China's Xi Jinping 'sends message' to country's technology companies as DeepSeek called 'profound threat'
China's President Xi Jinping (Farhan Abdullah/Malaysia's Department of Information via AP)
Chinese President Xi Jinping has reportedly declared artificial intelligence (AI) a cornerstone of the next technological revolution, urging China to seize a competitive edge in this transformative field. Speaking at a high-level meeting of the Communist Party focused on emerging technologies, Xi emphasized that AI is reshaping human production and lifestyles, positioning it as a strategic priority for China's global ambitions. His remarks, reported by state-run Xinhua, underscore Beijing's determination to lead the AI race while navigating growing international tensions over its technological advancements.Xi called for leveraging China's unique system of resource mobilization to drive AI innovation, emphasizing self-reliance and application-driven development. He advocated for a balanced approach, promoting AI's growth in a way that is 'beneficial, safe, and equitable.' Acknowledging gaps in foundational theories and core technologies, Xi urged accelerated efforts in scientific research, industrial applications, and regulatory frameworks to ensure China retains control over both AI development and governance. 'We must comprehensively advance sci-tech innovation and firmly grasp the initiative,' he stated, signaling a long-term vision to close the gap with global leaders like the United States.China's AI ambitions are part of a broader push to dominate emerging technologies. In recent years, the country has ramped up investments in AI, quantum computing, and electric vehicles (EVs), emerging as a global leader in EV production. The Chinese military has also begun integrating AI into non-combat applications, such as logistics and surveillance, raising concerns among Western nations about potential dual-use capabilities. According to a 2024 report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, China's AI investment reached $25 billion in 2023, second only to the U.S., with state-backed firms driving much of the progress.A notable example of China's AI prowess is DeepSeek, a low-cost AI model developed by Chinese tech firm High-Flyer. Launched in early 2025, DeepSeek gained global attention for its affordability and performance, positioning it as a competitor to Western models like those from OpenAI. However, the tool has sparked controversy. On April 17, the U.S. House Select Committee on Strategic Competition labeled DeepSeek a 'profound threat' to national security, alleging ties to the Communist Party and accusing it of undermining U.S. technological leadership. The committee's report cited concerns over data privacy and potential military applications, reflecting broader anxieties about China's growing influence in AI.
The backlash against DeepSeek has not been limited to the U.S. Countries like India, Japan, and Australia have imposed restrictions on its use by government officials, citing risks of data leaks and espionage. India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, for instance, flagged DeepSeek's data collection practices as a potential violation of its 2024 Digital Personal Data Protection Act. These restrictions have fueled accusations from Beijing that the West and its allies are politicizing trade and technology. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian recently condemned the bans, arguing they 'stifle innovation and distort global cooperation.' Trump Tariffs and the new Cold War
Xi's push for AI leadership comes amid an intensifying U.S.-China tech rivalry, often described as a new Cold War. The U.S. has tightened export controls on advanced semiconductors and AI technologies, aiming to curb China's access to critical components. In response, China has doubled down on domestic innovation, with firms like Huawei and Baidu making strides in AI chip development despite Western sanctions. A 2025 analysis by the Brookings Institution noted that China's focus on applied AI—such as facial recognition and smart cities—has given it an edge in real-world deployments, even if it lags in foundational research.
However, China's AI strategy faces challenges. Experts point to a shortage of top-tier talent and overreliance on state-driven investment as potential bottlenecks. From an international perspective, China's AI rise is both an opportunity and a concern. Developing nations in Africa and Southeast Asia have welcomed affordable Chinese AI tools, which offer cost-effective solutions for healthcare, agriculture, and education. Yet, fears of data sovereignty and dependency on Chinese tech have prompted calls for stricter oversight. The European Union, for instance, is exploring a 'third way' in AI governance, balancing innovation with ethical standards to counter both U.S. and Chinese dominance. Made-in-China strategy
Xi's vision for AI reflects China's broader goal of achieving technological self-sufficiency by 2035, a target embedded in its 14th Five-Year Plan. With initiatives like the 'Made in China 2025' strategy, Beijing is positioning AI as a driver of economic growth and geopolitical influence. However, the path forward is fraught with risks, from escalating trade disputes to ethical dilemmas surrounding AI surveillance and autonomous systems.
