Are 10% council tax rises on the way in Scotland?
Scotland's councils are to decide on local tax rates over the coming weeks, with many mulling rises of up to 10%.
Rates have been frozen or capped for much of the last 20 years, but look set to increase as local authorities work to balance the books.
This is the culmination of years of concerns about mounting pressure on local budgets, amid increased demand for services and rows over funding.
Why are Scotland's councils so short of cash, and are big increases in local levies set to become the new normal?
Councils deliver crucial local services from schools to social care. They collect bins and maintain roads, provide housing, oversee planning and development, and run community facilities like libraries and sports centres.
They are also continually short of cash.
Going into this year's budget season, the country's 32 councils warned they faced a projected shortfall between committed spending and expected funding of £392m - and said it could rise to £780m the following year.
Previous years have involved equally dizzying figures. Councils closed a budget gap of £759m in 2023-24, and faced another of £585m in 2024-25.
This is the result of a stack of pressures including inflation, pay deals and pensions, greater demand for services like housing support, the ever-increasing strain of providing care for an aging population, and delivering policy commitments like free school meals.
Funding from the Scottish government makes up the bulk of council finances, so there is usually an annual scrap over whether enough cash is forthcoming from Holyrood.
This year, leaders actually gave Finance Secretary Shona Robison's budget a cautious welcome, calling it a "step in the right direction" which provided some extra funding.
But they insisted it was still a "difficult" settlement in light of longer-term pressures, with each individual council working to fill a gap of millions of pounds.
And that was before they discovered they would have to cover part of the cost of the UK-wide increase in employer's National Insurance Contributions.
Councils need to find £96m to offset their staffing costs - equivalent to a 3% increase in council tax on its own, before you start on any of the other challenges.
Council tax is the biggest fiscal lever councils have to pull upon. And most look ready to pull hard.
Many authorities ran consultations ahead of their budget-setting meetings, seeking views on hikes ranging up into double figures.
Scottish Borders Council has already agreed a draft plan with a 10% rise, with leaders saying the "extremely difficult decision" was needed to safeguard "essential services".
Councils from East Lothian to Fife to Shetland have also mulled increases of up to 10%, while Edinburgh, Midlothian and East Ayrshire are reportedly looking at 8%.
Inverclyde Council actually did implement an 8.2% increase in council tax last year, but after a last-second deal with the government paid the money back to residents through a rebate. That was a one-off though, so residents will still be subject to that rise this year, along with any additional increase for 2025-26.
Some are looking further ahead too. Perth and Kinross Council has proposed a rise of 10% this year, as well as 10% next year and 6% the year after. Leaders say this will provide "stability and predictability" in planning over the longer term.
All of these decisions remain up in the air for now, with individual councils meeting to set their budgets in late February and early March.
For a big chunk of recent history, councils haven't had a free hand over local rates.
The SNP instituted a council tax freeze for nine years after it came to power at Holyrood in 2007, with then-Finance Secretary John Swinney essentially paying councils a lump sum not to raise rates.
When the freeze eventually ended, controls remained. A similar deal was struck to cap rate rises at 3%, and was used most years thereafter.
And last year, then-First Minister Humza Yousaf announced a fresh council tax freeze out of the blue.
Politically, it wrecked his attempts to reset the government's relationship with local authorities, which would far rather be able to make their own decisions.
It also soured ties with the Scottish Greens, contributing to the collapse of the Bute House agreement which ultimately swept Mr Yousaf out of power.
And economically, it underlined the fact that freezes are increasingly expensive, a blunt fiscal tool which benefitted the well-off every bit as much as lower earners.
So this year, councils have a free hand - other than Mr Swinney, now first minister, trying to nudge them a little by suggesting that big rises are not necessary.
Other than 2023-24 - when many councils raised rates by about 5% - this is the first time for almost 20 years when a big increase has really been possible.
Is there an alternative to hiking council tax rates?
There are a range of options available - but few are untapped resources.
The simplest answer is to cut spending on staffing and services. Realistically councils have already been doing this, and will continue to do so hand in hand with tax rises.
The fear is that any fat was trimmed away in previous budget cycles, and that cuts now go to the bone. Things like libraries and community centres are coming under threat - ideas even more unpalatable to councillors than big tax rises.
Most authorities have also dipped heavily into their reserves in recent years, utilising the funds they have squirreled away for a rainy day.
But this pool of cash was drained by 5% last year alone, and 84% of general funds are now committed.
Some money can be raised by increasing charges for services - for everything from rent on council houses to garden waste collections.
Many councils are also seeking to get creative when it comes to revenue streams.
There are new options open to them, thanks to reforms made at Holyrood - things like the tourist tax.
Edinburgh has taken the lead with a 5% levy on accommodation costs, which will be introduced from July 2026. But others like Glasgow, Highland and Stirling are looking at similar measures - and Aberdeen City is pondering a steeper tariff, of 7%.
Another recent addition is the power to double council tax on second homes. Councils including Aberdeenshire, Scottish Borders, Fife and Edinburgh have instituted 200% rates, and others including North Ayrshire have consulted on joining in.
