ScotGov pulls plug on lifeline finance of state ferry fiasco firm
The transport secretary Fiona Hyslop has confirmed that more money would have had to be pumped into the yard to allow it to get a direct uncontested contract to build seven new ferries and secure its future.
But she has admitted in correspondence with former community safety minister Ash Regan that that subsidy was not justified and the contract went to an overseas firm.
Ferguson Marine has been dogged with issues with the delivery of lifeline ferries Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa which were due online in the first half of 2018 when it was under the control of tycoon Jim McColl.
The last estimates suggest the costs of delivery of the vessels for CalMac will have soared to more than five times the original £97m cost.
The shipyard firm which currently employs over 400 staff including over 100 sub-contractors was brought under state control by the Scottish Government at the end of 2019 following its financial collapse under the control of Mr McColl as a row erupted over long delays and mounting costs over the delivery of the vessels.
Nicola Sturgeon on a past visit to the yard (Image: PA)
The yard's business plan to 2029 assumed that the Scottish Government would sanction a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. It was an integral part of a plan to deliver a "sustainable, profitable, efficient and competitive yard".
After it was decided that the £175m contract would go to a competitive tender, Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL), the state-controlled ports owner and ferry procurer declared in March that the job to build seven new loch-class electric ferries would go to Poland.
It previously awarded two other ferry contracts worth to £220m to Cemre Marin Endustri A.S (Turkey) - with Ferguson Marine again losing out.
The board of the loss-making Scottish Government-owned ferry fiasco shipyard firm has admitted that questions over further financial support from ministers was casting a "significant doubt" on its ability to continue operations and that the contact for the seven ferries was seen as crucial.
Meanwhile the Scottish Government said there was an "intention" to give a direct award of a £3.7bn contract to run the Clyde and Hebrides lifeline ferry service from October 1 after a due diligence exercise concluded that there was no legal issue in terms of state aid rules that would prevent that.
Ms Hyslop was asked what assessment was undertaken that resulted in it determining that state-owned ferry operator CalMac should be directly awarded the Clyde & Hebrides Ferry Services (CHFS) contract without an open tender process while stating that doing the same for Ferguson Marine with the small ferries contract was presenting a legal risk.
She replied that there was "no financial, operational or legal impediment" to implementing a direct award to CalMac.
And she added: "Shipbuilding is a competitive global market and a designated sensitive sector under the UK Subsidy Control Act.
"For SVRP [the Small Vessel Replacement Programme] it was assessed that a substantial subsidy would have been required to support direct award of the Phase 1 contract to Fergusons, which we did not consider would be capable of being justified.
"Given no clear path to subsidy control compliance and the risks of legal challenge, ministers concluded that directly awarding the Phase 1 contract would have been likely to lead to the worst of both worlds - a delay in adding new ferries to the network and the yard ultimately not securing any work from the programme."
Her position raises questions over whether it will can win the second phase of the ferry-building programme which involves building three further small ferries.
Ms Regan said: ' If the Scottish Government wants to protect commercial shipbuilding then they will need to invest in Scotland to ensure that Scottish ferries are built in Scotland - not Turkey or Poland.
"The minister says that directly awarding orders to a Scottish shipyard would've resulted in the worst of both worlds, but right now we already have the worst of both worlds - a nationalised shipyard without government orders that can't win private contracts because of mismanagement at the top.
"The response from the Government has revealed that it's not direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset.
"The longer this saga goes on, and the government fails to invest in its own shipyard, the less likely it is that there will be a future that ensures Scotland retains a ferry building capacity and that can only mean Scottish ministers being willing to pull the plug on the lower Clyde's last commercial shipyard. '
READ MORE by Martin Williams:
Why did Scots ministers support award of £395m in ferry contracts to firms abroad
Why does ScotGov keep ploughing public money into the ferry fiasco firm?
ScotGov raises 'doubt' on CalMac getting new ferry contract from October
'People going bananas': New ferry fiasco hits vital island supplies
'Mismanagement': Public cost of Scots ferry fiasco firm hits £750m amidst overspends
The completion of due diligence to confirm vital investment funds worth £14.2m for the yard has already has been held up for nearly a year, even though the money has technically been pencilled in to be awarded over two years.
