logo
One Year of the GNU: How the ANC-DA pact betrayed voters and blocked real change

One Year of the GNU: How the ANC-DA pact betrayed voters and blocked real change

IOL News7 hours ago

As the GNU marks one year, analysts eveal how collusions, fake promises, and ideological divides—especially between the ANC, DA, and excluded parties like the EFF—have complicated governance in a coalition government new to the nation.
Image: IOL Graphic
Arrogance, secretive deals, broken promises, and a surprise ANC-DA alliance, excluding the EFF and MK , is what defined the fallout of the ANC's lost majority, as the Government of National Unity (GNU) marks one year.
What began as an urgent response to a hung national election outcome in May 2024 has revealed itself, critics say, as a fragile alliance marred by internal tensions, ideological contradictions, and a growing trust deficit.
Political analyst Professor Bheki Mngomezulu of Nelson Mandela University (NMU) described the arrangement as mischaracterised from the beginning.
'It's not a GNU in the true sense. What we have is a coalition government at the national level,' Mngomezulu told IOL News.
'The way they projected it, calling it a GNU - is misleading. A GNU has its own dynamics, which differ from a multi-party coalition.'
Mngomezulu said South Africa failed to manage the coalition process effectively, as it was the first of its kind at the national level since democracy began in 1994.
'It came unexpectedly to the politicians. But to some of us watching from afar, it was predictable. The ANC was losing support, the DA wasn't gaining ground, and the EFF was stagnating.'
After the May 2024 elections, the African National Congress (ANC) secured just 40% of the vote, failing to maintain its decades-long parliamentary majority.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Following weeks of negotiations, a statement of intent was signed by 10 parties, among them the ANC, Democratic Alliance (DA), Inkatha Freedom Party, GOOD Party, Freedom Front Plus, United Democratic Movement, Al Jama-ah, Rise Mzansi, and others, establishing the coalition government at the national level.
Not surprisingly, tensions have flared within the GNU, especially between DA and ANC, as policy disagreements continue to strain the coalition.
The stability and future of the GNU have remained precarious, with ongoing infighting casting doubt on the coalition's ability to govern effectively.
This has left many South Africans still wondering, what really took place behind closed doors during the formation of the GNU?
However, Mngomezulu and Professor Ntsikelelo Breakfast agree: the foundation was unstable from the start.
Breakfast said the ANC's 'arrogance of power' contributed to its electoral loss and subsequent reliance on coalition partners.
'They were voted out, and then ended up at 40%, which created scope for a coalition,' he said.
'It was unexpected for the ANC and DA to end up in the same bed, given their ideological differences. But in my view, market forces played a role. Remember the delegation to the US with Johann Rupert and others?'
Breakfast believes the ANC chose the DA and other centrist parties to block more radical actors, namely Julius Malema's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and Jacob Zuma's uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, from entering government.
'The ANC sacrificed to work with the Freedom Front and the DA to avoid working with the EFF or MK,' he said.
'They used the GNU label to avoid the word 'coalition,' which carries more baggage.'
Breakfast added that DA leader John Steenhuisen admitted the party joined the GNU not out of alignment with the ANC, but to block the EFF and MK Party from participating in governance.
On the other side, Mngomezulu argued that the coalition's failure to deliver on promises reflects deeper issues of dishonesty and misalignment.
'They're not reading from the same script,' he said.
'The DA has openly said it joined just to keep the EFF and MK out, which shows it wasn't based on genuine cooperation.'
Policy differences have also been stark.
'On domestic policy, foreign policy, everything - they differ,' said Mngomezulu.
'The ANC is pro-Palestine, the DA is pro-Israel. That's not sustainable.'
He also criticised the ANC's continued dominance in tone and posture.
'They behave like they're still the sole governing party,' he said.
'Even the president once said the ANC is still in charge because they have the president, deputy president, and most ministers. That's not how a coalition work.'
Breakfast agreed, adding different interpretations of the coalition's framework.
'The ANC says it's a GNU. The DA says it's a coalition. These conflicting understandings are destabilising,' he said.
The GNU has also struggled to present a united front on key legislation.
Contentious laws such as the National Health Insurance (NHI) Bill, the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill, and the Land Expropriation Act were passed despite opposition from coalition members.
The DA's Leon Schreiber and Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube both initially opposed legislation their parties disagreed with, only to later fall in line.
The DA had strongly opposed the Employment Equity Amendment Act, however the ANC and other its Minister of Employment and Labour Nomakhosazana Meth, had backed it.
One of the biggest tests was the budget impasse, which required three attempts by the Finance Minister, Enoch Godongwana to pass.
Breakfast downplayed these tensions as normal.
'Globally, coalitions have ups and downs. Germany, the Netherlands, and even Israel experience this. Most conflicts revolve around budgets,' he said.
'Still, better conflict management structures could have prevented some of these issues.'
Mngomezulu, however, sees these incidents as signs of deeper instability.
'The GNU was never united. It was staged authenticity, something inauthentic presented as if it were real,' he said.
'Look at the DA litigating against the government it's part of. That makes a mockery of the whole arrangement.'
Despite repeated threats to exit the GNU, particularly from the DA, both analysts agree the party is unlikely to walk away.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ActionSA declines participation in Government of National Unity amidst scathing review
ActionSA declines participation in Government of National Unity amidst scathing review

