logo
Harbour Energy under fire over nearly £1bn in dividends amid job cuts

Harbour Energy under fire over nearly £1bn in dividends amid job cuts

The National18-05-2025

The North Sea oil and gas firm recently revealed plans to axe around 250 jobs in Scotland – about a quarter of its workforce in Aberdeen.
The job losses are on top of 350 roles that were cut by the firm in 2023.
The firm and union leaders have suggested the Energy Profits Levy – widely known as the windfall tax – is largely to blame.
The tax was introduced in 2022 after companies recorded skyrocketing profits due to a sharp rise in energy prices. It was then increased in last year's Budget and means oil and gas producers are paying a headline tax rate of 78%.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer to close legal route that allowed Palestinian family to settle in UK
Scott Barr, managing director of the firm's UK business, said of the expected job losses: "The review is unfortunately necessary to align staffing levels with lower levels of investment, due mainly to the Government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment."
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham, meanwhile, said it's clear that the UK Government policy is 'directly leading to thousands of jobs being axed and to decommissioning plans being accelerated'.
But doubts have now been cast on these claims, with campaigners and the Scottish Greens questioning why Harbour Energy has paid out $1.2bn (roughly £910 million) in dividends to shareholders and share buybacks in the last three years alone.
Next week, a proposed dividend of $227.5 million on ordinary shares is also set to be paid out according to a Trading and Operations Update in which the firm reaffirmed its $455m annual dividend policy.
It was dated May 8 – the day after the job cuts were announced.
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie MSP told the Sunday National it was 'yet another example of fossil fuel executives pocketing vast sums of money at the expense of Scottish workers and our planet'.
'Time and again, we've seen that fossil fuel companies are just as willing to abandon their workforce as they are to wreck the climate,' he said.
'It's no secret that the fossil fuel industry is in decline, but instead of moving with the times, these companies would rather scrape the barrel for their own profit than be part of Scotland's green industrial future.'
Harvie (above) went on: 'Fossil fuel workers deserve better, they need the opportunity to transition to green jobs in renewables, construction or any of the other vast new career paths opening in Scotland, but that can only happen with support from the Scottish and UK Governments.
'In 2024 alone, there were more than 28,000 green jobs advertised in Scotland, that's more than the total jobs currently directly filled in the North Sea oil sector. The direction of travel is clear for Scotland's industry, and it's time for governments to back a just transition for Scottish workers and communities.'
Rosie Hampton, oil and gas campaigns manager at Friends of the Earth Scotland, also hit out at the firm.
'Harbour Energy bosses have been shedding crocodile tears about the windfall tax, laying off oil workers with one hand and paying out billions to shareholders with another,' she said.
'The numbers show that the money for a fair energy transition is there, but Harbour Energy is more interested in spending it in the boardroom than on their workers in the North Sea. Time and time again, private companies have shown that they cannot be trusted to lead the energy transition, yet both the UK and Scottish Governments are allowing them to run rampant at the expense of workers and the climate.'
Hampton added: 'We urgently need to see the Government step in and lead the North Sea transition. That means investing in publicly owned wind manufacturing, upgrading and taking equity stakes in our ports, and creating a training fund that properly supports oil and gas workers to move to secure, unionised renewables jobs.'
Harbour Energy managing director Barr, meanwhile, said: 'Harbour is launching a review of its UK operations, which we expect to result in a reduction of around 250 onshore roles in our Aberdeen-based business unit.
'The review is unfortunately necessary to align staffing levels with lower levels of investment, due mainly to the Government's ongoing punitive fiscal position and a challenging regulatory environment.
'We are also reviewing the resourcing required to support our Viking carbon capture and storage project, where progress beyond front-end engineering design and the recent securing of a Development Consent Order has been hindered by repeated delays to the Government's Track 2 process.
'Harbour remains among the largest producers in the UK North Sea and, while our dedicated and highly skilled people will continue to produce vital energy safely and responsibly, we must take these difficult steps in response to the challenges presented by the current external environment.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Free bus pass in England latest as Government issues update
Free bus pass in England latest as Government issues update

Daily Mirror

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Free bus pass in England latest as Government issues update