The Port Glasgow yard, which was featured in a Standing up for Scotland SNP video fronted by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, is also not certain to get the money it needs to complete a lifeline island vessel at the centre of a "new farce" over soaring delays and costs.
The £35m extra public costs for Glen Rosa being asked for by Ferguson Marine is to become subject to further 'due diligence' probing by ministers before a decision is made on whether the extra money will be provided.
Glen Rosa was expected to be taking passengers in September - but now state-owned Ferguson Marine has admitted the full sign off and deliver will not be till the summer of next year - between April and July.
The Scottish Government had already carried out a 'due diligence' exercise over the provision of a direct uncontested contract to Ferguson Marine to build the ferries but minister previously said it was rejected as it was felt it would be subject to a state aid legal challenge.
Ferguson Marine's business plan which assumed that there would be a direct award was approved and submitted in June, last year before being verbally accepted by ministers the following month, when Ms Forbes publicly stated an intention to invest £14.2m to upgrade the yard. The plan was based on the yard remaining under public ownership for at least the next five years.
Concerns over the funding of the yard come after the Herald revealed that the public cost of Ferguson Marine had hit up to £750m. A £69m overspend in 2023/24 alone - with costs totalling £131m was said to be in the main due to huge slump in the value of the two fiasco ferries.
Financial statements up to 2025/26 had revealed that budgets set by the Scottish Government for Ferguson Marine were overspent to the tune of £210m in the first five years since it was nationalised at the end of 2019 as it attempted to deliver two long-delayed and wildly over-budget lifeline ferries.
The costs so far of the beleaguered Inverclyde shipyard firm - which includes sums to cover running costs, wages and a dramatic slump in the value of the stricken vessels - soared to just nearly £710m before the board last month sought £35m more public money from the Scottish Government because of further rises in costs to deliver Glen Rosa, the second of the two ferries.
The Ferguson Marine bill is enough to cover the cost of 13 ferries of the type currently being built for Scotland at the Cemre Marin Endustri shipyard in Turkey.
Kate Forbes at Ferguson Marine (Image: Andrew Milligan) Ms Forbes has consistently told MSPs that the £14.2m support package over two years to help secure Ferguson Marine's future was in place and in March told MSPs that "hundreds of jobs have been protected only because of the actions of the Government".
In March she told MSPs that there needed to be support for Ferguson Marine to be as competitive as possible so that it is able to secure work through a fair and open procurement process and that "that is the reason for the £14.2m investment"
She further told them: "The bottom line is that we have agreed to invest £14.2 million in equipment for the yard so that it can compete on a global basis."
But officials had consistently confirmed to the Herald that the two-year investment remains subject to the kind of due diligence tests that stopped the yard from directly getting the small vessels ferry contract.
That due diligence investigation, which involves passing detailed legal analysis and independent financial and commercial assessments, was supposed to be complete by the Autumn of last year.
The board of the loss-making Scottish Government-owned firm has admitted that questions over further financial support from ministers is casting a "significant doubt" on its ability to continue operations as losses incurred by Ferguson Marine have totalled over £2.7m in the last two full years.
Ferguson Marine has a 'letter of comfort' which says that "it is our present policy, including with active consideration of the business plan budget and future work of the group, subject to the approval of the Scottish Parliament and in so far as permitted by applicable laws and withing agreed budgets for at least a period of 12 months...to continue to provide support to the group".
Despite that, the board in financial papers acknowledged that there [is] uncertainty surrounding the future levels of support required....including due diligence surrounding letters of assurance and investment in the yard [that] indicate a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the group's ability to continue as a going concern and, that it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business."
Ferguson Marine (Port Glasgow) which made a net loss of £1.3m in 2022/23 had previously been concerned about the risks to the business and pointed to a failure to get a committed investment at that point of £25m to support future work at the Inverclyde after the delivery of Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa.
Ousted Ferguson Marine chief executive David Tydeman has indicated that even the reduced £14.2m over two year would not itself be enough.
Under his leadership, the shipyard which relies on public funds, had stated that a failure to get a committed investment of £25m to support future work had cast "significant doubt" on its ability to continue.
Investment was required for a vital new plating line and software to raise productivity and help it compete for future work and it was hoped there would be delivery by December, last year. But that hasn't happened.
