US life expectancy vs. the world in 2025: Where do Americans stand?
But lurking beneath all these headlines and gripes lies a stubborn, unshakable fact: in 2025, Americans simply don't live as long as citizens in dozens of other high-income countries.
If you're an average American baby born this year, you're expected to live about 78 years. That sounds fine, maybe even good to some ears, but step outside US borders even just over to Canada or across the United Kingdom and it's abundantly clear: Americans are living shorter lives than almost all their economic peers and, frankly, than millions of people in less wealthy parts of the world.
So, what's going on? Let's take a look into what the latest data tells us about American longevity—and why, for all the tech innovations and world-class medical centers dotting the landscape, life expectancy here just keeps stagnating.
How does
US life expectancy
measure up?
First things first: life expectancy is the average number of years a newborn can expect to live under current mortality rates. In the US, that number hit a recent low after COVID-19 but has since bounced back a bit.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Still, it's not keeping pace with history—or with the rest of the developed world.
2023 US life expectancy: 78.4 years
Global Average (2025): 73.5 years
Ranking: 48th globally (and slipping)
Here's the kicker: the US is above the global average, but a few years below its 'peer' nations. Most of Western Europe, plus Japan, Australia, South Korea, and even some smaller nations like Monaco, enjoy life expectancies between 82 and 87 years.
Americans are on average living about 3–5 years less than their economic peers, and as much as 8 years less than the world leaders.
What the numbers really say
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes the latest stats for the US:
Both sexes: 78.4 years (2023 data)
Males: 75.8 years
Females: 81.1 years
By comparison, Canada, France, Japan, and even the UK all clock in well above the US average.
WHO (World Health Organization) data lines up: no matter which authority you check, the trend is the same.
America's rank in the longevity league
So where does that put the US? In 48th place (as per several reports) and, according to the latest forecasts by World Population Review, likely to drop even further down the list by 2050.
Other wealthy nations, meanwhile, continue to inch higher, sometimes gaining years while the US just creeps forward months at a time.
Peer nations growing faster: For example, Japan, Korea, Portugal, the UK, and Italy already clock in at 80+ years and counting.
US trend is stagnating: Some projections put the US at 80.4 years—in 2050. That's nearly a quarter-century just to gain a single year.
Why is the US lagging behind?
If you spent any time in a US health economics classroom, you might echo this refrain: Americans spend more—way more—on healthcare than anyone else, but live shorter lives.
Why?
Here's where things get sticky (and let's be real, infuriating). According to the CDC and public health research, several chronic and acute challenges conspire to keep US life expectancy low:
Cardiovascular disease and obesity: Rates here dwarf those in peer nations.
Diabetes: A chronic and costly epidemic.
"Diseases of despair": Suicide, alcoholism, and drug overdoses hit the US particularly hard.
Maternal and infant mortality: Above-average for a wealthy nation.
Motor vehicle fatalities: Still shockingly high.
Healthcare disparity: Insurance rates, cost barriers, and uneven healthcare access.
Socioeconomic inequality: Health outcomes dramatically vary by income, ZIP code, and racial group.
Americans are living shorter, sicker lives even as the country outspends rivals on everything from advanced surgeries to high-end drugs.
Comparing to the UK and peers: A stark gap
Let's pause and zero in on a particularly telling comparison: the United States vs.
the United Kingdom. Recent investigative reports by Johns Hopkins' Bloomberg School of Public Health deliver this sobering headline: Americans live years less than the Brits.
Leading causes of excess US deaths: Heart disease, drug overdoses, infant and maternal deaths
What really stands out isn't just the small year-by-year difference. It's the long-term trend: since the 1980s, America's trajectory has flatlined, while Europe trudges upward—even through its own crises.
Why?
Policy differences: Universal coverage, safety nets, and regenerative social programs in the UK and Europe often make healthier choices easier and provide fallback care when disaster strikes.
Public health investment: The UK spends less on care, but more on prevention and community wellness.
