
GenAI Content Is Everywhere. That's Why Thought Leaders Must Go Deeper
Archaeologist working in field, carefully revealing ancient skull
As thought leaders or emerging thought leaders, writing with AI is not just about using AI better. It's about making sure that our ideas still matter — and that they are ours.
Generative AI makes it easier than ever to produce clean, competent text. In seconds, it can generate blog posts, social media captions, newsletters, and more. What once took hours can now be done in minutes.
And yet, as I reminded participants, it takes more than expertise to resonate with an audience.
Decent writing may fill space, but thought-leadership writing should fill minds.
This distinction is more urgent than ever as AI makes surface-level content alarmingly easy to produce.
One of the dangers of AI is that it encourages what I call 'headline thinking.' This happens when we let algorithms stitch together the most common phrases and concepts from the internet, leaving us with ideas that sound good but say little.
For emerging thought leaders — people who aim to introduce, spread, and champion important ideas in service to their audience — this is a serious risk.
If your thinking stays safe, generic, and frictionless, your writing may be indistinguishable from what AI produces.
Worse, it may be indistinguishable from what hundreds or thousands of other professionals are already saying.
That's why I challenged the Accelerator participants to go deeper.
At this point in the session, I introduced a deceptively simple exercise: freewriting.
For five minutes, I asked everyone to silence their inner critics, shut down their devices (except for the document they were writing in), and just… write.
The prompt, which I clarified was only for humans, was this:'Write about why it is so important for you or your organization to show thought leadership. What's at stake? Why now? Why you?'
As the timer began, the (virtual) room went quiet. No AI prompts. No structured outlines. No instant drafting tools. Just minds meeting blank pages.
At first, the exercise seemed awkward to some. 'I felt like I had nothing new to say,' one participant shared later. Another confessed, 'Without AI, I realized how much I rely on having a structure handed to me.'
But that was exactly the point.
After our freewriting, something shifted. As we discussed what emerged, participants shared surprising discoveries.
'I ended up writing about something I never talk about publicly — my frustration with how slow change happens in my industry,' one said. Another found herself zeroing in on a niche, overlooked challenge her clients face — something she had never considered turning into content.
This is what happens when we give ourselves space to think and write without shortcuts.
Ideas that are deeper and more personal begin to surface. The easy clichés and conventional wisdom fall away. What's left is real.
AI can be tremendously useful once you've done the heavy lifting of idea generation and clarity. It can help:
But what it can't do — and what thought leaders must guard fiercely — is determine the what and why of your ideas.
Only you know which hills you want to plant your flag on.
Only you have lived your particular professional journey and can distinguish your thinking from that of rivals with more resources.
Only you can bring the nuance, vulnerability, and conviction that makes writing memorable.
One of the Accelerator participants put it like this:
"AI can help me say something faster. But only I can figure out what I really want to say."
If you want your thought leadership to rise above the AI-generated flood, try these strategies:
AI is not the enemy of thought leadership. Used well, it can be a helpful collaborator, freeing us from rote tasks and enabling us to focus on the work that matters most.
To be seen and heard as serious thinkers, AI must remain in the passenger seat — not the driver's seat.
As I reminded the Accelerator participants, depth wins. In an age of infinite words, people are hungry for ideas that make them pause, reflect, and perhaps even change course.
So go deeper. Give yourself permission to write badly in service of writing bravely.
Freewriting is the way I began the actual writing of my book, Write Like a Thought Leader. I had outlined and researched and lined up my concept, but I hadn't actually started writing the manuscript. So I found a friend for a spontaneous round of freewriting via Zoom.
You can do the same.
Find what only you can say, and say it with clarity and conviction.
AI can generate words. Only you can generate wisdom.
