Iran-Israel live: Trump says US bombs ‘obliterated' key Iranian nuclear sites; Tehran says ‘dangerous war' has begun
Iran has said a 'dangerous war' with the US has begun after president Donald Trump announced that US warplanes had 'obliterated' three nuclear facility sites in Iran.
At around 8pm ET on Saturday, Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social that 'very successful' strikes had been carried out on the nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.
Iran responded by saying it 'reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people,' and called for an emergency UN Security Council meeting.
Shortly after the US strikes, missile attacks launched by Iran injured 11 people in Israel. The strikes caused severe damage in Tel Aviv, with several two-story residential buildings heavily damaged or collapsing, emergency responders said.
And Israel said it had resumed its own strikes on Sunday morning, targeting military sites in western Iran.
Israel began launching attacks on Iran on 13 June, saying it was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran says its atomic programme is only for peaceful purposes.
Why are Iran and Israel fighting
Israel and Iran have been engaged in shadow warfare for decades, with a long history of clandestine attacks by land, sea, air and cyberspace, which Tehran has conducted via its various proxies and allies in the region.
The two nations had been allies prior to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, which installed a new theocratic regime ideologically opposed to Israel's existence. Israel would also come to view Tehran's nuclear ambitions as an existential threat.
When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, Iran's new regime helped to establish Hezbollah by lending the militant group funds and training. Tehran also funds Hamas in Gaza, Yemen's Houthis, and other paramilitary groups in Iraq and Syria, according to the US State Department.
But after Hamas sparked the ongoing war in Gaza on 7 October 2023, Israel has killed much of the group's senior leadership, while also decimating Hezbollah and striking Houthi targets over the same period, leaving Tehran significantly more isolated.
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:28
Watch: Benjamin Netanyahu reacts to Trump's US military strikes on Iran
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:24
Oman says Trump targeting Iran threatens to 'widen the war', state media reports
Oman has said Donald Trump targeting Iran threatens to 'widen the war', according to state media.
It also reported that Oman accused the US of violating international law.
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:24
Tel Aviv shares jump at open and hit record highs after US strikes Iran nuclear sites
Israeli stocks opened more than 1.5 per cent higher on Sunday and hit fresh all-time highs after the US attacked Iran's nuclear sites.
The broad Tel Aviv 125 index was 1.5 per cent higher, while the blue-chip TA-35 was 1.6 per cent higher in early trading. Shares rose during all five sessions last week, gaining some 6 per cent, as Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military targets.
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:22
Full story: Starmer backs Trump's bombing of Iran saying it 'can never be allowed to develop nuclear weapon'
The US president said the attacks carried out at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan were 'very successful'.
In a statement the prime minister said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.
Whitehall editor Kate Devlin and political editor David Maddox report:
Starmer backs Trump's Iran bombing saying Tehran cannot develop a nuclear weapon
US president bombs Iranian nuclear sites and says key facilities 'completely and totally obliterated'
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:20
Iranian lawmaker says US strikes give Iran legal right to exit nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Iran has the legal right to withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) based on its Article 10 following US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, parliament foreign policy committee head Abbas Golroo said on X on Sunday.
Article 10 states that an NPT member has 'the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country'.
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:17
IAEA chief announces emergency meeting
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief has announced an emergency meeting 'in light of the urgent situation in Iran'.
Rafael Mariano Grossi posted on X this morning: 'In light of the urgent situation in Iran, I am convening an emergency meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors for tomorrow.'
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:14
Saudi Arabia expresses concern after US attacks on Iran nuclear sites
Saudi Arabia expressed its "great concern" following US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, according to a statement by the foreign ministry posted on X on Sunday.
The kingdom called on the international community to boost efforts in such 'highly sensitive circumstances' to reach a political solution to end the crisis.
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:06
Farage backs Trump's decision to strike Iran
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has backed Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran.
He said: "Reform UK stands behind the military actions of the USA overnight.
"Iran must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, the future of Israel depends on it."
Tara Cobham22 June 2025 08:01
Who are Iran's regional allies and could they be activated in its response to US
Iran's so-called Axis of Resistance is a network of militant groups across the Middle East that the country has long relied upon.
However, the network is a shadow of what it was before the war ignited by Hamas' 7 October, 2023, attack on Israel out of the Gaza Strip – but it still has some formidable capabilities.
Israel's 20-month war in Gaza has severely diminished the Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups, and Israel mauled Lebanon's Hezbollah last fall, killing most of its top leadership and devastating much of southern Lebanon, making its involvement unlikely.
But Iran could still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea if the US entered the war, and allied militias in Iraq. Both have drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the United States and its allies.
Iran could also seek to respond through militant attacks further afield, as it is widely accused of doing in the 1990s with an attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina that was blamed on Iran and Hezbollah.
22 June 2025 08:00
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Trump claims a 'total ceasefire' has been agreed - but new missiles launched
Explosions have been heard in Tel Aviv overnight - plunging the US president's claims of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran into doubt. Iran's foreign minister has thanked "our brave Armed Forces who remain ready to defend our dear country until their last drop of blood".
