Jennifer Lopez Finds Herself in Legal Trouble With Paparazzi
Jennifer Lopez has always been active on social media, but award-show season snapshots might have gotten her into hot water with photographers.
The 55-year-old superstar was it with copyright infringement claims for two photos from a Golden Globes pre-party in January, according to Billboard. The dual lawsuits, filed by photographer Edwin Blanco and photo agency BackGrid USA on May 17, indicate they are the owners of two of the images from Amazon MGM Studios x Vanity Fair Party at Bar Marmont in Los Angeles. She shared the set on her Instagram and X accounts on Jan. 5 with the caption, "GG Weekend Glamour ✨🤍."
'Ms. Lopez's unauthorized use of the Images is commercial in nature, intended for the purpose of self-promotion,' attorney Peter Perkowski wrote in the lawsuit. 'For example, Ms. Lopez used the images to spotlight the designer of her clothing and jewelry, leveraging the publicity from the event to promote her fashion affiliations and brand partnerships.'
The lawsuit alleges that the photo agency and Blanco were in contact with Lopez's team and an agreement had been worked out for payment. Per the BBC, the agreement has not been signed yet. If the lawsuit proceeds, BackGrid and Blanco could receive damaged for up to $150,000 per photo, per the federal Copyright Act.
Celebrities often find themselves in a tricky situation when it comes to paparazzi photos because they do not own the rights to them.
The Brooklyn Sports & Entertainment Law Blog describes it as "copyright trolling." It's a situation when "a celebrity posts a photo of themself, taken by a paparazzo, onto their Instagram page without paying the photographer a licensing fee." A photographer will scour the internet for that image and then file a copyright infringement suit for unauthorized use of the photo.
Men's Journal reached out to Jennifer Lopez's representative for a response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elton John says ‘we will not back down' in awards speech addressing AI concerns
Sir Elton John said 'we will not back down' in an awards speech where he pleaded with the UK Government to 'do the right thing' by strengthening copyright protections when artificial intelligence (AI) models learn from creatives' content. The Government has repeatedly rejected changes to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, proposed by the House of Lords, aimed at strengthening protections for the creative sector. Peers have attempted to amend the Bill by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements, aiming to ensure copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by who. Veteran rock singer Sir Elton, 78, who picked up the Creators' Champion Award at Billboard's Global Power Players Event on Wednesday, is among hundreds of creatives who have raised concerns over AI companies using copyrighted work without permission. In an Instagram post he thanked the US magazine for the award and said: 'Supporting the next generation of British artists is one of the major driving forces in my life. 'As everyone in that room was aware, the Data Bill is currently looming over our industries and the future livelihood of all artists. It is an existential issue. 'Earlier this evening, the Government was defeated for an unprecedented fifth time by the House of Lords who have backed the crucial amendment to the Bill. 'I am now calling on the Government to do the right thing and get transparency added to the Bill. 'Administration of copyright must be transparent. And it must have an artist's full permission. These two principles are the bedrock of our industry. They must be included in the data Bill as a backstop. 'Let's be clear – we want to work with the Government. We are not anti AI. We are not anti big tech. We are not against Labour. We want a solution that brings all parties together in a way that's transparent, fair and allows artists to maintain control of their work. 'We will not let the Government forget their promise to support our creative industries. We will not back down and we will not quietly go away. This is just the beginning. 'Thank you, Billboard. And thank you Baroness Kidron and The House of Lords for standing up for our world-beating artists, journalists, playwrights, designers and authors.' The prolonged impasse and the conduct of proceedings at Westminster now threatens the future of the whole Bill and its measures, including a crackdown on deepfake porn abuse. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gay GB News host says Pride ‘doesn't show anything good about the gay community'
Alex Armstrong, a gay presenter, has come out against , saying the gay community doesn't need it anymore. Armstrong, who hosts The Saturday Five on the right-wing news channel, was participating in a debate with the topic 'Do we need Pride anymore', arguing against its existence. 'Things like Pride do the exact opposite to what Jonathan [a guest on the show] thinks they do. It turns people off,' Alexander said. 'What I see when I see some of those Pride events is fetishes being displayed on the street, men running naked around, thinking that's acceptable when there are children walking around. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Alex Armstrong (@alexharmstrong) 'It doesn't show anything good about the gay community. It stereotypes them, and there'll be millions of gay men, thousands of them watching tonight, who'll go: 'Actually, I don't want that representing us'.' Amrstrong went on to say go beyond criticising Pride, instead blasting the gay community writ large for its support of granting access to puberty blockers to trans children. He went on to say: 'They've advocated for for children. During the 2000s gay rights was being relatively accepted, people have got over the fear of it all and moved on. The public had moved on. Do you know what? We don't really care anymore. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Alex Armstrong (@alexharmstrong) 'It's the assimilation argument all over again, isn't it? Do you want to be part of society, or do you want society to look at you and think you are different?' Armstrong later shared a clip of his appearance on Instagram, posted with the caption: 'Millions of gay people are sick of having their sexuality weaponised, being told it's the most important thing about them. Then you get the far-left activist LGBT groups pushing their degenerate ideology down people's throats on top of it all.' The host received support from a number of his 14,000 followers, with one user commenting: 'Well said Alex, we wanted equality which we have. We didn't want to be part of a cult and for the movement to be hijacked, not only by what it is now but by corporations virtue signalling. There are still countries where you can be imprisoned or put to death for being gay, don't see them virtue signalling in those countries though.' The post Gay GB News host says Pride 'doesn't show anything good about the gay community' appeared first on Attitude.