Digging into health habits and policy differences
If you're looking for 'silver bullet' explanations, the data won't cut you any slack. It's death by a thousand small problems, and they're entangled:
Diet: Appallingly high processed food consumption, sugar-sweetened beverages, and ultra-processed snacks.
Exercise: Sedentary lifestyles prevail, especially among kids and teens.
Addiction: A toxic brew of widespread opioid, meth, and alcohol abuse. Overdose rates have reached devastating levels.
Mental health: Underfunded and stigmatized, pushing more people into crisis and self-harm.
Healthcare Coverage: Insurance gaps, high out-of-pocket costs, and rural hospital closures remain endemic.
Environmental factors: Pockets of heavy pollution and 'food deserts.'
As the CDC points out, even American children today face a 1-in-5 shot at developing obesity before adulthood, foreshadowing future medical costs and mortality.
What would it take for America to catch up?
Public health experts and studies converge on a short list of must-dos:
Tackle chronic disease: Expand access to preventive screening, healthy foods, and physical activity.
Address the opioid crisis: Investment in mental health and addiction treatment.
Make healthcare universal and affordable: Reduce insurance and cost barriers.
Maternal and infant health: More prenatal care, family leave, and education.
Tackle poverty and inequality: Social safety nets, fair wages, and safer housing.
Without bolder national action—and strong local follow-through—these gains will remain elusive.
America's health gap is no longer a technical problem; it's a political, social, and moral one. Other countries have shown it's fixable, but it takes serious willpower and the humility to learn from others.
The question for the next generation, then, is simple: Will we keep coasting along on what's left of the old American advantage, or finally tackle the causes behind our shorter lives? For now, the world's watching and, to tell the truth, living longer.
References:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
CDC – Life Expectancy Data Briefs
WHO Data: United States
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Lok Nayak Hospital ex-director booked by CBI for irregularities
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has registered a case against Dr Suresh Kumar, former medical director of Delhi government-run Lok Nayak Hospital (LNH), and others for alleged criminal conspiracy, breach of trust, and misconduct by a public servant, officials said on Monday. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables. (File photo) The FIR, filed on July 30, comes three years after a preliminary enquiry (PE) was initiated by the CBI in 2022 following reports of administrative lapses during Dr Kumar's tenure. According to officials, the PE has now led to the registration of a regular case (RC) after prima facie evidence was found. 'Prima facie offences under IPC Section 120-B read with Section 409 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act have been disclosed against Dr Suresh Kumar and other former staff,' the FIR stated. HT has accessed a copy of the document. The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a 2017 open tender floated by LNH on the Delhi government's procurement portal for sanitation consumables and non-consumables, including macerators — machines used for hygienically disposing of human waste. The FIR alleges that only one firm was favoured repeatedly over an extended period, from the original contract period in 2017 until 2021, leading to 'undue benefits' to the firm and corresponding losses to the government. Eight macerators of 'inferior quality' were allegedly purchased at inflated prices, despite better-quality alternatives being available at lower costs. 'No fresh open tender was floated during the extended period,' the FIR adds, 'and extensions were granted to the same firm without justification -- from January 29, 2020, to July 13, 2021.' It also notes that the Covid-19 pandemic, often cited for emergency procurement, only began affecting India in mid-March 2020 -- two months after the original tender expired. The PE further flagged violations in medicine procurement norms. Under government policy, generic medicines -- which are more affordable and equally effective -- are to be prioritised over branded drugs. However, the FIR alleges that between April 7 and September 16, 2022, LNH procured medicines worth ₹32.23 crore from a local authorised chemist, of which ₹25.17 crore (approximately 80%) was spent on branded drugs, and only ₹7.05 crore on generic ones. 'This resulted in avoidable expenditure and reduced access to essential medicines for the public,' the FIR states. CBI officials said CCTV footage, procurement records, and other evidence are being examined to identify the officials involved in the decision-making process. So far, no arrest has been made in the case. Dr Kumar has not responded to messages and calls requesting comment on the matter till the time of going to print.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
