San Francisco residents say someone is now reporting them for parking in their own driveways — costing them hundreds
'One-hundred-and-eight dollars for parking in my driveway,' the senior noted to NBC Bay Area in a story published July 14.
Reed and several of his Mission District neighbors are speaking out after receiving hundreds of dollars in fines for allegedly parking in a manner that obstructs the sidewalk. But the residents insist they're parking on their property and aren't causing any problems.
Don't miss
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how
Meanwhile, the city's parking authority told NBC Bay Area that officers are simply responding to complaints submitted to the 3-1-1 system.
"The thing is, it's never happened until this year,' Reed said. 'So, it seems to be somebody who's newly moved in.'
Documenting the unusual details
Some neighbors suspect there's somebody out there gaming the system and costing them money.
'We don't know what the deal is. It's just, when we park on the driveway, we get a notice,' Yolanda Francisco told NBC Bay Area. 'It's been reported to 3-1-1 multiple times, but one picture multiple times.'
Complaints, plus accompanying photos, can be tracked online. Francisco's son-in-law, David Chen, says he noticed a pattern after receiving a citation of his own.
'So, I don't know when these photos were taken, but somebody obviously has a collection of these and is just re-posting them,' he told NBC Bay Area.
Chen was walking by when Reed found his latest parking ticket. The length of the vehicle appears to partly cover the sidewalk, but he says it's not enough to be problematic.
"There's, like, 10 feet of open space,' Chen said. 'It's not causing a problem for anyone with accessibility issues. It's literally somebody making themselves feel good by submitting it, trolling us, getting us tickets."
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
Turning off the flood of tickets
Reed has attempted to appeal to the neighborhood parking complainer by posting letters on lightposts in the area, asking the person to simply call him instead if and when his car is bothering them so that he can move it. While this hadn't yet yielded results, there are some other steps that Reed and his neighbors can take to avoid parking these parking fines.
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency allows citizens to protest parking violation citations within 21 days of the date the ticket was issued, either by mail or online. They ask that if you plan to protest your citation, you should refrain from paying your ticket. As part of the submission, Reed and his neighbors can upload their own photos of their parking, and any other evidence that supports their claim. The parking citation is then placed on hold and reviewed within 90 days.
If this first protest is denied, they have the option to request an administrative hearing within 25 days of the decision.
There are also programs in place to help the city's low-income residents pay for citations via payment plans or reduced fees.
If parking in your neighborhood is similarly tight, you can avoid tickets by staying on top of the local parking bylaws, so that if anything changes, you're aware. Also, take into account the road allowance and ensure your vehicle isn't blocking the sidewalk, even partially. If you live in a neighborhood where driveways are short, you may even consider measuring how much space you have before you buy a new car.
Finally, getting to know your neighbors may be a safeguard against any complaints. If you're on friendly terms, a neighbor may feel more comfortable reaching out to you directly if they have an issue, rather than going through official channels.
What to read next
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Jury Found Tesla Partially Liable for Fatal 2019 Crash Involving the Brand's Autopilot Feature
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." A Florida jury ruled that Tesla was partly to blame for a fatal 2019 crash that killed a 22-year-old woman, according to . Lawyers for the woman's family argued that Tesla's Autopilot system should have avoided the crash. The case was the first fatal accident involving Autopilot to go to a jury; Tesla has settled several cases outside of court. A Florida jury ruled that Tesla was partially responsible for a crash in 2019 that killed a 22-year-old woman and left her boyfriend seriously injured, according to The New York Times. Specifically, the jury awarded $59 million in compensatory damages to the family of the woman and $70 million to her boyfriend. The jury also awarded $200 million in punitive damages. The jury found Tesla 33 percent to blame for the crash, and the company will be forced to pay one-third of the compensatory damages. It will also be forced to pay the entirety of the punitive damages. According to the NYT report, the jury placed the rest of the blame on the driver, George Brian McGee, who previously settled with the families outside of court for an undisclosed amount of money. The 19-year-old Naibel Benavides, who was a college student at the time, died on April 25, 2019, after being struck by a Tesla Model S sedan driven by George Brian McGee. McGee had dropped his phone while approaching a T-intersection with Tesla's Autopilot software activated. The NYT report states that he drove through the intersection at more than 50 mph, crashing into the legally parked SUV of Benavides and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, on the other side. It was also