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

ActionSA declines participation in Government of National Unity amidst scathing review

ActionSA's parliamentary leader Athol Trollip says ActionSA is not joining the GNU. Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers ActionSA has made a U-turn on its interest in joining the Government of National Unity (GNU) just two months after it partnered with the ANC, which leads the GNU, in passing the Budget vote. The party released its "GNU Performance Tracker" on Tuesday, which aims to objectively assess the coalition government's performance last year. The tracker paints a bleak picture of the government's failures, awarding it a series of failing grades across six critical themes, including ethical leadership and public service, the economy, infrastructure, basic services, education, and crime. Despite indications from its leader, Herman Mashaba, just months ago that it may consider joining the coalition, that includes the DA, Action SA has slammed the GNU effectively ruling out joining. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ A while ago the party saved the ANC from being embarrassed after it voted with them during the passing of the 0.5 percentage point VAT hike and the fiscal framework document in parliament. Mashaba, at the time, had shown interest in joining the GNU. However, ActionSA's parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, has ruled out these assertions, saying his party would rather focus on being a constructive opposition. Trollip said supporting the ANC in passing the Budget did not mean they were interested in joining the GNU. 'We have always maintained that the ANC when we were backing them during the budget battle, that we didn't want any incentives or to be part of the GNU,' he reportedly said. He added that his party did not regret its decision not to join the GNU arrangement a year ago. While the EFF and the uMkhonto weSizwe Party also widely criticised the GNU's performance one year on, ActionSA gave the government an F for leadership and public service, citing excessive government spending and criticising the size of the "bloated cabinet". ActionSA MP Alan Beasley painted a grim picture of unemployment and the economy, awarding the government an F-grade. "In South Africa, we have 8.3 million people unemployed. There are a further 3.5 million workers who have been discouraged who have given up looking for work. So, there are nearly 12 million South Africans that are unemployed — 12 million South Africans that are being psychologically murdered because of unemployment," Beasley said. ActionSA's education assessment revealed critical systemic failures, with the high school dropout rate alarming. Only 53.6% of students who start grade 10 complete matric, a number that had dropped from 55.3% in 2024. The crime landscape also remained dire, with a staggering 5,727 murders recorded between January and March 2025. "We don't want to be in the Government of National Unity. We are perfectly placed between a hegemonic GNU and a big, but hopeless opposition," Trollip said. He said the party will focus on being a constructive opposition, supporting where it can and opposing where it must.

