logo
EXCLUSIVE Tense moment fare dodger is confronted by ticket inspectors after 'falling £1.30 short for his ticket'

EXCLUSIVE Tense moment fare dodger is confronted by ticket inspectors after 'falling £1.30 short for his ticket'

Daily Mail​a day ago

This is the tense moment a young fare dodger was confronted by rail ticket inspectors before trying to push past them while wrongly travelling on a child's ticket.
The passenger was caught at Weybridge station in Surrey using the ticket which gives a half-price discount on adult prices for children aged five to 15.
South Western Railway revenue protection inspectors intercepted him on the bridge over the platforms after an issue was flagged at the gates when he went through.
But when the team demanded that he show them his ticket, he refused to do so before trying to force his way pass them to walk down onto the platform.
Other officers stepped in to assist and try to block the passenger at the top of the stairs, as he brazenly told them: 'You can't actually physically touch me.'
But after a stand-off, the man eventually relented and showed them his child's ticket, claiming that he had bought it because he was £1.30 short of the adult fare.
Camera crews captured the moment he was stopped in the latest episode of Channel 5's Fare Evaders: At War With The Law which airs next Monday at 9pm.
The man was issued with an unpaid fare notice, which gives permission to travel and pay the fare within 21 days. If unpaid, passengers face the risk of prosecution.
The documentary revealed how the railway industry has noticed a rise in passengers aged over 15 trying to get away with using half-price child tickets.
In a clip shared exclusively with MailOnline, two South Western Railway inspectors called Sharon and Carlos confront a young man who refuses to show his ticket.
What are the rules on UK child rail tickets?
Children aged five to 15 get a 50 per cent discount against the adult price on most National Rail train tickets.
Children aged under five can travel for free, when with a fare-paying adult.
But anyone aged over 15 travelling on a child's ticket could receive a penalty fare if caught by an inspector.
Within the Transport for London (TfL) area, children can travel for free on most trains up to the age of ten when accompanied by an adult.
Those aged 11 to 15 can get 50 per cent off their journeys within the TfL area with a Zip Oyster photocard.
Carlos approaches the passenger after an issue was flagged at the ticket barriers, asking him: 'Have you got a child ticket? Can I have a look at your ticket?'
But the passenger replies: 'No.' Carlos then said: 'Can I see your ticket? You don't have a ticket?' And the man responds: 'No, I do.'
Sharon then stepped in, saying: 'Yeah we need to see it. Just needs to look at it.'
As tensions mount, the passenger says: 'You can't actually physically touch me'
Sharon says the inspectors are not touching him, and other officers step in to assist – telling each other to ensure their body-worn cameras are switched on.
One of the team tells him: 'You're not going down on the platform mate and you're not travelling. Why don't you just show us a ticket?'
The man responds: 'Because I don't need to.' But the inspector insists: 'Yes you do.'
The young man eventually gives in, admitting he does not have the correct ticket.
Sharon then tells the camera: 'It seems that the young lad was short of money. About £1.30 for an adult ticket, so he's purchased a child ticket, but he's over the age of 15.
'A colleague's been really fair with him. He's issued an unpaid fare notice, which is the lowest penalty we can give and it's just the price of the ticket that he should have bought.'
An unpaid fare notice gives permission to travel and pay the fare in 21 days. If unpaid, passengers face the risk of prosecution.
Another inspector says of his job: 'Sometimes we get bad language towards us, they will just push through and then we've got to stop them.
'We do get that level of abuse from them. And these are kids that are between 14 and 16 and they're effing and jeffing at us. And I'm like, well, hang on.'
He adds: 'You do get people who are unhappy about being spoken to. No one wants trouble. You hope that everyone is going to be nice, but not everyone is the same, are they? But then you get customers who do actually appreciate it as well.'
A further inspector then says: 'The gateliner was saying it's a huge deterrent us being here. He actually said 'SWR 1 Fare Evaders 0'.'
The clip features in episode six of the documentary, which also showed the moment an Elizabeth line fare dodger was caught in the act by ticket inspectors after evading £1,650 in ticket costs over nearly 250 journeys.
The passenger who regularly commuted from Harold Wood or Romford to Stratford was confronted with 35 pages of evidence dating back eight months.
A passenger is spoken to by investigators at London Waterloo station after only buying a ticket from Vauxhall, as he is finally caught after evading nearly £20,000 in ticket costs
One of his common methods while travelling through East London was to pay for a fare in Zones 2 to 3 only, rather than the full fare for his journey in Zones 2 to 6.
On the morning of the sting, the passenger was caught not touching in on the card
After being taken to a private room for questioning, the man eventually hands over the Oyster card and is told he could be taken to court for the offences.
The man was then allowed to go on his way but told he would continue to be tracked on the Oyster card – and the case was passed to TfL's prosecution team.
MailOnline has already covered a series of incidents featured in the documentary, which comes after Robert Jenrick highlighted fare dodging at Stratford last month.
The shadow justice secretary posted a video on social media in which he confronted people who forced their way through the ticket barriers at the station.
Separately, a report released on June 4 found fare evasion is becoming 'normalised', with train staff telling the inquiry that they are struggling to cope with 'aggressive' passengers who refuse to buy tickets.
Travellers are using 'a range of techniques to persistently' underpay or avoid paying and see it as a 'victimless crime', according to the Office of Road and Rail (ORR).
Meanwhile TikTok influencers are brazenly showing Tube passengers how to illegally travel for free by 'bumping' through the station ticket barriers .
Fare Dodgers: At War With The Law is on Channel 5 on Monday, June 23 at 9pm

