Military chiefs of S. Korea, US vow to strengthen trilateral security cooperation with Japan
Adm. Kim Myung-soo, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and his US counterpart, Gen. John Daniel Caine, held the talks Tuesday, which marked the first between the two sides since Caine took office last month.
"Through the South Korea-US-Japan Trilateral Chief of Defense meeting set to take place in South Korea in July, (the two sides) agreed to further strengthen the momentum of trilateral security cooperation," the JCS said in a release.
The three countries have recently ramped up trilateral security cooperation through joint military drills amid growing nuclear and missile threats from North Korea.
Kim and Caine also stressed the importance of establishing the capabilities and posture to effectively respond to advancing North Korean threats in line with Pyongyang's expanding cooperation with Moscow, according to the JCS.
North Korea is suspected to have received military technology assistance from Russia in return for deploying troops in support of Moscow's war against Ukraine. (Yonhap)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
10 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Westinghouse deal tensions loom over Korea-US summit
Controversial KHNP agreement faces backlash at home as leaders prepare to discuss nuclear energy cooperation Escalating tensions over a deal between South Korea's state-run energy firms and US company Westinghouse are complicating the agenda for the upcoming Korea-US summit, where nuclear energy cooperation is expected to take center stage. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in Washington next Monday for their summit, with officials saying nuclear partnership will be high on the agenda. According to a local media report on Wednesday, state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse, the two companies at the heart of the controversy, are preparing to form a joint venture to enter the US nuclear reactor market on the occasion of the upcoming summit. The report explained that since KHNP cannot independently access the US market, it plans to enter through a partnership with the American firm while handling most of the construction work. Nuclear energy's inclusion on the summit agenda was widely expected, given that the sector was part of South Korea's $200 billion investment pledge in the US under the tariff deal announced last month. President Trump has vowed to expand US nuclear energy capacity from 97 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Achieving this target would require constructing approximately 300 new 1,000-megawatt reactors. Industry observers view the US as eyeing Korean companies' technological expertise and construction capabilities to meet this goal. The plan comes amid controversy over a separate agreement that KHNP and Korea Electric Power Corp. struck with Westinghouse in January, sparking worries about potential summit implications. The settlement resolved Westinghouse's claims that KHNP had violated its intellectual property rights by using licensed Westinghouse technology in the development of its APR 1000 and 1400 nuclear reactor designs. The deal cleared the way for a KHNP-led consortium to sign an estimated 26 trillion won ($18.58 billion) contract in June to build two nuclear reactors in the Czech Republic. But after details of the settlement came to light on Monday following another local media report, the state-run company came under fire for agreeing to lopsided conditions to reach a swift deal, while burdening itself with hefty financial commitments. According to the agreement, KHNP agreed to sign contracts for goods and services worth $650 million with Westinghouse for each export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay an additional $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. The 50-year deal also contains a provision requiring Westinghouse to verify the technical independence of Korean companies before they can bid on overseas nuclear reactor projects, including small modular reactors. It also restricted KHNP to pursuing nuclear projects in only 12 designated countries -- including the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa -- while barring it from new deals in North America, Britain, Japan, Ukraine and the EU, except for the Czech Republic. Lawmakers blamed KHNP for bowing to US pressure to secure the Czech deal. 'It has been confirmed that the Yoon Suk Yeol government signed an unfair contract with Westinghouse to break the deadlock in the Czech project,' said Rep. Han Jeong-ae of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea at the National Assembly on Tuesday. Amid the controversy, KHNP CEO Whang Joo-ho on Tuesday said the deal terms remain within acceptable limits, but he declined to provide detailed answers, citing confidentiality obligations. 'While I cannot say (Westinghouse's demands) are justified, they are something tolerable enough for us to endure and still generate profit,' Whang said at the National Assembly. Meanwhile, opposition People Power Party lawmakers also stressed that just before the Korea-US summit, it may not serve the national interest for the parliament to directly confront the Westinghouse issue. 'Westinghouse may hold the original technology, but it lacks the construction capacity to independently build reactors, which means Korean companies are likely to handle the construction,' said an industry insider on condition of anonymity. 'Even if the deal is viewed as unfavorable, I believe it was inevitable if Korean companies are going to expand their overseas nuclear businesses.' Amid growing backlash, South Korea's presidential office has ordered the Industry Ministry to investigate the deal to verify that the negotiations and contract process were carried out based on laws and regulations and in accordance with principles and procedures.
