logo
Are 10% council tax rises on the way in Scotland?

Are 10% council tax rises on the way in Scotland?

Yahoo11-02-2025

Scotland's councils are to decide on local tax rates over the coming weeks, with many mulling rises of up to 10%.
Rates have been frozen or capped for much of the last 20 years, but look set to increase as local authorities work to balance the books.
This is the culmination of years of concerns about mounting pressure on local budgets, amid increased demand for services and rows over funding.
Why are Scotland's councils so short of cash, and are big increases in local levies set to become the new normal?
Councils deliver crucial local services from schools to social care. They collect bins and maintain roads, provide housing, oversee planning and development, and run community facilities like libraries and sports centres.
They are also continually short of cash.
Going into this year's budget season, the country's 32 councils warned they faced a projected shortfall between committed spending and expected funding of £392m - and said it could rise to £780m the following year.
Previous years have involved equally dizzying figures. Councils closed a budget gap of £759m in 2023-24, and faced another of £585m in 2024-25.
This is the result of a stack of pressures including inflation, pay deals and pensions, greater demand for services like housing support, the ever-increasing strain of providing care for an aging population, and delivering policy commitments like free school meals.
Funding from the Scottish government makes up the bulk of council finances, so there is usually an annual scrap over whether enough cash is forthcoming from Holyrood.
This year, leaders actually gave Finance Secretary Shona Robison's budget a cautious welcome, calling it a "step in the right direction" which provided some extra funding.
But they insisted it was still a "difficult" settlement in light of longer-term pressures, with each individual council working to fill a gap of millions of pounds.
And that was before they discovered they would have to cover part of the cost of the UK-wide increase in employer's National Insurance Contributions.
Councils need to find £96m to offset their staffing costs - equivalent to a 3% increase in council tax on its own, before you start on any of the other challenges.
Council tax is the biggest fiscal lever councils have to pull upon. And most look ready to pull hard.
Many authorities ran consultations ahead of their budget-setting meetings, seeking views on hikes ranging up into double figures.
Scottish Borders Council has already agreed a draft plan with a 10% rise, with leaders saying the "extremely difficult decision" was needed to safeguard "essential services".
Councils from East Lothian to Fife to Shetland have also mulled increases of up to 10%, while Edinburgh, Midlothian and East Ayrshire are reportedly looking at 8%.
Inverclyde Council actually did implement an 8.2% increase in council tax last year, but after a last-second deal with the government paid the money back to residents through a rebate. That was a one-off though, so residents will still be subject to that rise this year, along with any additional increase for 2025-26.
Some are looking further ahead too. Perth and Kinross Council has proposed a rise of 10% this year, as well as 10% next year and 6% the year after. Leaders say this will provide "stability and predictability" in planning over the longer term.
All of these decisions remain up in the air for now, with individual councils meeting to set their budgets in late February and early March.
For a big chunk of recent history, councils haven't had a free hand over local rates.
The SNP instituted a council tax freeze for nine years after it came to power at Holyrood in 2007, with then-Finance Secretary John Swinney essentially paying councils a lump sum not to raise rates.
When the freeze eventually ended, controls remained. A similar deal was struck to cap rate rises at 3%, and was used most years thereafter.
And last year, then-First Minister Humza Yousaf announced a fresh council tax freeze out of the blue.
Politically, it wrecked his attempts to reset the government's relationship with local authorities, which would far rather be able to make their own decisions.
It also soured ties with the Scottish Greens, contributing to the collapse of the Bute House agreement which ultimately swept Mr Yousaf out of power.
And economically, it underlined the fact that freezes are increasingly expensive, a blunt fiscal tool which benefitted the well-off every bit as much as lower earners.
So this year, councils have a free hand - other than Mr Swinney, now first minister, trying to nudge them a little by suggesting that big rises are not necessary.
Other than 2023-24 - when many councils raised rates by about 5% - this is the first time for almost 20 years when a big increase has really been possible.
Is there an alternative to hiking council tax rates?
There are a range of options available - but few are untapped resources.
The simplest answer is to cut spending on staffing and services. Realistically councils have already been doing this, and will continue to do so hand in hand with tax rises.
The fear is that any fat was trimmed away in previous budget cycles, and that cuts now go to the bone. Things like libraries and community centres are coming under threat - ideas even more unpalatable to councillors than big tax rises.
Most authorities have also dipped heavily into their reserves in recent years, utilising the funds they have squirreled away for a rainy day.
But this pool of cash was drained by 5% last year alone, and 84% of general funds are now committed.
Some money can be raised by increasing charges for services - for everything from rent on council houses to garden waste collections.
Many councils are also seeking to get creative when it comes to revenue streams.
There are new options open to them, thanks to reforms made at Holyrood - things like the tourist tax.
Edinburgh has taken the lead with a 5% levy on accommodation costs, which will be introduced from July 2026. But others like Glasgow, Highland and Stirling are looking at similar measures - and Aberdeen City is pondering a steeper tariff, of 7%.
Another recent addition is the power to double council tax on second homes. Councils including Aberdeenshire, Scottish Borders, Fife and Edinburgh have instituted 200% rates, and others including North Ayrshire have consulted on joining in.
However not all powers have been taken up; Edinburgh dropped plans for a charge on workplace parking last year, with councillors saying it was "hitting working people with a big huge stick" and "not giving them any carrots".
Meanwhile, borrowing by councils went up by £400m last year, chiefly to invest in buildings and infrastructure - and while this is vital, it means almost all of them now face higher levels of debt and annual interest costs.
All but one council increased their debts in 23-24, and combined they have a net debt of £20bn - up 16% on the previous year.
Will things change in future?
Council tax has never been particularly popular.
It is broadly accepted to be a "regressive" tax; it weighs more heavily on poorer households, as a proportion of income, than those on higher incomes.
It's also undeniably out of date, being rooted in property values from 1991.
The SNP's 2007 manifesto promised to replace the "hated" levy with a local income tax.
But talk of change has never led to any real action, even when the SNP had a majority from 2011, or when it partnered up with the strongly pro-reform Greens.
A fresh consultation has just been announced, but given there is only a year until the next Holyrood election nothing is going to actually happen in this term of parliament.
In theory that election should still produce a super-majority in favour of reform. Alongside the SNP and Greens, Scottish Labour and the Lib Dems are both in favour of scrapping the council tax.
But that has been the case for decades. The question is whether it can become enough of a priority for parties to actually do something about it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Assails Sanctions by UK, Other Allies on Israeli Ministers
US Assails Sanctions by UK, Other Allies on Israeli Ministers