A petition on the parliament website has been growing in support with 63,000 people calling for a change. But the Department for Transport has now responded with a warning The Department for Transport has issued a fresh update on the mounting pressure to provide travellers on buses in England with the same concessions as those in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. A parliamentary petition has garnered significant support, with over 63,000 people advocating for a change in policy. Presently, people over 60 years old in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are entitled to free bus travel. However, in England, it is up to local authorities, which often face financial constraints, to provide funding for such initiatives. As a result, free bus travel for the over-60s is only available in a handful of areas, including Merseyside and London. ‌ The petition, which has amassed 63,285 signatures, states: "We call on the Government to extend free bus travel to all people over 60 years old in England outside London. We believe the current situation is unjust and we want equality for everyone over 60. ‌ "Currently, people in England who do not live in London are not entitled to free bus travel until they reach the state pension age, which we believe has changed dramatically. "As people get older some over 60s drive less and less, therefore we believe we need equality on public transport. It would mean England had the same provision as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland." In a recent Parliamentary inquiry, Labour's Markus Campbell-Savours quizzed Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander about the effects of granting free bus passes to those 60 and over on various aspects including social inclusion, the economy, and the environment, reports Lancs Live. Answering the query, Parliamentary Under-Secretary Simon Lightwood from the Department for Transport warned that such a move might come with a hefty price tag, yet indicated there's a glimmer of hope as local authorities have received funds in the most recent financial agreement which could be channelled towards this purpose. He explained: "The English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age, currently sixty-six. "The ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme's financial sustainability. ‌ "No assessment has been made of the potential impact of lowering the age on social inclusion, the economy or the environment. "Local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations such as lowering the age of eligibility. Additional local concessions are provided and funded by local authorities from local resources. "The government has confirmed £955 million for the 2025 to 2026 financial year to support and improve bus services in England outside London. This includes £243 million for bus operators and £712 million allocated to local authorities across the country. "Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish. This could include extending the discretionary concessions available in local areas to support the local economy and environment." To view the petition and a full response from the Department for Transport click here.

Badenoch to launch review examining whether UK should pull out of ECHR
Badenoch to launch review examining whether UK should pull out of ECHR

North Wales Chronicle

time24 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Badenoch to launch review examining whether UK should pull out of ECHR

The commission will examine whether Britain should pull out of a series of agreements, it is understood. It comes ahead of a speech Conservative leader Mrs Badenoch is expected to make on Friday. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Mrs Badenoch has stopped short of calling for the UK to leave, but in February she suggested that the UK would 'probably' have to withdraw from the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'. She told a London event: 'When it comes to the ECHR, I have always been very clear that the ECHR should not stop us from doing what is right for the people of this country and what is right in our national interest. 'And if it continues to do so, at some point we will probably have to leave. 'What I have not agreed with is deciding that we should leave without having a plan for what that looks like and how to do so in a way that makes sense.' The Convention's Article 8 – a right to a family life – has been notably used by foreign criminals to avoid deportation from the UK. The Government's immigration white paper released last month promised legislation to 'strengthen the public interest test to make it clear that Parliament needs to be able to control our country's borders and take back control over who comes to, and stays in the UK'. Sir Keir Starmer said at the time that the 'the right balance' needed to be made between individual rights and 'the national interest'.

Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit
Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Five MILLION pensioners could get winter fuel allowance in chaotic Labour U-turn - but millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit

Five million pensioners could get winter fuel allowance reinstated this year under Labour's humiliating climbdown, it was claimed today. However, millions more face higher tax bills to 'claw back' the benefit - worth up to £300. And there are concerns that bereaved families could be hit with unexpected demands for cash. The complicated solution has been mooted after months of scrambling to defuse fury at the policy. It was one of the first announcements Rachel Reeves made after entering No11, and has been blamed for triggering the dramatic slump in Labour's popularity. Keir Starmer dramatically announced a U-turn on the plans last month, without saying what exactly was being proposed or when it would take effect. Yesterday the Chancellor confirmed confirmed the changes would be in place 'this winter' – but was still unable to say who will qualify. She also said the Government will not set out how the reinstated payments will be funded until the Autumn Budget. Designing a cost-effective means test for the benefit - which ministers are adamant should not be paid to 'millionaires' - has been causing major headaches for officials. According to the Times, the Treasury has drawn up an option that would hand winter fuel payments to all 10million pensioners this season. But there would then be an equivalent tax charge for those with incomes above a threshold. That could be set at the average household disposable income of £37,000. In that case around half of pensioners would end up paying back the allowance to the Treasury later. But there are concerns that the government would end up chasing repayments from the families of pensioners who die after receiving the handouts, but before the tax settlement. Pensions minister Torset Bell is facing an angry backlash after he claimed that scrapping the winter fuel allowance had 'no effect' on the health of older people. Mr Bell told MPs that among those who had been hit by the cuts 'we see no differential effects on their health'. Dennis Reed, of over-60s campaign group Silver Voices, said: 'It is a ridiculous thing to say. 'We know from our own members that a lot of people have been shivering in their homes with their overcoats on last winter because they were too afraid to put the heating on. 'Many conditions, such as arthritis and respiratory conditions, are made worse by the cold – how can he possibly claim it's had no effect?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store