At the time Ferguson Marine admitted it was not as competitive as other yards that have modern plating lines and modern facilities.
As the plating line cannot be installed for nearly two years the yard would not get decent productivity until 2027, even if ordered now, which makes pricing for future work harder.
Mr Tydeman was fired on March 26, last year after a tumultuous two years at the helm of the nationalised shipyard after he told ministers there would be even further delays to Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa.
Ferguson Marine declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Water: Swinney signed off on £3m of 'fat cat' bonuses
The Herald has seen confirmation that from 2010 to 2021, John Swinney was responsible for approving the payouts to Scottish Water described as "incentive plans" when he was finance secretary. He had during that time been critical of bonus payments when paid by councils, universities and other public bodies. The bonuses and benefits bill at Scottish Water amounted to £2.8m in the final eight years of his role. The three key directors including then chief Douglas Millican received benefits and bonuses worth £628,000 in 2021/22 alone and it included £395,000 from a Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) covering a period from 2015 to 2021. Present and past chief executive of Scottish Water - Douglas Millican and Alex Plant (Image: Newsquest) The biggest payout came in 2015/16 when the then four-man board received a total of £669,000 - including a further LTIP bonus. State-owned Scottish Water has been included amongst the list of bodies, including Scottish Government's core directorates, its associated departments, agencies and corporations that the Scottish Government's public sector pay policy applies to. Other state-owned firms such as Ferguson Marine are not included. The public sector pay policy says that the suspension of bonuses allows public bodies to maximise their resources to "address fair pay issues and pay awards". The Scottish Government insists it is exempt. It comes as water bills in Scotland increased by almost 10% in April while Scottish Water is in the midst of a bitter pay dispute with staff. The long-standing policy says that the suspension applies to all non-consolidated performance payments. It was Mr Swinney himself that said that bonuses would be suspended back in 2010 while saying that public sector salaries would be frozen. And in 2015, he hit out at bonus payments totalling almost £7m paid by councils, universities and other public bodies in 2013/14. He had said it would be a "good idea" if these organisations followed the Scottish Government's example and ended the practice of awarding bonuses at a time of continued pressure on the public purse. He said at the time: "One of the tough decisions I took was to restrict public sector pay policy to enable us to maintain employment levels in the public sector. "It meant also that bonuses had to come to an end and that was the right decision to protect public services and the public finances." Read more by Martin Williams: But in the wake of The Herald's revelations about the extent of the latest bonuses at Scottish Water, Mr Swinney defended the awards. He states in March in a response to questions in Parliament: "When it comes to the recruitment of leadership for Scottish Water, we are invariably in competition with other water companies around the United Kingdom. "In that competition, the element of bonuses is part of the fabric of the financial settlements that are available to attract employees. Comparatively, bonus payments for the leadership of Scottish Water are much lower than those in other parts of the United Kingdom and the performance of Scottish Water is much higher than that of companies in other parts of the United Kingdom. "I acknowledge that those are difficult comparisons to make, but they are part of the judgments that the Government has to arrive at on how we attract the leadership to safeguard the important asset that is Scottish Water." Former Scottish Labour leader and current convener of the parliamentary public audit committee Richard Leonard said the bonuses should not exist and that they should go into a pay pot for the benefit of everyone. Richard Leonard (Image: Scottish Parliament TV) He said of Mr Swinney's involvement: 'This is a failure of political leadership. 'John Swinney personally sanctioned and signed off bonuses and benefits for Scottish Water bosses for more than a decade, so we perhaps should not be surprised to see him defending them now. "He is now choosing to use his office as First Minister to stand up for Scottish Water executive excesses rather than backing Scottish Water workers. He is on the wrong side of the argument." In 2022/23 three key executives of Scottish Water, Douglas Millican, Peter Farrer and Alan Scott, between them pulled in £242,000 in performance bonuses and benefits which include car allowances and inclusion on a life assurance scheme on top of six-figure salaries. But since the installation of chief executive Alex Plant in place of Douglas Millican in 2023 the executive bonuses have risen to £329,000 in 2023/24. Mr Plant in the first ten months in post as chief executive received bonuses and benefits amounting to £170,000 on top of a £246,000 basic salary, taking his remuneration package including pension to £483,000. Those benefits included a one-off £73,000 payment made to Mr Plant - who had previously been director of