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

US Assails Sanctions by UK, Other Allies on Israeli Ministers

Secretary of State Marco Rubio rebuked five allies over sanctions they imposed on two members of Israel's cabinet as fissures between the US and its partners widen over the war in Gaza and the treatment of Palestinians. In a statement released late Tuesday, Rubio criticized the UK, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia for penalties imposed on Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.

Government urged to disrupt ‘addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives
Government urged to disrupt ‘addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Government urged to disrupt ‘addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives

The Government is being urged to create child-friendly playful neighbourhoods and disrupt the 'addictive grip' of smartphones on children's lives. Closures of playgrounds, busier roads, shortened school break times and the dominance of screentime have restricted children's opportunities to play, a report has suggested. Urgent action is needed to create more opportunities for children to play outdoors and away from digital devices and social media, according to a report by the Raising the Nation Play Commission inquiry. It warned: 'Too many of our children are spending their most precious years sedentary, doomscrolling on their phones and often alone, while their health and wellbeing deteriorates.' The commission was chaired by Paul Lindley, founder of organic baby food manufacturer Ella's Kitchen, in partnership with the Centre for Young Lives think tank, which was co-founded by the former children's commissioner for England Baroness Anne Longfield. It has called on the Government to establish a National Play Strategy for England, backed by an annual £125 million investment and led by a 'minister for play'. The strategy should include a commitment to a 'step-change' in the quantity and quality of children's use of digital devices through stronger regulation, public engagement and information, and addressing addictive 'push' factors that have driven children online, the report added. The inquiry has called on the Government to raise the digital age of consent to 16 and introduce a ban on smartphones in schools during the school day. It added that it should become easier for parents to organise 'safe play' in their streets, and there should be a national ban on 'No Ball Games' signs. A poll of 2,000 parents in England, commissioned by the inquiry, suggested that 55% of parents believe their youngest child plays outside less than they did when they were children. Around three in four (76%) parents agree that people are generally less accepting of children playing outside on the street than when they were a child, according to the poll. The Raising the Nation Play Commission brought together 19 expert commissioners to conduct a year-long inquiry into how play can be restored to every childhood in England. Lady Longfield, executive chairwoman of the Centre for Young Lives, said: 'Too many of our children are spending their most precious years sedentary, doomscrolling on their phones and often alone, while their health and wellbeing deteriorates. 'It is no coincidence that the least happy generation, the generation with the highest rates of obesity and rising ill health, is the generation that plays less and less. 'As we have heard from a swathe of experts and professionals working with children over the last year, play is being squeezed out of childhoods, with drastic implications for children, our economy and public services. 'With so much at stake children really have everything to play for: their health, wellbeing, happiness, learning, and development depends on our ability to reignite the role of play. 'This report provides a blueprint for how we can get children playing again and also tackle the scourge of addictive doomscrolling, so we can prevent future generations from becoming glued to screens.' Technology Secretary Pete Kyle has indicated he is considering an 'app cap' for children. On Sunday, the minister signalled he was looking at measures to restrict the amount of time children spend on their phones, including through a possible 10pm curfew. Mr Lindley, chairman of the Raising the Nation Play Commission, said: 'Creating truly playful communities is not just about better street design, traffic management, and reduced crime, but also about a reversal of the growing culture of intolerance towards children playing. 'This will also encourage more parents to have confidence they can let their children play out more freely, in the knowledge that their children will be both having a great time and are also safe. 'We need to give our children back the time, space, opportunity, freedom – and the right – to play again.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise the vital importance of play and access to nature as part of children's development and wellbeing as we strive to create the healthiest and happiest generation of children ever. 'Through our Plan for Change, we are setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom. 'We have given hundreds of thousands of children the tools to turn their grey school spaces green as part of our National Education Nature Park, we are opening up grassroots sports to all with £100 million investment in facilities and we are working with experts to develop a framework to improve access to activities outside of school. 'Schools already have the power to completely ban phones in the classroom and the overwhelming majority – 99.8% of primary schools and 90% of secondary schools – limit or restrict use. 'And from July, new rules under the Online Safety Act will require social media platforms to protect children in the UK from seeing harmful content online.'

