Mining bill sparks uproar in the House
Lawmakers from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), particularly those representing merged districts, staged a walkout in protest. They announced their intention to raise the issue with PTI founder Imran Khan.
Assembly members criticized the Mines and Minerals Department for failing to present a timely and clear comparison between the previous 2017 bill and the new 2025 version. Many expressed frustration over the lack of transparency and preparation.
Sources told The Express Tribune that the briefing was held in the Jirga Hall of the Provincial Assembly to address and build consensus among government and opposition members. The session was attended by the Speaker, Provincial Law Minister, Advocate General, and members from both sides of the aisle.
Tensions flared when the Secretary and Director General of the Minerals Department began presenting the bill. PTI MPA Abdul Salam Afridi objected, claiming the bill was against the public interest and would allow unfair control over the province's resources.
ANP MPA Muhammad Nisar echoed these concerns, accusing the government of trying to hand over mineral resources to private companies through non-transparent means. A heated exchange then broke out between Provincial Minister for Higher Education Meena Khan Afridi and ANP MPA Muhammad Nisar. Nisar alleged the government aimed to loot provincial resources, while Meena Khan responded that ANP had supported a similar bill in Balochistan and had overseen peak corruption in the sector during their tenure.
Seeing the situation out of control, Speaker Babar Saleem Swati intervened and adjourned the briefing till next Monday, April 21.
He appealed to members to discuss the matter in a peaceful atmosphere. During the briefing, PTI MPA Anwar Zaib raised an objection as to whether this bill has been brought to the notice of the PTI founder. If it has not been brought to the notice of Imran Khan, then they cannot listen to this bill nor will they approve it.
He said that they, as lawmakers from the merged districts, walk out of this briefing. The briefing was stopped after the walkout.
The briefing of the Department of Minerals on the Mines and Minerals Act 2025 ended after the walkout of the members.
Speaker Saleem Swati expressed anger at the Department of Minerals for failing to present a comparison in front of the assembly.
The Speaker issued orders to provide hard copies to the lawmakers by this afternoon.
Opposition members said that the bill increased the control of the federal government or private companies over provincial resources, but the government maintained that the new law will help stop illegal mining and modernize the industry.
PTI and ANP members insisted that the bill should be further debated and transformed into a public interest bill. After the Speaker's order, a briefing will be held again next Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Imran's fate hinges on high courts
Though ex-prime minister Imran Khan has been convicted in five cases since August 5, 2023, none of his convictions has so far been endorsed by any high court. Likewise, serious questions are being raised on the fairness and non-adherence to due process during his trials. Imran Khan's legal team is consistently alleging that due process and the requirements of fairness enshrined in Article 10-A of the Constitution have not been adhered to during his trials. Though the PTI leadership has been unable to evolve any effective strategy for the release of Imran Khan during the last two years, the non-adherence to due process during his trials has raised serious doubts among the masses, which is also giving political advantages to his party. Despite the absence of a joint symbol and the non-availability of a level playing field, the February 8 general election results were shocking for other major political parties. Until Imran is considered a political victim, his opponents cannot defeat him in a free and fair election, says a senior lawyer. He said that the two major political parties, the PML-N and the PPP, should have realized that if they want to defeat Imran on the political ground, then the victim card should have been taken away. First, Imran Khan was convicted in the Toshakhana case on August 5, 2023. The trial court, presided over by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Humayun Dilawar, had given a three-year sentence. However, some lawyers believe that there were serious defects in the judgment. They questioned why the trial court was in such a hurry to decide the case without recording statements of the witnesses whom Imran Khan wanted to present in his defence. Even the trial court did not wait for his counsel, Khawaja Haris, to give his final arguments. Faisal Siddiqi, while commenting on the judgment on August 5, had expressed grave concern over the trial court's decision, viewing it as a symbolic destruction of political justice in the country. Siddiqi also asserted that the judgment was "a result of revenge politics on the part of the PDM government and political manipulation by the deep state." He not only called for the judgment to be overturned but also urged the superior judiciary to investigate the author judge for tarnishing the entire judicial system's reputation. Soon after the announcement of the decision, Imran Khan was arrested in Lahore. After a couple of weeks, the Islamabad High Court led by then Chief Justice Aamer Farooq suspended the trial court decision. The main appeal in this case is still pending in the IHC. Later, Imran was convicted in three cases wherein trials were conducted in Adiala Jail. These convictions were awarded before the general election of February 8, 2024. There are serious allegations of manipulation of trials in those matters. Interestingly, Imran's conviction in the Cypher case has been set aside by a division bench of the IHC led by Justice Aamer Farooq. Likewise, in a second matter, the appellate court also quashed Imran and his wife Bushra Bibi's convictions in the Iddat case. The IHC suspended their convictions in the Toshakhana case. The final appeal is still pending in this matter before the IHC. Meanwhile, the trial court conducted the jail trial of Imran and his wife in the 190 million pounds case. Though the judge fulfilled all procedural requirements during the trial in the 190 million pounds case, questions are being raised on the maintainability of the case after the NAB law amendments. Likewise, the judge postponed the date for the announcement of judgment three times. Despite the passage of more than five months, the IHC is yet to decide Imran and Bushra's petitions seeking suspension of the judgment in the 190 million pounds case. Imran's legal team is consistently filing early hearing applications, but the high court is yet