logo
What are the government's planned welfare changes?

What are the government's planned welfare changes?

BBC News5 hours ago

A significant number of Labour MPs are threatening to vote against the government's working-age welfare reform plan when it comes before the House of Commons next week.The reforms are designed to reduce the overall working-age welfare bill by about £5bn a year by the end of the decade.The rebel MPs have signed an amendment to the legislation that makes a series of objections, including a lack of official consultation and impact assessments.BBC Verify explains the detail of the reforms and their possible impact.
Which benefits would be cut?
The government wants to save money by:making it harder for people to access Personal Independence Payments (Pip)cutting the rate of incapacity benefitIncapacity benefit - which is mainly paid through the health element of Universal Credit - goes to those deemed to be unable to work for health reasons.This benefit is set to be reduced by 50% in cash terms for new claimants from April 2026. For existing claimants, it is due to be held flat in cash terms until 2029-30 - meaning payments will not rise in line with inflation. The government estimates these two changes will save £3bn a year by the end of the decade.Pip is paid to people with a long-term physical or mental health condition or a disability and who need support. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has acknowledged that almost 20% of recipients are in work.
The government plans to make it more difficult for people to claim the "daily living" element of Pip from 2026-27. Under the current assessment system, claimants are scored on a zero to 12 scale by a health professional on everyday tasks such as washing, getting dressed and preparing food.What are the Pip and universal credit changes and who is affected?Under the proposed change, people would need to score at least four on one task, ruling out people with lower scores who would previously have qualified for the benefit. The government estimates this will save an additional £4.5bn a year from the welfare bill by the end of the decade.
Why is the government trying to cut welfare spending?
It is concerned about the rise in the number of people claiming working-age benefits in recent years and the implications of this trend for the public finances.Last Autumn, the government projected that the numbers of working-age claimants of Pip in England, Scotland and Wales would rise from 2.7 million in 2023-24 to 4.3 million in 2029-30, an increase of 1.6 million.At that time, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's official forecaster, projected that the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5bn in 2024 to £75.7bn by 2030.That would have represented an increase from 1.7% of the size of the UK economy to 2.2%, roughly the size of current spending on defence.
Ministers argue that this rising bill needs to be brought under control and that changes to the welfare system are part of that effort.It is worth noting though that - even after factoring in the planned cuts - the OBR still projected this bill to continue to rise in cash terms to £72.3bn by 2030.And the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) still projected the total number of working-age Pip recipients to rise by 1.2 million between 2023-24 and 2029-30 - after the cuts.
In this sense, the main effect of the Pip cuts would be to reduce the increase in claimants that would otherwise have occurred.
What would the impact of the reforms be?
The government's official impact assessment estimates that about 250,000 additional people (including 50,000 children) will be left in "relative poverty" (after housing costs) by 2030 because of the reforms.However, that assessment included the impact of the government deciding not to proceed with welfare reforms planned by the previous Conservative administration, which government analysts had judged would have pushed an additional 150,000 people into poverty.Some charities and research organisations have suggested this means the government's 250,000 estimate understates the impact of its own reforms, since the previous administration's reforms were never actually implemented.Iain Porter from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has suggested the actual poverty impact of the government's changes could therefore be up to 400,000 (adding the 250,000 figure to the 150,000 figure to generate an estimate of the total numbers affected).However, the government's impact assessment cautions against simply adding the two figures together, noting that "some people are affected by more than one [reform] measure", meaning this approach risks double counting individuals.Taking account of this, the Resolution Foundation think tank has estimated that the net effect of the government's reforms would mean "at least 300,000" people entering relative poverty by 2030.
What about the impact on employment?
The government has claimed that its reforms are not just about saving money, but helping people into work.Chancellor Rachel Reeves told Sky News in March 2025 that: "I am absolutely certain that our reforms, instead of pushing people into poverty, are going to get people into work. And we know that if you move from welfare into work, you are much less likely to be in poverty."To this end, the government is gradually increasing the standard allowance in Universal Credit - the basic sum paid to cover recipients' living costs - by £5 a week by 2029-30.This is projected to be a net benefit to 3.8 million households and the government argues it will also increase the incentives for people to work rather than claim incapacity benefits.The government is also investing an extra £1bn a year by 2029-30 in additional support to get people out of inactivity and into employment.
What are the rebels' objections?
The rebel MPs say disabled people have not been consulted on the proposed reforms.They also say there has been no evaluation of the overall employment impacts by the OBR.It is true that the government has not consulted disabled people on the specific cuts to Pip and incapacity benefits, though it is now consulting on the broader reform package.It is also the case that the OBR has not yet done a full employment impact assessment, though the forecaster says it will do one before the Autumn Budget.Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation has done its own estimate of the employment impact of the overall reform package.It estimates the total increase in employment could be between 60,000 and 105,000, although it stressed that these figures are highly uncertain.This positive employment figure contrasts with the 800,000 people who are projected to lose part of their Pip payments by 2029-30 and the 3 million people families who will see a cut in their incapacity benefits.
What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning
PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning

