Elon Musk blasts Donald Trump's mega-bill as 'disgusting abomination'
Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House.
Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency' last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of radical spending cuts.
'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda.
'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.'
It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programmes.
But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts.
On Tuesday he said the bill – being considered by Congress – would burden 'citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.'
His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign.
Musk has become disillusioned, US media reported, as his goals for White House action that would benefit him personally have gone unrealised.
The bill he was criticising cuts the electric vehicle tax credit – bad news for Tesla – while Axios reported that Musk was rebuffed in his efforts to extend his role beyond the statutory 130-day limit.
He also failed to have his Starlink satellite system used for air traffic control, according to Axios, and was angered by Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA chief.
The normally pugilistic Trump has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters – a key Trump constituency in 2024.
'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet.
The spat came with House Republicans set to pass legislation sent from the White House to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts, mostly money destined for public broadcasting and foreign aid.
House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments 'disappointing,' adding that he had walked the entrepreneur through the bill on Monday, and that he 'seemed to understand.'
As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's 'incredible service.'
Trump even insisted that Musk was 'really not leaving' after a turbulent four months in which the South Africa-born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid.
DOGE led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young 'tech bros' slashing tens of thousands of jobs.
But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion – more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024.
The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total – just $180 billion – and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting.
Senate Democrats released a report on Tuesday itemising 130 examples of 'unethical or potentially corrupt' administration actions they say have helped Musk dodge regulation and add $100 billion to his wealth.
The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade.
Trump said on Monday it was 'the single biggest Spending Cut in History,' although he added: 'The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse.'
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
3 hours ago
- The Herald
'A man of unwavering principles': Ramaphosa delivers eulogy at activist cleric Tshenuwani Farisani's funeral
He developed an interest in liberation theology and its message that the true Christian faith demands active resistance to all forms of oppression and solidarity with the poor. He became involved with underground political organisations like the Black People's Convention, the black consciousness movement. It was at this time that Farisani travelled extensively across the country. In his many travels, he visited Mphaphuli High School, where Ramaphosa was a pupil. 'Farisani was a guest at our school's flourishing debating society, which a number of us, including Judge Raulinga, Tshifhiwa Muofhe and people like Willy Mudau, had set up. Farisani and I formed an immediate and lasting bond of friendship, comradeship and loyalty based on respect and love. He opened to me the radical interpretation of the Bible, which Farisani was later to become famous for. 'He argued the Lutheran church must turn away from political conservatism and become an instrument of opposition,' said Ramaphosa. He said Farisani was a courageous revolutionary who inspired a generation to reclaim their pride and to stand up for their rights. 'I was one of those who were hugely inspired by him. He was, in addition to everything else, a renowned academic, a prolific scholar whose writings gave voice to the voiceless. He was a guide and a mentor to many.' Ramaphosa said Farisani's activism continued into the democratic era, where he became an MEC and speaker of the legislature in Limpopo province. He said those roles placed him in a position of power and influence, yet did not change him. 'He was a servant leader who came, served and left. When he saw corruption being perpetrated by those who are trusted with public funds, he was vocal and scathing in his criticism, and that is why he was one of those when the VBS looting happened who spoke out. 'He spoke out to a point where a number of people started to hate him, but it never moved him. The foundation that bears his name continues to be an influential voice in the public space in advancing social justice. Neither beatings nor torture could make Farisani surrender his principles' . TimesLIVE
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
What Trump vs Musk makes us appreciate about South Africa
You just can't imagine that kind of behaviour among real South African leaders. This combination of pictures created on 12 August 2024 shows, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, left, and former US president and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. Picture: Frederic J Brown and Brendan Smialowski/ AFP Can you imagine Johan Rupert, Oppenheimer or Motsepe publicly feuding with the president of the nation? Could you imagine them going at it and stopping just short of calling the president a sex predator? Probably not. That's because it's pretty unbecoming for business people to try to sway public opinion against a sitting president. Then again, it's pretty unbecoming of a president to do the same to some important economic drivers. You just can't imagine that kind of behaviour among real South African leaders. Sure, you'd expect it to come from the 'small boys', but those really driving the national agenda, for all their flaws, actually behave respectably. Just try to imagine the anger between the parties during the now-forgotten spat over the budget. Fixing our problems For all of that anger, all we got were a few matter-of-fact statements from various sides, but nothing along the lines of name-calling and bashing, at least nothing to the American extent. We might not have the economy and infrastructure, but we can still look one another in the eye when having a disagreement. It seems our leadership, with all its flaws, is still capable of picking up a phone and sorting issues out rather than committing the public to our battles. We vote for politicians so they can do that battling of our interests for us, not to abuse us as their useful idiots to drive their own agendas. And we've been pretty solid of late on holding them to account on that. They may not be incredibly good at hearing us holding them to account, but we'll take it in baby steps. For now, we can be grateful that poor form can swing more than 10% of an electorate. That would never happen in the USA because no matter how bad things get, they still have their guy. Their democracy has a personality cult bent to it. ALSO READ: Trump and Musk alliance melts down in blazing public row Petty politics While we do love a bit of our Fikiles, Jacbobs and Cyrils, the faith is personality is not that strong. Ask your boys Ace and Carl, but you won't because they're no longer your boys. It's that level of decorum that may seem mundane and a non-issue but is really driving some of what is right in South Africa. Obviously, you'd want political leaders who are firm and robust in stature, and that does involve a significant amount of disagreement. Goodness gracious, though. The world's most powerful man taking on the world's richest man to gain the popular support of the rest of the country's men does seem so…petty. Fighting for a debate Americans should ask themselves why these two dudes are so invested in making this spat public. Surely, if they disagree, they could pick up the phone and discuss it. One has a whole satellite constellation, and the other has a whole military. You can't tell me that they don't have the equipment to have a call. It's because the point isn't to win the debate. It's for the debate, if you can call it that, to go on. That way, they get a platform to continue building their cults, which will eventually battle it out. It's already so powerful that it inspired an insurrection years ago. What would this, much bigger, fight yield? There's so much we can be upset about in our country. There's a lot going wrong, but a fundamental to fixing the issues is that we're still able to talk directly without turning the public into ammunition for personal interests. You can be upset with Cyril's lack of action, silly actions when he takes them, and insistence on pursuing inept policy. You can even be upset with him for the poor economy. You cannot be upset with him for rude, dictatorial and abrasive behaviour because, unlike his US counterpart, he still has the fundamentals of democratic leadership in place. Anyway, sterke daar Suid-Afrikaanse refugees. NOW READ: Elon Musk unceremoniously steps down from Trump administration
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
LOS ANGELES - US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 troops on Saturday to handle escalating protests against immigration enforcement raids in the Los Angeles area, a move the state's governor termed "purposefully inflammatory." Federal agents clashed with angry crowds in a Los Angeles suburb as protests stretched into a second night Saturday, shooting flash-bang grenades and shutting part of a freeway amid raids on undocumented migrants, reports said. The standoff took place in Paramount, where demonstrators had gathered near a Home Depot that was being used as a staging area by federal immigration officials, the Fox 11 news outlet reported. They were met by federal agents in gas masks, who lobbed flash-bang grenades and tear gas at the crowd, according to news reports and social media posts. Since taking office in January, Republican Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants -- who he has likened to "monsters" and "animals." Late Saturday, Trump signed a memo deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs." About an hour before the White House confirmed the deployment, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said he opposed the move. "That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," he said on social media platform X. "We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." The protests came a day after masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs. LA Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that some city residents were "feeling fear" following the federal immigration enforcement actions. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable," she said on X. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday's clashes.