However not all powers have been taken up; Edinburgh dropped plans for a charge on workplace parking last year, with councillors saying it was "hitting working people with a big huge stick" and "not giving them any carrots".
Meanwhile, borrowing by councils went up by £400m last year, chiefly to invest in buildings and infrastructure - and while this is vital, it means almost all of them now face higher levels of debt and annual interest costs.
All but one council increased their debts in 23-24, and combined they have a net debt of £20bn - up 16% on the previous year.
Will things change in future?
Council tax has never been particularly popular.
It is broadly accepted to be a "regressive" tax; it weighs more heavily on poorer households, as a proportion of income, than those on higher incomes.
It's also undeniably out of date, being rooted in property values from 1991.
The SNP's 2007 manifesto promised to replace the "hated" levy with a local income tax.
But talk of change has never led to any real action, even when the SNP had a majority from 2011, or when it partnered up with the strongly pro-reform Greens.
A fresh consultation has just been announced, but given there is only a year until the next Holyrood election nothing is going to actually happen in this term of parliament.
In theory that election should still produce a super-majority in favour of reform. Alongside the SNP and Greens, Scottish Labour and the Lib Dems are both in favour of scrapping the council tax.
But that has been the case for decades. The question is whether it can become enough of a priority for parties to actually do something about it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House advances Trump's $9.4B spending cuts package targeting NPR, PBS, USAID to House-wide vote
President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cuts package survived a key hurdle on Wednesday afternoon, setting the measure up for a final House-wide vote later this week. Trump's proposal, which was introduced as legislation by House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., would cut $8.3 billion from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and just over $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributes federal funding to NPR and PBS. The House of Representatives made a procedural motion known as a "rule vote," which passed mostly along party lines. Mike Johnson, Donald Trump Get 'Big, Beautiful' Win As Budget Passes House The rule passing now allows for debate on the $9.4 billion spending cut measure, followed by a final House-wide vote. Read On The Fox News App But it's not atypical for House leaders to include unrelated measures in rule votes, as is the case with the spending cuts package – House GOP leaders included a provision with minor changes to Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" to account for the Senate needing to amend the bill. That latter piece of legislation, a vast tax and immigration bill, is moving through the budget reconciliation process. By dropping the Senate's threshold for advancement from 60 votes to 51, it allows the party in power to skirt the minority – in this case, Democrats – on vast pieces of legislation, provided they adhere to a specific set of budgetary rules. House GOP leaders said they needed to make the recent changes to the bill to better adhere to the Senate's "Byrd Bath," when the Senate parliamentarian reviews the bill and removes anything not adhering to reconciliation guidelines. Whereas that deals with the government's mandatory spending processes that are more difficult to amend, the $9.4 billion spending cuts package tackles discretionary spending that Congress controls every year. It's called a "rescissions package," which is a formal proposal by the White House to claw back federal funds already allocated for the current fiscal year. Like reconciliation, the mechanism allows for a 51-vote majority in the Senate rather than 60. Congress has 45 days to consider it, or it is deemed rejected. Republican leaders have held up this rescissions package as the first step to codifying the billions of dollars of government waste identified by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Trump allies have also made clear they view this first package as a test of what kind of cuts congressional Republicans can stomach. Mccaul Touts Money In Trump Tax Bill To Pay Texas Back For Fighting Biden Border Policies And while the rule vote was expected to pass, the bill could have trouble ahead of its expected Thursday afternoon vote. Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., pointed out in a bipartisan statement that the media funding represents less than 0.01% of the federal budget and said taking that money away would "dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans." Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., told reporters on Tuesday that he got assurances that USAID cuts would exclude critical medical funding. "I feel better than what I was hearing last week, that was gonna be a total cut," he said, without revealing whether he would support the article source: House advances Trump's $9.4B spending cuts package targeting NPR, PBS, USAID to House-wide vote
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Loch Ness hydro project to go before councillors
Plans for one of three large hydro power schemes that would draw water from Loch Ness to generate electricity are to go before Highland councillors next week. Loch Kemp Storage Ltd has proposed building a power station and tunnels near Whitebridge, about 10 miles (16km) north of Fort Augustus. The Scottish government, which has a say on whether it eventually goes ahead or not, has consulted Highland Council on the project. The local authority's officials have recommended that the south planning applications committee does not raise any objections to the plans. More stories from the Highlands and Islands News from the Highlands and Islands on BBC Sounds Loch Kemp is one of three different pumped storage hydro schemes proposed for near Loch Ness. The others are Statkraft's Loch na Cathrach, in the hills above Dores, and Glen Earrach Energy (GEE), near Drumnadrochit. They would also draw water from Loch Ness to help generate electricity for thousands of homes. Pumped storage hydro involves two bodies of water at different heights. The water flows from one to the other through tunnels, passing through a power station to generate electricity. When there