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeal after inmate absconds from HMP Sudbury
Appeal after inmate absconds from HMP Sudbury

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Appeal after inmate absconds from HMP Sudbury

A search is under way to locate an inmate who absconded from an open prison in Derbyshire. Steven Gaskell left HMP Sudbury between 20:30 BST and midnight on Friday, Derbyshire Police 32-year-old was serving a sentence of more than five years for causing death by driving whilst disqualified and possession with intent to supply is described as being about 6ft 3in tall (1.9m), with blonde hair and a blonde/ginger beard. The force said Gaskell had links to Derbyshire, Northamptonshire, Leicestershire, West Yorkshire, Hertfordshire, Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and with any information about his whereabouts is urged to contact Derbyshire Police.

Firearms officer who shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes says he would do anything to turn back time as he apologies to his grieving family
Firearms officer who shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes says he would do anything to turn back time as he apologies to his grieving family

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Firearms officer who shot dead Jean Charles de Menezes says he would do anything to turn back time as he apologies to his grieving family

A retired firearms officer who shot dead an innocent electrician mistaken for a suicide bomber has issued an apology to his grieving family. Almost two decades after the tragedy, one of the two marksmen who killed Jean Charles de Menezes has spoken publicly about the shocking murder for the first time. The 27-year-old was shot dead in the head by two officers at London 's Stockwell station on July 22, 2005 having been wrongly identified as failed July 21 bomber Hussan Osman in the aftermath of the 7/7 London bombings. Now, in an emotional statement, one of his killers has expressed how he wishes to say 'sorry' to Mr Menezes' family, adding that he 'would do anything to roll back time, to have a different set of circumstances where that didn't happen'. Speaking in a four-part Netflix documentary set to be released next week, the policeman, codenamed C2, reflected on the tragedy, adding: 'By the time I got home I was aware there was speculation regarding the identity of the person I had killed. I didn't get any sleep, and I still had massive tinnitus, a very, very loud ringing in my ears. 'The next day I caught the tube back to work and I was called into the chief superintendent's office. He told me that the man I shot was completely innocent. I can't describe how I felt, the worst feeling ever, I killed an innocent man'. The firearm officers, who had only been given a 'ten-second glimpse' of the real target prior to the botched operation, had tracked Mr Menezes down while on his way to work. The electrician had been wrongly identified by surveillance teams as Osman as he lived in the same block of flats in Tulse Hill, south London. After being given the go-ahead by bosses for armed deployment, Mr Menezes was shot seven times in the head at point-blank range in a packed carriage during the morning rush hour. All 17 eyewitnesses confirmed that he had not behaved aggressively or suspiciously and made no attempt to flee police. But initial reports wrongly claimed he had vaulted station barriers while wearing a bulky jacket, fuelling assumptions he was a threat. C2, who shot dead the innocent man with six bullets after his colleague initially opened fire, said that he 'accepts responsibility' for the tragic murder, but questioned 'why were we in that position?' in the first place. Calling on those who instructed him to shoot Mr Menezes to acknowledge their role in the tragedy, he added: 'Those people in command put me in that position, they also have to answer'. Meanwhile, the other firearms officer involved, named only by his cypher C12, reflected on the awful tragedy during a