Korea Herald
40 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Kim Jong-un issues inter-Korean policy rejecting Seoul's olive branch
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on Tuesday conveyed his inter-Korean policy plan through his sister Kim Yo-jong, who handed it down during a meeting with key Foreign Ministry officials while denouncing Seoul's olive-branch offer as 'deceptive,' state media reported Wednesday. Seoul swiftly rejected the charge. The presidential office said, "It is regrettable that a North Korean official distorts and misrepresents our sincere efforts." President Lee Jae Myung's office also pledged to "move beyond an era of hostility and confrontation, restore mutual trust, and open a new era of peaceful coexistence and joint growth on the Korean Peninsula." North Korea's latest statement was part of a series of high-level pronouncements that zeroed in on what it labeled a "contradiction" in the Lee administration's conciliatory inter-Korean policy — pointing to the ongoing Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise between South Korea and the US. Kim Yo-jong, vice department director of the Party Central Committee, 'conveyed and assigned the head of state's foreign policy plan at a consultative meeting with director generals of the Foreign Ministry,' state-run Korean Central News Agency reported Wednesday in a Korean-language dispatch. At the same time, Kim 'sharply criticized the essence of the Republic of Korea government's deceptive 'appeasement offensive' and its two-faced nature,' KCNA added, referring to South Korea by its official name. 'Clarifying once again on this occasion, the ROK cannot become our state's diplomatic counterpart,' Kim was quoted as saying in the KCNA report. 'The DPRK Foreign Ministry must properly seek accurate countermeasures regarding relations with the most hostile state and with the states that listen to its agitation, based on the conclusion of our head of state, who pointed out the true nature of the ROK," Kim said. DPRK stands for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. KCNA reported that Kim Yo-jong "analyzed Seoul's behavior of pretending as if the ROK's policy toward the DPRK is making a 'rapid U-turn'" during the meeting. Kim specifically dismissed President Lee's Aug. 15 National Liberation Day speech, in which Lee pledged to respect the North Korean system, not to pursue unification by absorption and clarified South Korea's intent not to conduct any hostile acts. Then, Kim denounced the Lee administration for 'parroting' its predecessors' rhetoric by describing the annual combined military exercises between South Korea and the United States as defensive in nature. 'This is a passage that vividly reflects the double-faced character of the Seoul authorities, whose inside and outside are different," Kim was quoted as saying in the KCNA report. "Whoever in the ROK it may be, one must not forget the fact that they are America's top-class running dog.' Mounting pressure before Lee-Trump summit Lim Eul-chul, a professor at Kyungnam University's Institute for Far Eastern Studies in Seoul, assessed that 'Kim Yo-jong's core message is essentially a propaganda line.' 'The point is that as long as the South Korean government remains subordinate to the US, it cannot create a new history of sustainable and peaceful inter-Korean relations," Lim said. 'North Korea is seeking to push the Lee Jae Myung administration into making a more drastic shift from its hostile policy toward the North — including the suspension of ROK-US military exercises — by exerting maximum pressure on the administration.' The latest remarks followed Kim Jong-un's order — issued Monday, the first day of the Ulchi Freedom Shield regular exercises between South Korea and the US — calling for a rapid nuclear buildup and denouncing the combined drills. On Aug. 14, Kim Yo-jong had similarly criticized the exercises, claiming that the Lee administration's policy toward North Korea 'has not changed in the least and cannot change.' The string of denunciatory statements comes ahead of the first summit between President Lee and US President Donald Trump on Aug. 25 in Washington. Lim further explained that the outcomes of the Lee-Trump summit 'are expected to have a significant impact on inter-Korean relations.' 'The key question is whether the results will show weakened dependence on the US and greater diplomatic autonomy vis-a-vis the US,' Lim said. 'However, North Korea is likely well aware of the structural constraints and dilemmas the Lee administration faces.'
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Presidential office says peace overture aimed at stability for both Seoul, Pyongyang
The presidential office said Tuesday that recent peace overtures by President Lee Jae Myung were aimed at ensuring stability for both Seoul and Pyongyang, in a response to a statement by the sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un that criticized Lee for such efforts. Earlier in the day, the North's state media reported that Kim Yo-jong, the influential sister of Kim, again rebuffed Seoul's peace overture, saying South Korea will never become a diplomatic partner for North Korea and calling Lee "not the sort of man who will change the course of history." "The Lee Jae Myung administration's proactive measures for peace on the Korean Peninsula are not moves made for one-sided interests or with anyone in mind, but for the stability and prosperity of both the South and the North," the office said in a statement. "The government will leave behind the era of hostility and confrontation to open a new era of peaceful coexistence and shared growth on the Korean Peninsula," the office said. In a Liberation Day speech last week, Lee said he would respect North Korea's political system and would not seek unification by absorption. He also pledged to take steps to restore the now-suspended 2018 inter-Korean military pact designed to ease tensions. (Yonhap)