to decide the case. Now, two trials of Imran Khan are continuing in Adiala Jail. One is related to Toshakhana and the other to the May 9 rioting. Recently, the Lahore High Court (LHC) rejected the post-arrest bail of Imran Khan in the May 9 cases. Subsequently, the legal team has approached the apex court against the LHC order. The matter is listed for hearing in the SC on August 12. Post-26th Amendment, as well as the transfer of judges to the IHC, Imran Khan is struggling to get relief in the superior courts. Though the IHC passed an order conditionally allowing meetings with Imran Khan in Adiala Jail, the decision has not been implemented by jail authorities. At present the government is in a strong position and Imran Khan is still receiving massive support, the only loser is the justice system, which has so far failed to adhere to due process and the requirements of fairness enshrined in Article 10-A of the Constitution during the last two years. Recently, Supreme Court judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah issued an additional note in the ex-PM Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto presidential reference case. He said judges must uphold their oaths with courage in the face of oppression, for only then can the judiciary truly safeguard democracy and the rights of the people. "Let the lesson of transitional justice be clear transitional justice, however, often becomes necessary because, during oppressive rule, some judges fail to uphold their constitutional duty, succumbing to the pressure of illegitimate authority. "This failure not only enables violations of due process and fair trial rights but also erodes public trust in the judiciary," wrote Justice Shah. He said the Bhutto case serves as a classic example of a political trial, illustrating how such trials can be manipulated to advance authoritarian designs. Likewise, present CJP Yahya Afridi in a similar case said that the extraordinary political climate of the time and the pressures inherent in such an environment appear to have influenced the course of justice in a manner inconsistent with the ideals of judicial independence.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
PTI on streets!
PTI is kick-starting a new political agitation from today, marking the two years of incarceration of former PM Imran Khan. That the opposition party is on a weak pitch - as it stands divided due to its internal differences and is pushed to the wall by the government - is for all to see. It will thus be a horrendous task for the party to mobilise a sizeable crowd and make its presence felt on the streets. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is understood to lead the movement and there isn't much certainty as to how Punjab and the federal capital's populace will respond, as they have been a victim of lethal crackdown in the past. This dizziness has apparently compelled PTI to chalk out a smart strategy wherein workers and supporters plan to "block roads, share their political heart and disperse peacefully". To what extent it succeeds in building a momentum of change through this 'guerilla campaign' is anybody's guess, but taking into account the vibrancy of the party on social media, it is set to create ripples and give a tough time to the coalition dispensation that is out to exterminate the opposition. The PTI has already launched a mass campaign as far as its overseas strength is concerned, and its media blitz in the Western capitals is making a qualified anti-government impact. The whirlpool tour of Khan's sons to the US, seeking their father's release, has galvanised the necessary sparks and their proposed visit to Pakistan is in need of being watched. Little is known about the role of the six-party opposition alliance, TTAP, in the protest. But what is certain is that the pestering instability is pushing the country to the cliff, and this new phase of revulsion will have its toll. The outcome rests in talking it out, and it's high time for the authorities to engage with the PTI. Many of its demands are worth accepting, like release of all prisoners, including Imran Khan, and provision of due political space. Will someone stand up and be counted from the corridors of power to usher in a thaw?
Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Section 144 imposed in Rawalpindi ahead of PTI protest
Listen to article Authorities in Rawalpindi have imposed Section 144 across the district, banning all public gatherings, motorcycle pillion riding, and rallies from August 4 to August 10, citing security concerns ahead of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) August 5 protest. The Deputy Commissioner's office issued a formal notification on Monday, stating that the restrictions are aimed at maintaining law and order during a sensitive period. According to the notification, 'There will be a complete ban on political gatherings, rallies, and processions in Rawalpindi district. Pillion riding on motorcycles will also be prohibited from August 4 to 10.' The notification also prohibits the display of arms and the use of loudspeakers in public spaces. Any attempt to remove official roadblocks placed on major thoroughfares will result in legal action, officials warned. The administrative clampdown comes amid PTI's continued mobilisation efforts despite ongoing political and legal challenges. The party has not officially announced a rally in Rawalpindi, but authorities appear to be taking preventive measures. It is worth noting that after a series of failed protests, the PTI founder has once again decided to demonstrate street power to campaign for the rule of law and the release of imprisoned party leaders and workers. However, the party appears divided on key policy matters, with dissenting voices increasingly surfacing in public. Days ahead of its planned protest on August 5, the PTI is facing a widespread crackdown, with party leaders going into hiding, workers reporting home raids and several bank accounts reportedly frozen. Party leaders and workers allege that police across Punjab have intensified efforts to suppress the protest by launching a campaign of intimidation. Many party workers lament that since August 1, police have been knocking on doors, forcing workers to sign affidavits promising not to participate in the protest. The raids have led to panic within PTI ranks, with multiple leaders choosing to go underground to avoid arrest. Party sources claim that the "door-knocking" campaign has expanded rapidly over the past few days. In addition to the pressure tactics on the ground, several reports have emerged of financial restrictions being imposed on PTI leadership. The bank account of Hafiz Zeeshan Rasheed, a senior PTI office-bearer in Punjab, has reportedly been frozen, one of many such cases, according to the party.
