Senate plows forward, but budget reckoning appears nearer
BOSTON (SHNS) – Hours after U.S. House Republicans passed a landmark bill featuring deep tax cuts and spending reductions, Senate Ways and Means Chair Michael Rodrigues signaled his branch will continue debating its fiscal 2026 budget that does not account for any federal funding losses.
On a 215-214 vote early Thursday morning, the U.S. House passed a bill that would extend President Donald Trump's tax cuts from his first term, slash SNAP benefits funding by about $267 billion over the next decade, and reduce Medicaid spending by nearly $700 billion, according to the Associated Press.
The vote came just before the Massachusetts Senate dove into the third day of annual budget deliberations. Rodrigues told reporters he had yet to scrutinize the action out of Congress when the Senate got going around 10 a.m.
'We have not had a chance to analyze it, deep analyze it,' Rodrigues said when asked how that U.S. House package may affect his thinking about the state's spending plans for the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Beacon Hill budget-writers have baked nearly $16 billion in federal dollars into their packages. Rodrigues said that 'as the days go on' his committee staff will take a 'close look' at the sweeping federal policy proposal.
Debate on the federal bill is moving to the U.S. Senate. U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday his goal is to get a bill to Trump's desk by July 4, and said senators should be mindful of a 'delicate equilibrium.'
'I encourage them to remember that we have a very delicate equilibrium that we reached on here,' Johnson said. 'A lot of work went into this to find exactly the right balance. You all saw how perilous that was over the last week, as it developed. And I encourage our Senate colleagues to think of this as a one-team effort as we have, and to modify this as little as possible, because it will make it easier for us to get it over the line ultimately and finished, and get it to the president's desk by July 4.'
The timetable is important, he said, due to the need to deliver tax relief to people 'as soon as possible.'
The federal bill, should it come together in the way that Republicans hope, would force Rodrigues and House Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz to reevaluate state revenue and spending assumptions.
'I don't know if we'll pause,' Rodrigues said. 'We will deal with the facts once we know the facts. Chair Michlewitz and I are ready to adjust if needed to adjust. But we have to assess that once we know the facts.'
On rare occasions, state budget writers have changed revenue assumptions and made other adjustments in conference committee, after the branches have approved their respective budgets.
'Right now there's so much speculation and rumor,' the Westport Democrat said. 'We see what the House did in Congress. The Senate has yet to act — that has to go through their reconciliation process. So we will deal with the facts once we know the facts, and we're prepared to deal with them in a responsible manner.'
Increasingly, public officials are putting their analysis on the public record.
MassHealth officials said last week that Massachusetts is in jeopardy of losing more than $1 billion annually, with hundreds of thousands of residents at risk of losing coverage.
U.S. Rep. Lori Trahan said the GOP reconciliation bill will cause 14 million Americans to lose health insurance coverage, including 270,000 people in Massachusetts.
She said it 'slashes $3.7 billion from MassHealth, threatening health care for children, seniors, and working families.' An aide said $3.7 billion represents the amount Massachusetts could lose over 10 years based on a 10% cut to a federal matching rate to states that provide coverage to migrants.
'The way things are playing out between Beacon Hill and Capitol Hill, there aren't great choices for lawmakers here right now because of the uncertainty,' Evan Horowitz, executive director of the Center for State Policy Analysis at Tufts University, told the News Service on Thursday.
Horowitz said Massachusetts may dodge Medicaid funding formula changes, but work requirements for able-bodied MassHealth enrollees may create a de facto eligibility change that would trim program enrollment. The biggest factor for lawmakers, he said, is the macroeconomic situation and impacts of tariffs on tax revenue. Negative impacts, he said, could make it likely that Gov. Maura Healey might have to cut next year's budget.
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation President Doug Howgate said Massachusetts is adjusting to dealing with the uncertainty that comes with the Trump administration and will know more about federal tax and spending policies in the fall, but should stick to its plan to aim for a new budget by July.
'Having a budget on the books for the start of the fiscal year is absolutely the right way to go,' he said.
Howgate said that as the overseer of the executive branch, Healey would be in a position to manage spending and perhaps make unilateral adjustments next fiscal year. But the former top Beacon Hill budget aide also said a 'coordinated partnership' between Healey's fiscal team and the House and Senate Ways and Means committees is important since some adjustments may require the passage of legislation.
The debate on the U.S. House bill showed just how differently it is viewed by Republicans and Democrats.
'The left doesn't like this bill. That tells you it's a good bill,' Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan said. 'This bill is about fundamental conservative principles, regular things that the American people appreciate. This bill cuts taxes. This bill requires work for able-bodied adults in our welfare system. This bill gives school choice to parents. This bill secures the border. We're the party that believes in letting moms and dads keep more of their money to spend on their goals and their dreams.'
Congressman Richard Neal of Springfield warned the bill would require $4 trillion in borrowing for tax cuts that will 'overwhelmingly go to people at the very top, including the billionaire class.'
'The American people don't buy this because they know where these tax cuts are going and intended to help people at the top, when it is really the people at the bottom and then the middle who need help,' Neal said in floor remarks delivered at around 5:10 a.m. 'So hospitals are going to close, children are going to go hungry. Health care is going to be denied, but the billionaire class is going to pick up a considerable number of dollars. And again, the number that I cited earlier, if you make a million dollars, you pick up 90,000 additional dollars. It's almost 10%. And if you make under $50,000, Mr. Speaker, you're getting a buck a day? That's what this tax package means?'
State senators on Tuesday and Wednesday processed most of the 1,058 annual budget amendments, adding about $74 million to the $61.32 billion bottom line. The Senate is likely to finalize its budget bill Thursday.
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Primary election 2025: Berks officials certify election results
Berks County election officials have finalized the tally of results from the primary election. During a special meeting Friday, the elections board voted unanimously to certify the vote totals and authorize the submission of the results to the secretary of the commonwealth. There is now a clear picture of which Democratic and Republican candidates will be on the November ballot for municipal, school, county and judicial races. In addition to those candidates who appeared on the primary ballot, nearly 100 candidates were added to the fall election through successful write-in campaigns. Independent and third-party candidates still have a chance to petition to be on the ballot before the lineup is finalized. Elections Director Anne Norton told the elections board that her term performed the required reviews and audits of the May 20 primary, finding no variations or discrepancies with the official tally. The official results of the election will be posted on the county elections website. Overall, just over 21% of registered Democrats and Republicans voted. Voter turnout was slightly lower than recent, similar elections. In the 2023 municipal primary, for example, turnout was about 24%. The elections board thanked the election services team as well as those who worked the polls and handled mail ballots for the hard work and long hours they put into making sure every vote was counted. 'A huge thank you to everyone involved,' Commissioner Michael Rivera said. Commissioner Dante Santoni Jr. also commended those who ran to represent their fellow residents in local positions. 'When you run for office it takes time away from other things,' he said. 'You stick your neck out for your community at all levels of government and I give kudos to everyone who participated in the democratic process.'