Channel 4 documentary released late last year. The former officer choked back tears as he described the moment he first pulled the trigger while on the stationary train. He said: 'He (Mr Menezes) just got up and immediately turned to his right, which is where we were, and came towards us. The electrician had been wrongly identified by surveillance teams as Hussan Osman (pictured) as he lived in the same block of flats in Tulse Hill, south London. Pictured: Osman's gym membership card found in a rucksack at the site of the failed bombing on July 21, 2005 'At the same time I brought my weapon up and pointed it at his head and I shouted 'armed police. 'At that stage in my head, this person knew who we were. This person was coming forward in order to detonate a bomb and kill us.' C12 said he had suffered in the two decades after the shooting, with the trauma remaining a 'weeping sore' on his life. For Mr Menezes' heartbroken family, there is no apology or remorse that could help relieve the pain of their loss nearly 20 years on. The young man's two cousins, Patricia Da Silva Armani and Vivian Figueiredo, who were sharing a flat with him at the time of his death, acutely remember the agony of finding out he had been wrongfully killed. Ms Figuieredo, who realised Mr Menezes had not come home that night, initially believed he had simply been arrested due to being suspected of terrorism. Speaking to The Mirror, she said: 'I was shocked. But I also had hope. It was just a matter of going to the police to clarify everything.' But the reality was to be far worse. The pair were then taken to a police station, alongside their two other cousins, Alex Alves Pereira and Alessandro Pereira, where they were later told of the devastating tragedy. Ms Armani, who had last seen her beloved cousin just two days prior, said: 'My English wasn't great and I didn't understand a lot of what they were saying. I only understand the last part - "He is dead". Still, I didn't think I heard right. 'I went into total despair. Everyone was crying and screaming.' Despite the family's pursuit of legal action, no officers were charged for Mr Menezes' murder, although the Metropolitan Police was found guilty of health and safety failures. After an inquest into the death returned an open verdict, the force was fined £175,000 over the botched operation and the de Menezes family agreed an undisclosed settlement in 2009. Ms Figueiredo, who said that her 'whole world fell apart' when Mr Menezes was killed, described her cousin as a 'happy person' and an 'extrovert' that simply 'wanted to help people and make his family proud'. She added: 'I remember him all the time but especially at times when I wished he were still here, like when my daughter was born. He'll never be forgotten'. Meanwhile, Mr Menezes' 80-year-old mother Maria previously told the Mirror that she has made peace with the officers who took her son's life. Speaking from her home in Brazil, she said: 'I forgive, but I cannot accept what they have done because they destroyed my son's life. 'But I've come to realise that I don't want to keep this hatred inside my heart. I believe those people who made the mistakes will pay for it somehow. 'They have souls, and I have entrusted it to God, as to what will happen to them. But I don't want this hatred for myself anymore, because I don't want this to destroy me.' In a previous statement the Metropolitan Police said that the tragedy occurred 'at a time of unprecedented terrorist threat to London'. 'No officer sets out intent on ending a life. Our sole purpose is the protection and preservation of life, and we have taken extensive action to address the causes of this tragedy.

Hero police officer who rescued toddler from a burning building loses job after speeding to work
Hero police officer who rescued toddler from a burning building loses job after speeding to work

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Hero police officer who rescued toddler from a burning building loses job after speeding to work