ABC Of Care: Centres Bear The Bite Alone
New Delhi: The conversation around street dog sterilisation in Delhi has grown louder in recent weeks. Civic meetings and demands of residents' welfare associations and animal welfare groups alike have pushed the system into the spotlight. With dog bite incidents making frequent headlines, the call now isn't just for more sterilisations but for a system that tracks better, is better funded and is better prepared to deal with the problem. Delhi has 20 authorised animal birth control (ABC) centres, each handling 250-500 sterilisations per month. In six months this year, over 65,000 dogs were sterilised and vaccinated. Meanwhile, 49 rabies cases have been reported so far this year, while media reports indicate that three major govt hospitals recorded 91,009 dog bite cases till July — a sharp rise from 63,361 cases in 2021. As anxiety rises, so do ideas like microchipping, compulsory blood tests and stricter tracking of the canine population. But what are the real challenges for ABC centres? TOI went behind the scenes in the city's functional centres to see what happens beyond the statistics. On paper, the programme ticks the boxes. But on the ground, hidden cracks become apparent. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Tucked in a busy market in Vasant Vihar, a board marks the Pet Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) sterilisation centre. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Secret Lives of the Romanovs — the Last Rulers of Imperial Russia! Learn More Undo The setup is basic: a stretcher on the side, tin-roofed kennels for recovery and a lean team going about its work. "We manage 200-250 sterilisations a month," said Dr RT Sharma, the veterinarian in charge. "But funding is a constant challenge." Each NGO is expected to manage the full cycle of the sterilisation process — catching the dogs, surgery, post-op care and release — within the stipulated Rs 1,000 per dog. But salaries, transport, medicines and surgical supplies push the real cost far beyond that. "We bear the rest of the cost. We follow all surgical protocols — overnight fasting, pre-op checks, three-day post-operative care," said Sharma, adding, "Coordination is weak. Pickups happen via municipal workers, RWAs or a van doing the rounds. There's no centralised system. If RWAs were better integrated, it would make a big difference." It's the same for other centres too. Friendicoes in Bijwasan performs 450–500 sterilisations a month. Animal welfare activist Geeta Seshamani, vice-president of Friendicoes SECA, said, "We have enough space for bigger infrastructure and we have tried our best by adding cages. But the demanding infrastructure facilities often takes time and hinders growth and expansion." Listing three major concerns, she said, "Repairs and maintenance are incredibly expensive, and we've always had to raise public funds to keep the centres hygienic and safe for the dogs. " Seshamani also demanded that ABC centres should not be made to pay commercial rates for electricity and water. "And the Rs 1,000 paid per surgery hasn't been revised in years. With rising costs of medicines, surgical supplies, food, and cleaning agents, it should be at least Rs 1,450." Infrastructure aside, she highlighted a critical flaw in planning. "There's no emphasis on buffer zones or Delhi-NCR demarcations. Dogs don't recognise municipal boundaries, and if we don't sterilise across the borders, the programme will always seem ineffective." Meanwhile, at Animal India Trust, which is currently shifting dogs to another facility due to renovations at its Lajpat Nagar centre, Dr Sarungbam Yaiphabi Devi said their work area spans Nizamuddin, Sarai Kale Khan, South Extension and Kotla. "MCD recognised us 22 years ago, but funding is a big hurdle. Most development and operational costs are covered by private sources." The absence of a structured, area-based sterilisation plan is another drawback. One thing Devi highlighted was how success is still measured by one metric: the number of surgeries, not how many dogs recover or whether populations are stabilising locality-wise. In June, TOI reported that the last dog census in Delhi was undertaken nine years ago by the erstwhile South Delhi Municipal Corporation. That year, the survey estimated 1,89,285 stray dogs in south Delhi areas, with 40.3% males and 27.8% females reported as sterilised. "There's no proper dog census in the city. Planning is guesswork. We don't even know how many dogs live in various areas," said Devi. If not for these challenges, experts say the ABC programme is key to making Delhi rabies-free. While public anger peaks after dog bite incidents, animal aggression isn't always random. Sterilisation lowers testosterone, reduces mating-driven fights and stabilises packs, curbing triggers like territorial behaviour, fear and protective aggression, especially among alpha males and nursing females. As the city pushes for improvement, microchipping of dogs and compulsory blood tests, those on the frontlines say what's needed clearly are updated data on population, stronger infrastructure, realistic reimbursements to dog care centres and better coordination among civic bodies, RWAs and NGOs. Without that, the programme will keep functioning — but never truly catch up.