That's why thought leaders must go deeper — they must have the ability to access their wisdom, bring it forth and articulate their gems of ideas that had been hiding beneath the surface.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micron to invest $200 billion in US memory facilities
Memory chip maker Micron (MU) announced on Thursday that it will invest an additional $30 billion in the US, as it looks to build out its manufacturing and research and development facilities in Idaho and New York. The move brings Micron's total US manufacturing and R&D investments up to roughly $200 billion which will create some 90,000 direct and indirect jobs, the company said. Micron is receiving about $6.5 billion in funding from the US CHIPS Act. The plans call for Micron to build a second memory manufacturing plant at its Boise, Idaho, facility and a massive chip fabrication complex in New York. The company is also updating and expanding its Virginia plant. Micron also said it expects the second Idaho plant to help it bring its advanced high-bandwidth memory (HBM) manufacturing to the US. HBM is a key component in AI data centers. 'Micron's investment in advanced memory manufacturing and HBM capabilities in the U.S., with support from the Trump Administration, is an important step forward for the AI ecosystem,' Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang said in a statement. 'Micron's leadership in high-performance memory is invaluable to enabling the next generation of AI breakthroughs that NVIDIA is driving. We're excited to collaborate with Micron as we push the boundaries of what's possible in AI and high-performance computing,' Huang added. All totaled, Micron says the investments will allow the company to produce 40% of its DRAM memory in the US. Its initial Idaho plant is expected to begin pumping out the hardware in 2027. Micron also says it is set to begin preparing the ground for its New York facilities later this year. 'This approximately $200 billion investment will reinforce America's technological leadership, create tens of thousands of American jobs across the semiconductor ecosystem and secure a domestic supply of semiconductors—critical to economic and national security,' Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra said in a statement. 'We are grateful for the support from President Trump, Secretary Lutnick and our federal, state, and local partners who have been instrumental in advancing domestic semiconductor manufacturing.' Micron isn't the only company bringing HBM production to the US, though. South Korea's SK Hynix is also building a new HBM plant in Indiana as part of a $3.8 billion construction project. The Trump administration, and the Biden administration before it, has made onshoring semiconductor manufacturing a key component of its domestic agenda, as it seeks to wean itself off of the country's dependence on foreign-made chips. Companies ranging from Intel (INTC) and TSMC (TSM) to Samsung and GlobalFounderies (GFS) and others have recently announced plans to build or upgrade their facility throughout the country, thanks in part to billions of dollars in funding through the CHIPS Act. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
AI chatbots need more books to learn from. These libraries are opening their stacks
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — Everything ever said on the internet was just the start of teaching artificial intelligence about humanity. Tech companies are now tapping into an older repository of knowledge: the library stacks. Nearly one million books published as early as the 15th century — and in 254 languages — are part of a Harvard University collection being released to AI researchers Thursday. Also coming soon are troves of old newspapers and government documents held by Boston's public library. Cracking open the vaults to centuries-old tomes could be a data bonanza for tech companies battling lawsuits from living novelists, visual artistsand others whose creative works have been scooped up without their consent to train AI chatbots. 'It is a prudent decision to start with public domain data because that's less controversial right now than content that's still under copyright,' said Burton Davis, a deputy general counsel at Microsoft. Davis said libraries also hold 'significant amounts of interesting cultural, historical and language data' that's missing from the past few decades of online commentary that AI chatbots have mostly learned from. Supported by 'unrestricted gifts' from Microsoft and ChatGPT maker OpenAI, the Harvard-based Institutional Data Initiative is working with libraries around the world on how to make their historic collections AI-ready in a way that also benefits libraries and the communities they serve. 'We're trying to move some of the power from this current AI moment back to these institutions,' said Aristana Scourtas, who manages research at Harvard Law School's Library Innovation Lab. 'Librarians have always been the stewards of data and the stewards of information.' Harvard's newly released dataset, Institutional Books 1.0, contains more than 394 million scanned pages of paper. One of the earlier works is from the 1400s — a Korean painter's handwritten thoughts about cultivating flowers and trees. The largest concentration of works is from the 19th century, on subjects such as literature, philosophy, law and agriculture, all of it meticulously preserved and organized by generations of librarians. It promises to be a boon for AI developers trying to improve the accuracy and reliability of their systems. 