Bengal Polls Next Year, Digha Jagannath Temple Trinamool's Hindu Outreach
Quick Take
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
A replica of Puri's Jagannath temple, built at a cost of Rs 250 crore in Bengal's Digha, was consecrated by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee today. The temple aims to boost tourism and counter BJP's "appeasement policy" criticism.
Kolkata:
The replica of Puri Jagannath temple, built at a cost of Rs 250 crore in Bengal's seaside town of Digha, was consecrated today, marking Mamata Banerjee's outreach to the Hindus. The inauguration of the temple took place yesterday and today, the auspicious occasion of Akshaya Tritiya was reserved for the consecration of the idols.
Ms Banerjee's government, in a reprisal of the BJP's Ayodhya temple inauguration, had set up huge screens across the state to live telecast the ceremony, which started at 2.30 pm.
"You must see this (religion) from the heart. Religion cannot be preached by word of mouth. It is what touches the heart. Religion is people's trust, belief and love," the Chief Minister told reporters a day ahead of the yagna ceremony, in which she is taking part.
Ms Banerjee already donates huge funds during Durga Puja to puja committees and has undertaken multiple temple renovation projects.
But that has not been enough to counter the appeasement politics allegation of the BJP, especially in view of the money her government donates to mosques and madarasas. Bengal has 27 per cent Muslims.
The inauguration of this temple ahead of next year's election, is seen as a major effort of the ruling Trinamool Congress to reach out to the Hindus ahead of next year's state election, in which the BJP is hoping to unseat the Mamata Banerjee government.
Today, the BJP's Suvendu Adhikari ripped into the state government with a reminder of the recent violence in Murshidabad during the passage of the Waqf bill in parliament.
"Mamata Banerjee is solely responsible for that genocide. It is a government sponsored genocide. The entire government, the fire brigade, police, the fire minister, all ministers and also their high leader have killed everyone. So far 15 deaths have been declared. it will go till 25," he said.
The state government has said it is hoping that the temple would make the seaside town - already a popular tourist spot - "an international destination of tourism".
Ms Banerjee said the temple will be the pride of Bengal and the country.
"It has beautiful architecture. Servitors from Jagannath temple in Puri and priests and monks from various other temples and organisations, including Dakshineshwar Kali Temple and ISKCON, have come," she had told reporters ahead of the inauguration.
The red sandstone temple, a replica of the 12th-Century shrine in Puri, is built over 24 acres of land located in Digha, a popular beach destination 200 km southeast of Kolkata.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sibal questions Dhankar's ‘inaction' on impeachment notice against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) questioned why Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar had not taken any action on the notice for moving an impeachment motion against Allahabad High Court Judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav, and alleged the government was trying to save the judge after he made "entirely communal" remarks last year. Speaking on the subject of the Uniform Civil Code, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of Allahabad High Court on December 8, 2024 reportedly said that Hindus did not expect Muslims to follow their culture but only wanted them not to disrespect the same. Mr. Sibal, who is also a senior advocate, said the whole incident smacks of "discrimination" as on one hand the Rajya Sabha secretary general wrote to Chief Justice of India to not go ahead with an in-house inquiry against Yadav as a petition was pending against him before the Upper House, while did not do so in the case of Justice Yashwant Varma. Mr. Sibal said it was very unfortunate and questions are bound to arise when the person who is sitting on the constitutional post, which is second in the hierarchy, does not fulfil constitutional obligations in six months. "On December 13, 2024, we had given a notice for an impeachment motion to Chairman Rajya Sabha, it had signatures of 55 MPs, six months have gone, but no steps have been taken," Mr. Sibal said at a press conference here. "I want to ask those who are sitting on constitutional posts, their responsibility is to only verify whether signatures are there or not, should that take six months? Another question that arises is whether this government is trying to protect Shekhar Yadav," Mr. Sibal said. On the "instructions" of the VHP, Mr. Yadav had made a speech in High Court premises and then the matter came to the Supreme Court which took action, he said. Justice Yadav said in December: 'I feel no hesitation in saying that this is India and it will run as per the wishes of its majority,' he said. A video of the speech was shared on social media by some of the event's attendees. The judge said that being a Hindu, he respected his religion, but that did not mean he had any 'ill will' towards other religions or faith. 