SA needs structural reform and moral courage, not more fiscal tinkering
SA needs structural reform and moral courage, not more fiscal tinkering

Daily Maverick

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

SA needs structural reform and moral courage, not more fiscal tinkering

At the third time of asking, on Wednesday, 11 June, Parliament considered, debated and voted for the 2025 Fiscal Framework, the basis for the Government of National Unity's (GNU) very first budget. To paraphrase former US congressman and economist Phil Gramm, passing a pro-growth budget is like going to heaven – everybody wants to do it, but nobody wants to do what you have to do to get there. Unfortunately, the GNU was not willing to do what it takes, and instead pushed through a budget that will not produce the rapid investment and growth required to begin our journey out of the economic doldrums. Growth flat, investment dried up, and taxes on the rise. We will be back here next year, facing another round of tax increases, because there will have been little to no investment. A budget ought to be a blueprint for progress. A reflection of our values, our priorities and our path forward as a country. The 2025 Fiscal Framework was preceded by the GNU's 31 priorities in its Medium-Term Development Plan, a bold promise of reform and delivery. Yet the Fiscal Framework tabled in Parliament offers no clear roadmap for achieving those priorities. There is no strategic alignment between what the government says it wants to do and what it is willing to fund. Without that alignment, these priorities are reduced to political rhetoric. We've seen this playbook before. The National Development Plan (NDP), hailed over a decade ago as the blueprint for South Africa's long-term development, now serves more as a reminder of broken promises than a source of policy coherence. Most of its targets on jobs, education, crime reduction and infrastructure remain unmet. Over the past 10 years, our economy has grown at an anaemic average of less than 1% per year. In the most recent quarter, growth was a paltry 0.1%. The only sector showing sustained growth is financial services. Meanwhile, real economy, labour-absorbing sectors such as agriculture, mining, manufacturing, construction, trade and transport have all declined in their contribution to GDP. These are precisely the sectors that should be powering inclusive growth and job creation. Gross fixed-capital formation, which is the clearest indicator of future growth and productivity, remains stagnant at 4.2%. These numbers are warnings. And they are being ignored. The diplomatic disaster last month at the White House only confirmed what many investors already suspect: South Africa is becoming uninvestable. And we are seeing the consequences. I recently visited Accra, the capital of Ghana, and you can feel the difference in the air. Cranes fill the skyline, a clear signal of construction, investment and progress. How many cranes are visible in Johannesburg, Cape Town or Durban today? We cannot tax our way out of this crisis. We must invest our way out. And that means fundamentally rethinking how we use the public purse. We must prioritise investments that unlock growth – in infrastructure, digital connectivity and efficient public transport systems. We need to fast-track the rollout of modern special economic zones, backed by genuine incentives. Instead of bold reforms or pro-growth investments, the Budget leans on familiar and increasingly regressive tactics: raising taxes on the already-overburdened middle class and borrowing more from international lenders without a clear plan for debt repayment or structural reform. This year's tax increase comes disguised as 'bracket creep' in personal income taxes, effectively taxing South Africans more without explicitly changing the rates. Next year, there are already whispers of additional taxes on the horizon. The government is milking a shrinking base instead of expanding the economic pie. Years ago, when VAT was raised, we were promised serious spending reforms and a leaner, more effective state. That promise, too, has faded. The state remains bloated, with an oversized Cabinet and a civil service often rewarded more for loyalty than for performance. There are still no performance scorecards linked to Cabinet roles. There has been no movement on taxing high-turnover, high-risk sectors such as online gambling. And crucial functions such as policing and justice remain underfunded and underperforming. The human cost of this drift is staggering. Education budgets in key provinces such as Free State, KwaZulu-Natal and North West are taking a hit, on track to run out of funds to support teachers. Our doctor-to-patient ratio now stands at 1 to 3,000, a clear sign of a healthcare system under collapse. The National Prosecuting Authority continues to buckle under the weight of its mandate, unable to bring criminals to justice in a country overrun by corruption and violent crime. There are small signs of momentum. Minister Barbara Creecy's commitment to rail and transport reform is welcome. Fixing our logistics network is essential for reigniting growth in key sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing. But isolated reforms are not enough. We need a coherent, national strategy backed by real budgetary commitments. I reject the idea that this is the best we can do. South Africa does not need more fiscal tinkering. We need structural reform and moral courage. I am proposing three immediate steps to be pursued in round two and three of the budget process , asParliament considers the Appropriations Bill and the Division of Revenue Bill. First, cut wasteful spending. Initiate independent, sector-wide spending reviews to reduce inefficiencies, and reallocate funds to frontline services. Second, legislate for investment. Pass laws that make South Africa the easiest place in Africa to do business. Prioritise local businesses with the same urgency we show global ones such as Starlink.

