Palestinian-American medical student sues Emory University over suspension
The lawsuit, filed on Monday morning in federal district court on Mohammad's behalf by the Council on Islamic-American Relations in Georgia (Cair-Ga), centers on Emory's alleged 'intentional discrimination and retaliation' during disciplinary proceedings against the medical-sociology dual degree student last year. It names the university, its board of trustees and John William Eley, a dean at the medical school, as defendants.
It has been filed in pursuit of 'accountability and justice … [and] has potential repercussions for how student activists have been treated over the last two years in this country', said Azka Mahmood, executive director of Cair-Ga.
If successful, the lawsuit could lead to 'stopping disciplinary proceedings for protected expression – and that this becomes more of a policy moving forward' – both at Emory and elsewhere, said Keon Grant, one of the Cair-Ga attorneys who filed the complaint.
The school declined to provide comment to the Guardian on pending litigation.
The suit alleges that the school's disciplinary response to remarks Mohammad made on the news show Democracy Now! in April 2024 showed unequal, discriminatory treatment. On the program, Mohammad spoke about the climate on campus for protesters – including at Emory, where police used tasers on students the day before during a protest against Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza.
She expressed concern about an unnamed Emory medical school professor who returned from volunteering as a medic in the Israeli military and was 'now back at Emory so-called 'teaching' medical students and residents how to take care of patients'.
The investigation and November hearing were both 'plagued by procedural irregularities, such as pressuring Plaintiff to admit guilt, altering charges, manipulating deadlines, disregarding institutional policies, and imposing disproportionate sanctions', according to Monday's lawsuit.
Still, Emory found that Mohammad 'violated 'the standards and expectations of the medical profession'', according to the lawsuit, and suspended her from medical school for one year, pushing her graduation to 2029. Mohammad's appeal of the suspension was denied.
Both Mahmood and Grant said they knew of no other medical school student suspended for speech on Israel and Gaza.
The lawsuit notes that Emory's own committee on free expression defended Mohammad's speech as protected by the school's own policies, only to be ignored by the medical school.
It also points to a settlement the school entered into with the Department of Education's office of civil rights in the first few weeks of the Trump administration, in response to a Title VI complaint filed directly with the department last year. Former president Joe Biden's outgoing civil rights investigators found that Emory 'may have contributed to and at a minimum appears to have failed to respond promptly or effectively to a hostile environment based on race and national origin, including shared Palestinian, Muslim, and/or Arab ancestry'.
This shows the school 'was aware of systemic issues in how Palestinian and Arab students were treated', the lawsuit asserts.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Mohammad was recently notified that an additional complaint had been filed about remarks she allegedly made on Israel and Palestine. The school has not clarified the issue, but last year's disciplinary proceedings also included placing her on probation until graduation – meaning an additional complaint may be grounds for expulsion, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit comes at a time when the current administration is wielding Title VI almost exclusively as a tool to allege antisemitism on high-profile US campuses, as seen in the 30 June announcement finding Harvard guilty of 'acting with deliberate indifference towards harassment of Jewish and Israeli students by other students and faculty from October 7, 2023, through the present'.
Though not as high profile as Harvard, Emory has an endowment of $11bn – the 11th-highest in the US, according to the Atlanta Business Chronicle.
'I definitely think the new Title VI world we're living in is much more challenging,' Grant said. 'Still, it's an important tool – not only to seek relief, but if no Title VI complaints were filed, it would lead to a kind of erasure.'
The law, which prohibits a recipient of federal financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of race, color or national origin, 'is now being weaponized to target student activism [on behalf of Palestine]', said Mahmood.