reported that McGee's foot was on the accelerator pedal as he approached the intersection, thereby overriding a function of Autopilot that is capable of stopping for objects in the road. The lawyer representing Benavides' family said that data and video from the crash showed that the Autopilot system recognized the parked SUV and at least one pedestrian before the collision. While this particular case was the first fatal accident involving Autopilot to go to a jury, Tesla has settled several cases outside of court. A 2023 study by the Washington Post found that between 2019 and 2023, Tesla's Autopilot system was involved in 736 crashes, 17 of which were fatal. At the time, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg stated during an interview that he found the name misleading. "I don't think that something should be called, for example, an Autopilot, when the fine print says you need to have your hands on the wheel and eyes on the road at all times," he said. According to the NYT report, Tesla plans to appeal the verdict. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," the company said in a statement. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida Executes Machete Killer of His Wife and Children, Breaking Decade-Long Record for Capital Punishment
Edward Zakrzewski and his wife Sylvia had been going through marital problems; he had told a neighbor that he would rather kill his family than go through a divorceNEED TO KNOW Edward Zakrzewski, 60, was executed by lethal injection in Florida for the brutal 1994 murders of his wife and two young children After committing the murders, Zakrzewski fled to Hawaii, changed his identity, and lived on a religious commune His execution marked Florida's ninth this year, the highest number since 2014A man convicted of killing his family with a machete three decades ago was put to death in Florida on Thursday, July 31, setting the state's record for the highest number of annual executions since the restoration of the death penalty. Edward Zakrzewski, 60, was executed by lethal injection at Florida State Prison in Bradford County, according to court records obtained by PEOPLE. Zakrzewski and his 34-year-old wife Sylvia had been going through marital problems; he had told a neighbor twice that he would rather kill his family than go through a divorce, according to the court documents. On the morning of Jun 9, 1994, when Zakrzewski found out Sylvia wanted a divorce, he purchased a machete on his lunch break. His day went on as usual, then went home and waited for his family, the court documents said. When his family got home, Zakrzewski first approached Sylvia, knocking her unconscious and strangling her with rope as she was sitting alone in the living room, per the court documents. He then approached his 7-year-old son Edward and killed him with the machete. According to the court documents, he then confronted his 5-year-old daughter Anna, striking her with the machete as she was in the bathroom. Following the murders, Zakrzewski drove to Orlando and took a flight to Hawaii, where he changed his name and lived with a family who ran a religious commune for four months, per the court documents. One day, the family was watching the television show 'Unsolved Mysteries' and saw Zakrzewski's picture, the court documents said. The next day, he turned himself in to local police. Over the years, Zakrzewski's lawyers filed numerous appeals but they were all denied, court documents show. On the day of his execution, Zakrzewski woke up at 5:15 a.m. and had fried pork chops, root beer and ice cream as his last meal, CBS News reported, citing state Department of Corrections spokesman Paul Walker. According to Walker, he had one visitor and 'remained compliant' as he awaited to be its lethal injection, Florida uses a combination of a sedative, a paralytic and a drug that stops the heart, the outlet reported, citing the state Department of Corrections. This year, Florida has executed more people than it has in any year since 2014. Zakrzewski was the ninth person to be executed in the state, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Read the original article on People
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
White House monitors coverage of Epstein controversy and can't make it disappear
President Donald Trump has begged his base to stop thinking about Jeffrey Epstein. But 25 days after his Justice Department declared it had nothing more to say on the convicted sex offender, the drumbeat for action continues. Some officials acknowledge, at least privately, that the administration will have to release more information on Epstein in an attempt to quiet accusations of a coverup. Administration officials told CNN that they believe the best antidote to the intense public interest in Epstein is time. But they also acknowledge that without the release of more tangible details, the attention may never fully subside. 'Either we release more documents and it's a confirmation of suspicions, or there is some gap between what people think and what we actually have,' a White House official said. 'And you have to address it directly.' The White House has been intensely monitoring cable news and media coverage of the controversy, sources said. Since Attorney General Pam Bondi sparked public uproar by declaring that Epstein's so-called 'client list' doesn't exist, the administration has scrambled to quell the outrage by moving to interview Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell and release sealed grand jury transcripts related to both her and Epstein's criminal cases. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and is likely one of the only living people who could shed more light on the extent of Epstein's crimes, was moved from her Florida prison to a lower-security facility in Texas on Friday. The Justice Department has not said why Maxwell was transferred. Nor has Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said anything about his two days of closed-door meetings with Maxwell, aside from promising in a statement that the DOJ would share more information about what they learned 'at the appropriate time.' Trump has not been accused of legal wrongdoing related to Epstein. The White House acknowledged but did not provide a response to a request for comment on this story. The story's staying power has partly been an issue of the president's own making. Trump is clearly frustrated by reporters who have him asked Epstein-related questions, but the small snippets of responses he does give — such as saying this week that he fell out with Epstein after the financier 'stole' a young woman, Virginia Giuffre, from working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort — only serve to reignite the public interest and sow further questions about what Trump knew about Epstein and when. That statement shocked the family of Giuffre, who died by suicide in April. 'She wasn't stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump's property,' Giuffre's brother Sky Roberts told CNN. A Trump administration official acknowledged the president's statements have been unhelpful in tamping down the Epstein-related furor but added they are just manifestations of his intense anger about the situation. The posture within the administration, officials said, has been to reassure the public that it is still committed to sharing more information that has been collected and reviewed by the Justice Department. But that could present another dilemma for the administration: any document dump would likely require extensive redactions to protect the identities of children who were victims of Epstein's crimes. And pages full of black ink may serve only to raise the specter of a coverup, administration officials said. The administration is also being careful not to repeat history by overpromising, which would further upset the many high-profile figures in the president's base who have expressed their frustration over the issue. 'The frenzy and criticism we saw has abated somewhat since the first two weeks. That's in large part thanks to the administration making clear this isn't cased closed like they initially said,' a person close to Trump told CNN. 'But the idea that this can be buried, or will go away thanks to some bigger news story, is a fantasy,' this person said. 'Even if a news story sucks up the oxygen for a time, it will pop up again. It won't die until people get some real answers.' Friday was a prime example of the issue popping back up with Maxwell's surprise transfer. And there will be more court filings next week. In theory, August could bring some relief to an aspect of the Epstein news cycle with Congress on recess for the month, limiting actions from Democrats to force Republicans to take a public stand on the matter. And an attempt by House Republicans to interview Maxwell has failed for now. Maxwell made a list of demands, including requesting immunity and to be provided with a list of questions in advance. The House Oversight Committee on Friday rejected those demands. It did agree, however, to delay any deposition until after the Supreme Court weighs her pending appeal, which won't happen until the end of September. Meanwhile, while officials believe Trump's directive to Bondi to move to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the investigations of Epstein and Maxwell, as well as the Justice Department's interview of Maxwell in prison, are steps in the right direction, multiple people inside and outside of the administration maintain there's still recognition that the fury around Epstein will not abide until more substantial material is released. The limits of that information are well-established. For instance, the grand jury transcripts the Justice Department is asking to unseal from its investigation include testimony from only two witnesses, both law enforcement officials, according to a DOJ memo submitted this week. In an order Thursday evening, federal Judge Richard Berman asked for more information from the government regarding their motion to unseal grand jury transcripts from Epstein's case. Berman made several requests, including verifying the dates of all grand jury presentations in the case, providing exhibits shown to grand jurors and stating whether the government wants exhibits unsealed in addition to transcripts. Those answers are due Monday. Tuesday, meanwhile, is the deadline for Epstein's victims and Maxwell to respond to the DOJ's request to release grand jury files. The judge then has pledged to rule quickly. In the White House's version of a perfect world, the American people would be celebrating Trump's trade war successes, the record-low number of migrants crossing the southern border or the renewal of a society that is being shaped to the president's expansive vision. That may happen, but the Epstein story will remain no matter what. 'There is an acknowledgement that this isn't just going to go away,' one White House official told CNN. CNN's Annie Grayer and Casey Gannon contributed to this report.