'We do not expect you to take seven rounds [around the] fire while getting married... we don't want you to take a dip in Ganga... but we expect you to not to disrespect the culture, gods and great leaders of the country,' Justice Yadav said. Mr. Sibal added: 'Yadav was questioned in Delhi. A report was also sought from the CJI Allahabad High Court. I heard the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court gave a negative report, and amidst this, on February 13, 2025, the Chairman said that the matter should be looked at in a constitutional way and Parliament can take it forward.' The Rajya Sabha secretariat sent a letter to the CJI asking for no action and it was said the matter will be taken as there is an impeachment motion notice and the Supreme Court must stop its in-house procedure against Mr. Yadav, Mr. Sibal said. "I don't understand on what basis this happened? Should the Chairman write such a letter to the CJI? The in-house procedure is SC's own, it has no connection with the impeachment motion. Till now impeachment motion has not even been admitted, it has been six months and only signatures are being verified," Mr.. Sibal said. So when the impeachment motion has not been admitted, what relation does it have with the Supreme Court in-house inquiry, and even if it had been admitted, still what connection does it has with the inquiry, Mr. Sibal asked. 'Communal' statement "What Justice Yadav said is before everyone there is no doubt about that. He has not disputed it. The Supreme Court had to decide whether he should have said so, as according to us this is a totally communal statement. And also decide whether he should sit on the chair of the judge after making that statement," Mr. Sibal said. "Why did you not write a letter over in-house inquiry against Justice Varma. So does this government want to protect Shekhar Yadav, we think they want to save him," he said. So either no action will be taken or they will reject a few signatures in the impeachment notice and reject the motion so that "we go to the Supreme Court and it takes time which would ensure that Shekhar Yadav retires in 2026", Mr. Sibal said. "So according to me this is unfortunate and it smacks of discrimination. The intention of this government is to save Yadav because what he said was entirely communal," he said. Members of several opposition parties on December 13 had moved the notice in the Upper House for the impeachment of Allahabad High Court Judge Yadav over his controversial remarks at a VHP event. The notice for moving the impeachment motion was signed by 55 opposition MPs, including Mr. Sibal, Jairam Ramesh, Vivek Tankha, Digvijaya Singh, John Brittas, Manoj Kumar Jha and Saket Gokhale. The notice for the motion was moved under the Judges' (Inquiry) Act, 1968, and Article 218 of the Constitution, seeking initiation of proceedings for impeachment of Justice Yadav. The notice mentioned that the speech/lecture delivered by Justice Yadav during an event organised by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) prima facie showed that he "engaged in hate speech and incitement to communal disharmony in violation of the Constitution of India". The notice also mentioned that the judge prima facie showed that he targeted minorities and displayed bias and prejudice against them. At a VHP function on December 8, Justice Yadav said the main aim of a uniform civil code was to promote social harmony, gender equality and secularism. A day later, videos of the judge speaking on provocative issues, including the law working according to the majority, were circulated widely on social media, prompting strong reactions from several quarters, including opposition leaders.
Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In a first, Centre caps MGNREGS spend at 60% for first six months of FY 2025-26
For the first time, the government has capped spending under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) at 60 per cent of its annual allocation for the first half of the financial year 2025–26, The Indian Express has learnt. Until now, the rural jobs guarantee scheme has operated as a demand-driven programme with no such spending limit. It is learnt that the Ministry of Finance has informed the Ministry of Rural Development that c will now be brought under the Monthly/Quarterly Expenditure Plan (MEP/QEP), a spending control mechanism from which it had been exempt so far. The Finance Ministry introduced the MEP/QEP in 2017 to help ministries manage cash flow and avoid unnecessary borrowing. MGNREGS remained outside its scope until now, with the Rural Development Ministry arguing that the scheme's demand-driven nature made fixed spending caps unworkable. But at the start of the 2025–26 financial year, the Finance Ministry is learnt to have directed the MoRD to include MGNREGS under the MEP/QEP framework as well. It is learnt that the Rural Development Ministry (MoRD) had submitted its MEP/QEP for MGNREGS to the Budget Division of the Finance Ministry, proposing a higher spending limit for the first two quarters of 2025–26. However, the Finance Ministry did not agree. After multiple rounds of communication between the two ministries, the Finance Ministry informed MoRD on May 29 that it could spend up to 60 per cent of MGNREGS's annual outlay—Rs 86,000 crore—in the first half of the financial year, 'considering the urgent need of expenditure to be incurred during [the] first half.' This means that only Rs 51,600 crore will be available for the scheme until the end of September. Although a 60 per cent spending cap may not have made a difference in most years—given that first-half spending has typically ranged between 50 and 60 per cent (53.5 per cent in 2024–25, 60.51 per cent in 2023–24, 54.29 per cent in 2022–23, 60.83 per cent in 2021–22, and 53.79 per cent in 2020–21)—officials told The Indian Express that it could impact employment generation under the rural job guarantee scheme this year, due to a significant carryover of pending liabilities