A hero police officer who won a commendation for rescuing a toddler from a burning house has been sacked for speeding to work during a staffing crisis. Custody Sgt Tim Perrin, 43, was dismissed by Devon and Cornwall Police after being found to have acted dishonestly when he tried to appeal against the speeding fine. The father of two, who had a 20-year unblemished career in the police, was fired last week over the one-off incident that occurred almost two years ago. He has said the experience has completely shattered his faith in the police misconduct process and makes him fear for the future of the service. Mr Perrin accused the force of spending 'well over six figures' on investigating his case, at a time when they cannot afford to attend burglaries or shopliftings. He told the Telegraph: 'I am not surprised they came to the decision they did in the end as cancel culture in the police is rife. There is a huge over-reaction to things nowadays. 'The pendulum has swung completely in the opposite direction and forces are just desperate to show that they are squeaky clean. Officers are no longer given the benefit of the doubt.' Mr Perrin has warned that the police's actions is causing experienced officers to leave in their droves, and they are being replaced with young inexperienced recruits - which is bad for policing and bad for the public. The father of two, who had a 20-year unblemished career in the police, has said the experience has completely shattered his faith in the police misconduct process and makes him fear for the future of the service The decision was made despite Mr Perrin receiving a string of commendations after he entered a burning building to rescue a toddler who had become trapped on the third floor in 2008. In a glowing citation, the local fire chief wrote he and his colleagues had placed themselves at considerable risk for bravely saving the life of the child. Mr Perrin is now working as a maintenance man in Torquay and said the outcome has had a devastating impact on him and his partner, Lisa, who is also a serving police officer. His case has echos of Pc Lorne Castle's case, which involved him being dismissed by neighbouring Dorset Police for using 'disproportionate force' when he tackled a teenage knife-wielding thug during an arrest in Bournemouth in January 2024. A Stanley-like knife fell from the boy's waistband during his arrest, but a misconduct panel said PC Castle – who put his hand in the teen's face and on his neck and jabbed his finger at him - failed to act with self-control or show the boy 'courtesy and respect'. The father-of-three told LBC Radio he had received thousands of messages of support. A GoFundMe campaign to support him and his family has raised over £120,000. Sgt Perrin's case dates back to August 2023 when he was asked if he would be able to make a 45 minute drive to Plymouth the following morning to help cover a staffing crisis in the custody cells there. But just before he was about to set off, he said he received a message from an officer at the Plymouth station asking him to hurry as things were getting out of control. Rushing to his colleague's aid, Sgt Perrin admitted putting his foot down in order to get there as soon as was safely possible. At some point during the journey he was pictured by a speed camera doing 48mph in a 30mph zone. A few days later he received a letter notice of intended prosecution. He decided to appeal against the ticket on the basis he believed had been fulfilling a valid policing purpose, with his boss agreeing. But when the appeal was rejected Sgt Perrin accepted the decision, paid the fine and took the points - thinking that would be the end of the matter. However in January 2024 he was stunned to learn he was being investigated for gross misconduct over his allegedly 'dishonest account'. The force's department of professional standards had raised suspicions over some alleged inconsistencies in his account and suggested he had lied about receiving the call urging him to get to Plymouth as soon as possible on that day. Although he was shocked by the development, he thought the investigation wouldn't go anywhere as he thought he hadn't done anything wrong. He was interviewed last spring and was asked to give a very detailed account of the incident, which was almost a year earlier. This made recalling every aspect of that specific day very challenging, he said. The force tried to speak to officers who had been on duty at Plymouth who might have made the phone call to Sgt Perrin, but he said as there was nothing remarkable about what happened they understandably could not recall the conversation. Sgt Perrin's case was then escalated to a hearing, which caused him to worry. He faced the misconduct panel on June 16 where, on the balance of probabilities, the force found the case against was proven and he was dismissed. According to Sgt Perrin, he was grilled by the barrister representing the force for several hours, which involved ridiculing and patronising. He said they tried to discredit him and make him look like he had done something wrong. His attempted to explain that he had not been dishonest, but that perhaps his account was poorly worded in places and left open to interpretation for people who worked outside of the custody environment. But because gross misconduct had been proven on the balance of probabilities, and it was an honesty and integrity issue, the only outcome could be dismissal without notice. The force made the decision despite all of the good character evidence that Sgt Perrin put forward, and how well he was respected in his local community. He has said he feels he has been treated 'worse than any criminal' and questioned the force's disproportionate time and effort to investigate his offence, which is far beyond what the force would invest into investigating actual crime. Sgt Perrin estimated the cost to the public would be well over six digits, while at the same time there is no money to attend burglaries or shopliftings. As well as saving the toddler from a burning building, Sgt Perrin on another occasion, won praise for being part of a Taser crew who successfully tackled a man believed to be armed with a shotgun. He also received a third commendation for heroically rescuing a man who had fallen down a coastal cliff during a storm. A spokesman for Devon and Cornwall Police said in a statement: 'Following a two-day gross misconduct panel hearing this week, Mr Perrin was found to have been culpable for gross misconduct and dismissed with immediate effect. 'Mr Perrin was found to have breached standards of professional behaviour in terms of honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. 'This related to his reply to a notice of intended prosecution following a speeding offence in his private vehicle. The panel did not accept the account provided by the officer to be true and found the actions of this officer were deliberately misleading for personal gain representing a lack of integrity and undermining public confidence in the police service. 'As with all cases of this nature, a full report from the gross misconduct panel chair will be submitted to the force in due course, provided to Mr Perrin and published on our website.' In a post on his Twitter account after the hearing on June 17, Mr Perrin wrote: 'Today, after over 20 yrs as a dedicated, decorated and highly skilled officer, I was dismissed for providing a 'misleading account' in relation to a speed camera activation application for exemption when rushing to help colleagues whilst on duty. 'I left with my head held high. 'I've spoken with spectators present at the hearing. None can work out what I was actually dismissed for. 'Yet we sack officers because it's what the public expect. Do they really expect an officer with an unblemished, distinguished 20 yr career be sacked for something like this?' A few days later on June 20 he added: 'The outpouring of support, particularly from my D&C colleagues has been incredible and humbling. 'Unfortunately this has been the catalyst for some who can draw an immediate pension to throw the towel in now. Retention of experience seems to be in major crisis up and down the UK.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store