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs
It is concerning when any country has nuclear weapons - but it's a threat the world has learned to manage. There's a basic assumption that most nuclear-armed countries refrain from using atomic bombs out of self-preservation. That is, if they fired nuclear warheads, their country would be destroyed. Defence experts call this 'Mutually Assured Destruction'. But what if a state doesn't fear destruction? What if it welcomes it, viewing it as a gateway to divine salvation? That's long been the concern with Iran. And it's not an exaggerated risk. Iran's nuclear ambitions don't exist in a vacuum. They sit within a broader ideological framework that includes what's known as millenarianism: the belief that the world is heading for a final, transformative clash between good and evil. Years ago, as a university academic, I supervised an honours student whose thesis examined millenarianism. It opened my eyes to its impact on politics in the Middle East. In Shia Islam, millenarianism is tied to the return of the Mahdi, or the Hidden Imam. He is a messianic figure who will emerge in an era of chaos to establish a just Islamic order. This isn't just background noise, by the way. Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad openly embraced this worldview. During his presidency, he not only referred to the Mahdi in speeches, including at the United Nations no less, but his government poured funds into religious preparations for the Mahdi's return. Ahmadinejad believed the apocalypse wasn't to be avoided but welcomed - even hastened. Road upgrades to Jamkaran, home of the mosque linked to the Mahdi's reappearance, were budgeted as national infrastructure. The line between religion and state planning was deliberately blurred. While not every Iranian leader is a millenarian, enough are, and the political system gives them real influence. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which would almost certainly be in control of any Iranian nuclear arsenal were that to eventuate, has leaders who parrot similarly apocalyptic language. General Hossein Salami, the head of the IRGC - before he was recently killed by Israeli strikes - had repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. He described Israel as a 'cancerous tumour' that must be 'destroyed'. There's not a lot of room to move with such rhetoric. It can't be treated as a metaphorical flourish. It is a statement of intent, rooted in a belief that conflict with Israel is religiously sacred. This is why Israel acts the way it does - from targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists to cyber sabotage and the recent airstrikes in Iran. The moves by the US and Israel this past fortnight aren't just about national defence. They're about preventing the unimaginable: a nuclear-armed state run by people who don't fear a true Armageddon. The US under Trump hit three separate nuclear-linked sites, facilities buried deep underground, because no other country has the capability to strike those types of bunkers effectively. The message was clear: diplomacy has its limits when dealing with a state like Iran, which in many ways is a much more dangerous actor than somewhere like North Korea precisely because of its millenarian tendencies. While Iran has always claimed its nuclear program is civilian, about energy not weapons, that claim doesn't pass the sniff test. Places like Fordow, the nuclear fortress buried under mountains, were deliberately shielded from airstrikes precisely because it's not an energy enrichment site. It's designed for survivability in the event of war, which only makes sense if the goal is to build a weapon, not a civilian reactor. The US has now apparently taken care of that. Iran getting the bomb poses other risks. If it was armed with nuclear weapons, we would see nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. If Iran got the bomb, Saudi Arabia would want one (it has said as much), and potentially, so would Turkey. Egypt might seek to build one too. Some in the West forget, or wilfully ignore, that Iran is not the underdog in the Middle East. It is the regional bully. Far from being a besieged victim of aggression Iran is the primary source of destabilisation right across the region. As a Shia theocracy in a predominantly Sunni region Iran's rise is deeply feared by Sunni Arab states. Its nuclear ambitions are seen as part of its ideological mission to reshape the Middle East in its image. It's a revolutionary regime, where parts of the leadership believe global chaos isn't to be avoided, it's to be embraced, because it brings the end times closer. If that doesn't justify aggressive containment measures, what does?
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer to commit to spending 5% of GDP on defence by 2035 at Nato summit
The target, expected to be formally agreed by Nato countries at a summit in The Hague this week, includes spending 3.5% on 'core defence' and another 1.5% on 'resilience and security'. It represents a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and from the UK Government's aim of spending 2.5% of GDP on defence from 2027 and 3% at some point after the next election. But the figure is in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump, who has called for Nato allies to shoulder more of the burden of European defence. Ahead of his trip to the Netherlands, Sir Keir Starmer said the increased spending target was 'an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation's wider security and resilience'. He said: 'We must navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest to deliver security for working people and keep them safe.' The Government expects to spend 1.5% of GDP on resilience and security by 2027. The details of what counts towards that target are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies. But increasing core defence spending to 3.5% will not happen until 2035, with at least two elections likely to take place before then. Nor would Downing Street say how the increase would be paid for, with a spokesman describing the figure as 'a projected target' that allies would review in 2029 when Nato carries out its next capability assessment. The Royal United Services Institute has estimated that increasing core defence spending to 3.5% by 2035 would cost £40 billion a year more than keeping the figure at 2.5%. Conservative shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said the Tories welcomed the higher Nato target, but said the Government's commitment was 'both unfunded and a decade away, when the threat we face is real and imminent.' He said: 'The Chancellor failed to set a path to 3% in the spending review, and this is another announcement without a plan. 'Instead of using smoke and mirrors to inflate defence spending, Labour must get to 3% this parliament and back our country's defence with a fully funded plan.' Sir Keir's announcement came as the Prime Minister prepared to fly to the Netherlands for the two-day Nato summit against the background of both the war in Ukraine and escalating hostilities in the Middle East. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said Sir Keir would continue to press for a diplomatic solution to the Israel-Iran crisis. He will also urge allies to help secure a 'just and lasting peace' in Ukraine by showing strength and providing Kyiv with 'the support it needs to defend itself against continued Russian aggression'. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is also expected to attend the summit, but not take part in the main discussions of the North Atlantic Council. Ahead of the summit, Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte described the move to spend more on defence as a 'quantum leap' that would make the organisation 'a stronger, a fairer and a more lethal alliance'. But it was reported on Sunday that Spain had reached a deal that would see it exempted from the 5% target. Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said that Spain would be able to keep its commitments to the 32-nation military alliance by spending 2.1% of GDP on defence needs. Tuesday will also see the publication of the UK's national security strategy, which is expected to call for the whole of society to become more resilient and recognise national security 'means more than it used to'. The document will tie together a series of reviews commissioned by the Government, including the recent strategic defence review, a review of the Aukus alliance with the US and Australia and an audit of relations with China.