worth Rs 21,000 crore from the previous financial year. According to government sources, a significant portion of this year's MGNREGS allocation will go towards clearing pending liabilities from the previous financial year, limiting the scope for generating the targeted number of persondays. The term 'persondays' refers to the total number of days of work performed by individuals under the scheme. For 2025–26, the Rural Development Ministry has approved a labour budget of 198.86 crore persondays. Of this, 67.11 per cent—or 133.45 crore persondays — are projected to be created in the first half of the financial year. As of June 8, 2025, the Centre has released Rs 24,485 crore, which is 28.47 per cent of MGNREGS's total allocation of Rs 86,000 crore for the year. Finance Ministry officials are also learnt to have raised questions about the pending liabilities from the previous year. Citing provisions of the MGNREGA Act, 2005—which mandate that wages must be paid within 15 days—they questioned how dues of over Rs 21,000 crore were still pending for the last fortnight (March 15–31) of the 2024–25 financial year. Launched in 200 of the country's most backward rural districts in 2006–07, MGNREGS was expanded to 130 more districts in 2007–08 and rolled out nationwide in 2008–09. The scheme saw a surge in demand during 2020–21, when a record 7.55 crore rural families accessed work under it amid the Covid-19 outbreak. It became a key safety net for migrant workers returning to their villages during the lockdown. Since then, the number of families employed under the scheme has steadily declined—7.25 crore in 2021–22, 6.18 crore in 2022–23, 5.99 crore in 2023–24, and 5.79 crore in 2024–25. These figures do not include beneficiaries from West Bengal, where the scheme has been suspended since March 2022. Harikishan Sharma, Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express' National Bureau, specializes in reporting on governance, policy, and data. He covers the Prime Minister's Office and pivotal central ministries, such as the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Cooperation, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Jal Shakti. His work primarily revolves around reporting and policy analysis. In addition to this, he authors a weekly column titled "STATE-ISTICALLY SPEAKING," which is prominently featured on The Indian Express website. In this column, he immerses readers in narratives deeply rooted in socio-economic, political, and electoral data, providing insightful perspectives on these critical aspects of governance and society. ... Read More
Mint
40 minutes ago
- Mint
Robert Vadra seeks new date to appear before ED in Gurugram land deal case: Report
Businessman Robert Vadra reportedly sought a new date from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to appear before the financial probe agency in connection with the Gurugram land deal case. Vadra, the husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi, was summoned by the Enforcement Directorate on Tuesday. He, however, has "informed the central agency that he would not appear today and sought a fresh date," sources told news agency ANI. Vadra had earlier appeared before the Enforcement Directorate on April 17 — the third straight day — for questioning in a money laundering case linked to alleged irregularities in a 2008 Haryana land deal case. The Enforcement Directorate's probe involves properties in London and financial transactions during the UPA regime (2004–2014). The central agency alleged Vadra's involvement with Sanjay Bhandari through the London property, financial transactions, and personal associations, supported by email trails and Thampi's role, News 18 reported. Bhandari is allegedly a close aide of Vadra and had fled India in 2016. He is currently living in the United Kingdom. On April 17, after the Enforcement Directorate interrogated him on Thursday in connection with the Gurugram land case, businessman Robert Vadra said that the investigative agency was asking him repeated questions that he had already answered in 2019. "There was no new question; all the questions were repeated from 2019. If tomorrow were not a public holiday, I would have to celebrate my birthday in the ED office. "Tomorrow is Good Friday, and I will celebrate my birthday with my family; otherwise, they will keep calling me," Vadra told the media. Vadra slammed the action as a "political vendetta", accusing the government of misusing investigative agencies to target opposition voices. Vadra questioned the ED's impartiality, alleging selective action against leaders from non-BJP parties while vowing to continue his fight against "injustice". "This is a political vendetta. Agencies are being misused. This is wrong. How will there be trust in agencies when they are after any candidates for the CM position in the country, or when a party is doing well? Which BJP minister or member has been summoned by the ED? Why has none of them been summoned? Is everyone in the BJP good? Do they not have any allegations against them? "There are several allegations," Vadra said. Vadra also claimed that the ED's action against him was fueled when he started raising his voice over atrocities against minorities. "If I were to enter politics, which is what everyone wants, they (the BJP) would either speak of dynasty or misuse ED. This difficulty started when, a few days back, I gave messages through social media regarding atrocities against minorities. This is nothing else. Ever since I said that people wanted me to enter politics, this difficulty has started. But the ED summons has no basis," he said.