Ladbrokes ads banned over use of ‘Ladbucks' likely to appeal to under-18s
Ladbrokes ads banned over use of ‘Ladbucks' likely to appeal to under-18s

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ladbrokes ads banned over use of ‘Ladbucks' likely to appeal to under-18s

Ads for gambling firm Ladbrokes have been banned for using the term 'Ladbucks', found to resemble gaming references likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s. The TV ad, seen in December, featured a voiceover that stated: 'This is a Ladbuck, the new way to get rewarded at Ladbrokes, and these are some of the 100 million Ladbucks that will be dropping weekly. 'Collect them on our free to play games and choose rewards like free spins, free bets and more … Plus you can even use them to play your favourite games for free in our Ladbucks arcade. Like Fishin Frenzy and Goldstrike.' A Video on Demand ad, seen on Channel 4 around the same time, was the same as the TV ad. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received two complaints that the term 'Ladbucks' was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s. Ladbrokes said the term 'Ladbucks' was chosen as a play on the word Ladbrokes, and because it referenced, through the use of the term bucks, that it had value on the Ladbrokes website. They said the word had no origins in youth culture and believed that it was not of inherent strong appeal to under-18s, and highlighted that both ads had targeting restrictions to reduce the likelihood of children viewing them. The firm said it believed that the term was not associated with any coins from video games which were popular with under-18s, adding that 'V-Bucks' from Fortnite and 'Robux' from Roblox were in-game currencies that had to be purchased before being used to buy in-game items. Further, it did not believe the term 'lad' referred to a boy or young man and said its brand had never been used in that context. The ASA said several online games popular with under-18s, such as Roblox and Fortnite, had their own in-game currencies, which were called Robux and V-Bucks respectively. These currencies, which could be both bought and earnt through gameplay, were depicted as coins, and spent within in-game stores, usually on cosmetic items that enhanced gameplay. According to Ofcom's 2024 report into media use and attitudes, 60% of children aged between three and 17 years gamed online, while 89% of 11 to 18-year-olds gamed online weekly, with categories of games that were most popular including building games, such as Roblox, followed by games played against others, such as Fortnite. The ASA said it considered the term 'Ladbucks', through the suffix 'bucks', had strong similarities to the in-game currencies Robux and V-Bucks. It said the name 'Ladbucks', when considered alongside the imagery and the application of the coin in the ads, was 'depicted in a manner which was similar to features in video games popular with children'. 'We therefore considered the term in the ads was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s and breached the Code,' it said. The watchdog ruled that the ads must not appear again in their current form, adding: 'We told Ladbrokes not to include content in ads that was reflective of youth culture or which had strong appeal to those under 18 years of age.' A spokesman for Entain, which owns Ladbrokes, said: 'We are disappointed by the ASA's ruling on our 'Ladbucks' advertising campaign, and we are seeking an independent review of what we consider to be a flawed decision. 'For example, it is based on an inaccurate comparison with games such as Fortnite or Roblox and their in-game currencies. Entain works extremely carefully to ensure that its advertising does not target or appeal to under-18s. 'We maintain that this was a responsibly created and targeted campaign, pre-approved by Clearcast and only shown after the watershed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store