
CBIC lays down plan for supportive, people-focused tax regime
New Delhi: The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), the government's indirect tax policy body, has laid down an annual plan for a supportive, people-focused and tech-driven tax administration for FY26, its chairperson Sanjay Kumar Agarwal said.
In a communication to field officers, Agarwal told different zonal offices to prepare their own annual strategies based on the priorities set by the CBIC.
The plan covers areas like GST, customs, human resource optimization, grievance redressal and capacity building among others, Agarwal said in the communication posted on CBIC's website. The plan reflects an 'aspiration for a facilitative, technology-driven, and citizen-centric tax administration,' Agarwal said.
'A decentralized, yet coordinated approach will be vital in ensuring that our efforts are responsive, measurable, and impactful throughout the year,' Agarwal stated.
The central government has estimated an indirect tax collection of ₹ 17.3 trillion in the current financial year, expecting an 8.35% annual growth collectively from central excise duty, customs and GST.
On GST, authorities have gradually increased the disclosure requirements to keep an eye on different points in the supply chain.
Central and state GST authorities have also increasingly lowered the monetary threshold for various reporting requirements. This enables them to ensure that economic activity does not go unreported and that GST is collected.
Customs duty collections—both basic customs duty and IGST on imports—will depend on the value of imports, while excise duty receipts will depend on consumption growth in fossil fuels.
The CBIC's emphasis on a 'facilitative' tax administration comes in the context of signals from policy makers to ensure that ease of doing business is not compromised while collecting taxes.
Last month, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman cautioned regulators that foreign investors were watching and any delays in approvals, lengthy litigation, and transparency gaps could hamper India's ability to strike trade deals in an uncertain global environment, Mint reported on 20 May.
Last year, the then revenue secretary Sanjay Malhotra had cautioned tax officials to be careful not to hurt the economy's interests in the bid to mop up increased revenue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
32 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Imports under FTAs can be cleared under the provisional assessment
Rajagopalan answers readers' SME queries related to GST, export and import matters TNC Rajagopalan Listen to This Article We import our raw materials under the free trade agreements. We find that invariably the Customs raise some query or the other and the clearance gets delayed. This results in demurrage and even our production schedule gets disrupted sometimes. Is there any way we can avoid that? The CBIC has issued comprehensive guidelines for provisional assessments vide Circular No. 38/2016- Customs dated 22.08.2016. This circular has been revised after the implementation of the Customs (Administration of Rules of Origin under Trade Agreements) Rules, 2020 (referred to as the CAROTAR, 2020) issued vide Notification No. 81/2020-Customs (N.T.) dated 21st August, 2020.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Quoting DIN (document identification number) not needed in tax notices, clarifies CBIC
New Delhi: The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) Monday clarified that quoting a document identification number (DIN) is not required for communications generated through the common portal of GST, including show-cause tax notices, if they already bear a reference number (RFN). The CBIC had amended its earlier circular that made it mandatory to quote a DIN on all communications sent to taxpayers and other concerned persons. The move was initiated after several taxpayers did not respond to GST notices as they did not bear a DIN. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 5 Wealth Management Firms in The United States SmartAsset Learn More Undo The decision to exempt communication bearing RFN from DIN requirement is based on the fact that RFN is already verifiable through the GST portal, providing details of the document such as date of RFN generation, date of issuing the document, module, type of communication and name of the office issuing the document. "It is therefore clarified that for communications via common portal (in compliance with Section 169 of the CGST Act, 2017) having verifiable reference number (RFN), quoting of document identification number (DIN) is not required and such communication bearing RFN is to be treated as a valid communication," the CBIC circular said. Live Events


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Attention B2C GST filers who are facing problem with GSTR-1: GSTN issues new advisory, Here's what experts say
The Goods and Service Tax Network ( GSTN ) has issued an advisory tweet mentioning that in table 12 of GSTR-1 return, B2B supplies information is mandatory, but B2C is optional. This means those Goods and Services Tax (GST) registered taxpayers who have to file GSTR-1 return on or before June 11, 2025 for June 2025 tax period need to mandatorily give their B2B sales information and HSN code , otherwise the system won't allow filing it. However, this has created another problem namely for those GST registered taxpayers who are selling their services or products to end consumers i.e. those with only B2C sales and no B2B sales. What did GSTN say about this problem? In a tweet dated June 7, 2025, GSTN said: As per the current implemented design, the GST system is only validating the values in Table -12 of GSTR-1 concerning the B2B table which is mandatory. Whereas the GST system is allowing any numerical value to be entered in B2C table of Table-12 of GSTR-1, even it could be left empty as the said field is not mandatory.' Chartered Accountant Deep Koradia says: 'GSTN has changed the GSTR-1 form and now separate reporting for B2B supply and B2C Supply. It's mandatory to report GSTR-1 B2B supply invoice details and its corresponding HSN codes from the May 2025 tax period. B2C supply details are optional for now. But the problem is for those GST registered taxpayers who don't have any B2B supplies. The system is not letting these taxpayers file their GSTR-1 return as their B2B supply HSN code column is blank, the deadline for which is June 11, 2025.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo The image below shows how GSTR-1 filers can't file GSTR-1 due to absence of B2B sales. GSTR-1 Source: CA Deep Koradia Live Events — Infosys_GSTN (@Infosys_GSTN) Buyers GST input tax credit may be delayed if sellers can't file GSTR-1 on time Koradia explains: 'Ideally GSTN should make both B2C and B2B supply reporting mandatory ONLY IF there is such supply in their respective tab, but instead of solving this problem, GSTN issued a clarification that B2B is mandatory, and B2C is optional. As a direct impact of sellers being unable to file their GSTR-1 return, buyers will not be able to claim their input tax credit for May 2025 tax period as their GSTR-3B will not get auto-populated with this detail. The reason for this is that the seller's GSTR-1 return feeds information into the buyer's GSTR-3B.' What is the solution to this problem? Koradia says: 'Till the time GSTN comes out with a solution for this problem, we have found a makeshift solution. Sellers with no B2B sales should write 0 (zero) in the HSN column of B2B and then fill up the B2C data. This will enable them to file GSTR-1 returns successfully.' What is table 12 of GSTR-1 return? In an advisory GSTN said: In Table-12 validation with regards to value of the supplies have also been introduced. These validations will validate the value of B2B supplies shown in different Tables viz: 4A, 4B, 6B, 6C, 8 (recipient registered), 9A, 9B (registered), 9C (registered), 15 (recipient registered), 15A (recipient registered) with the value of B2B supplies shown in table-12) Similarly, validations will validate the value of B2C supplies shown in different tablesviz: 5A, 6A, 7A, 7B, 8 (recipient unregistered), 9A (export), 9A (B2CL), 9B(unregistered), 9C (unregistered), 10, 15 (recipient unregistered), 15A (recipientunregistered) with the value of B2C supplies shown in Table-12. In case of amendments, only the differential value will be taken for the purpose of validation.