'Still, you have to [have] faith in the federal courts and the constitution – you have to give this fight your all, to get justice – and pull all the levers this great country gives us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bipartisan group plans to bring Epstein victims to capital to speak out on files and push Congress to release them
GOP rebel Thomas Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna plan to bring survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse to Washington, D.C., in a bipartisan push to get Congress to release the controversial 'files' in the case. Massie of Kentucky, who has created a headache for President Donald Trump this year after rebelling against the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' said that he will host a joint press conference at the Capitol with the California congressman, several survivors and their attorneys. 'I will be hosting a press conference at the Capitol, joined by survivors of Epstein and Maxwell's abuse — several of whom will be speaking out for the first time,' Massie and Khanna announced Monday in a post on X. 'The survivors deserve justice and Americans deserve transparency.' The Epstein case engulfed the Trump administration in controversy for weeks following a Justice Department and FBI memo in early July that said no further files in the case would be released, contrary to the president's previous pledges to do so. That sparked fury among the Trump base, which has long sought their release. Trump has defended the move even as politicians on both sides of the aisle call for their release. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend and sex-abuse accomplice who is serving 20 years for her role in his sex trafficking scheme, was recently moved to a minimum-security prison in Texas after being interviewed by the Justice Department for information about his case. Massie and Khanna's press conference is scheduled for September 3. The Republican representative clapped back at criticism on X that the publicity stunt was 'putting the victims at a huge risk.' Massie said that the survivors set to attend the press conference 'thought they were getting justice' before the Trump administration 'did a 180.' 'Some might have come forward before to provide testimony or evidence already that wasn't made public,' Massie added. Khanna is leading the charge for the Democrats on the issue and is also pushing a House Oversight subcommittee to subpoena Epstein's alleged 'birthday book.' The book is the subject of a The Wall Street Journal report that revealed the alleged existence of a 'bawdy' 50th birthday card from Trump to Epstein. The president has denied the validity of the letter and has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch, WSJ 's parent company, Dow Jones, and the two journalists whose bylines appear on the story. Massie and Khanna's press conference is reminiscent of a similar move pulled by Trump in 2016 to embarrass his former opponent, Hillary Clinton. He appeared at a press conference ahead of the October 2016 televised debate with three women who accused former President Bill Clinton of inappropriate sexual contact—Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey—and rape victim Kathy Shelton, whose attacker was defended by Hillary Clinton. Bill Clinton denies the allegations of the three women. At the time, Clinton's campaign said they were 'not surprised to see Donald Trump continue his destructive race to the bottom.' The president reportedly planned to seat the Clinton accusers in the Trump family box during the presidential debate, but it was thwarted at the last minute, according to reports. Since deploying 800 National Guard troops to the streets of D.C. to wage a war on 'out of control' crime in the capital, the spotlight has largely moved on from Epstein, despite the efforts of some Democrats and MAGA influencers who are still up in arms over the debacle. Still, anger remains from constituents at town halls across the country. Doug LaMalfa, a fourth-generation rice farmer who has represented his northern California district in Congress since 2013, was booed, jeered and cursed out by angry voters Monday at the local Elks Lodge in Chico over the president's economic policies and the administration's handling of the Epstein case. Over 90 minutes, attendees called LaMalfa a 'liar,' an 'a**hole,' and accused him of 'bull****.' At one point, when the moderator called on one person to ask a question, someone yelled: 'F*** you!' There have been similar reported scenes earlier this year in states including Wisconsin, Georgia and North Carolina.