is low demand for electricity from consumers and/or when surplus power is available from wind farms, electricity is used to pump water from the lower level to fill a reservoir further up the hill. The water can then be released from the upper reservoir, flowing down the tunnels to drive turbines which generate hydro-electricity. This happens at times of high demand, or when there is not enough wind to power wind farms. Loch Kemp Storage Ltd, which is owned by Statera Energy, has proposed damming Loch Kemp, the upper reservoir of its scheme, to raise water levels. It also plans to construct an underground waterway systems and tunnels, and powerhouse on the shores of Loch Ness. GEE has been holding community events this week as part of its work towards trying to secure consent for the 2GW project on Balmacaan Estate. The developer has made a commitment to deliver a community wealth fund of more than £20m a year throughout the lifetime of the scheme. A spokesperson said GEE was developing one of the UK's "largest and most water efficient" pumped storage hydro schemes. Loch na Cathrach, formerly known as Red John, was granted consent by the Scottish government in June 2021. The project was taken over by Statkraft in December 2023 and is in a pre-construction phase. The UK has four existing pumped storage projects - Cruachan and Foyers in Scotland, and Dinorwig and Ffestiniog in Wales. However, a large-scale pumped storage scheme has not been built in the UK for more than 30 years. Foyers Power Station on Loch Ness opened in 1974, though hydro electricity has been generated in the area since the late 19th Century. Operator SSEN Transmission has proposed an extension to the switching station, which manages the flow of electricity from the site. A proposal of application notice was submitted to Highland Council in February. The operator of Cruachan - an underground power station dubbed "Hollow Mountain" - has put on hold its plans for a major expansion of the site. Renewables developer Drax had proposed building a new hydro-electric facility next to its existing complex inside Ben Cruachan, near Dalmally in Argyll. But it said the costs of the project had risen and it would not be bidding for UK government support at this time. The company said the expansion could potentially go-ahead in the future, "subject to an appropriate balance of risk and return". Major hydro power plant expansion put on hold Plan to extend part of Loch Ness hydro power site Loch Ness hydro power 'gold rush' branded a disaster The massive green power projects stuck in limbo Loch Kemp Storage GEE Loch na Cathrach
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Loch Ness hydro project to go before councillors
Plans for one of three large hydro power schemes that would draw water from Loch Ness to generate electricity are to go before Highland councillors next week. Loch Kemp Storage Ltd has proposed building a power station and tunnels near Whitebridge, about 10 miles (16km) north of Fort Augustus. The Scottish government, which has a say on whether it eventually goes ahead or not, has consulted Highland Council on the project. The local authority's officials have recommended that the south planning applications committee does not raise any objections to the plans. More stories from the Highlands and Islands News from the Highlands and Islands on BBC Sounds Loch Kemp is one of three different pumped storage hydro schemes proposed for near Loch Ness. The others are Statkraft's Loch na Cathrach, in the hills above Dores, and Glen Earrach Energy (GEE), near Drumnadrochit. They would also draw water from Loch Ness to help generate electricity for thousands of homes. Pumped storage hydro involves two bodies of water at different heights. The water flows from one to the other through tunnels, passing through a power station to generate electricity. When there is low demand for electricity from consumers and/or when surplus power is available from wind farms, electricity is used to pump water from the lower level to fill a reservoir further up the hill. The water can then be released from the upper reservoir, flowing down the tunnels to drive turbines which generate hydro-electricity. This happens at times of high demand, or when there is not enough wind to power wind farms. Loch Kemp Storage Ltd, which is owned by Statera Energy, has proposed damming Loch Kemp, the upper reservoir of its scheme, to raise water levels. It also plans to construct an underground waterway systems and tunnels, and powerhouse on the shores of Loch Ness. GEE has been holding community events this week as part of its work towards trying to secure consent for the 2GW project on Balmacaan Estate. The developer has made a commitment to deliver a community wealth fund of more than £20m a year throughout the lifetime of the scheme. A spokesperson said GEE was developing one of the UK's "largest and most water efficient" pumped storage hydro schemes. Loch na Cathrach, formerly known as Red John, was granted consent by the Scottish government in June 2021. The project was taken over by Statkraft in December 2023 and is in a pre-construction phase. The UK has four existing pumped storage projects - Cruachan and Foyers in Scotland, and Dinorwig and Ffestiniog in Wales. However, a large-scale pumped storage scheme has not been built in the UK for more than 30 years. Foyers Power Station on Loch Ness opened in 1974, though hydro electricity has been generated in the area since the late 19th Century. Operator SSEN Transmission has proposed an extension to the switching station, which manages the flow of electricity from the site. A proposal of application notice was submitted to Highland Council in February. The operator of Cruachan - an underground power station dubbed "Hollow Mountain" - has put on hold its plans for a major expansion of the site. Renewables developer Drax had proposed building a new hydro-electric facility next to its existing complex inside Ben Cruachan, near Dalmally in Argyll. But it said the costs of the project had risen and it would not be bidding for UK government support at this time. The company said the expansion could potentially go-ahead in the future, "subject to an appropriate balance of risk and return". Major hydro power plant expansion put on hold Plan to extend part of Loch Ness hydro power site Loch Ness hydro power 'gold rush' branded a disaster The massive green power projects stuck in limbo Loch Kemp Storage GEE Loch na Cathrach