Nkabane reveals names of panellists who oversaw controversial Seta board appointments
Nkabane reveals names of panellists who oversaw controversial Seta board appointments

Daily Maverick

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Nkabane reveals names of panellists who oversaw controversial Seta board appointments

After weeks of mounting pressure, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane has released the list of panellists who assisted her with the appointments of 21 Seta board chairpersons — several of whom are linked to ANC politicians. Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane initially refused to disclose the names of the independent panel responsible for appointing the chairpersons of 21 Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. Among the board chairpersons were people connected to the ANC, including Gwede Mantashe's son, Buyambo Mantashe, former KwaZulu-Natal premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube and ex-ANC KZN provincial deputy chairperson Mike Mabuyakhulu. All these appointments were withdrawn by Nkabane after a public outcry. Nkabane revealed the names after requests from frustrated members of the parliamentary committee on higher education. Independent panel The long-awaited names of the independent panel established by the Nkabane include advocate Terry Motau SC, who conducted investigative work into the collapse of VBS Mutual Bank, where he was commissioned by the South African Reserve Bank to lead a forensic probe. His findings — summarised in the 2018 report, The Great Bank Heist — detail how about R1.8-billion was misappropriated, implicating more than 50 individuals in high-level fraud. Motau has also contributed to the Investigating Directorate under the National Prosecuting Authority and to the Zondo commission as an investigator. Motau did not attend any of the panel's meetings. Another member is Asisipho Solani, who is an adviser to Nkabane and usually accompanies the minister to oversight and committee meetings. Solani was a South African Students Congress leader at the University of the Western Cape and is a lecturer at the University of South Africa. Also part of the panel is Nelisiwe Semane, who has been chief of staff in Nkabane's office since September 2024, according to her LinkedIn profile. The other two members are deputy director-general for corporate services in the Department of Higher Education and Training Rhulani Ngwenya and chief director for Seta coordination Mabuza Ngubane. During a parliamentary committee meeting early this month, Ngwenya was part of Nkabane's team that came under the scrutiny of MP Sihle Lonzi. These were the five members who were responsible for assisting Nkabane in making decisions on the Seta boards' chairpersons. During a parliamentary committee meeting, it was revealed that there had been no vetting to ensure that these panel members were suitable. Missed deadline Nkabane was given until 12 June 2025 to submit the names to the committee, but she missed the deadline due to her concerns over the panellists' rights to privacy. Although she asked for an extension until 30 June, she has now submitted the names. Higher Education spokesperson Camagwini Mavovana told Daily Maverick that Nkabane 'is determined to ensure that Sector Education and Training Authorities and all institutions under the Department of Higher Education and Training deliver tangible outcomes, empowering young people and addressing unemployment.' The Seta board appointments caused chaos at the parliamentary committee meeting on 14 May and 2 June 2025, leading to the eviction of the EFF's Sihle Lonzi after he questioned Department of Higher Education and Training Director-General Dr Nkosinathi Sishi, and called the Seta board appointments 'corrupt'. Chairperson of the committee Tebogo Letsie told Daily Maverick, 'We're very happy, as the committee, that she has furnished us with the names. We had not yet discussed whether we were going to agree to give her the extension to 30 June.' Despite Nkabane submitting the names, the Democratic Alliance's Karabo Khakhau will refer Nkabane to the ethics committee for misleading the committee, because she had said that all the panellists were independent. The committee will meet tomorrow to discuss whether to call the minister to appear before it. A statement released by the the chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education on Wednesday stated that 'After reviewing the letter submitted by the Minister of Higher Education, the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education has expressed concern that it was misled about the composition of the panel responsible for recommending appointments to the boards of Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs). Members of the Committee said the information provided through the letter does not reflect the independence initially claimed and that its raises serious questions about the transparency and integrity of the appointment process.' The statement went on to say that 'Committee members feel misled by previous representations made regarding the independence of the panel and the integrity of the appointment process. In particular, the Committee finds the redaction or censoring of some panel member names highly irregular and unacceptable. Furthermore, the committee is alarmed by the revelation in the Minister's letter that the purported Chairperson of the panel did not attend any of its meetings raising further questions about who chaired the panel meetings and oversaw the selection of candidates for SETA boards.' DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store