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fox News host rages at rising Democrat for accusing him of abruptly ending interview
Fox News' Will Cain fired back at Texas State Rep. James Talarico on Tuesday after the rising Democratic star claimed that an intense on-air interview was abruptly ended because the conservative host struggled to answer questions about Republican gerrymandering. 'Trolls distorting the interview is one thing, but you were there,' Cain tweeted at Talarico. 'I respectfully gave you ten minutes, an eternity in cable news.' In recent days, Talarico has served as something of a spokesman for the Texas Democrats who fled the state in an effort to block Republicans from pushing through a redistricting vote that could potentially allow the GOP to pick up five new U.S. House seats. Talarico, along with many of his Democratic colleagues, is c urrently holed up in Illinois to deny the legislature a quorum. Talarico, who suddenly burst onto the national scene last month following a well-received appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast, appeared on Cain's show to defend the Democrats' decision to flee the Lone Star State. Throughout the interview, which featured Cain repeatedly denouncing the lawmaker for 'abandoning' Texas, Talarico widely condemned redistricting efforts as an attempt to 'rig' elections. Having vehemently defended the Texas GOP's mid-decade gerrymander push by claiming it better reflects the state's overall electorate, Cain accused Talarico of hypocrisy before tossing out a sports analogy. 'You've done something that you say is constitutional, which I'd suggest is pretty radical, which is leaving your office – abandoning your office – in defense of a minority point of view. It's been done in several other states where your party has a majority,' the Fox host declared. 'It's a little bit like taking your basketball and going home when you don't like the way it's played, but when you're winning in Illinois, you're happy to play by these rules.' Once again saying he's 'condemned all gerrymandering across the country,' the Democratic legislator retorted with a question of his own that left the right-wing commentator scuffling. 'When Democrats had a majority in Congress, they voted to ban gerrymandering. Do you know how many of them joined them in that effort?' Talarico asked. 'Which one? I'm sorry, which state did you just refer to?' Cain, after a brief pause, responded. 'I'm asking, do you know how many Republicans joined Democrats in the U.S. Congress to ban gerrymandering? All the Democrats voted for it. Zero Republicans voted for it, zero,' the Democrat shot back. He was apparently referring to the 2021 For the People Act, which would have banned mid-decade redistricting and required independent redistricting commissions. The legislation passed the House but eventually died in the Senate due to a lack of GOP support. 'You can spare me both-sides rhetoric. It's clearly one side that is trying to rig the rules in the middle of the game,' Talarico continued. 'We don't accept cheating in politics and in our relationships. We shouldn't accept cheating it in our elections... We should stand up to politicians that don't want to face accountability at the ballot box. That's what's happening here.' After Cain admitted he was 'unfamiliar' with the details of that legislation, he attempted to corner Talarico on Massachusetts and why the state doesn't have any Republican-held congressional seats despite Donald Trump receiving roughly 35 percent of the vote during the last presidential election. 'In my view, what has happened here is you've done something in certain states, and you don't like it when it's done in Republican states,' Cain proclaimed before referencing California's threat to respond to Texas' redistricting effort with one of its own. ' And now you're saying you've done the same thing as us—you've done the same thing as us—and we are going to, by the way, if you do it, we're going to ratchet it up even more, in the words of Gavin Newsom,' he added. Talarico, however, appeared to turn the tables on the Fox star and stumped him once again. 'My party has never gerrymandered in the middle of the decade at the request of the president of the United States, nor would we. The only way this is going to happen in blue states is if Texas executes this power grab,' he replied. 'You mentioned Massachusetts. Do you know the party of the governor that signed that map into law? He was a Republican. It was a Republican governor that signed that map into law,' Talarico continued, referencing then-Gov. Charlie Baker signing off on Massachusetts' new map in 2021. The Boston Globe has also reported that it is 'practically impossible' to draw a GOP-leaning district in the state due to geography. 'And I asked you if Republican policies are popular, why do they need to redraw these maps? Why can't they just run on their policies?' Talarico then pressed the host, prompting Cain to seemingly tap out. 'I'm getting wrapped on time. I'm enjoying this conversation. I apologize,' Cain said before asking his guest one more question about whether he was receiving any funding from liberal philanthropist George Soros or former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke. With the back-and-forth quickly going viral on social media, Talarico tweeted a clip of the exchange on Tuesday evening and claimed that Cain cut the interview short rather than respond to his questions about the GOP's gerrymandering efforts. 'I just went on Fox News to tell the truth about the redistricting power grab in Texas,' he posted on X. 'I asked a simple question: 'If Republican policies are so popular, why do they need to redraw these maps; why not run on their policies?' He refused to answer — and cut the interview early.' Cain, meanwhile, quickly shot back with a pair of social media posts of his own and accused Talarcio of 'dishonesty,' noting that the conversation ran nearly ten minutes and that the Democrats' pointed question wasn't the reason why the interview wrapped when it did. 