READ SOURCE businessmayor April 28, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Fusion Energy May Be The Key To World Hegemony
What would it take for the United States to lose its hegemony to a rising power like China? Right now, America appears to be ahead economically and militarily. However, there is a stark difference between America's national strategy (insofar as one exists) and China's. The US under President Trump calls for regression. It seeks to restore a manufacturing economy that peaked in the 1950s—like an elderly man trying to restore hair where it hasn't grown for decades. It is doubling down on domestic oil, gas and coal. Through tariffs, disparagement of NATO and aggression towards allies like Canada and Denmark, the administration has alienated partners that long supported a US-led world order. China, meanwhile, has a tremendous lead in developing the economy of the future. It has a near monopoly on rare earth minerals, which are needed for electronics, renewable energy systems, defense technologies and more. China leads in solar, wind and batteries, the energy systems growing at the fastest rate. It is ahead in electric vehicles, industrial robotics and drones as well. It probably has achieved parity in artificial intelligence and may surpass the US soon. If China were to take Taiwan, it would control the global market for advanced chip manufacturing. In the background, but probably most importantly, China may be on track to commercialize fusion energy before the US or its disgruntled allies. Unlike the US, China has no domestic energy industry with vocal lobbyists (and purchasable politicians) to slow progress. It is funding fusion as a national strategy while private fusion companies in the West are at the mercy of investors that, for the most part, chase low risk and quick returns. Fusion promises cheap, plentiful, baseload energy without carbon emissions. AI, data centers and industrial robotics powered by fusion would produce goods and services at much lower costs than value chains dependent on fossil-fired electricity. Militaries built on swarms of small, cheap, electronic drones and robots—powered by small, distributed fusion facilities deep underground, safe from attack—would have an edge over competitors using large, expensive, petroleum-powered vehicles with vulnerable supply chains. I cannot overstate the ramifications of China developing fusion first. As an analogy, imagine if Japan and Germany had uncovered vast reserves of oil at home in the 1920s. American and Soviet oil gave the Allies a strategic advantage over the Axis powers. Had the situation been reversed, World War II could have ended differently. While private fusion companies in the West have raised about $8 billion total, China is investing at least $1.5 annually into fusion projects—double what the US government spends. Japanese and German investments in fusion don't even come close. Canada, for the record, has no fusion funding strategy. Moreover, the government of British Columbia, home of industry leader General Fusion, seems not to understand the value of this crown asset.* On all fronts nuclear, China is leaping ahead. In April, its scientists added fresh fuel to an operational thorium molten salt reactor—a first. The thorium reserves found in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of China, could theoretically meet Chinese energy demand for thousands of years. The kicker: this reactor design originated in the US. As project lead Xu Hongjie put it, 'The US left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor." Moreover, in January, China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) sustained a fusion reaction for 1,066 seconds, setting a new record. Its Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST) fusion reactor could come online by 2027 and is expected to produce five times the amount of energy it consumes. When BEST announces this milestone, Western fusion companies may be announcing that they've run out of funding. To China, fusion is not a startup project—it's a matter of national interest and security. Its scientists are patenting more fusion-related technologies than any other single country and graduating more doctorates in fusion-related fields. And because China is the top refiner and exporter of the critical minerals needed in fusion reactors (e.g., for magnets), no external force is going to slow their progress. In the meantime, China has a cheap gas station next door—Russia—supplying all the fossil fuels China could need in exchange for support in its war with Ukraine. That support includes critical minerals needed by Russian arms manufacturers. Is fusion energy, along with other Chinese-dominated technologies, enough to end US hegemony? In 1988, historian Paul Kennedy published The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, a book that tried to explain the relative success (and failure) of powerful states. According to Kennedy, their rise and fall '…shows a very significant correlation over the longer term between productive and revenue-raising capacities on the one hand and military strength on the other.' Essentially, states must balance economic prosperity with strategy. Technological breakthroughs are vital to both. Innovation creates wealth, which enables the state to invest in defense and win wars. While underinvestment in defense leaves the state vulnerable to other powers, overextension and overspending on defense can run an economy into the ground, leaving it unable to sustain a strong military. Now, picture a great power—China—with a military to rival the US and fusion reactors that provide virtually unlimited energy. Imagine the clout China would have in establishing ports, military bases and consumer markets around the world if it could license that fusion technology. A China that exceeds the US in energy, industry, intelligence, mobility and defense is positioned to usurp it. Of course, China could bungle its advantage. Authoritarian regimes have a habit of mismanaging internal dissent, falsifying reality and making preventable mistakes. The rise of China is inevitable, but the self-inflicted decline of the US and its allies isn't. Rather, it's a choice reflecting how societies invest their resources and envision their future. *Disclosure: The author is an investor in General Fusion and sits on its board of directors.
