. A Maritime Safety and Security Team in the area intercepted the vessel. Assisted by USCGC Halibut, the Seattle-based small boat team detained 10 foreign nationals without authorization to enter the U.S. and transferred them to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Halfway across the country, USCGC Joseph Doyle had intercepted a boat with four Mexican men illegally fishing off Texas inside the U.S. exclusive economic zone. The catch included about 200 red snappers. The crew transferred the men to CBP on return to Coast Guard Station South Padre Island. The two operations marked the start of a busy summer season for the Coast Guard, which is tasked with safeguarding the nation's borders, facilitating commerce and supporting maritime safety. Since Jan. 21, its national security role has taken on greater focus as the Trump administration beefed up military forces along the U.S. land and maritime borders to thwart illicit and illegal activities and stop inflows of dangerous drugs and unauthorized people. In the first three-plus months of the new administration, Coast Guard personnel detained more than 860 aliens and stopped as much illicit cocaine as was interdicted at sea during fiscal 2024, Adm. Kevin E. Lunday told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security on May 14. 'We surged forces, tripling the number of forward-deployed air and surface assets in that area.' Off Southern California, for example, migrant interdiction increased 54 percent between late January and early May, and 'this year, we are on track to exceed our bulk cocaine interdiction goal,' says Lt. Cmdr. Steve Roth, chief of media relations for the Coast Guard. 'This operational surge is a great example of what the Coast Guard is capable of doing, meeting the need — but it's a surge. It''s not sustainable,' Roth says. 'The Coast Guard has been an incredible bang for the buck for the taxpayer. Look at what you''re getting out of them. We''ve got to give them the attention that they need and get them whole after decades of under-funding.' The 55,000-member force has long grappled with the need to modernizing its fleet, force and infrastructure. Top officials hope that changes under Force Design 2028, the plan developed by the Coast Guard and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to bolster national security and commit resources to both capabilities and facilities. Four lines of effort Force Design 2028 was developed to strengthen, expand, reshape and modernize the Coast Guard, with focus on four key areas: people, organization, acquisition and contracting and technology. The Coast Guard 'is more in demand than ever before. We are on the edge of transformational change, and we will become a stronger, more capable and agile force to meet the challenges ahead,' Lunday said at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy graduation May 21 in New London, Connecticut. The Force Design executive report outlines numerous changes across its headquarters and the force. The Coast Guard plans to improve training systems, expand medical care access and modernize reserve and civilian management systems. It revamps organizational structures and decision-making processes. It aims to eliminate or minimize bureaucratic acquisition and contracting delays to get forces what they need faster. It wants to accelerate getting state-of-the-market technology that enhances data sharing, situational awareness and operational effectiveness. The campaign underscores the need for action, Roth says. 'The report makes an alarming assessment of the service's current state, describing it as facing a readiness crisis that is fragile … and on a path to failure, stemming from decades of under-investment, neglect and strategic drift,' he says. 'The report highlights a significant workforce shortage and aging assets on the verge of collapse, warning that, without change, the Coast Guard will fail. It proposes a bold and urgent transformation blueprint aimed at fundamentally changing the service from a reactive posture to a proactive strategy relying on innovation.' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem affirmed those commitments in remarks to the Academy's Class of 2025, adding: 'We're going to build a more agile, capable and responsive fighting force. A new chapter for America's Coast Guard, one like we have never seen before, starts right now,' Noem said. The secretary in recent months met with Coast Guard leaders and crews in visits to several Coast Guard stations, cutters and maritime security units. 'The Coast Guard's vital role in our safety and security is paramount,' she said, highlighting investments that include more icebreakers to address needs in the Arctic and adding 15,000 new personnel by 2028. Many of this year's 200 academy graduates, now commissioned as Coast Guard officers, will serve and lead missions around the globe as the service expands and modernizes. Service and Hill advocacy At Congressional hearings, Coast Guard leaders have detailed the service's needs that will be supported by Force Design 2028. 'We maintain a persistent presence in the maritime domain — from coastal ports and inland waters to the high seas —– to control, secure and defend the U.S. border and maritime approaches from maritime threats; facilitate the flow of safe and secure commerce; respond to maritime disasters; and save lives,' Lunday testified in May. The campaign has several goals, Roth says. These include delivering an execution plan; commencing a Force Posture and Operational Concepts Campaign focused on reinventing ways the Coast Guard employs forces and delivers results; and delivering the first semiannual update to the DHS secretary on FD2028's implementation. Unclear yet are the costs to modernize, change and expand the Coast Guard, as much of its funding is part of broader DHS budgets. But flat budgets have long plagued the service, leading to underfunded requirements, aging infrastructure, maintenance backlogs and lags in modernization, despite bipartisan efforts last year. Complicating the service's budget and authorization is that Coast Guard jurisdiction falls to multiple congressional committees and subcommittees. Force Design also proposes a Senate-confirmed service secretary for the Coast Guard. Establishing a new secretary would provide a senior political appointee who 'can advocate for us in a way that a member of the uniformed armed services could not politically,' Roth says.
USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Zelenskyy give up land to Putin? Live updates on White House showdown
Ukraine's leader is scheduled to meet with President Trump and his advisers in the Oval Office alone before an expanded meeting with European leaders. WASHINGTON — The last time Volodymyr Zelenskyy came to the White House, his meeting with President Donald Trump went so poorly that the Ukrainian leader was kicked out. Trump mocked his clothes and Vice President JD Vance called him 'disrespectful' in the February Oval Office meeting that turned into a televised brawl. Zelenskyy is on far better terms with Trump than he was back then. But when he comes to the White House on Aug. 18 to discuss a potential peace agreement with Russia, he'll still be in a challenging position. The Ukrainian leader is scheduled to meet with Trump and his advisers in the Oval Office alone before an expanded meeting with European leaders. In a late-night Truth Social post ahead of their White House meeting, Trump put the onus on Zelenskyy to end Russia's assault on his country and ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine He also said the territory of Crimea would stay with Russia, returning to a position he staked out months ago. "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight. Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Trump said in the Aug. 17 post. Zelenskyy said in an X post as he arrived in Washington that a peace deal must be enduring. "Not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East—part of Donbas—and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack." "I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance. Russia must end this war, which it itself started," he said. What time does Trump meet with Zelenskyy? Trump and his team are scheduled to meet with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his team initially, before a later meeting with a group of European leaders who assembled discuss how to deal with Russia's President Vladimir Putin. The European leaders are set to arrive at the White House at noon, an hour before Zelenskyy's arrival. Trump and Zelenskyy will meet in the Oval Office at 1:15 p.m. Trump will then greet a group of European leaders in the State Dining Room at 2:15 p.m. The group is expected to pose for a picture at 2:30 p.m. Trump will meet with all the European leaders at 3 p.m. in the East Room. -Bart Jansen Zelenskyy: Putin seeks to 'humiliate diplomatic efforts' President Donald Trump's meeting with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that could help shape the direction of Russia's war is still hours away. Ahead of that, Zelenskyy said that Russia's President Vladimir Putin was trying to "humiliate diplomatic efforts" after Moscow overnight launched dozens of drones and fired four missiles at Ukraine, killing at least 10 people. "The Russian war machine continues to destroy lives despite everything," Zelenskyy wrote in a social media post. "Putin will commit demonstrative killings to maintain pressure on Ukraine and Europe." - Kim Hjelmgaard European leaders rush to Washington for emergency summit Zelenskyy came to Washington alone last time he was in the U.S. capital. This time he's bringing loads of backup. French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte are also flying in. They'll arrive at the White House before Zelenskyy and wait in the wings until his meeting with Trump is finished, The show of force from European leaders comes on the heels of a summit Trump held for Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska that neither they nor Zelenskyy were invited to participate in. Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin and touted the strength of their relationship after the Aug. 15 meeting. He said 'many points' were agreed on in the closed-door talks and advised Zelenskyy: 'Make a deal.' - Francesca Chambers More: Trump tells Zelenskyy to leave after Oval Office clash, mineral deal not signed Talks could last six hours or more, Rubio says Shortly after his Putin summit Trump said he'd host Zelenskyy at the White House on Aug. 18. Then the gathering quickly swelled to include major European leaders. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on the 'Sunday Morning Futures' program on Fox News that Trump told Zelenskyy he could bring other heads of state with him. 'I also think the Europeans are very helpful being in the room sometimes and sort of giving ideas about what accommodations can be made and what flexibility the Ukrainian side could have,' Rubio said. In all, Rubio said he expected six to seven hours of discussion, possibly more. - Francesca Chambers United States considers security guarantees for Ukraine A top administration official said over the weekend that the United States could join Europe in committing to protect Ukraine if it is attacked again as part of a deal to end the war. Special envoy Steve Witkoff said Russia agreed to security guarantees that mimic the protections Ukraine would receive if it were allowed to join NATO. 'We got to an agreement that the United States and other European nations could effectively offer Article 5-like language to cover a security guarantee,' Witkoff said on CNN's 'State of the Union.' Zelenskyy called it a 'historic decision that the United States is ready to take part in security guarantees for Ukraine' and said they 'must be developed with Europe's participation.' Russia has reneged on written agreements with Ukraine in the past, and that is why the country is seeking security commitments from America and its allies. Rubio said on Fox News that such a promise 'would be a huge concession' by Trump and he was still weighing his options. 'It would be a very big move by the President if he were to offer a U.S. commitment to a security guarantee,' Rubio said. 'If he does it, it tells you how badly he wants peace.' Trump adviser says 'land swap' a fundamental issue In addition to security guarantees, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said that Russia agreed to security guarantees for Ukraine that mimic the protections the country would receive if it were allowed to join NATO. Putin also said Russia would pass legislation stating it will not go after additional territory in Ukraine or violate any European country's sovereignty once a peace deal is codified. The major outstanding issue is 'some sort of land swap, which is obviously ultimately in the control of the Ukrainians,' the Trump envoy said. Witkoff said the concession that Zelenskyy has steadfastly rejected would be on the agenda.