strategy and regulation at Anglian Water - to relocate to Scotland. That included £13,000 in relocation assistance, an accommodation allowance of £29,000 and a contribution of £42,000 towards Land and Building Transaction Tax (LBTT) associated with the purchase of a new permanent home. Scottish Water has defended the salary packages saying that they maintain and operate a "simple remuneration structure" with a pay policy that aims are to "attract, develop, motivate and retain highly talented people at all levels of the organisation" and to "incentivise and reward good individual and corporate performance as well as out-performance". But GMB Scotland has been fiercely critical of 'fat cat' bonuses as it is one of the unions in dispute with the utility over a 7% pay rise over two years which they say falls short of what other public sector workers in Scotland have received. Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser in Scottish Water, said: 'The First Minister's defence of indefensible bonuses to Scottish Water executives while workers are having to fight and scratch for a fair rise is disappointing and frustrating but sadly not surprising. Claire Greer (Image: GMB) "The same leadership team being heaped with financial rewards has led the company into a long-running industrial dispute after entirely failing to engage with the workforce in a constructive, clear and fair way. 'If John Swinney really believes that failure, that dereliction of duty at a publicly-owned company, merits such exorbitant bonuses he is living in a very different world to its workers. "If these bonuses are really in line with the Scottish Government's public pay policy then it is not a policy at all but window dressing that is unfit for purpose and needs overhauled.' Scottish Water, which serves more than 2.6m households, operates under an annual borrowing limit set by the Scottish Government. The annual borrowing limit controls the amount by which Scottish Water can increase externally sourced finance. Net new borrowing by Scottish Water from the Scottish Government was planned to be to the tune of £170m in 2024/25 to carry out its activities. As at March 31, 2024, government loans to Scottish Water totalled £4.7 billion. Scottish Water declined to comment. A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Scottish Water has a longstanding exemption on this point of Public Sector Pay Policy in recognition of its operating model and the need to retain staff in competition with the private sector. "The framework for bonus payments has to be approved by Scottish Ministers who have reviewed this ahead of each regulatory period since 2007-2011. The current framework was approved in advance of the 2021-27 regulatory period.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Plan to demolish pub to make way for student flats approved
Plans for new student flats at the site of the former Murrayfield Sports Bar in Gorgie were approved by a committee in Edinburgh. The proposals will create 80 units of student accommodation for the area which has nearby amenities for students and a direct public transport link to Edinburgh University's main campus. The developer said the proposals 'can also help shift students out of flatted accommodation to free up much needed housing during a 'housing emergency''. The site. (Image: Fletcher Joseph/Google) Maurice McCann, development manager on behalf of EH1 Students Gorgie, said: 'I'm absolutely delighted to get the backing of Edinburgh's planning committee for our first student housing proposal in the city. We're determined to make this a development of which Gorgie and the city can be proud and one that will provide an outstanding living experience for the students who choose to stay here.' Tony Banks, chief executive at EH1, said: 'It is good to see planning approved for this development. It will be a great addition to the city's accommodation for students and free up capacity in the stretched housing system in Edinburgh. We welcome this positive step and look forward to continuing to invest in the city as the project progresses.' Harrods-owned H Beauty officially launches Silverburn store H Beauty has opened its second Scottish store with the brand officially launching its Silverburn shop.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
ScotGov pulls plug on lifeline subsidy of state ferry fiasco firm
The transport secretary Fiona Hyslop confirmed a "substantial subsidy" was needed to allow it to get a direct uncontested contract to build seven new ferries and secure its future. But she has admitted in correspondence with former community safety minister Ash Regan that that subsidy was not justified and the contract went to an overseas firm. Ms Regan has raised concerns that it was "not the direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset". The Scottish Government denied on Thursday evening that any funding had been halted. Ferguson Marine has been dogged with issues with the delivery of lifeline ferries Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa which were due online in the first half of 2018 when it was under the control of tycoon Jim McColl. The last estimates suggest the costs of delivery of the vessels for CalMac will have soared to more than five times the original £97m cost. The shipyard firm which currently employs over 400 staff including over 100 sub-contractors was brought under state control by the Scottish Government at the end of 2019 following its financial collapse