Salt Lake City librarians officially unionize, but likely referendum to determine next steps
Despite potential headwinds from a new state law barring public collective bargaining agreements, which is now likely headed for the ballot, Salt Lake City librarians made Utah history this week by voting to unionize.
A whopping 92% of Salt Lake City Public Library employees voted to unionize during a formal vote that wrapped up on Thursday, union officials said on Friday. They now join the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, which represents many other Salt Lake City employees, setting up negotiations for what could be the first-of-its-kind collective bargaining agreement in the state — should HB267 be overturned.
'We, as workers, are looking forward to negotiating our first contract. We've always been here for our community, and we finally have the tools to advocate for ourselves and for each other,' said Christina Ordonez, a Salt Lake City associate librarian, in a statement after the votes were tallied.
The city library system 'respects and affirms' the election results, Noah Baskett, CEO of The Salt Lake City Public Library, said after the results were announced.
'This moment reflects a renewed and shared commitment — by our employees and our leadership — to continue to be a workplace rooted in dignity, fairness and respect. I deeply appreciate the thoughtfulness and care with which our staff have engaged in this process,' he added in a statement.
This week's vote marked the end of a long process that first went public over two years ago.
Over 60% of the city's workforce is represented by various unions, but city librarians were the largest department not unionized at the time staff revealed their intent to form one in April 2023. Employees said at the time they wanted to resolve 'long-standing issues' related to the job, including safety concerns, below-average wages, inaccessible or expensive health care, and exclusion from decisions made by library system leaders.
Their request sparked lengthy negotiation efforts, which ended with the Salt Lake City Public Library board of directors voting in December 2024 to allow employees to unionize, and the Salt Lake City Council voting in February of this year to create a collective bargaining structure process should employees unionize.
They're now the first public library union in the state, following the recent vote.
'This is a historic moment not just for Salt Lake City, but for the entire state of Utah,' said Jerry Philpot, president of the local union chapter. 'Library workers have always served their community with dedication, and now they will finally have a voice at the table to ensure their workplace is fair, safe and sustainable.'
However, it's unclear how those negotiations will play out because of HB267, which bans collective bargaining in the public sector, among other things related to public unions. It was slated to go into effect in July, but groups opposed to it collected enough signatures on a referendum to put it up for a public vote.
Once finalized by the state, the legislation will be held before going on the 2026 ballot.
Unionization may not factor into the library's upcoming budget, but the system plans to pay employees 'equitably and competitively' based on the results of a compensation study carried out by a third-party company, Baskett told Salt Lake City leaders last month. He added at the time that library staff had been 'in close conversation' with union lawyers over the next steps.
Next year's likely referendum will ultimately play a role in the future steps.
'We are moving forward in the hopes that Utahns will vote in the best interests of their public workers,' Philpot said. 'This isn't just about union rights. It's about protecting the people who serve our communities every single day.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Office of Open Records orders Cambria County to search again for 2024 election failure
CAMBRIA COUNTY, Pa. (WTAJ) — Cambria County officials have been ordered to conduct a new search for records related to a major voting system failure during the November 2024 election, following a successful appeal from State Rep. Frank Burns under Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law. The state Office of Open Records ruled that the county's original reason for denying Burns' records request, citing a noncriminal investigation, was not valid, requiring the county to either provide the documents or legally attest that they do not exist. Burns requested any documentation explaining the nature of the voting machine malfunction that led to ballots going unscanned and unaccounted for, as well as a tally of how many ballots were successfully or unsuccessfully scanned on Election Day. The Nov. 5, 2024, issue reportedly involved voting machines that had passed pre-election testing but failed when used, prompting concerns from voters and lawmakers alike. Burns has continued to push for transparency surrounding the incident, stating that the public still has no clear explanation for what went wrong or how many ballots were impacted. In response to an inquiry from WTAJ, Cambria County's solicitor, Ronald Repak, provided a statement acknowledging the OOR ruling and outlining the four key parts of the decision. According to the county, the OOR deemed one of Burns' requests moot after the county turned over the logic and accuracy testing records. The OOR also denied Burns' request for a finding of bad faith, instead stating, 'The County has been timely, attentive, and professional in both its responses to the Requester and to the OOR and has made serious attempts to provide the Requester with the information he is seeking.' The county confirmed the OOR did grant Burns' request for the number of ballots that failed to scan, which officials say occurred because the ballots did not include TIS (timing) marks required by the tabulation system. The county said this issue affected all ballots when polls opened. Additionally, the OOR granted Burns' request for documentation explaining the nature of the problem. The county reiterated it has repeatedly said the mistake was due to a clerical error by a county worker who uploaded ballots to the system without the necessary marks. Officials said there was no malicious intent. 'The County has no issue with completing another search to answer questions which the County has already gone to great lengths in answering,' Repak stated. The OOR has given the county 30 days to provide Burns with the relevant records or a sworn statement that they do not exist. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