Business Insider
43 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I got married and started my career young. When I got divorced and quit my job, I compared myself to others.
My parents always encouraged me to be myself. Still, I somehow picked up the belief that there's a "right" way and a "wrong" way to do life and that the right way means doing things in a certain order. I believed that your early 20s were the only time it was perfectly acceptable (and perhaps even adorable) to be a hot mess, while your late 20s were for taking the first steps toward getting "old and boring" — getting married, getting serious about a career, the whole nine yards. But even with this steadfast belief, I still did things out of order. Or so I thought. I got married and started my career by 25, but neither worked out By 25, I already had a full year of being "old and boring" under my belt. I was married and a project manager at a PR company. I was ahead of the curve of where I thought I should be in terms of stability and normality. However, I was also learning that life wasn't for me. Getting married quickly in my early 20s turned into getting an agonizingly slow divorce in my late 20s. It was only then that I finally started to understand what "forever" actually means, and that it would not be comfortable for me to spend that much time with someone I was fundamentally incompatible with. There I was, 28 and suddenly single, watching engagement announcements crop up all over my Instagram feed, like fungus after a rainstorm. I felt washed up, like Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard, though I had yet to reach the age where you adopt a monkey and an all-caftan wardrobe. It turned out PR also wasn't for me, and I was both out of a job and a husband. Now single and living alone, my bills had doubled while my income was nonexistent. I had to Scotch tape together my living, like when I was fresh out of college — except this time, I was proficient in Microsoft Project (and burned out on using it). I needed both money and a change, so I answered a somewhat questionable call for hair models on LA Casting. Fortunately, it turned out to be legit. I didn't even know hair modeling was a thing until I did it. I thought you could only model clothes and hands. But there I was, stumbling into a modeling career in my late 20s, when most "real" models were hitting retirement. Another milestone hit in reverse. I often compared myself to my best friend The year before my divorce, my best friend from growing up had gotten married. At the same time that I felt as though I was doing things backward, she was hitting life milestones"the right way" with almost textbook-level precision. In fact, the weekend of her wedding was when I first started wondering about my compatibility with my own husband, and if we truly had to be bound by "I do" forever. Just after my divorce, she and her husband bought a house in the suburbs while I lived in a studio apartment I could barely afford. And at the beginning of my modeling career, I found out she was pregnant when I was on Bourbon Street, partying it up with other models after a giant hair modeling gig I had been flown out to New Orleans for. Next to my best friend, I felt as though I looked like a train wreck. Bleaching my hair and posting "hot modeling photos" on Instagram right after a divorce didn't scream stable. But that messy exterior was really a cocoon as I transformed into something more majestic than a butterfly — myself. I'm glad things happened the way they did It was hard for me not to compare myself to someone who seemed to have the perfect life, especially when I was fully submerged in the unavoidable chaos of change. But having every inch of my life explode was worth it. Now, I have a career that suits me, a great partner, and I live in an apartment with more than one room. But most importantly, I'm happy, because my life is what I want it to be, not what I arbitrarily feel it "should" be. If I had the choice to Freaky Friday with my best friend, I wouldn't trade places for anything. I had believed growing up that your early 20s are for making mistakes, before you finally figure out what you want your life to look like, and in some ways, that is what I did. Setting up a life that wasn't right for me — and then getting out of it — was a mistake, sure, but it helped me get to where I am now.