Hamilton Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann's intellectual property and fan-favorite labels
NEW YORK (AP) — Craft labels from the now-shuttered fabrics seller Joann are making their way to a new home: Michaels. The Michaels Companies announced on Thursday that it had completed its purchase of Joann's intellectual property and private label brands — in an acquisition that arrives as the Texas-based arts and crafting chain works to expand its own fabric, sewing and yarn offerings. 'We're honored to have the opportunity to welcome JOANN customers into our creative community and are committed to delivering the selection, value, and inspiration they are looking for at Michaels,' Michaels CEO David Boone said in a statement. The deal, he added, allows the company to better 'respond to rising demand' among both new and existing customers. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. The Associated Press reached out to Michaels for further information on Friday. With roots dating back to a single Ohio storefront in 1943 , Joann had grown into a destination for generations of sewers, quilters, knitters and lovers of other crafts for more than 80 years. But more recently, operational challenges continued to pile up — with the retailer pointing to sluggish consumer demand, inventory shortages and rising competition. Joann announced it would be going out of business back in February, just one month after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time within a year. At the time, the company said financial services company GA Group, together with Joann's term lenders, had been selected as the winning bidder to 'acquire substantially all of Joann's assets' and conduct going-out-of-business sales at all store locations. Michaels on Thursday said that its purchase of Joann's IP and private brands included the acquisition of 'Big Twist' yarns, which had become a staple in Joann stores over the years. Those 'Big Twist' labels are now being developed as part of Michaels' portfolio — and will be available in-stores and online later this year, the company said. In the meantime, Michaels has also dedicated a landing page to welcome former Joann customers online. And as part of its overall expansion into fabrics, Michaels said on Thursday that its adding more than 600 new products from new and existing brands — including quilting supplies and fabrics, specialty threads, sewing machines and more. Michaels, founded in 1973, currently operates 1,300 stores across 49 U.S. states and Canada. Its parent company also owns Artistree, a framing merchandise manufacturer.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk's Political Exit Results In More Volatility for Tesla Stock — Experts Answer Whether You Should Buy the Dip
Elon Musk has taken a step back from politics, and some investors are excited about the tech billionaire's renewed focus on Tesla. Musk's entrepreneurial successes and ability to think ahead are one of the main reasons that Tesla stock commands a high premium. Learn More: Read Next: Some people see Musk's exit from politics as a good thing for the stock, while others still don't view it as a buying opportunity. The recent spat between Musk and Trump has created even more uncertainty for the stock, but fear can create opportunities. Several experts shared their thoughts about the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Elon Musk's involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency has stirred up controversy. Liberals make up a large percentage of EV buyers, and many people in this group adamantly turned against the tech billionaire. Robert P. Johnson, PhD, certified financial advisor (CFA), CAIA, professor of finance at Creighton University's Heider College of Business, views Musk's DOGE departure as good for business, but he has to clear a few hurdles. 'More attractive, but there are a couple of problems. First, Musk himself has seemingly always divided his time between several endeavors — Space X, X (formerly Twitter), Neuralink, etc. Second, his DOGE involvement also negatively impacted Tesla in the sense that he alienated a large part of his current and potential owner base by aligning himself with Trump,' Johnson explained. Find Out: While liberals have been turned off by Musk, he also risks losing conservatives due to a recent string of X posts. 'Now, his criticism of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' may alienate potential buyers of Teslas who are supporters of Trump. In other words, Musk has seemingly alienated people on both sides of the political aisle,' Johnson added. 'Wading into politics is a losing proposition for the CEO of a publicly traded company, particularly one with as high a visibility as Musk.' Musk committing more of his time to Tesla isn't only a tailwind for its EVs. Tesla has been working on several projects, such as robotaxis and humanoid robots, that have the potential to deliver massive gains for patient investors. Alex Black, chief marketing officer at EpicVIN, encourages investors to consider all of Tesla's underlying businesses before making a decision. 'This is not an auto company — it's energy, software, AI, all in one. High potential, high volatility. Monitor margins, delivery numbers, and how they're competing against Chinese competition. And remember: Hype drives this stock more than rationale at times,' Black said. He also suggested considering where you are with your finances before making an investment. Your age plays a big role in the types of assets you should consider. 'Are you young and have time to take the ups and downs? Future tech in the form of EVs, AI and autonomy may be worth it,' according to Black. 'But if you're close to retirement, playing it safe with solid, proven companies is the better bet. Diversify a bit if possible.' Another problem for Tesla is the rising competition. BYD is a leading EV maker that is gobbling up market share in China, Europe and Mexico. Competition can present several problems for the valuation. John Ellmore, editor and spokesperson for Electric Car Guide, shares what investors should monitor. 'Investors need to look past the brand and dig into the numbers. Tesla's margins are tightening, sales are flatlining in key markets and the competition is delivering cheaper EVs at scale,' he pointed out. 'I think the market is catching up, so I would urge caution for would-be investors.' Musk's return to Tesla can minimize concerns about competition. The tech billionaire may have additional time to focus on Tesla and regain lost ground. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on Musk's Political Exit Results In More Volatility for Tesla Stock — Experts Answer Whether You Should Buy the Dip Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