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
IVF explained: What couples need to know about fertility treatments
IVF remains to be a common fertility treatment opted by couples who are unable to conceive naturally. World IVF Day, also known as World Embryologist Day, is celebrated globally on 25th July every year. This day acknowledges the contributions and progress made by embryologists in the field of reproductive medicine and focuses on the various advancements in fertility treatments available for those who cannot conceive naturally. Infertility is now a global issue. According to WHO (World Health Organisation) Infertility affects millions of people – and has an impact on their families and communities. Estimates suggest that approximately one in every six people of reproductive age worldwide experience infertility in their lifetime. On this special event of World IVF Day 2025, here is what leading IVF Specialist, Dr. Pooja Bajaj Wadhwa has to say to couples planning to go through infertility treatments. What Happens in an IVF Cycle ? In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART) where sperm and an egg are fertilized outside of the human body. During the IVF cycle, medications are used to stimulate multiple eggs to grow to maturity inside the ovaries. These eggs are then retrieved from the ovaries and fertilized by sperm in a laboratory. The fertilized eggs, now embryos, are cultured in a controlled environment in the laboratory. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Knee Pain? Start Eating These Foods, and Feel Your Pain Go Away Click Here Undo The embryos are monitored for growth and development over the next few days. These embryos are then transferred to the uterus in order to achieve a pregnancy. Which Couples Should Consider Consulting an IVF Specialist? There are certain indications which should not be ignored by a couple wanting to conceive: If the female has tubal disorders such as blocked fallopian tubes, uterine disorders like endometriosis, septate uterus or fibroids, any disorder of the ovaries, such as polycystic ovarian syndrome and other follicular disorders or if the male partner is having a testicular failure to produce sperm, for example due to varicoceles or abnormal sperm function and quality. Conditions or situations that cause abnormal shape (morphology) and movement (motility) of the sperm negatively affect fertility. 'Under such conditions it's important for you to find an IVF specialist who can assist you with a tailored approach towards your unique condition. As an IVF Specialist it is extremely important to diagnose the right issue and suggest a treatment plan that best suits the problem of the couple.' Dr. Bajaj says Is IVF always Successful? The success rate for IVF differs from couple to couple. However the global success rate of IVF ranges from 40% to 65%. Certain factors determine the success rate of an IVF cycle, including the couple's age, the quality of their sperm and eggs, and any underlying reproductive issues. It's important to consult with a fertility/IVF specialist for personalized guidance and to understand the potential success rates based on individual circumstances of the couple opting for the treatment. Is Natural Birth possible after an IVF Cycle? The short answer is yes; it is absolutely possible to have a normal birth after an IVF treatment. Women who opt for IVF treatment intend to have healthy pregnancies and deliver naturally. The mode of delivery—whether natural or cesarean—should be carefully assessed by the treating doctor, as it depends largely on individual health conditions and how the pregnancy progresses throughout each trimester. 'Couples wishing to conceive either naturally or through IVF should understand the importance of lifestyle as well. Alcohol, smoking and a bad diet full of junk food should be avoided by both partners when planning for pregnancy. It is also essential to balance one's mental well being and try to be stress free. On this World IVF Day, I would like to encourage couples to seek treatment at the right time as delay can affect your overall fertility health.' Dr. Bajaj.