'Oh James. Trolls distorting the interview is one thing, but you were there. I respectfully gave you ten minutes, an eternity in cable news. And in all that time you had no answer as to why you've abandoned your job. You can take a flag to IL but you still cut and run from Texas,' he wrote. 'And your dishonesty in suggesting I cut your interview short perfectly illustrates the honesty of your run away from TX,' Cain added. 'I always welcome honest debate but it's clear that's not who you are. Stay in Illinois little Jimmy. Better fit for you than TX.' Those plans could change if Republicans go back on their word and call a second special session on Friday that would include the redistricting legislation. Abbott, who has also threatened to gerrymander Texas even more in Republicans' favor if other Democratic-led states try to redistrict, said on Tuesday morning that he would 'immediately' call another special session after ending the first one.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Of course Mark Zuckerberg is still doing good works – he's just switched up the definition of ‘good'
If you put it in a novel – a ham-fisted satire of tech overlord hypocrisy, say – it would look too contrived to fly. But here we are, absorbing a story from the New York Times this week in which Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, are discovered to have been running a private school out of their compound in Palo Alto, California, in violation of city zoning laws. More pertinently, the school of 14 kids, which includes two of the couple's three daughters, is less than a mile from the school for low-income families that the couple founded in 2016. Guess which school the world's second-richest man and his wife are shutting down? Say the word 'zoning infraction' to a certain stripe of American and the effect is equal to using 'queue jumper' on a Briton, but of course the broader point here isn't one about permits. (A spokesperson for Zuckerberg and Chan told the newspaper that the family was unaware about the zoning laws and that the private school, or 'pod of home schoolers' as they put it, is now moving to another location.) It is, rather, about Zuckerberg's perceived retreat from progressive social causes, starting with the shuttering of the school and ending with the announcement in May this year that the pair's charitable foundation, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI), will be pulling funding from almost all the affordable housing and homeless charities it supports in the San Francisco Bay Area, as well as slashing diversity programmes. Officially, the reason for these changes is that after a decade spent learning the ropes of effective philanthropy, CZI has decided that its money is best allocated to science and medical funding. Unofficially, of course, the switch from a mission statement about 'advancing human potential and promoting equality' to a foundation that now calls itself a 'science-first philanthropy' seems in keeping with more localised changes in the Zuckerberg household. Namely: the Meta head's swing from the kind of guy who, during the Biden administration, might have worn a This Is What A Feminist Looks Like T-shirt, to his Trump-era guise as someone who goes on Joe Rogan to argue for more 'masculine energy' in the workplace and appoints a Trump ally to the Meta board. Zuckerberg's politics are clearly as flexible as the next tech leader's, but I suspect there are other things in play here, too. Unlike science research, the specimens in philanthropy-funded social experiments have a nasty habit of talking aback. In 2010, when Zuckerberg gave $100m to overhaul the Newark public school system, some educators called him out for what they saw as the application of startup values and glib quick fixes – charter schools, anyone? More 'parental choice'? – to the vast, interlinked challenges of the US's struggling public school system. You can imagine how this might have gone down at HQ. We're trying to help them; why are they giving us shit? Why aren't these nobodies tugging their forelocks like a billionaire at an autocrat's inauguration? Another thing about billionaires: they get bored very quickly. One of the alleged reasons that Zuckerberg and Chan are shutting their charitable school in East Palo Alto, is that, reportedly, Chan was frustrated by the slow pace of progress. It is baffling, isn't it, given the geniuses involved; and yet these kids seem determined to stay poor and not get into Harvard. The rock-solid certainty among certain tech leaders that their skills are infinitely transferable is, however, a hard one to unseat. Consider the Bezos Day 1 Academies Fund, in which the world's third-richest man promises to 'operate a network of tuition-free, Montessori-inspired preschools in under-resourced communities', rather than, say, compel his $2.36tn company to pay its fair share of taxes to fund state education coffers. Meanwhile, back in the Zuckerbergs' Crescent Park community, things are getting a bit tense. In an area popular with Stanford professors, the Zuckerbergs bought 11 properties, turned them into a compound, and like low-rent oligarchs in Holland Park, west London, promptly put in a pickleball court and dug out the basement. Years of noise, construction and traffic from the school – oh, boy, were neighbours ready when the New York Times reporter came calling. 'No neighbourhood wants to be occupied,' said one, whose home is surrounded on three sides by Zuckerberg properties. 'But that's exactly what they've done. They've occupied our neighbourhood.' Substitute 'neighbourhood' for 'world' and he's summed it up nicely. Emma Brockes is a Guardian columnist