under the control of Mr McColl as a row erupted over long delays and mounting costs over the delivery of the vessels. Nicola Sturgeon on a past visit to the yard (Image: PA) The yard's business plan to 2029 assumed that the Scottish Government would sanction a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. It was an integral part of a plan to deliver a "sustainable, profitable, efficient and competitive yard". After it was decided that the £175m contract would go to a competitive tender, Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL), the state-controlled ports owner and ferry procurer declared in March that the job to build seven new loch-class electric ferries would go to Poland. It previously awarded two other ferry contracts worth to £220m to Cemre Marin Endustri A.S (Turkey) - with Ferguson Marine again losing out. The board of the loss-making Scottish Government-owned ferry fiasco shipyard firm has admitted that questions over further financial support from ministers was casting a "significant doubt" on its ability to continue operations and that the contact for the seven ferries was seen as crucial. Meanwhile the Scottish Government said there was an "intention" to give a direct award of a £3.7bn contract to run the Clyde and Hebrides lifeline ferry service from October 1 after a due diligence exercise concluded that there was no legal issue in terms of state aid rules that would prevent that. Ms Hyslop was asked what assessment was undertaken that resulted in it determining that state-owned ferry operator CalMac should be directly awarded the Clyde & Hebrides Ferry Services (CHFS) contract without an open tender process while stating that doing the same for Ferguson Marine with the small ferries contract was presenting a legal risk. She replied that there was "no financial, operational or legal impediment" to implementing a direct award to CalMac. And she added: "Shipbuilding is a competitive global market and a designated sensitive sector under the UK Subsidy Control Act. "For SVRP [the Small Vessel Replacement Programme] it was assessed that a substantial subsidy would have been required to support direct award of the Phase 1 contract to Fergusons, which we did not consider would be capable of being justified. "Given no clear path to subsidy control compliance and the risks of legal challenge, ministers concluded that directly awarding the Phase 1 contract would have been likely to lead to the worst of both worlds - a delay in adding new ferries to the network and the yard ultimately not securing any work from the programme." Her position raises questions over whether it will can win the second phase of the ferry-building programme which involves building three further small ferries. Ms Regan said: ' If the Scottish Government wants to protect commercial shipbuilding then they will need to invest in Scotland to ensure that Scottish ferries are built in Scotland - not Turkey or Poland. "The minister says that directly awarding orders to a Scottish shipyard would've resulted in the worst of both worlds, but right now we already have the worst of both worlds - a nationalised shipyard without government orders that can't win private contracts because of mismanagement at the top. "The response from the Government has revealed that it's not direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset. "The longer this saga goes on, and the government fails to invest in its own shipyard, the less likely it is that there will be a future that ensures Scotland retains a ferry building capacity and that can only mean Scottish ministers being willing to pull the plug on the lower Clyde's last commercial shipyard. ' READ MORE by Martin Williams: Why did Scots ministers support award of £395m in ferry contracts to firms abroad Why does ScotGov keep ploughing public money into the ferry fiasco firm? ScotGov raises 'doubt' on CalMac getting new ferry contract from October 'People going bananas': New ferry fiasco hits vital island supplies 'Mismanagement': Public cost of Scots ferry fiasco firm hits £750m amidst overspends The completion of due diligence to confirm vital investment funds worth £14.2m for the yard has already has been held up for nearly a year, even though the money has technically been pencilled in to be awarded over two years. The Port Glasgow yard, which was featured in a Standing up for Scotland SNP video fronted by former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, is also not certain to get the money it needs to complete a lifeline island vessel at the centre of a "new farce" over soaring delays and costs. The £35m extra public costs for Glen Rosa being asked for by Ferguson Marine is to become subject to further 'due diligence' probing by ministers before a decision is made on whether the extra money will be provided. Glen Rosa was expected to be taking passengers in September - but now state-owned Ferguson Marine has admitted the full sign off and deliver will not be till the summer of next year - between April and July. The Scottish Government had already carried out a 'due diligence' exercise over the provision of a direct uncontested contract to Ferguson Marine to build the ferries but minister previously said it was rejected as it was felt it would be subject to a state aid legal challenge. Ferguson Marine's business plan which assumed that there would be a direct award was approved and submitted in June, last year before being verbally accepted by ministers the following month, when