South Wales Guardian

time27 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning

The Prime Minister insisted the correct preparation has been done to ensure the Bill is 'workable in all its aspects'. Sir Keir supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in a historic vote on Friday which saw the proposed legislation clear the Commons. The Government is neutral on the topic and MPs had a free vote, meaning they made their own decisions rather than following party lines. Mr Streeting was one of the most senior Government ministers to vote against the Bill, alongside Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner. At the weekend, Mr Streeting warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service. He said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. Writing on his Facebook page, Mr Streeting said: 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' Sir Keir was asked by reporters if the will of Parliament must be implemented and a budget found for assisted dying. He said: 'It is my responsibility to make sure the Bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects. 'I'm confident we've done that preparation.' The Bill cleared the Commons on Friday, but with a narrower majority of 23 votes, compared with a majority of 55 in November. It will next come before the House of Lords for further debate and votes. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, has said she hopes peers will not try to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. Speaking in the aftermath of the Commons vote, she said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.

PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning
PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning

South Wales Argus

time28 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

PM ‘confident' on assisted dying law despite Streeting's ‘no budget' warning

The Prime Minister insisted the correct preparation has been done to ensure the Bill is 'workable in all its aspects'. Sir Keir supported the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in a historic vote on Friday which saw the proposed legislation clear the Commons. The Government is neutral on the topic and MPs had a free vote, meaning they made their own decisions rather than following party lines. Mr Streeting was one of the most senior Government ministers to vote against the Bill, alongside Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner. At the weekend, Mr Streeting warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service. He said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. Health Secretary Wes Streeting voted against the assisted dying Bill (Lucy North/PA) Writing on his Facebook page, Mr Streeting said: 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' Sir Keir was asked by reporters if the will of Parliament must be implemented and a budget found for assisted dying. He said: 'It is my responsibility to make sure the Bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects. 'I'm confident we've done that preparation.' The Bill cleared the Commons on Friday, but with a narrower majority of 23 votes, compared with a majority of 55 in November. It will next come before the House of Lords for further debate and votes. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, has said she hopes peers will not try to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. Speaking in the aftermath of the Commons vote, she said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.

UK energy and steel to be classed as ‘nationally important' in procurement shift
UK energy and steel to be classed as ‘nationally important' in procurement shift

Western Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

UK energy and steel to be classed as ‘nationally important' in procurement shift

Public sector buyers would be able to avoid normal requirements to consider overseas bidders and instead give priority to domestic firms under the plans set out in a consultation launching on Wednesday. Ministers would be allowed to designate sectors such as steel, energy and cyber nationally important in order to help grant them more of the £400 billion spent on procurement each year, the Government said. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said the proposals would ensure British industry was supported and 'boost growth'. 'The new rules being considered will give us the power to protect our national industries, ensuring more money goes to them as we buy goods and services in Government,' he said. The Government said the new rules will also ensure buyers exclude companies that cannot provide evidence of a good record of paying companies in their supply chains promptly and on time in a move to protect small businesses. New guidance will also require Government departments to consider British steel products for the £725 billion of UK infrastructure spending over the next 10 years announced in the industrial strategy on Monday. UK Steel welcomed the proposals, describing them as 'unequivocally positive news' that would help safeguard jobs in the industry. Director general of UK Steel, Gareth Stace, said: 'These changes rightly recognise the strategic importance of steelmaking to national security and the vital role of resilient domestic supply chains.' It comes as the industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. The Government has said both sides have agreed to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products' in ongoing talks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store