'A lot of the data that's been used in AI training has not come from original sources,' said the data initiative's executive director, Greg Leppert, who is also chief technologist at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. This book collection goes "all the way back to the physical copy that was scanned by the institutions that actually collected those items,' he said. Before ChatGPT sparked a commercial AI frenzy, most AI researchers didn't think much about the provenance of the passages of text they pulled from Wikipedia, from social media forums like Reddit and sometimes from deep repositories of pirated books. They just needed lots of what computer scientists call tokens — units of data, each of which can represent a piece of a word. Harvard's new AI training collection has an estimated 242 billion tokens, an amount that's hard for humans to fathom but it's still just a drop of what's being fed into the most advanced AI systems. Facebook parent company Meta, for instance, has said the latest version of its AI large language model was trained on more than 30 trillion tokens pulled from text, images and videos. Meta is also battling a lawsuit from comedian Sarah Silverman and other published authors who accuse the company of stealing their books from 'shadow libraries' of pirated works. Now, with some reservations, the real libraries are standing up. OpenAI, which is also fighting a string of copyright lawsuits, donated $50 million this year to a group of research institutions including Oxford University's 400-year-old Bodleian Library, which is digitizing rare texts and using AI to help transcribe them. When the company first reached out to the Boston Public Library, one of the biggest in the U.S., the library made clear that any information it digitized would be for everyone, said Jessica Chapel, its chief of digital and online services. 'OpenAI had this interest in massive amounts of training data. We have an interest in massive amounts of digital objects. So this is kind of just a case that things are aligning,' Chapel said. Digitization is expensive. It's been painstaking work, for instance, for Boston's library to scan and curate dozens of New England's French-language newspapers that were widely read in the late 19th and early 20th century by Canadian immigrant communities from Quebec. Now that such text is of use as training data, it helps bankroll projects that librarians want to do anyway. 'We've been very clear that, 'Hey, we're a public library,'" Chapel said. 'Our collections are held for public use, and anything we digitized as part of this project will be made public.' Harvard's collection was already digitized starting in 2006 for another tech giant, Google, in its controversial project to create a searchable online library of more than 20 million books. Google spent years beating back legal challenges from authors to its online book library, which included many newer and copyrighted works. It was finally settled in 2016 when the U.S. Supreme Court let stand lower court rulings that rejected copyright infringement claims. Now, for the first time, Google has worked with Harvard to retrieve public domain volumes from Google Books and clear the way for their release to AI developers. Copyright protections in the U.S. typically last for 95 years, and longer for sound recordings. How useful all of this will be for the next generation of AI tools remains to be seen as the data gets shared Thursday on the Hugging Face platform, which hosts datasets and open-source AI models that anyone can download. The book collection is more linguistically diverse than typical AI data sources. Fewer than half the volumes are in English, though European languages still dominate, particularly German, French, Italian, Spanish and Latin. A book collection steeped in 19th century thought could also be 'immensely critical' for the tech industry's efforts to build AI agents that can plan and reason as well as humans, Leppert said. 'At a university, you have a lot of pedagogy around what it means to reason,' Leppert said. 'You have a lot of scientific information about how to run processes and how to run analyses.' At the same time, there's also plenty of outdated data, from debunked scientific and medical theories to racist narratives. 'When you're dealing with such a large data set, there are some tricky issues around harmful content and language," said Kristi Mukk, a coordinator at Harvard's Library Innovation Lab who said the initiative is trying to provide guidance about mitigating the risks of using the data, to 'help them make their own informed decisions and use AI responsibly.'


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Arm CEO Sides With Nvidia Against US Export Limits on China
Arm Holdings Plc Chief Executive Officer Rene Haas said Thursday that US export controls on China threaten to slow overall technological advances and are ultimately bad for consumers and companies, aligning himself with Nvidia Corp. Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang and others looking to ease tensions between Washington and Beijing. 'If you narrow access to to technology and you force other ecosystems to grow up, it's not good,' Haas said Thursday in an interview with Bloomberg at the Founders Forum Global conference in Oxford. 'It makes the pie smaller, if you will. And frankly, it's not very good for consumers.' He also noted that Arm's footprint in China is 'quite significant.'