Ms Forbes publicly stated an intention to invest £14.2m to upgrade the yard. The plan was based on the yard remaining under public ownership for at least the next five years. Concerns over the funding of the yard come after the Herald revealed that the public cost of Ferguson Marine had hit up to £750m. A £69m overspend in 2023/24 alone - with costs totalling £131m was said to be in the main due to huge slump in the value of the two fiasco ferries. Financial statements up to 2025/26 had revealed that budgets set by the Scottish Government for Ferguson Marine were overspent to the tune of £210m in the first five years since it was nationalised at the end of 2019 as it attempted to deliver two long-delayed and wildly over-budget lifeline ferries. The costs so far of the beleaguered Inverclyde shipyard firm - which includes sums to cover running costs, wages and a dramatic slump in the value of the stricken vessels - soared to just nearly £710m before the board last month sought £35m more public money from the Scottish Government because of further rises in costs to deliver Glen Rosa, the second of the two ferries. The Ferguson Marine bill is enough to cover the cost of 13 ferries of the type currently being built for Scotland at the Cemre Marin Endustri shipyard in Turkey. Kate Forbes at Ferguson Marine (Image: Andrew Milligan) Ms Forbes has consistently told MSPs that the £14.2m support package over two years to help secure Ferguson Marine's future was in place and in March told MSPs that "hundreds of jobs have been protected only because of the actions of the Government". In March she told MSPs that there needed to be support for Ferguson Marine to be as competitive as possible so that it is able to secure work through a fair and open procurement process and that "that is the reason for the £14.2m investment" She further told them: "The bottom line is that we have agreed to invest £14.2 million in equipment for the yard so that it can compete on a global basis." But officials had consistently confirmed to the Herald that the two-year investment remains subject to the kind of due diligence tests that stopped the yard from directly getting the small vessels ferry contract. That due diligence investigation, which involves passing detailed legal analysis and independent financial and commercial assessments, was supposed to be complete by the Autumn of last year. The board of the loss-making Scottish Government-owned firm has admitted that questions over further financial support from ministers is casting a "significant doubt" on its ability to continue operations as losses incurred by Ferguson Marine have totalled over £2.7m in the last two full years. Ferguson Marine has a 'letter of comfort' which says that "it is our present policy, including with active consideration of the business plan budget and future work of the group, subject to the approval of the Scottish Parliament and in so far as permitted by applicable laws and withing agreed budgets for at least a period of 12 continue to provide support to the group". Despite that, the board in financial papers acknowledged that there [is] uncertainty surrounding the future levels of support due diligence surrounding letters of assurance and investment in the yard [that] indicate a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the group's ability to continue as a going concern and, that it may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business." Ferguson Marine (Port Glasgow) which made a net loss of £1.3m in 2022/23 had previously been concerned about the risks to the business and pointed to a failure to get a committed investment at that point of £25m to support future work at the Inverclyde after the delivery of Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa. Ousted Ferguson Marine chief executive David Tydeman has indicated that even the reduced £14.2m over two year would not itself be enough. Under his leadership, the shipyard which relies on public funds, had stated that a failure to get a committed investment of £25m to support future work had cast "significant doubt" on its ability to continue. Investment was required for a vital new plating line and software to raise productivity and help it compete for future work and it was hoped there would be delivery by December, last year. But that hasn't happened. At the time Ferguson Marine admitted it was not as competitive as other yards that have modern plating lines and modern facilities. As the plating line cannot be installed for nearly two years the yard would not get decent productivity until 2027, even if ordered now, which makes pricing for future work harder. Mr Tydeman was fired on March 26, last year after a tumultuous two years at the helm of the nationalised shipyard after he told ministers there would be even further delays to Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa. Ferguson Marine declined to comment. The Scottish Government was approached for comment at lunchtime on Wednesday but did not respond until 6.41pm on Thursday A spokesman said: "Any reports that funding to the Ferguson Marine shipyard has been halted is completely untrue. Scottish Government funding for the yard is set out in the 2025/26 Scottish budget. "As previously set out, the Scottish Government stands ready to invest up to £14.2 million over two years, subject to due diligence and commercial standards being met, to help enhance yard infrastructure and deliver productivity improvements to help it win more work."