11 INVESTIGATES EXCLUSIVE: City a no-show at Juneteenth court hearing, Judge hears arguments anyway
B. Marshall and his attorney were all ready to go for a hearing before a judge at the City-County building in downtown Pittsburgh Thursday morning, but the city attorney never showed. The city, in a statement to 11 Investigates, claimed it didn't know about the hearing before Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Dan Regan. It was set for 9:30 a.m. after Marshall filed a petition last week asking a judge to force the city to act on his permit for his Juneteenth celebration that is two weeks away. PREVIOUS COVERAGE >>> 11 Investigates: Attorney for Juneteenth organizer blasts city permit process, files legal action 'For the city of Pittsburgh to not show up today on such an important issue is extremely, highly disappointing,' said Phil DiLucente, Marshall's attorney. Even though the city never showed, DiLucente was allowed to present his case to the judge. 'The city of Pittsburgh needs to step up. Time is of the essence. We are two weeks away,' DiLucente told the judge. Marshall filed a petition last week with the courts to force the city to act on his permit application for his Juneteenth festival at Mellon Park in East Liberty later this month. Marshall applied for the permit in February. He said he's been getting the run around since then. The city told 11 Investigates last week they were waiting for PennDOT to decide on closing Penn Avenue, but Marshall said today he withdrew that request more than a month ago. His attorney also told the judge that Marshall does not want to close Penn Avenue anymore. 'They (the city) continue to tell that falsehood that we are blocking off Penn Avenue, but we are not, so that's why we know the application will be permitted and the festival will go forward,' said Marshall. While the city did not attend the hearing, an attorney representing Bakery Square in East Liberty near Mellon Park did. Jon Kamin expressed concern on behalf of the more than 500 residents who live near the park. His biggest concern was with the potential closing of Penn Avenue, but after the hearing, Kamin said he was relieved that Penn Avenue wouldn't be closing, and wanted more details about the event. Kamin said his clients were concerned that residents would not be able to get in and out of their apartments if Penn Avenue were closed. 'This is just about trying to understand what the decisions are going to be, and having a seat at the table so that we can make sure we are adequately represented and everybody's safe and can have a great time,' said Kamin. Marshall believes the city is holding up the permit because of his well-publicized feud with Mayor Ed Gainey, who pulled $125,000 in funding from Marshall last year. After public outcry, the city council reinstated Marshall's funding last year. But the city also awarded a $125,000 contract to Bounce Marketing to put on an official city celebration last year. 11 Investigates learned that this year, the city is scaling back the celebration. It won't be organized by a marketing firm, buy by the city's Department of Parks and Recreation. PREVIOUS COVERAGE >>> New details emerging about Pittsburgh's Juneteenth celebration The city has not released details about the event, but sources told 11 Investigates that it will include a small celebration with music and food on the North Side at Allegheny Commons East Park on June 14th from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Marshall did not get any city money this year, but he said he has plenty of sponsors in place, along with musical acts like headliner Morris Day and The Time. Marshall also has food and vendors lined up, as well as activities and games for everyone. He's expecting 65,000 people to attend the festival. After the hearing Thursday morning, Marshall and his attorney said they were both optimistic about the outcome of the case. 'You know my mother used to say, you can't fight city hall, but we fought them today and I think it's going to be a good outcome,' said DiLucente. The city claims they were not aware of the hearing because they have not been served with the petition, and they said if Marshall no longer wants Penn Avenue closed, he needs to update his permit application. The judge is expected to issue a ruling as soon as tomorrow. Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
El Paso County approves delivery method for construction of new Office of Medical Examiner
EL PASO, Texas (KTSM) — The El Paso County Commissioners Court approved the use of a construction manager at risk (CMAR) for the construction of a new Office of the Medical Examiner on Monday, June 2. According to the news release by the County, the CMAR approach will 'allow the County to hire a construction firm early in the process to collaborate closely with the design team.' In addition, the CMAR method is 'designed to improve project coordination, manage costs, save time and deliver the best value for El Paso County,' the County said. As we've previously reported, the new Office of the Medical Examiner is one of three major projects that El Paso County voters approved in 2024 as part of the Capital Improvement Program. County commissioners approve next steps in multimillion dollar voter-approved projects According to the County, the Commissioners Court also authorized the County Purchasing Agent to 'solicit proposals from qualified firms to serve as the CMAR for this project.' The Medical Examiner's Office is responsible for investigating deaths that happen suddenly, without explanation or under suspicious or violent circumstances, the County said For more information on other approved projects in the 2024 Capital Improvement Program, you can visit El Paso County's website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.