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Military leaders must resist Trump's politically motivated invasion of cities
Here's a thought experiment. What would happen if we put thousands of heavily armed soldiers into the streets of major American cities to enforce laws and deal with civil unrest, even though the troops had no significant training in either regard? And what would happen if citizens held mass demonstrations against this affront to their constitutional rights of speech and assembly, despite the protesters having little or no training in nonviolent resistance? We know the answer because it happened at Kent State University in 1970. Here is another scenario. What would happen if armed provocateurs showed up in this volatile mix, intending to trigger a second civil war in America? We know the answer. We saw an example on Jan. 6, 2021, when Proud Boys and several other extremist groups provoked violence during a riot at the Capitol. Today, President Trump is engaged in his own experiment — a dangerous performative political stunt in which he's federalized the National Guard and deployed regular U.S. troops to cities run by Democrats. How do we know it's performative? Because he's threatening to invade only blue states and cities. His law-and-order excuse is implausible. Few Americans have shown more contempt for law and order than the four-times indicted, twice impeached, 34-times convicted president — the first felon to occupy the White House. A law-and-order president would not have granted sweeping clemency to nearly 1,600 people charged with, convicted of, or pleading guilty to participating in the Jan. 6 riot. A president committed to law and order would not egregiously violate the nation's statutes and the Constitution. Sadly, we have come to expect such behavior from Trump. He is the thug he accuses others of being. The real disappointment at this moment is the U.S. military's capitulation to Trump's latest stunt. Prior to last year's election, Trump made no secret of his intentions. He has threatened to deploy the military against civilians — a decision generally prohibited by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 — since at least March 2023, suggesting he would use federal troops in urban 'crime dens.' 'You're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in (but) the next time, I'm not waiting,' Trump said during a rally in Iowa. Before last year's election, Trump told Time magazine he endorsed using the military and building a migrant detention camp to remove more than 11 million people from the country. During a speech on June 1, 2020, Trump urged governors to deploy the National Guard to 'dominate the streets' against people protesting the murder of George Floyd. He threatened to deploy the military if governors didn't act. Meanwhile, protestors gathered in the park across the street from the White House to protest the Floyd murder. Police used rubber bullets and tear gas to clear the park. Then, Trump and a coterie of administration officials strode into the park for a photo op of Trump holding a Bible. They were joined by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, dressed in battle fatigues. But Milley realized he was being used as a political prop and left the event. A cursory investigation concluded a year later that the police did not clear the park specifically for Trump's photo op, but it was widely condemned as a violation of the protesters' constitutional right to assemble. Milley apologized publicly and profusely. He said his appearance in uniform 'sparked a national debate about the role of the military in civil society. I should not have been there. My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics.' While addressing graduates at the National Defense University, Milley urged the future military officers to remain apolitical. Today's military leaders should take his advice if they expect the armed services to maintain the public's respect. In 2024, conducted its own thought experiment about what would happen if Trump sent active-duty troops to 'quash protests on American soil.' 'In speaking with more than a dozen Pentagon officials as well as outside experts,' the article said, 'what emerged was a landscape where few concrete legal protections exist to prevent an abuse of power by a president, especially if that president chooses to lean on the Insurrection Act, a vaguely worded law originally passed in 1792.' But, it continued, 'uniformed commanders also have a specific obligation to reject an order that's unlawful.' Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, soldiers are not obligated to obey unlawful orders. An international court made the same determination after World War II when it rejected the 'Nuremberg defense,' the argument by Adolf Hitler's officers that they were just following orders when committing war crimes or crimes against humanity. Why is this important? Although Trump is in office, the U.S. military might be the last line of defense for protecting our democratic republic, since Congress and the courts have largely capitulated to his autocratic rule. What happens if top military officers and next year's voters don't stand up to Trump? We can ask the nearly 6 million people, more than 70 percent of the world's population, what their lives are like under authoritarian rule. America is on a slippery slope to join them. William S. Becker Presidential Climate Action Project.
